Netherlands

Recognizing printed words involves identifying individual letters, as well as keeping track of specific positions of the letters. Interestingly, some languages show flexibility in letter-position coding which is inferred by the observation that pseudowords formed by transposing internal letters of a word (e.g., jugde-JUDGE) can facilitate recognition of the given word. While research in English and other Indo-European languages have shown that readers can cope with such violations in the canonical order of letters in a word, research from other languages such as Arabic, Hebrew, and Korean produce contrary findings. Such scenario creates a demand for conducting similar research across different languages using different writing systems, so that a universal model of word-recognition can be built. Therefore, in the current study, we investigated flexibility in letter-position coding in Hindi (Devanagari script). Interestingly, we find evidence for flexibility in letter position encoding in Hindi similar to English and other Indo-European languages.

**Authors:**

Suraj Kumar: Indian Institute of Technology Kanpur; Anurag Khare: Indian Institute of Technology Kanpur; Ark Verma: Indian Institute of Technology Kanpur

CogSci 2024

Is there flexibility in Letter-Position Encoding in Hindi? Evidence from masked form priming study

### Welcome to CogSci Conference 2025!

The 47th Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society was a hybrid meeting held in San Francisco. 

<div style="position:relative;padding-top:0;width:900px;height:500px;"><iframe style="position:absolute;border:none;width:100%;height:100%;left:0;top:0;" src="https://online.fliphtml5.com/ebtyf/amvr/"  seamless="seamless" scrolling="no" frameborder="0" allowtransparency="true" allowfullscreen="true" ></iframe></div>

#### About

The Cognitive Science Society brings together researchers from around the world who hold a common goal: understanding the nature of the human mind. The mission of the Society is to promote Cognitive Science as a discipline, and to foster scientific interchange among researchers in various areas of study, including Artificial Intelligence, Linguistics, Anthropology, Psychology, Neuroscience, Philosophy, and Education.

The Society is a non-profit professional organization and its activities include sponsoring an annual conference and publishing the journals Cognitive Science and TopiCS.

#### Our History 

* **Society Creation**<br>
The Society was incorporated as a 501(c)(3) non-profit professional organization in Massachusetts in 1979. The organizing committee included Roger Schank, Allan Collins, Donald Norman, and a number of other scholars from psychology, linguistics, computer science, and philosophy. 
<br><br>
* **Conference Creation**<br>
The first conference on cognitive science was held at La Jolla, California in August, 1979, and has occurred annually since then. The proceedings of each conference are published, and those from most years are available through Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc. The annual proceedings of the Cognitive Science Conference represent a major source of information on new work and new ideas in the scientific study of thinking. In 1990, the Society, with help from an anonymous donor, established the David Marr Prize for the best student paper at each annual meeting.
<br><br>
* **Journal Creation**<br>
The Journal, Cognitive Science, began publication in 1976, and is now published by Wiley-Blackwell. The Executive Editor is currently Richard P. Cooper of Birkbeck, University of London, and there are 18 Associate Editors and a 30-member editorial board. It serves as the premier outlet for research reports that intersect two or more disciplines. Copyrights for articles published in the journal are held by the Society. The Governing Board of the Cognitive Science Society voted in late 2006 to found a new journal, Topics in Cognitive Science (topiCS). The Editor in Chief is Wayne Gray, Cognitive Science Department, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute. The journal seeks to fill a niche not occupied by Cognitive Science Journal or other cognitive science journals. Membership in the Society includes a subscription to Cognitive Science and TopiCS. Copyrights for articles published in the journal are held by the Society.
<br><br>

#### Code of Conduct

By attending the CogSci 2025 Conference, you are required to adhere to the society’s **[Code of Conduct](https://drive.google.com/file/d/1ChPuihLy6jE_BWqfO7J2KKgX35JW2zsM/view?usp=sharing)**.
<br><br>


You need to log in with the email address you registered with. 

Login credentials were sent to you from Underline -  subject line "Welcome to the CogSci 2025 Conference". Please be sure to check your spam/promotional inbox  if you do not see an email confirmation right away.





Please log in to join this event.

To access the site, please register [**here**](https://cognitivesciencesociety.org/registration/).

If you are registered and feel like you are seeing this message by mistake, please make sure you are logged in with the same email that you registered with. 

Please register!

CogSci 2025

The 47th Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society presents the latest research across cognitive science and highlights the theme of Cognition in Context.

poster

The 46th Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society was an in-person meeting held in Rotterdam, The Netherlands at the Postillion Hotel & Conference Centre.

**ON-DEMAND PROGRAM ACCESS AFTER THE CONFERENCE**<br>
Recordings of the invited program are now available. You can access them by clicking on the 'Schedule' icon on the left. Select view by week and navigate to the day and time slot of the recording you wish to view. Click on the time slot to access the recording.

Recordings available (click on each recording to view):

**Thursday, July 25**<br>
0900: [Keynote Speaker Morgan Barense on Enhancing real-world event memory](https://underline.io/events/465/sessions/17997/lecture/99084-dynamics-between-minds-and-the-environment)<br>
1000: [Gleitman Award Winner Isabelle Dautriche on Language Foundations: Insights from acquisition, communication, cognition, and more](https://underline.io/events/465/sessions/18000/lecture/99085-gleitman-talk)<br>
1415: [Invited Symposium: Dynamics between minds and the environment](https://underline.io/events/465/sessions?eventSessionId=18016&searchGroup=lecture)<br>
1700: [Rumelhart Prize Presentation Speaker Alison Gopnik on Exploit, explore, empower: Three ages and three intelligences](https://underline.io/events/465/sessions/18028/lecture/99161-rp1-rumelhart-prize-presentation)<br>

**Friday, July 26**<br>
0900: [C.L. de Carvalho-Heineken Prize Keynote Speaker Kia Nobre on Focusing in memory](https://underline.io/events/465/sessions/18035/lecture/99162-hp1-c-l-de-carvalho-heineken-prize-keynote-address)<br>
1030: [Rumelhart Symposium: Childhood as exploration](https://underline.io/events/465/sessions/18038/lecture/100346-childhood-as-exploration)<br>
1415: [Elman Prize Symposium](https://underline.io/events/465/sessions?eventSessionId=18053&searchGroup=lecture)<br>
1600: [Invited Symposium: Dynamics between minds](https://underline.io/events/465/sessions?eventSessionId=18065&searchGroup=lecture)<br>
1745: [Keynote Speaker Andrea E. Martin on Neural dynamics encode the structure and statistics of language](https://underline.io/events/465/sessions/18077/lecture/99271-neural-dynamics-encode-the-structure-and-statistics-of-language)<br>

**Saturday, July 27**<br>
0900: [Keynote Speaker Gregor Schöner on How higher cognition emerges from the dynamics of strongly interacting neural populations](https://underline.io/events/465/sessions/18083/lecture/99273-dynamics-within-the-mind)<br>
1000: [Glushko Talks](https://underline.io/events/465/sessions?eventSessionId=18086&searchGroup=lecture)<br>
1500: [Invited Symposium: Dynamics within minds](https://underline.io/events/465/sessions?eventSessionId=18100&searchGroup=lecture)<br>


#### **CogSci 2024 Program Book**
<div style="position:relative;padding-top:0;width:900px;height:500px;"><iframe style="position:absolute;border:none;width:100%;height:100%;left:0;top:0;" src="https://online.fliphtml5.com/ebtyf/cble/"  seamless="seamless" scrolling="no" frameborder="0" allowtransparency="true" allowfullscreen="true" ></iframe></div>


**The Program Book can be downloaded [here](https://drive.google.com/file/d/1yRVp1cBqRnAbdYi4GXWV_pZeyWNsRquv/view?usp=sharing).**

#### **Letter from the President**

Welcome to the 2024 Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society in Rotterdam! CogSci 2024 brings together a large community of cognitive scientists who have traveled here from around the world, as well as a smaller group of remote presenters. I would like to extend an especially warm welcome to our first-time CogSci meeting attendees, and hope that 
their experience inspires them to join our future meetings for many years to come.

I want to thank this year’s conference co-chairs, Larissa K Samuelson, Stefan Frank, Mariya Toneva, Allyson Mackey, and Eliot Hazeltine, for putting together an amazing series of invited talks and symposia around the theme of Dynamics of Cognition. The co-chairs also deserve credit for handling a record-breaking number of submissions and producing a truly exciting conference program 

Beyond the invited talks and symposia dedicated to this year’s conference theme, I would like to highlight the presentations and events honoring the 
Rumelhart, Elman, Gleitman and C .L . de Carvalho Heineken prize winners, including the Rumelhart reception on Thursday. As you may know, we are recording all of the invited talks and symposia, and all prize-winners’ talks, and will be making this content available after the conference. 

The Cognitive Science Society relies on the volunteer efforts of our Governing Board members who work on matters related to our membership; conference policies; diversity and inclusion, international, and outreach initiatives; prizes and much more. We welcome interest from Society members who would like to become more involved in what we do. The 
Society is deeply grateful to Rick Dale and Andrea Bender, who serve as editors of the two Society journals, Cognitive Science and Topics in Cognitive Science respectively. We especially acknowledge our editors’ generosity in donating their stipends each year to D&I and outreach efforts. 

This year’s Annual Meeting depends critically on the support of Marischal De Armond and his team at Podium Conference Specialists: Sharon Zwack, Cendrine De Vis, Sarah-Kate Burke, and Rachel Waller worked tirelessly to secure the venue and handled a multitude of logistical and organizational issues, from arranging coffee breaks and receptions to making sure that a huge number of posters fits comfortably into the available space. Finally, and importantly, I would like to acknowledge the Cognitive Science Society Executive Officer, Erica Wojcik, for managing the complex and ever expanding sphere of our Society’s activities.

I hope you enjoy this year’s meeting and the many different opportunities to engage with the vibrant community of cognitive scientists gathered here. I also hope you get a chance to explore the great city of Rotterdam with its many attractions, museums, restaurants and scenic views. If you’d like to talk more about our Society, or simply want to say hello, please stop by!

![](https://assets.underline.io/markdown_image/1/image/3c66d0e21fff30e204df1138ffd15173.jpeg)

**Anna Papafragou**  
President, Cognitive Science 
Society 2023-2024

**CODE OF CONDUCT**<br>
By attending the CogSci 2024 Conference, you are required to adhere to the society’s [Code of Conduct](https://drive.google.com/file/d/16-6KkptF0Gn3ZYGJDlpqpwTdImw45Ng0/view?usp=drive_link).

**ABOUT THE COGNITIVE SCIENCE SOCIETY**<br>
The Cognitive Science Society brings together researchers from around the world who hold a common goal: understanding the nature of the human mind. The mission of the Society is to promote Cognitive Science as a discipline, and to foster scientific interchange among researchers in various areas of study, including Artificial Intelligence, Linguistics, Anthropology, Psychology, Neuroscience, Philosophy, and Education.

The Society is a non-profit professional organization and its activities include sponsoring an annual conference and publishing the journals Cognitive Science and TopiCS.
<br><br>

You need to log in with the email address you registered with. Access credentials have been sent to your email. 

Please be sure to check your spam and other email folders if you do not see an email confirmation right away.

Please log in to explore this event.

It looks like you are not registered for this event. 

To access the site please register [**here**](https://cognitivesciencesociety.org/registration/). 

The 46th Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society presents the latest research across cognitive science and highlights the theme of Cognition in Context.

Round numbers are often interpreted approximately (Krifka, 2002), with "pragmatic halos" (Lasersohn, 1999) that encompass multiple permissible values. For example, stating "there were 200 people at the meeting" would be acceptable even if the exact count were 197 or 204. In line with the idea that larger numbers have more approximate representations (e.g., Cheyette & Piantadosi, 2020), we demonstrate that rounding and pragmatic halos are magnitude-dependent. First, an analysis of every single number in two large corpora (COCA, BNC) shows that indicators of rounding predict frequency (cf. Woodin et al., 2023), but crucially in interaction with magnitude, with round numbers over-represented for larger magnitudes. Second, we show that jigsaw puzzles often systematically deviate from what is advertised on the box in a way that depends on magnitude, e.g., a 1,000-piece puzzle may contain 1,024 pieces, whereas a 50-piece puzzle is more likely to contain the stated value exactly.

**Authors:**

Bodo Winter: University of Birmingham; Greg Woodin: University of Birmingham; Alexandra Lorson: University of Groningen

Rounding and magnitude: Pragmatic halos are bigger for larger numbers

Is it tautological to call an action “wrongful discrimination?” Some philosophers and political theorists answer this question in the affirmative and claim that the term “discrimination” is intrinsically evaluative. Others agree that “discrimination” usually conveys the action’s moral wrongness but claim that the term can be used in a purely descriptive way. According to such a view, the negative evaluation is only pragmatically, not lexically conveyed. In this paper, we present two corpus studies and two experiments designed to test whether the folk concept of discrimination is evaluative. We demonstrate that the term has undergone a historical development and is nowadays no longer used purely descriptively. Further, we show that this evaluation cannot be cancelled without yielding a contradiction. We conclude that the descriptive use of “discriminatory” is a thing of the past.

**Authors:**

Pascale Willemsen: University of Zurich; Simone Sommer Degn: Aalborg University; Jan García Olier: University of Zurich; Kevin Reuter: University of Zurich

“Wrongful discrimination” - a tautological claim? An empirical study of the evaluative dimension of discrimination vocabulary

Quotational constructions as in 'This phenomenon is called “moonbow”' involve predicates like call and are used to introduce a lexicalized word, i.e. “moonbow”, to the addressee. The name of a lexicalized concept is mentioned which is why we refer to this type of sentential construction as a name-mentioning construction (NMC). Although there is substantial philosophical research on the notion of quotation, empirical evidence is sparse. In our empirical investigation, we use eye-tracking data to look into the nature of the processing of quotation marks in NMCs. The results of Linear Mixed Models indicate that there is no statistically significant difference for early eye-tracking measures, but a significant effect for the expression in the target Interest Area Dwell Time. Words enclosed in quotation marks are processed longer than target words without quotes. We argue that our findings suggest the involvement of higher cognitive processes in the processing of quotes.

**Authors:**

Natascha Raue: University of Kassel; Holden Haertl: University of Kassel; Alvaro Cortés Rodríguez: University of Potsdam

Evidence from eye-tracking on the processing of quotation marks in German

Experimental studies show that the tendency to derive Scalar Implicatures (SIs) varies considerably between individuals: some individuals accept sentences that are literally true but carry a false SI, while others systematically reject them. The question of what factors drive these differences is crucial to understanding the mechanisms involved in SIs and currently at the center of numerous discussions. To date, there is no agreement on how to quantify individual differences in SI rates. 
In this article, we show how a hierarchical Bayesian modelling approach can be used to quantify subjects' preferences observed in the results of a truth value judgement task that investigated intra-individual and inter-individual variability in the rates of upper-bounding and lower-bounding SIs associated with the <some, all>-scale.
The results show that SI strength is partially modulated within individuals by certain linguistic features, such as the presence of negation.

**Authors:**

Sonia Ramotowska: University of Amsterdam; Paul Marty: University of Malta; Leendert van Maanen: Utrecht University; Yasutada Sudo: University College London

Some but not all speakers sometimes but not always derive scalar implicatures

Rhyme is widely considered to be a powerful mnemonic device that facilitates cognitive processing. Previous studies examined rhyme-perception development mainly in the case of children, while the analyses of information-recall processes in the adult population are scarce. It has been shown that rhyme and memory are closely connected in culture transmission procedures, which emphasises the demand for research on whether and how the adult population’s recall ability is enhanced by rhymes. The present study investigates whether rhyming words are more likely to be recalled than non-rhyming ones. Results suggest that rhymes affect the memory consolidation of both real-words and pseudowords in a group of adult subjects (N = 38). The research potentially elucidates the relation between both short- and long-term memory and rhyme. By gaining insight into the patterns of recalling and rhyme, into the processes of cognitive poetics, it may be possible to derive more general conclusions about cognition.

**Authors:**

Klára E. Finta: University of Vienna; Tecumseh Fitch: University of Vienna

Do Rhymes Enhance Memory Processes? Real word and pseudoword recall in rhyming conditions

This research investigates the advantages and roles of bilingualism in Indian school children with low vision impairment. Bilingualism, especially in a multilingual nation like India, may provide significant cognitive, social, and educational benefits. These advantages are considerably more apparent in children with modest visual impairments. The study focuses on a sample group of 100 school-aged children with varied degrees of low vision impairment and investigates how bilingual education influences their learning and social integration. The research uses both qualitative and quantitative approaches to evaluate cognitive development, language competency, and social interaction abilities in a bilingual setting. The findings show that bilingualism increases not just linguistic capabilities but also cognitive flexibility, problem-solving ability, and social empathy in young children. This study contends that bilingual education should be an essential component of the curriculum for visually impaired students in India, promoting their general development and integration into society. The results have major implications for educational policies and practices involving special needs children in multilingual settings.

**Authors:**

Male Shiva Ram M.S, PhD: University of Hyderabad; PHANI KRISHNA: University of Delhi; Baskar Theagarayan: University of Huddersfield

The Benefits and Role of Bilingualism in Indian Schoolchildren with Low Vision Impairment.

Generics have been presented as a window onto children’s concepts. Studies have documented the
facilitating effect of generics on inductive reasoning in children, particularly, that this effect is sensitive to
both age and domain of knowledge (natural kinds vs artifacts). The present study builds on Gelman (2002)
who compared how 3 to 5 years old children generalized novel properties about familiar categories,
contrasting the use of generics or specific quantifiers. We also expand Gelman’s work by measuring
interindividual variability and by disentangling the respective influence of conceptual development and
quantifiers understanding on induction performance. We enriched Gelman’s materials with food stimuli.
Crucially, we measured food neophobia disposition to determine if the later interferes with the facilitation
effect of generics on induction, as previous work has consistently shown that food neophobia interferes
with conceptual development in the food domain (Rioux et al., 2017). We also added a quantifier
understanding task adapted from (Gelman et al., 2016) to determine whether neophobic children’s
hypothesized poor performance in the task resulted from an immature conceptual system about food
and/or because they simply failed to understand the quantifiers. Results obtained shed light on the
psychological barriers to the development of food literacy in children which is of crucial importance for
dietary variety and children’s cognitive and physical development.

**Authors:**

Sabrina Boulkour: Université de Bourgogne; Jean-Pierre Thibaut: University of Bourgogne Franche-Comté; Lafraire Jérémie: Institut Paul Bocuse

The facilitating effect of generics on inductive reasoning in 3 to 5 years old children: interindividual variability and domain-specificity

Animacy is prevalent in as a semantic basis for noun classification systems (i.e., grammatical gender, noun classes and classifiers), but colour is completely absent, despite its visual salience. The absence of colour in such systems is sometimes argued to suggest domain-specific constraints on what is grammatically encodable. Here, we investigate whether this tendency could instead be explained by the superior predictive power of animacy (i.e., the degree to which it predicts other features) compared to colour. In a series of experiments, we find that animacy-based noun classes are learned better than colour-based ones. However, when participants are encouraged, by manipulating predictive power, to sort images based on colour, they are worse at learning animacy-based noun classes. The results suggest the animacy bias in grammar may have its roots in domain-general categorisation principles. They further serve as evidence for the role of cognitive biases in constraining cross-linguistic variation.

**Authors:**

Ponrawee Prasertsom: University of Edinburgh; Kenny Smith: University of Edinburgh; Jennifer Culbertson: University of Edinburgh

Domain-general categorisation principles explain the prevalence of animacy and absence of colour in noun classification systems

Abstract:
Language for communicating in a particular context is denoted as Pragmatics, in typical population pragmatics improve with age. A variety of measures have been developed in order to assess these skills however there is a need for a Hindi task to evaluate the progressing comprehension of pragmatics in north Indian children.
This study is an attempt to construct a Hindi pragmatics video-based task (HPVT). An experimental design was utilized in which impact of change in age is studied on pragmatics. The study encompasses creation of novel videos, standardization and administration of task and formulation of a comprehensive checklist for systematic evaluation. The study also explores the relationship between pragmatics and the theory of mind (ToM).
Method:
In order to construct the task scripts were shortlisted based on prior research and children were selected to act in videos. Each video was followed by two memory questions and one target question to map pragmatics development of 5- to 10-year-old children. The performance was scored using a checklist, ToM was assessed using first order false belief story narration with pictures. Parents rated these children on Pragmatic Abilities Questionnaire by Jafari et al. (2019) for establishing concurrent validity and content validity of HPVT. Face validity and inter-rater reliability was stablished using subject matter experts.
Result:
The performance of children in HPVT demonstrated an upward trajectory with age using linear regression b=.80, t (50) =11.11, p <.001. A significant equation was found F(1, 49) = 123.468, p< .000, with an R square of .636. Impactful result demonstrates positive relationship in measured Pragmatics and ToM. The standardization of the task was stablished. 
Conclusions:
The HPVT task has some great properties and is unique however it took lengthy amount of time to administer and the questions need to be edited for accurately measuring pragmatics. The task can be used in the educational practices and interventions aimed at enhancing pragmatic language skills in those with Social Pragmatic Disorder (SPD).
Keywords: Pragmatic Understanding, Child Development, Experimental Approach, Video-Based Tools, Standardization, Subject Matter Expert Ratings.

**Authors:**

Afreen Fatima: University of Delhi; Nandita Babu: University of Delhi

Development of Hindi Pragmatic Language Skills in Indian Children

A speaker’s use of language is one of the most important indicators in detecting deception. To date, however, little research has focused on grammatical cues used in deceitful statements. One such cue is evidentiality which is the grammatical encoding for the source of information; i.e., whether the speaker has direct or indirect access to what they assert. This study investigates whether and how evidentiality coding in Turkish, an evidential language, interacts with producing deceitful and truthful narratives. Deceptive retellings were notably longer and syntactically more complex compared to truthful counterparts. Our hypothesis of increased past forms in deception was confirmed, alongside a heightened use of direct evidential inflection (-dI) in deceptive conditions. This exploration sheds light on the nuanced relationship between grammatical evidentiality and deceptive language use.

**Authors:**

Cagla Aydin: Sabanci University; Dr Seçkin Arslan: Université Côte d'Azur; Selma Berfin Tanis: Sabanci University; Şeyma Kalender: Sabanci University; Ayberk Kaan Güneş: Sabancı University

Premium content

Downloads

Next from CogSci 2024

Rounding and magnitude: Pragmatic halos are bigger for larger numbers

Similar lecture

Existing Models May Not be Able to Explain Letter-Position Encoding in Hindi: Evidence from a Priming Study