Austria

Open-world planning with incomplete knowledge is crucial for real-world embodied AI tasks. Despite that, existing LLM-based planners struggle with long chains of sequential reasoning, while symbolic planners face combinatorial explosion of states and actions for complex domains due to reliance on grounding. To address these deficiencies, we introduce LLM-Regress, an open-world planning approach integrating lifted regression with LLM-generated affordances. LLM-Regress generates sound and complete plans in a compact lifted form, avoiding exhaustive enumeration of irrelevant states and actions. Additionally, it makes efficient use of LLMs to infer goal-related objects and affordances without the need to predefine all possible objects and affordances. We conduct extensive experiments on three benchmarks and show that LLM-Regress significantly outperforms state-of-the-art LLM planners and a grounded planner using LLM-generated affordances.

ACL 2025

Open-World Planning via Lifted Regression with LLM-Inferred Affordances for Embodied Agents

open-world planning

embodied agents

common sense reasoning

The purpose of the AAAI conference is to promote research in artificial intelligence (AI) and scientific exchange among AI researchers, practitioners, scientists, and engineers in affiliated disciplines. 

AAAI 2022

poster

### Welcome to The 63rd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL 2025)

Message from the General Chair: 
*It is my great pleasure and honor to welcome you to the 63rd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL 2025), held in beautiful Vienna, Austria, from July 27 to August 1, 2025. ACL2025continues our field’s tradition of excellence in scholarship, innovation, and inclusivity, and I am deeply grateful to the many volunteers who have worked tirelessly to bring this event to life.* 
[Read more](https://drive.google.com/file/d/1GI_hvOpjswAuYdUTromfeDiPpCcqidwg/view?usp=sharing)

To access this event page, you need to log in with the **email address you registered with**. Access credentials will be sent to your email from Underline - subject line "Welcome to ACL 2025". Please be sure to check your spam email folder if you do not see an email confirmation right away.

Please log in

To access this event page, you need to log in with the **email address you registered with**. 

Welcome to The 63rd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL 2025)

Evaluating large language model (LLM) is a complex task. Pairwise ranking has emerged as state-of-the-art method to evaluate human preferences by having humans compare pairs of LLM outputs based on predefined criteria, enabling ranking across multiple LLMs by aggregating pairwise results through algorithms like Elo. However, applying these ranking algorithms in the context of LLM evaluation introduces several challenges, such as inconsistent ranking results when using ELO. Currently there is a lack of systematic study of those ranking algorithms in evaluating LLMs. In this paper, we explore the effectiveness of ranking systems for head-to-head comparisons of LLMs. We formally define a set of fundamental principles for effective ranking and conduct extensive evaluations on the robustness of several ranking algorithms in the context of LLMs. Our analysis uncovers key insights into the factors that affect ranking accuracy and efficiency, offering guidelines for selecting the most appropriate methods based on specific evaluation contexts and resource constraints.

Ranking Unraveled: Recipes for LLM Rankings in Head-to-Head AI Combat

Recent advancements in long-context language models (LCLMs) promise to transform Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) by simplifying pipelines. With their expanded context windows, LCLMs can process entire knowledge bases and perform retrieval and reasoning directly -- a capability we define as In-Context Retrieval and Reasoning (ICR^2). However, existing benchmarks like LOFT often overestimate LCLM performance by providing overly simplified contexts. To address this, we introduce ICR^2, a benchmark that evaluates LCLMs in more realistic scenarios by including confounding passages retrieved with strong retrievers. We then propose three methods to enhance LCLM performance: (1) retrieve-then-generate fine-tuning, (2) retrieval-attention-probing, which uses attention heads to filter and de-noise long contexts during decoding, and (3) joint retrieval head training alongside the generation head. Our evaluation of five well-known LCLMs on LOFT and ICR^2 demonstrates significant gains with our best approach applied to Mistral-7B: +17 and +15 points by Exact Match on LOFT, and +13 and +2 points on ICR^2, compared to vanilla RAG and supervised fine-tuning, respectively. It even outperforms GPT-4-Turbo on most tasks despite being a much smaller model.

Eliciting In-context Retrieval and Reasoning for Long-context Language Models

Large Language Models (LLMs) are powerful in-context learners, achieving strong performance with just a few high-quality demonstrations. However, fairness concerns arise in many in-context classification tasks, especially when predictions involve sensitive attributes. To address this, we propose JUDGE—a simple yet effective framework for selecting fair and representative demonstrations that improve group fairness in In-Context Learning. JUDGE constructs the demonstration set iteratively using a greedy approach, guided by a small, carefully selected jury set. Our method remains robust across varying LLM architectures and datasets, ensuring consistent fairness improvements. We evaluate JUDGE on four datasets using four LLMs, comparing it against seven baselines. Results show that JUDGE consistently improves fairness metrics without compromising accuracy.

Let The Jury Decide: Fair Demonstration Selection for In-Context Learning through Incremental Greedy Evaluation

We focus on the problem of fusing two or more heterogeneous large language models (LLMs) to leverage their complementary strengths. One of the challenges of model fusion is high computational load, specifically in fine-tuning or aligning vocabularies. To address this, we propose Cool-Fusion, a simple yet effective approach that fuses the knowledge of source LLMs, which does not require training. Unlike ensemble methods, Cool-Fusion is applicable to any set of source LLMs that have different vocabularies. To overcome the vocabulary discrepancies among LLMs, we ensemble LLMs on text level, allowing them to rerank the generated texts by each other with different granularities. Extensive experiments have been conducted across a variety of benchmark datasets. On GSM8K, Cool-Fusion increases accuracy from three strong source LLMs by a significant margin of 17.4\%.

Cool-Fusion: Fuse Large Language Models without Training

We evaluate the parseability of structured outputs generated by small language models for open attribute-value extraction from clinical notes. Across JSON, YAML, and XML, JSON consistently yields the highest parseability. Targeted prompts and larger models improve structural validity, while longer documents reduce it. Error analysis reveals common failure patterns. Our findings highlight how model size, prompt specificity, document type, and output format interact to affect structural reliability.

Evaluating Structured Output Robustness of Small Language Models for Open Attribute-Value Extraction from Clinical Notes

Current research on the Decompose-Then-Verify paradigm for evaluating the factuality of long-form text typically treats decomposition and verification in isolation, overlooking their interactions and potential misalignment. We find that existing decomposition policies, typically hand-crafted demonstrations, do not align well with downstream verifiers in terms of atomicity—a novel metric quantifying information density—leading to suboptimal verification results. We formulate finding the optimal decomposition policy for optimal verification as a bilevel optimization problem. To approximate a solution for this strongly NP-hard problem, we propose dynamic decomposition, a reinforcement learning framework that leverages verifier feedback to learn a policy for dynamically decomposing claims to verifier-preferred atomicity. Experimental results show that dynamic decomposition outperforms existing decomposition policies, improving verification confidence by 0.07 and accuracy by 0.12 (on a 0-1 scale) on average across varying verifiers, datasets, and atomcities of input claims.

Optimizing Decomposition for Optimal Claim Verification

An extensive high-quality instruction dataset is crucial for the instruction tuning process of Large Language Models (LLMs). Recent instruction expansion methods have demonstrated their capability to improve the quality and quantity of existing datasets, by prompting high-performance LLM to generate multiple new instructions from the original ones. However, existing methods focus on constructing multi-perspective prompts (e.g., increasing complexity or difficulty) to expand instructions, overlooking the "Fixed Thinking Pattern" issue of LLMs. This issue arises when repeatedly using the same set of prompts, causing LLMs to rely on a limited set of certain expressions to expand all instructions, potentially compromising the diversity of the final expanded dataset. This paper theoretically analyzes the causes of the "Fixed Thinking Pattern", and corroborates this phenomenon through multi-faceted empirical research. Furthermore, we propose a novel method based on dynamic prompt updating: Global Eye. Specifically, after a fixed number of instruction expansions, we analyze the statistical characteristics of newly generated instructions and then update the prompts. Experimental results show that our method enables Llama3-8B and Llama2-13B to surpass the performance of open-source LLMs and GPT3.5 across various metrics. Our code and data are submitted to the Software & Data option.

Global Eye: Breaking the "Fixed Thinking Pattern" during the Instruction Expansion Process

As the demand for artificial intelligence (AI) grows to address complex real-world tasks, single models are often insufficient, requiring the integration of multiple models into pipelines. This paper introduces Bel Esprit, a conversational agent designed to construct AI model pipelines based on user requirements. Bel Esprit uses a multi-agent framework where subagents collaborate to clarify requirements, build, validate, and populate pipelines with appropriate models. We demonstrate its effectiveness in generating pipelines from ambiguous user queries, using both human-curated and synthetic data. A detailed error analysis highlights ongoing challenges in pipeline building.
Bel Esprit is available for a free trial at https://belesprit.aixplain.com.

Bel Esprit: Multi-Agent Framework for Building AI Model Pipelines

The rapid advancement of large language models (LLMs) has unlocked transformative potential for role-playing emotional companion products, enabling systems that address emotional well-being, educational goals, and therapeutic applications. However, existing approaches lack sustained personalization or contextual adaptability, limiting their real-world utility.
In this paper, we introduce iPET, an LLM-powered pet agent that enhances user engagement by offering rich pet lifestyles and user preference-oriented interactions.
The iPet consists of a dialogue module that instantiates virtual pet agents for emotionally interactive conversations, a memory module stores and synthesizes records of agent and user experiences, and a world simulation module generating diverse, preference-driven pet behaviors guided by high-level reflections. Deployed for over 200 days in a real-world non-commercial product, iPET has served millions of users, delivering emotional support to psychologically distressed individuals while validating its effectiveness in practical applications.

iPET: An Interactive Emotional Companion Dialogue System with LLM-Powered Virtual Pet World Simulation

Advertisement (Ad) video violation detection is critical for ensuring platform compliance, but existing methods struggle with precise temporal grounding, noisy annotations, and limited generalization. We propose RAVEN, a novel framework that integrates curriculum reinforcement learning with multimodal large language models (MLLMs) to enhance reasoning and cognitive capabilities for violation detection. RAVEN employs a progressive training strategy, combining precisely and coarsely annotated data, and leverages Group Relative Policy Optimization (GRPO) to develop emergent reasoning abilities without explicit reasoning annotations. Multiple hierarchical sophisticated reward mechanism ensures precise temporal grounding and consistent category prediction. Experiments on industrial datasets and public benchmarks show that RAVEN achieves superior performances in violation category accuracy and temporal interval localization. We also design a pipeline to deploy the RAVEN on the online Ad services, and online A/B testing further validates its practical applicability, with significant improvements in precision and recall. RAVEN also demonstrates strong generalization, mitigating the catastrophic forgetting issue associated with supervised fine-tuning.

Downloads

Next from ACL 2025

Ranking Unraveled: Recipes for LLM Rankings in Head-to-Head AI Combat

Similar lecture

The FF Heuristic for Lifted Classical Planning