United States

Background
Despite the availability of effective preventative measures, women in rural communities of Louisiana face health disparities, specifically regarding human papillomavirus (HPV) infections. Along with suboptimal vaccination rates and cervical cancer screening, these disparities are further exacerbated by a lack of awareness and access to healthcare services. To effectively promote equity for women in rural Louisiana about HPV, understanding their needs is essential for developing appropriate strategies to eliminate the stigma surrounding reproductive health and decrease these health disparities. Therefore, this study aims to identify the risk factors contributing to health disparities related to HPV among women residing in rural areas of Louisiana.
Methods
This cross-sectional study is conducted in a Mobile Unit (MU) that travels to remote North Louisiana areas. Two hundred total participants are estimated for this study, with 123 responses providing preliminary results. The inclusion criteria are English-speaking women aged 25 – 64 without a total hysterectomy and cervical cancer history. With written informed consent and HIPAA authorization, participants responded to a questionnaire. HPV screening was offered and collected by the MU Nurse (NP).
Results
Based on preliminary results, the average age of participants was 54.31 years old. Most participants were African Americans (55.1%). Fifty-two percent had completed high school, 32.8% were married, 37.1% worked full-time, and 80.8% had low income. Regarding cancer history, 64.8% had a family history of cancer. Among them, 52% had a parent with cancer, while 35.8% had a grandparent with cancer. Eight percent had cancer, and 11% had been diagnosed with HPV. Regarding knowledge about HPV, 30% had never heard of it before our study. 46% did not know that HPV is sexually transmitted, 68.8% were unaware HPV causes genital warts, 33.6% did not know HPV can cause cervical cancer, and 47.6% were unaware that an HPV vaccine is available. Additionally, almost 91% of participants believed they were not at risk of HPV infection.
Conclusion
To achieve health equity for women in rural areas of Louisiana about HPV, we must focus on targeted interventions that address the specific challenges they encounter. With preliminary results showing most participants not knowing about HPV or its risk factors, further efforts should be prioritized to improve access to healthcare services, improve education and awareness, and foster community engagement. Understanding these disparities will allow us to create a future where women have equal access to healthcare regardless of where they live.

AMA Research Challenge 2023

Bridging the Gap: Health Equity and HPV Among Women in Rural Areas of Louisiana

Welcome to the **largest national, multi-specialty research** event featuring research from more than 750 medical students, residents, fellows, and international medical graduates.

Use the buttons below or navigation menu to access the event.
 

[![](https://assets.underline.io/markdown_image/1/image/20e1e77aa954efeac7a15d84c85eb383.jpg)](https://underline.io/events/468/sessions?searchGroup=all)
 
[![](https://assets.underline.io/markdown_image/1/image/068522d81aca0b68a369787c7dfccd1b.jpg)](https://underline.io/events/468/posters?searchGroup=all)
 
[![](https://assets.underline.io/markdown_image/1/image/d3971ece79d5e5575b178bdc2c8bbfae.jpg)](https://underline.io/events/468/help-desk)
 

#### Event Details

The 2024 American Medical Association Research Challenge includes a poster symposium hall and a semifinals hall with the top scored research. **Log in at any time throughout the event to:**

* **View posters and presentations** on a variety of topics and specialties
* **Score posters in the semifinals** to help decide the top five finalists (AMA member exclusive opportunity)
* **Connect with participants** and provide feedback to help advance their research

At the conclusion of this event, the AMA will announce the top five finalists who will advance to the AMA Research Challenge finals, present their research to an elite panel of judges, and compete to win a $10,000 grand prize presented by Laurel Road. 

### Grand Prize Sponsor

AMA would like to thank Laurel Road for sponsoring a $10,000 grand prize for the winner of the AMA Research Challenge. Laurel Road is not involved in winner selection process. The winner will be announced on February 20, 2025 during the AMA Research Challenge finals. Payment of the grand prize will be directly from Laurel Road. See the AMA Research Challenge Official Rules for terms and conditions.

[![](https://assets.underline.io/uploads/markdown_image/1/image/611e331d4a0eba0920f240cfc04b4d77.png)](https://www.laurelroad.com/)

You need to log in with the email address you registered with. Access credentials have been sent to your email. 

Please be sure to check your spam and other email folders if you do not see an email confirmation right away.

Please log in to explore this event.

**There is no registration fee for this event! **

If you have used the AMA Research Challenge platform previously, please click the ‘Log-in’ button below. If you do not remember your password, please click “forgot password” and follow prompts to reset your password. After resetting your password, please refresh your webpage to access the platform.

Register to explore research in a variety of topics. AMA members get exclusive access to score posters in the semifinals. 

**Please use this link [here](https://www.ama-assn.org/member-benefits/events/ama-research-challenge) to register for free.**

Registration Is Required

AMA Research Challenge 2024 

Join the AMA Research Challenge poster symposium and semifinals to explore top research posters and score posters in the semifinals (an AMA member exclusive opportunity).

poster

Welcome to the **largest national, multi-specialty research** event featuring research from nearly 700 medical students, residents, fellows, and international medical graduates.

Use the buttons below or navigation menu to access the event.
 


[![](https://assets.underline.io/uploads/markdown_image/1/image/3e33a8c754cc49610b30950617d813e7.png)](https://underline.io/events/434/sessions?searchGroup=all)
 
[![](https://assets.underline.io/uploads/markdown_image/1/image/551404d429c4e274f9a54cbdd7081918.png)](https://underline.io/events/434/posters?searchGroup=all)
 
[![](https://assets.underline.io/uploads/markdown_image/1/image/677d92f566b880cebd36905fc738fc10.png)](https://underline.io/events/434/lounge)
 
[![](https://assets.underline.io/uploads/markdown_image/1/image/c7392833c7261c3874c5b43fa2f4df19.png)](https://underline.io/events/434/help-desk)
 

#### Event Details

The 2023 American Medical Association Research Challenge includes a poster symposium hall and a semifinals hall with the top scored research. **Log in at any time throughout the event to:**

* **View posters and presentations** on a variety of topics and specialties
* **Score posters in the semifinals** to help decide the top five finalists (AMA member exclusive opportunity)
* **Connect with participants** and provide feedback to help advance their research
* **Attend education sessions** with physician experts on key research topics

At the conclusion of this event, the AMA will announce the top five finalists who will advance to the AMA Research Challenge finals, present their research to an elite panel of judges, and compete to win a $10,000 grand prize sponsored by Laurel Road. 

### Grand Prize Sponsor

AMA would like to thank Laurel Road for sponsoring a $10,000 grand prize for the winner of the AMA Research Challenge. Laurel Road is not involved in the judging or scoring process to select the winner. The winner will be announced on February 4, 2024 during the AMA Research Challenge finals. Payment of the grand prize will be directly from Laurel Road. See the AMA Research Challenge Official Rules for terms and conditions.

![](https://assets.underline.io/uploads/markdown_image/1/image/611e331d4a0eba0920f240cfc04b4d77.png)

**There is no registration fee for this event! **

Register to explore research in a variety of topics. AMA members get exclusive access to score posters in the semifinals.

**Please use this link [here](https://www.ama-assn.org/about/events/ama-research-challenge) to register for free.**

Join the AMA Research Challenge poster symposium and semifinals to explore top research posters, score posters in the semifinals (an AMA member exclusive opportunity) and attend education sessions with experienced physicians to learn tips to advance your research and career. 

**Scoring is only possible in the semifinals hall**

**Abstract:**



Analysis of Trauma Protocols & Bias in Toxicology Screening of Patients in Motor Vehicle Accidents

Background
Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Transgender, and Queer (LGBTQ) individuals face higher levels of stress than the general population in the form of minority stress, defined as discriminatory, stigmatizing, and victimizing experiences. Minority stress has been posited as a cause for LGBTQ individuals to smoke as a coping mechanism, leading to higher than average rates of smoking in this population. The Deep South states of Louisiana, Mississippi, Alabama, Georgia, and South Carolina represent an area with both high levels of minority stress and smoking. Therefore, the objective of this study was to elucidate how minority stress influences smoking among LGBTQ smokers in the Deep South, using a mixed methods approach.

Methods
A one-time, cross-sectional online survey was administered to 1,296 LGBTQ smokers in the Deep South. Survey measurements included previously validated measures of minority stress (prejudice events, perceived stigma, and internalized queerphobia), mental health, social support, smoking, quitting, LGBTQ and non-LGBTQ norms, self-efficacy, and smoking outcome variables (stage of change and nicotine dependence level). Multiple linear regression was used to assess the relationship between minority stress variables and smoking outcome variables. To expound on how minority stress affects mental health and subsequent stage of change, 15 individual, semi-structured online interviews were conducted with LGBTQ smokers in the Deep South. Interview topics spanned across 5 domains: LGBTQ identity, smoking/quitting, minority stress, mental health, and social support.

Results
Survey findings showed that after adjusting for covariates, increased levels of internalized queerphobia were significantly associated with increased nicotine dependence level, and decreased levels of perceived stigma were associated with further stage of change. Six themes emerged across interviews: struggles with LGBTQ identity, coping with minority stress, reasons for smoking, desire to quit smoking, and barriers to quitting smoking.

Conclusion
This study elucidates how increased levels of minority stress are associated with poorer smoking outcomes among LGBTQ individuals in the Deep South. Findings will help guide future smoking prevention and cessation programs for LGBTQ smokers. Addressing minority stress in future targeted smoking interventions has the potential to reducing smoking disparities in LGBTQ populations.

Minority Stress among LGBTQ Smokers in the Deep South: A Mixed Methods Study

Background:
Historical redlining, a discriminatory practice that denied mortgage loans to people of color based on perceived risk, has had lasting effects on communities. These redlined areas, marked as high-risk on maps, continue to face health disparities. This study investigates the relationship between redlining and all-cause mortality rates in Austin, Texas.


90 Years Later: How Historical Redlining Predicts All-Cause Mortality in Austin, Texas

Background
Louisiana's Hispanic/Latinx population is a diverse community that has experienced significant growth in recent years. Unfortunately, COVID-19 has disproportionately impacted racial and ethnic minority groups, including Hispanics/Latinx, who often face disparities in healthcare access and outcomes. This study aims to investigate the impact and potential disparities of COVID-19 infection among the Hispanic/Latinx community in Northwest Louisiana.

Methods
A cross-sectional survey was conducted between June 2022 and March 2023. A total of 242 participants were recruited and asked to complete a structured questionnaire. Eligible participants included individuals above 18 years old who identified as Hispanic or Latinx and resided in Northwest Louisiana. Data analysis was conducted using SPSS Version 28 with a statistical significance level set at p < 0.05. Descriptive statistics were utilized to summarize and compare the characteristics of the overall sample, while Pearson’s Chi-squared tests were used to identify risk factors.

Results
The average age of the participants was 42.2 years, 64.7% were female, 56.6% were born in Mexico, 37.7% had attained high school education, 54.1% did not speak English, 61.3% were married, and 51.1% were below the poverty level. Approximately 80% of the study participants had access to COVID-19 testing, with 44.3% receiving testing in a clinical or hospital setting. Among the study participants, 53.6% had been infected with COVID-19. Of those infected, more than half (50.4%) did not receive medical care from a clinic or hospital. Additionally, 63.9% personally knew someone who had suffered severe illness due to COVID-19, and 68% expressed concern about contracting the virus. Factors associated with increased risk of COVID-19 infection included being female, having limited English proficiency, living with 3 or more people, obesity, and asthma.

Conclusion
This cross-sectional survey offers insights into the impact and disparities experienced by the Hispanic/Latinx population in Northwest Louisiana during the COVID-19 pandemic. These findings can aid in implementing prevention measures, resource allocation, and targeted interventions to reduce the risk of COVID-19 and other infectious diseases among minority communities, particularly Hispanics/Latinx.

Disparities and risk factors of COVID-19 infection among Hispanic/Latinx in northwest Louisiana: A Cross-Sectional Study

Background:
Firearm violence is increasingly prevalent in the United States. As such, the number of people living with retained bullet fragments (RBFs) is rising. Lead toxicity is a rare, but known complication of living with an RBF. Lead is a teratogen and fetal exposure to lead has been linked to a variety of congenital abnormalities and cognitive development impairment. Little is known about the risk of maternal-fetal lead toxicity from RBFs. The purpose of this dual systematic review is to investigate the impact that RBFs may have on pregnant patients and their fetuses.
Methods:
Two systematic reviews were conducted, adhering to PRISMA guidelines, using
PubMed/MEDLINE and Embase: one explored the relationship between lead poisoning and retained bullet fragments/foreign bodies, and the second examined the relationship between prenatal lead exposure and fetal/child development. The quality of each included study was assessed on a scale of 0 to 5.
Results:
Of the 494 search results of the first review, only 5 (average quality: 4.2) explored the relationship between retained bullet fragments and blood lead levels, all of which demonstrated a strong association. Of the 753 search results of the second review, 11 (average quality of 3.91) examined the relationship between elevated maternal BLL and fetal development, and all highlighted that elevated maternal BLL is associated with neurobehavioral, cognitive, and cardiovascular fetal development.
Conclusions:
Retained bullet fragments may be a risk factor for lead toxicity in pregnant people with the potential for detrimental effects on the pregnancy and fetus. These patients should be educated about the risk and screened for lead levels during pregnancy. To further improve the health outcomes of this subpopulation and to determine the most appropriate treatment options, more research is needed.

Considering Lead Levels in Pregnancy-Capable People with Retained Bullet Fragments

Background: As diversity continues to flourish in the United States (US), more patients encountered by physicians primarily speak languages other than English. 25.5 million people in the US disclosed they were Limited English Proficient (LEP). LEP patients are known to be marginalized in terms of receiving adequate health care and undergo less preventative care than other individuals of the same ethnicity that are proficient in English. 

Objective: To determine the prevalence and risk factors of breast and cervical cancer screening rates between women with and without difficulty communicating. 

Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted of adult women using the 2021 National Health Interview Survey. The rates of breast and cervical cancer screening between women who indicated they had “difficulty communicating” to women who did not were compared. The US Preventive Screening Task Force guidelines were used. Demographic and behavioral variables were analyzed in relation to reported breast and cervical cancer screening. SAS v9.4 was used to analyze the data in a manner that accounts for the complex sample survey design. Bivariate comparisons were performed using Chi-square test, all significance tests were two-sided, p-value < .05 for significance. This study was approved by UND IRB. 

Results: Of the estimated 50 million (unweighted n=6,851) respondents, 4.2% of women reported having difficulty communicating. Women who reported having difficulty communicating were significantly less likely to have received a mammogram within the last 2 years than women who reported no difficulty communicating (p=.015). Similarly, women who reported having difficulty communicating were significantly less likely to have ever had cervical cancer screening (p=.000), to have the last visit as wellness visit (p=.014), and to report poor health (p=.000) than women who reported no difficulty communicating. There was no association between being a US citizen, duration in the US, or birth in the US and difficulty communicating. 

Conclusion: Women with difficulty communicating were less likely to report mammography and cervical cancer screening compared to those with no difficulty communicating. Physicians should spend longer visits with women who have difficulty communicating to enhance preventive cancer screenings and should encourage yearly wellness visits.

Association Between Difficulty Communicating and Breast and Cervical Cancer Screening

Background
Nearly 38.3 million people are food-insecure nationwide. Food insecurity has been associated with diabetes, hypertension, obesity, arthritis, asthma, and decreased mental health. Despite food insecurity, nearly 35% of all grown food goes unsold or unconsumed, equating to around 130 billion meals and up to $285 billion in annual losses. Redistribution programs can alleviate hunger and provide tax benefits to donors. This study sought to investigate the challenges and successes of Brown County, Wisconsin food sectors regarding food waste, redistribution, and salvaging. Educational resources were provided to interested donors.

Methods
Electronic surveys were distributed via email or social media to 479 potential donors, including K-12 schools, colleges, restaurants, and more. Data was collected and analyzed via Qualtrics.

Results
Results (n=31) showed that although most donors expressed food sustainability concerns, a large number have no or low familiarity with food redistribution and salvaging. Further, greater than 50% of donors do have reduction efforts in place; however, only 40% have efforts specific to redistribution. On average, 5.84% of inventory goes unused each month; prepared foods comprise 50.29% of disposed foods, followed by baked goods and fresh produce each at ~15%. Finally, only 23% and 35% of potential donors expressed knowledge of tax benefits and legal protections, respectively.

Conclusion
Although statistical significance was not attained, this study demonstrated great potential for donors to alter food practices, providing donations to those in need. Additionally, there are significant opportunities for education on redistribution logistics and benefits. Future directions include outreach to additional donors, dissemination of information on tax advantages and legal protections, and small-scale pilot studies.

Food Salvaging and Redistribution in Brown County, Wisconsin

Over 40% of U.S. adults disclosed delaying both urgent and routine medical care during the pandemic due to COVID-19 concerns. We aimed to examine impacts of delays in care through the development of new chronic conditions since the beginning of the pandemic. For this cohort of older adults who lived through the COVID-19 pandemic, prevalence of all chronic conditions rose in age-stratified analyses, indicating worsening population health. However, delays in medical care during the pandemic were not associated with chronic condition development. Delays in care may have been compensated for by telehealth, medication delivery, and other services specific to the pandemic.

Impact of reported delay in medical care during the COVID-19 pandemic on development of chronic conditions in U.S. older adults

Introduction
Despite the preventable nature of oral and oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (OOPSCC) through risk factor avoidance, disparities persist regarding OOPSCC survival in medically underserved communities. This qualitative study aims to engage community stakeholders from a medically underserved neighborhood in Miami, FL to identify key problems and solutions related to high-risk behaviors associated with OOPSCC.

Methods
Twelve participants, selected based on community involvement and residence around the studied neighborhood, participated in two focus groups with six participants each. Transcriptions of the 60-minute sessions were analyzed using directed qualitative content analysis (DQICA) to identify common themes. Notable excerpts from the transcriptions were used to report the data and support overarching themes.

Results
12 participants of average age 45.6 years were extensively interviewed. The majority were female (75.0%), had 0-1 years community involvement (83.3%), were Black or African American (100%), and were non-Hispanic (83.3%). DQICA revealed five key problems contributing to high-risk behaviors for OOPSCC: historic social norms, mistrust of the healthcare system, lack of support systems, limited education, and availability of drugs and alcohol. Analysis identified five key solutions including continuity of care, community engagement and education, incentives, long-term relationships, and improved health accessibility.

Conclusions
This study highlights the influence of social determinants on OOPSCC risk in this medically underserved community of Miami, FL. Through a community-engaged approach, this study uncovers underlying problems and potential solutions to reduce high-risk behaviors contributing to OOPSCC. Addressing these factors is crucial in combating socioeconomic and racial disparities and improving overall OOPSCC survival.



A Community-Engaged Approach to Uncovering High-Risk Behaviors for Oral and Oropharyngeal Cancer

Background:
Policymakers have promoted Urgent Care (UC) as an alternative to the emergency department. We examined the proportion of UC visits managed by emergency physicians (EPs) vs other providers and how this distribution has changed over time.

Methods:
We examined UC claims for a national, 20% sample of Medicare beneficiaries age 65 and older from 2011-2017. We identified provider specialty, patient characteristics and visit diagnosis. For each year, we calculated the number of UC visits per 100 beneficiaries as well the rate and proportion of visits managed by provider specialty. We then created 3 specialty groups: EPs, advanced practice professionals (APPs; nurse practitioners, physician assistants) and other physicians. We compared visit characteristics among these groups for 2016-2017.

Results:
In our sample of 2,517, 333 UC visits, utilization rose from 3.8 UC visits per 100 beneficiaries in 2011 to 9.3 visits per 100 beneficiaries in 2017. The most frequent provider specialties were family practice (FP), emergency medicine (EM), physician assistant (PA), nurse practitioner (NP) and internal medicine (IM). All 5 specialties saw a rise in utilization, but the relative increase was greatest for NPs (+603%), followed by PAs (+337%), IM (+104%), FP (+81%), and EM (64%). FP, the most frequent specialty, declined from 39.9% of visits in 2011 to 30.0% in 2017. EPs were the second most common providers in 2011 (25.8%) but dropped to fourth place in 2017 (17.6%). Visits to PAs rose from 13.7% to 22.6% and NPs from 6.4% to 18.6%. The top diagnoses were upper respiratory tract infection (14.6%), urinary tract infection (6.2%), bronchitis (6.0%), skin infections (4.6%) and lower respiratory tract infection (4.3%) and this distribution was stable over time. EPs cared for older patients (mean 75.4 years) compared to APPs (74.8 years) and other physicians (75.2 years). Chronic condition burden was lowest for APPs, followed by EPs and other physicians. Non-EM physicians cared for the greatest proportion of Medicaid-eligible beneficiaries (7.9%) followed by APPs (6.8%) and EPs (6.0%).

Conclusions:
UC utilization has risen markedly in recent years but this rise has been greatest for APPs, with a decline in the proportion of visits managed by EPs and other physicians. EPs cared for an older, sicker population while FPs saw a greater share of disadvantaged patients as measured by dual Medicaid-eligibility. 


Premium content

Downloads

Next from AMA Research Challenge 2023

Analysis of Trauma Protocols & Bias in Toxicology Screening of Patients in Motor Vehicle Accidents

Similar lecture

Comparing Perception of HPV Vaccination in Cervical and Oropharyngeal Cancer Patients