Austria

Majority voting is considered an effective method to enhance chain-of-thought reasoning, as it selects the answer with the highest &#39;&#39;self-consistency&#39;&#39; among different reasoning paths (Wang et al., 2023). However, previous chain-of-thought reasoning methods typically generate only a single answer in each trial, thereby ignoring the possibility of other potential answers. As a result, these alternative answers are often overlooked in subsequent voting processes. In this work, we propose to generate ranked answers in each reasoning process and conduct ranked voting among multiple ranked answers from different responses, thereby making the overall self-consistency more reliable. Specifically, we use three ranked voting methods: Instant-runoff voting, Borda count voting, and mean reciprocal rank voting. We validate our methods on six datasets, including three multiple-choice and three open-ended question-answering tasks, using both advanced open-source and closed-source large language models. Extensive experimental results indicate that our proposed method outperforms the baselines, showcasing the potential of leveraging the information of ranked answers and using ranked voting to improve reasoning performance. Code and logs will be released.

ACL 2025

Ranked Voting based Self-Consistency of Large Language Models

self-consistency

reasoning

ECAI2020 featured a full programme of technical papers, as well as many AI-related events of interest for researchers, students and all attendants who are interested on contemporary AI, including:




**An extensive programme of workshops, tutorials, and invited speakers**

**The Prestigious Applications of Intelligent Systems conference (PAIS)**

**The Frontiers in AI track sessions**

**The Lab To Market event**

**The Women in AI time**

**The EU Challenges forum**

… and many more!

ECAI 2020

ECAI 2020 featured a full programme of technical papers, as well as many AI-related events of interest for researchers, students and all attendants who are interested on contemporary AI.

Majority voting is considered an effective method to enhance chain-of-thought reasoning, as it selects the answer with the highest ''self-consistency'' among different reasoning paths (Wang et al., 2023). However, previous chain-of-thought reasoning methods typically generate only a single answer in each trial, thereby ignoring the possibility of other potential answers. As a result, these alternative answers are often overlooked in subsequent voting processes. In this work, we propose to generate ranked answers in each reasoning process and conduct ranked voting among multiple ranked answers from different responses, thereby making the overall self-consistency more reliable. Specifically, we use three ranked voting methods: Instant-runoff voting, Borda count voting, and mean reciprocal rank voting. We validate our methods on six datasets, including three multiple-choice and three open-ended question-answering tasks, using both advanced open-source and closed-source large language models. Extensive experimental results indicate that our proposed method outperforms the baselines, showcasing the potential of leveraging the information of ranked answers and using ranked voting to improve reasoning performance. Code and logs will be released.

poster

### Welcome to The 63rd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL 2025)

Message from the General Chair: 
*It is my great pleasure and honor to welcome you to the 63rd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL 2025), held in beautiful Vienna, Austria, from July 27 to August 1, 2025. ACL2025continues our field’s tradition of excellence in scholarship, innovation, and inclusivity, and I am deeply grateful to the many volunteers who have worked tirelessly to bring this event to life.* 
[Read more](https://drive.google.com/file/d/1GI_hvOpjswAuYdUTromfeDiPpCcqidwg/view?usp=sharing)

To access this event page, you need to log in with the **email address you registered with**. Access credentials will be sent to your email from Underline - subject line "Welcome to ACL 2025". Please be sure to check your spam email folder if you do not see an email confirmation right away.

Please log in

To access this event page, you need to log in with the **email address you registered with**. 

Welcome to The 63rd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL 2025)

The breakthrough of OpenAI o1 highlights the potential of enhancing reasoning to improve LLM. Yet, most research in reasoning has focused on mathematical tasks, leaving domains like medicine underexplored. The medical domain, though distinct from mathematics, also demands robust reasoning to provide reliable answers, given the high standards of healthcare. However, verifying medical reasoning is challenging, unlike those in mathematics. To address this, we propose **Medical Verifiable Problems** with a medical verifier to check the correctness of model outputs. This verifiable nature enables advancements in medical reasoning through **a two-stage approach**: (1) using the verifier to guide the search for a complex reasoning trajectory for fine-tuning LLMs, (2) applying reinforcement learning (RL) with verifier-based rewards to enhance complex reasoning further. Finally, we introduce HuatuoGPT-o1, a medical LLM capable of complex reasoning, which outperforms general and medical-specific baselines using only 40K verifiable problems. Experiments show complex reasoning improves medical problem-solving and benefits more from RL. We hope our approach inspires advancements in reasoning across medical and other specialized domains. Code, datasets, and models are publicly available at https://github.com/FreedomIntelligence/HuatuoGPT-o1.

Towards Medical Complex Reasoning with LLMs through Medical Verifiable Problems

In recent progress, mathematical verifiers have achieved success in mathematical reasoning tasks by validating the correctness of solutions generated by policy models. However, existing verifiers are trained with binary classification labels, which are not informative enough for the model to accurately assess the solutions. To mitigate the aforementioned insufficiency of binary labels, we introduce step-wise natural language feedback as rationale labels, that is, the correctness of each step and the detailed explanations. In this paper, we propose Math-Minos, a natural language feedback-enhanced verifier by constructing automatically generated training data and a two-stage training paradigm for effective training and efficient inference. Our experiments reveal that a small set of natural language feedback can significantly boost the performance of the verifier in both verification and reinforcement learning and also significantly alleviates the data-demanding problems of the reward model with an over 700% data efficiency improvement.

LLM Critics Help Catch Bugs in Mathematics: Towards a Better Mathematical Verifier with Natural Language Feedback

Question Answering (QA) with large language models has shown impressive performance, yet hallucinations still persist, particularly when user queries carry incorrect premises, insufficient context, or linguistic ambiguity. To address this issue, we propose Lightweight Query Checkpoint (LQC), a small classification model that detects verification-required queries before the LLM generates a potentially faulty answer. LQC leverages hidden states extracted from intermediate layers of a smaller-scale, non-instruct-tuned LLM to effectively distinguish queries requiring verification from clear queries. We first systematically define categories of queries that need verification, construct a dataset comprising both defective and clear queries, and train a binary contrastive learning model. Through extensive experiments on various QA datasets, we demonstrate that incorporating LQC into QA pipelines reduces hallucinations while preserving strong answer quality.

Lightweight Query Checkpoint: Classifying Faulty User Queries to Mitigate Hallucinations in Large Language Model Question Answering

In-hospital text data contains valuable clinical information, yet deploying fine-tuned small language models (SLMs) for information extraction remains challenging due to differences in formatting and vocabulary across institutions. Since access to the original in-hospital data (source domain) is often restricted, annotated data from the target hospital (target domain) is crucial for domain adaptation. However, clinical annotation is notoriously expensive and time-consuming, as it demands clinical and linguistic expertise. To address this issue, we leverage large language models (LLMs) to annotate the target domain data for the adaptation. We conduct experiments on four clinical information extraction tasks, including eight target domain data. Experimental results show that LLM-annotated data consistently enhances SLM performance and, with a larger number of annotated data, outperforms manual annotation in three out of four tasks.

Exploring LLM Annotation for Adaptation of Clinical Information Extraction Models under Data-sharing Restrictions

The scarcity of publicly available clinical corpora hinders developing and applying NLP tools in clinical research. While existing work tackles this issue by utilizing generative models to create high-quality synthetic corpora, their methods require learning from the original in-hospital clinical documents, turning them unfeasible in practice. To address this problem, we introduce RecordTwin, a novel synthetic corpus creation method designed to generate synthetic documents from anonymized clinical entities. In this method, we first extract and anonymize entities from in-hospital documents to ensure the information contained in the synthetic corpus is restricted. Then, we use a large language model to fill the context between anonymized entities. To do so, we use a small, privacy-preserving subset of the original documents to mimic their formatting and writing style. This approach only requires anonymized entities and a small subset of original documents in the generation process, making it more feasible in practice. To evaluate the synthetic corpus created with our method, we conduct a proof-of-concept study using a publicly available clinical database. Our results demonstrate that the synthetic corpus has a utility comparable to the original data and a safety advantage over baselines, highlighting the potential of RecordTwin for privacy-preserving synthetic corpus creation.

RecordTwin: Towards Creating Safe Synthetic Clinical Corpora

Language models (LMs) risk inadvertently memorizing and divulging sensitive or personally identifiable information (PII) seen in training data, causing privacy concerns. Current approaches to address this issue involve costly dataset scrubbing, or model filtering through unlearning and model editing, which can be bypassed through extraction attacks. We propose REVS, a novel non-gradient-based method for unlearning sensitive information from LMs. REVS identifies and modifies a small subset of neurons relevant for constituent tokens which form sensitive information. To adequately evaluate our method on truly sensitive information, we curate three datasets: an email and URL datasets naturally memorized by the models, and a synthetic social security number dataset that we tune the models to memorize. Compared to other methods, REVS demonstrates superior performance in unlearning sensitive information and robustness to extraction attacks, while retaining underlying model integrity.

REVS: Unlearning Sensitive Information in Language Models via Rank Editing in the Vocabulary Space

Large Language Model (LLM) agents have demonstrated impressive capabilities in handling complex interactive problems. Existing LLM agents mainly generate natural language plans to guide reasoning, which is verbose and inefficient. NL plans are also tailored to specific tasks and restrict agents’ ability to generalize across similar tasks. To this end, we explore pseudocode-style plans (P-code Plan) to capture the structural logic of reasoning. We find that P-code Plan empowers LLM agents with stronger generalization ability and more efficiency. Inspired by this finding, we propose a pseudocode-style ̲Planning ̲Guided ̲Preference ̲Optimization method called PGPO for effective agent learning. With two planning-oriented rewards, PGPO further enhances LLM agents’ ability to generate high-quality P-code Plans and subsequent reasoning. Experiments show that PGPO achieves superior performance on representative agent benchmarks and outperforms the current leading baselines. Analyses reveal the advantage of PGPO in reducing action errors and omissions during reasoning.

PGPO: Enhancing Agent Reasoning via Pseudocode-style Planning Guided Preference Optimization

As autonomous agents powered by large language models (LLMs) continue to demonstrate potential across various assistive tasks, ensuring their safe and reliable behavior is crucial for preventing unintended consequences. In this work, we introduce CIP, a novel technique that leverages causal influence diagrams (CIDs) to identify and mitigate risks arising from agent decision-making. CIDs provide a structured representation of cause-and-effect relationships, enabling agents to anticipate harmful outcomes and make safer decisions. Our approach consists of three key steps: (1) initializing a CID based on task specifications to outline the decision-making process, (2) guiding agent interactions with the environment using the CID, and (3) iteratively refining the CID based on observed behaviors and outcomes. Experimental results demonstrate that our method effectively enhances safety in both code execution and mobile device control tasks.

Enhancing LLM Agent Safety via Causal Influence Prompting

Identifying factors that make ad text attractive is essential for advertising success. This study proposes AdParaphrase v2.0, a dataset for ad text paraphrasing, containing human preference data, to enable the analysis of the linguistic factors and to support the development of methods for generating attractive ad texts. Compared with v1.0, this dataset is 20 times larger, comprising 16,460 ad text paraphrase pairs, each annotated with preference data from ten evaluators, thereby enabling a more comprehensive and reliable analysis. Through the experiments, we identified multiple linguistic features of engaging ad texts that were not observed in v1.0 and explored various methods for generating attractive ad texts. Furthermore, our analysis demonstrated the relationships between human preference and ad performance, and highlighted the potential of reference-free metrics based on large language models for evaluating ad text attractiveness.
The dataset is publicly available at: https://github.com/CyberAgentAILab/AdParaphrase-v2.0.

AdParaphrase v2.0: Generating Attractive Ad Texts Using a Preference-Annotated Paraphrase Dataset

Despite possessing impressive skills, Large Language Models (LLMs) often fail unpre-dictably, demonstrating inconsistent success in even basic common sense reasoning tasks. This unpredictability poses a significant challenge to ensuring their safe deployment, as identifying and operating within a reliable “safe zone” is essential for mitigating risks. To address this, we present PredictaBoard, a novel collabo-rative benchmarking framework designed to evaluate the ability of score predictors (referred to as assessors) to anticipate LLM errors on specific task instances (i.e., prompts) from existing datasets. PredictaBoard evaluates pairs of LLMs and assessors by considering the rejection rate at different tolerance errors. As such, PredictaBoard stimulates research into developing better assessors and making LLMs more predictable, not only with a higher average performance. We conduct illustrative experiments using baseline assessors and state-of-the-art LLMs. PredictaBoard highlights the critical need to evaluate predictability alongside performance, paving the way for safer AI systems where errors are not only minimised but also anticipated and effectively mitigated. Code for our bench-mark can be found at https://github. com/Kinds-of-Intelligence-CFI/PredictaBoard

Downloads

Next from ACL 2025

Towards Medical Complex Reasoning with LLMs through Medical Verifiable Problems

Similar lecture

Voting Rules from Random Relations