Leszek Siwik and Rafał Drezewski (October 1st 2009). Agent-Based Multi-Objective Evolutionary Algorithms with Cultural and Immunological Mechanisms, Evolutionary Computation, Wellington Pinheiro dos Santos, IntechOpen, DOI: 10.5772/9621. 

Rafal Drezewski and Leszek Siwik (November 1st 2008). Agent-Based Co-Evolutionary Techniques for Solving Multi-Objective Optimization Problems, Advances in Evolutionary Algorithms, Witold Kosinski, IntechOpen, DOI: 10.5772/6128. 

Chakir Aziza and Chergui Meriyem (April 11th 2020). Using Multi-Agent System to Govern the IT Needs of Stakeholders [Online First], IntechOpen, DOI: 10.5772/intechopen.91440. 

New Zealand

AAMAS 2020

Mitingating the Negative Side Effects of Reasoning with Imperfect Models: A Mult - Objective Approach

The purpose of the AAAI conference series is to promote research in Artificial Intelligence (AI) and foster scientific exchange between researchers, practitioners, scientists, students, and engineers across the entirety of AI and its affiliated disciplines. AAAI-23 is the Thirty-Seventh AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence. The theme of this conference is to create collaborative bridges within and beyond AI. Like previous AAAI conferences, AAAI-23 will feature technical paper presentations, special tracks, invited speakers, workshops, tutorials, poster sessions, senior member presentations, competitions, and exhibit programs, and two new activities: a Bridge Program and a Lab Program. Many of these activities are tailored to the theme of bridges and all are selected according to the highest standards, with additional programs for students and young researchers. 
AAAI is providing you with a conference planner, which you can use to help organize your itinerary of activities. This includes talks to attend in person, talks to attend remotely, breaks with colleagues and your site seeing activities. To access this conference planner, please go to [https://aaai-2023.takemobi.io](https://aaai-2023.takemobi.io).

In order to access this site, you need to register. If you haven't already, please register [here](https://aaai.org/Conferences/AAAI-23/registration/).


AAAI 2023

The purpose of the AAAI conference series is to promote research in Artificial Intelligence (AI) and foster scientific exchange between researchers, practitioners, scientists, students, and engineers across the entirety of AI and its affiliated disciplines.

technical paper

AAMAS is the leading scientific conference for research in autonomous agents and multi-agent systems. The AAMAS conference series was initiated in 2002 as the merging of three respected scientific meetings: the International Conference on Multi-Agent Systems (ICMAS), the International Workshop on Agent Theories, Architectures, and Languages (ATAL), and the International Conference on Autonomous Agents (AA). The aim of the joint conference is to provide a single, high-profile, internationally-respected archival forum for scientific research in the theory and practice of autonomous agents and multi-agent systems.

Browse keynotes, discussions, panels and over 300 presentations.


AAMAS is the leading scientific conference for research in autonomous agents and multi-agent systems. The AAMAS conference series was initiated in 2002 as the merging of three respected scientific meetings: the International Conference on Multi-Agent Systems (ICMAS), the International Workshop on Agent Theories, Architectures, and Languages (ATAL), and the International Conference on Autonomous Agents (AA). 

Optimal Swarm Strategy for Dynamic Target Search and Tracking

A variety of constructive manipulation, control, and bribery for approval-based multi-winner voting have been extensively studied very recently. However, their destructive counterparts seem to be less studied in the literature so far. This paper aims to fill this gap by exploring the complexity of several destructive bribery problems under five prestigious approval-based multi-winner voting rules. Generally speaking, these problems are to determine if a number of given candidates can be excluded from any winning committees by performing a series of modification operations yet without exceeding a given budget. We consider five operations. We offer a complete landscape of the complexity of the problems studied in this paper, and for NP-hard problems we study their parameterized complexity with respect to meaningful parameters.

On the Complexity of Destructive Bribery in Approval-Based Multiwinner Voting

"Peer-to-peer ridesharing (P2P-RS) enables people to arrange one-time rides with their own private cars, without the involvement of professional drivers. It is a prominent collective intelligence application producing significant benefits both for individuals (reduced costs) and for the entire community (reduced pollution and traffic), as we showed in a recent publication where we proposed an online approximate solution algorithm for large-scale P2P-RS.
In this paper we tackle the fundamental question of assessing the benefit of predicting ridesharing requests in the context of P2P-RS optimisation. 
Results on a public real-world show that, by employing a perfect predictor, the total reward can be improved by 5.27% with a forecast horizon of $1$ minute.
On the other hand, a vanilla long short-term memory neural network cannot improve upon a baseline predictor that simply replicates the previous day's requests, whilst achieving an almost-double accuracy"

Predicting Requests in Large-Scale Online P2P Ridesharing

Motivated by the apparent societal need to design complex autonomous systems whose decisions and actions are humanly intelligible, the study of explainable artificial intelligence, and with it, research on explainable autonomous agents has gained increased attention from the research community. One important objective of research on explainable agents is the evaluation of explanation approaches in human-computer interaction studies. In this demonstration paper, we present a way to facilitate such studies by implementing explainable agents and multi-agent systems that i) can be deployed as static files, not requiring the execution of server-side code, which minimizes administration and operation overhead, and ii) can be embedded into web front ends and other JavaScript-enabled user interfaces, hence increasing the ability to reach a broad range of users. We then demonstrate the approach with the help of an application that was designed to assess the effect of different explainability approaches on the human intelligibility of an unmanned aerial vehicle simulation.

Explainable Agents as Static Web Pages: UAV Simulation Example

We propose a novel method for analyzing and visualizing the complexity of standard reinforcement learning (RL) benchmarks based on score distributions. A large number of policy networks are generated by randomly guessing their parameters, and then evaluated on the benchmark task; the study of their aggregated results provide insights into the benchmark complexity. Our method guarantees objectivity of evaluation by sidestepping learning altogether: the policy network parameters are generated using Random Weight Guessing (RWG), making our method agnostic to (i) the classic RL setup, (ii) any learning algorithm, and (iii) hyperparameter tuning. We show that this approach isolates the environment complexity, highlights specific types of challenges, and provides a proper foundation for the statistical analysis of the task's difficulty. We test our approach on a variety of classic control benchmarks from the OpenAI Gym, where we show that small untrained networks can provide a robust baseline for a variety of tasks. The networks generated often show good performance even without gradual learning, incidentally highlighting the triviality of a few popular benchmarks.

Analyzing Reinforcement Learning Benchmarks using Random Weight Guessing

Multiagent systems can use commitments as the core of a general coordination infrastructure, supporting both cooperative and non-cooperative interactions. For agents whose objectives are aligned, and where one agent can help another achieve greater reward by sacrificing some of its own reward, their cooperative commitment should be chosen to maximize their joint reward. We present a solution to the problem of how cooperative agents can efficiently find an (approximately) optimal commitment by querying about carefully selected commitment choices. We prove structural properties of the agents' values as functions of the parameters of the commitment specification, and develop a greedy method for composing a query with provable approximation bounds, that we empirically show can find nearly optimal commitments in a fraction of the time that methods that lack our insights require.

Efficient Querying for Cooperative Commitments

In scenarios that require teamwork, we usually have at hand a variety of specific tasks, for which we need to form a team in order to carry out each one. Here we target the problem of matching teams with tasks within the context of education, and specifically in the context of forming teams of students and allocating them to internship programs. We provide a formalization of the problem, and show the computational hardness of solving it optimally.
Thereafter, we propose a heuristic anytime algorithm that generates an initial team allocation which later on attempts to improve in an iterative process.
Moreover, we present the results of our evaluation, and compare the results with a state-of-the-art optimizer.

TAIP: an anytime algorithm for allocating student teams to internship programs

Theory of Mind is commonly defined as the ability to attribute mental states (e.g., beliefs, goals) to oneself, and to others. A large body of previous work---from the social sciences to artificial intelligence---has observed that Theory of Mind capabilities are central to providing an explanation to another agent or when explaining that agent’s behaviour. In this paper, we build and expand upon previous work by providing an account of explanation in terms of the beliefs of agents and the mechanism by which agents revise their beliefs given possible explanations. Our account satisfies a number of important desiderata which we posit must be met by accounts of explanation that purport to employ Theory of Mind, in contrast to previous work which has addressed some but not all of these desiderata.

Towards the Role of Theory of Mind in Explanation

Maximizing Plan Legibility in Stochastic Environments (Extended Abstract)

In this work, the Distributed Bayesian (D-Bay) algorithm is applied to an autonomous search use case. Within the use case multiple unmanned aerial vehicles equipped with cameras cooperatively search an area and minimize the required time. The use case is mod- eled within the continuous Distributed Constraint Optimization Problem (DCOP) framework. This framework extends the (discrete) DCOP framework by allowing variables with continuous domains. Compared to similar DCOP solvers, the characteristics of the D- Bay algorithm are well suited for the use case and allow for the implementation on autonomous vehicles with limited resources (computational power, memory, and communication bandwidth). Experimental results are given and these results are used to vali- date a simulation environment. Within the simulation environment various scenarios are implemented. The D-Bay algorithm was able to find solutions within 3.5 % of the optimal solution with a limited amount of samples per agent.

Mitingating the Negative Side Effects of Reasoning with Imperfect Models: A Mult - Objective Approach

Downloads

Next from AAMAS 2020

Optimal Swarm Strategy for Dynamic Target Search and Tracking

Similar lecture

AMOM: Adaptive Masking over Masking for Conditional Masked Language Model

Mitingating the Negative Side Effects of Reasoning with Imperfect Models: A Mult - Objective Approach

.css-70qvj9{display:-webkit-box;display:-webkit-flex;display:-ms-flexbox;display:flex;-webkit-align-items:center;-webkit-box-align:center;-ms-flex-align:center;align-items:center;}Downloads

Next from AAMAS 2020

Optimal Swarm Strategy for Dynamic Target Search and Tracking

Similar lecture

AMOM: Adaptive Masking over Masking for Conditional Masked Language Model

Downloads