Austria

Supervised fine-tuning (SFT) has enabled large language models (LLMs) to exhibit promising performance on various tasks. However, this fine-tuning process only compares current predictions and labels on each sample, yet fails to perceive and understand its error outputs from different degrees, which may potentially produce a large percentage of serious errors. This poses a problem for aspect-based sentiment analysis (ABSA) in that these serious errors bring a greater negative impact than acceptable ones. Humans tend to compare mistakes to understand the varying degrees of mistakes, thus avoiding major bad decisions. Inspired by this, we propose a simple yet effective framework that could perceive and understand the degree of different errors by learning from comparative error pairs. It utilizes the SFT model to yield multiple outputs on each sample and selects acceptable and severe errors based on the acceptable scores. Together with the labels, we construct two comparative error pairs and exploit their calibration losses to optimize parameters. We conduct comprehensive experiments on ABSA datasets to demonstrate the effectiveness of our framework over baselines.

ACL 2025

Error Comparison Optimization for Large Language Models on Aspect-Based Sentiment Analysis

comparison optimization

large language models

sentiment analysis

### Welcome!
The 62nd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL 2024) will take place in Bangkok, Thailand from August 11th to 16th, 2024. Our Virtual Poster Sessions will take place online Thursday, August 22, 2024.

You are required to register for this event. **Please register [here](https://2024.aclweb.org/registration). **

If you have already registered, please check your inbox for an email from Underline granting you access to ACL 2024 content.

Please register!

ACL 2024

The 62nd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL 2024) will take place in Bangkok, Thailand from August 11th to 16th, 2024. More information will be announced soon.

technical paper

### Welcome to The 63rd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL 2025)

Message from the General Chair: 
*It is my great pleasure and honor to welcome you to the 63rd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL 2025), held in beautiful Vienna, Austria, from July 27 to August 1, 2025. ACL2025continues our field’s tradition of excellence in scholarship, innovation, and inclusivity, and I am deeply grateful to the many volunteers who have worked tirelessly to bring this event to life.* 
[Read more](https://drive.google.com/file/d/1GI_hvOpjswAuYdUTromfeDiPpCcqidwg/view?usp=sharing)

To access this event page, you need to log in with the **email address you registered with**. Access credentials will be sent to your email from Underline - subject line "Welcome to ACL 2025". Please be sure to check your spam email folder if you do not see an email confirmation right away.

Please log in

To access this event page, you need to log in with the **email address you registered with**. 

Welcome to The 63rd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL 2025)

Current Large Language Models excel in general reasoning yet struggle with specialized tasks requiring proprietary or domain-specific knowledge. Fine-tuning large models for every niche application is often infeasible due to black-box constraints and high computational overhead. To address this, we propose a collaborative framework that pairs a specialized weak model with a general strong model. The weak model, tailored to specific domains, produces initial drafts and background information, while the strong model leverages its advanced reasoning to refine these drafts, extending LLMs’ capabilities to critical yet specialized tasks. To optimize this collaboration, we introduce a collaborative feedback to fine-tunes the weak model, which quantifies the influence of the weak model’s contributions in the collaboration procedure and establishes preference pairs to guide preference tuning of the weak model. We validate our framework through experiments on three domains. We find that the collaboration significantly outperforms each model alone by leveraging complementary strengths. Moreover, aligning the weak model with the collaborative preference further enhances overall performance.

Synergistic Weak-Strong Collaboration by Aligning Preferences

Most current automated essay quality assessment systems treat score prediction and feedback generation as separate tasks, overlooking the fact that scores provide a quantitative evaluation of quality, while feedback offers a qualitative assessment. Both aspects reflect essay quality from different perspectives, and they are inherently consistent and can reinforce each other. In this paper, we propose a novel bidirectional reinforcement learning framework that effectively utilizes this consistency constraint to jointly optimize score prediction and feedback generation, ensuring mutual reinforcement and alignment between them. In this way, our model is hope to obtain a simultaneous accurate ratings and consistent text feedback. We conducted extensive experiments on publicly available datasets. The results demonstrate that our approach surpasses the current state-of-the-art models, enhancing both scoring accuracy and feedback quality.

CEAES: Bidirectional Reinforcement Learning Optimization for Consistent and Explainable Essay Assessment

We propose a training-free framework that enables large language models (LLMs) to effectively process long texts, using a divide-and-conquer strategy for comprehensive document understanding.
The proposed LLM$\times$MapReduce framework splits the entire document into several chunks for LLMs to read and then aggregates the intermediate outputs to produce the final response. The main challenge for divide-and-conquer long text processing frameworks lies in the risk of losing essential long-range information due to document splitting, which can lead the model to produce incomplete or incorrect answers based on the segmented texts.
Disrupted long-range information can be classified into two categories: inter-chunk dependency and inter-chunk conflict.
We design a structured information protocol to better cope with inter-chunk dependency and an in-context confidence calibration mechanism to resolve inter-chunk conflicts. Experiments demonstrate that LLM$\times$MapReduce outperforms representative open-source and commercial long-context LLMs and is compatible with several models.
Our framework can also function as a data synthesis engine, capable of generating high-quality long-alignment data using only short-context LLMs.

LLM×MapReduce: Simplified Long-Sequence Processing using Large Language Models

Evaluating Large Language Models (LLMs) requires effective methods to assess semantic consistency across multiple reversible transformations. Traditional self-consistency methods often fail to capture subtle semantic errors in multi-step tasks. We introduce ConsistencyChecker, a tree-based evaluation framework that measures LLMs' ability to preserve semantic consistency during reversible transformation processes, sidestepping benchmark data contamination issues. Our approach constructs self-consistency trees where nodes represent text states after transformations (e.g., translation, code modification, paraphrasing) and edges represent pairs of opposite transformations. By analyzing semantic preservation between nodes at different tree depths, ConsistencyChecker quantifies model reliability without requiring manually annotated reference data. Experiments demonstrate that ConsistencyChecker reliably measures generalization abilities across models from 1.5B to 72B parameters. On translation tasks, GPT-4o Mini achieves the highest L3 consistency score of 98.0%. For code generation, Qwen 2.5 32B leads with 85.1% semantic consistency at L3. Results show Pearson correlation greater than 0.7 between our embedding-based scores and WMT 2024 rankings on 4 out of 5 shared language pairs, validating the method's effectiveness for benchmarking LLM performance without constructing new datasets.

ConsistencyChecker: Tree-based Evaluation of LLM Generalization Capabilities

Extracting spatial information from text is crucial for applications in geographic information systems (GIS), smart cities, disaster prevention, and logistics planning, helping decision-makers better understand geographic distributions and trends. However, the complex and unstructured nature of geographic expressions in text—including variations in place names, vague directions, and implicit spatial relationships—poses significant challenges for traditional methods. To overcome these challenges, we introduce SpatialWebAgent, an automated agent system that employs large language models (LLMs) to extract, standardize, and ground spatial information from natural language onto maps. SpatialWebAgent addresses the issues posed by diverse and ambiguous geographic expressions—ranging from varying place names and vague directional cues to implicit spatial relationships that require flexible combinations of localization functions—by leveraging the deep semantic understanding of LLMs. Our system extracts different types of spatial entities, then applies a series of geospatial functions to convert them into precise coordinates via geocoding APIs, and finally visualizes the results on interactive maps. Our demo is available at: https://sites.google.com/view/SpatialWebAgent.

SpatialWebAgent: Leveraging Large Language Models for Automated Spatial Information Extraction and Map Grounding

Large language models (LLMs) commonly struggle with specialized or emerging topics which are rarely seen in the training corpus. Graph-based retrieval-augmented generation (GraphRAG) addresses this by structuring domain knowledge as a graph for dynamic retrieval. However, existing pipelines involve complex engineering workflows, making it difficult to isolate the impact of individual components. It is also challenging to evaluate the retrieval effectiveness due to the overlap between the pretraining and evaluation datasets. In this work, we introduce ROGRAG, a Robustly Optimized GraphRAG framework. Specifically, we propose a multi-stage retrieval mechanism that integrates dual-level with logic form methods to improve retrieval robustness without increasing computational cost. To further refine the system, we incorporate various result verification methods and adopt an incremental database construction approach. Through extensive ablation experiments, we rigorously assess the effectiveness of each component. Our implementation includes comparative experiments on SeedBench, where Qwen2.5-7B-Instruct initially underperformed. ROGRAG significantly improves the score from 60.0% to 75.0% and outperforms mainstream methods. Experiments on domain-specific datasets reveal that dual-level retrieval enhances fuzzy matching, while logic form retrieval improves structured reasoning, highlighting the importance of adaptive retrieval. ROGRAG is deployed on an online research platform https://seedllm.org.cn and released as an open-source resource https://github.com/tpoisonooo/ROGRAG. It supports easy installation with pip and a demo video https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NL1_cuIiX-w is provided.

ROGRAG: A Robustly Optimized GraphRAG Framework

The rapid expansion of memes on social media has highlighted the urgent need for effective approaches to detect harmful content. However, traditional data-driven approaches struggle to detect new memes due to their evolving nature and the lack of up-to-date annotated data. To address this issue, we propose MIND, a multi-agent framework for zero-shot harmful meme detection that does not rely on annotated data. MIND implements three key strategies: 1) We retrieve similar memes from an unannotated reference set to provide contextual information. 2) We propose a bi-directional insight derivation mechanism to extract a comprehensive understanding of similar memes. 3) We then employ a multi-agent debate mechanism to ensure robust decision-making through reasoned arbitration. Extensive experiments on three meme datasets demonstrate that our proposed framework not only outperforms existing zero-shot approaches but also shows strong generalization across different model architectures and parameter scales, providing a scalable solution for harmful meme detection.

MIND: A Multi-agent Framework for Zero-shot Harmful Meme Detection

As language models regularly make mistakes when solving math problems, automated identification of errors in the reasoning process becomes increasingly significant for their scalable oversight. In this paper, we introduce ProcessBench for measuring the ability to identify erroneous steps in mathematical reasoning. It consists of 3,400 test cases, primarily focused on competition- and Olympiad-level math problems. Each test case contains a step-by-step solution with error location annotated by human experts. Models are required to identify the earliest step that contains an error, or conclude that all steps are correct. We conduct extensive evaluation on ProcessBench, involving two types of models: process reward models (PRMs) and critic models, where for the latter we prompt general language models to critique each solution step by step. We draw two main observations: (1) Existing PRMs typically fail to generalize to more challenging math problems beyond GSM8K and MATH. They underperform both critic models (i.e., prompted general language models) and our own trained PRM that is straightforwardly fine-tuned on the PRM800K dataset. (2) The best open-source model, QwQ-32B-Preview, has demonstrated the critique capability competitive with the proprietary model GPT-4o, despite that it still lags behind the reasoning-specialized o1-mini. We hope ProcessBench can foster future research in reasoning process assessment, paving the way toward scalable oversight of language models.

ProcessBench: Identifying Process Errors in Mathematical Reasoning

Given the high computational cost of preference alignment training of large language models (LLMs), exploring efficient methods to reduce the training overhead remains an important and compelling research problem. Motivated by the observation that alignment training typically involves only small parameter changes without injecting new knowledge into models, we propose a straightforward method called ExPO (model extrapolation) to expedite LLMs' alignment with human preferences. Given a partially-trained model and its initial SFT checkpoint, ExPO improves the implicit optimization objective of alignment training by simply amplifying the parameter change based on a first-order approximation, without any additional training overhead. Through controlled experiments, we demonstrate that ExPO boosts a DPO model trained with only 20% steps to outperform the fully-trained one. Moreover, we show that ExPO notably improves existing open-source LLMs (ranging from 1.8B to 70B parameters) on the leading AlpacaEval 2.0 and MT-Bench benchmarks, which highlights ExPO's broader utility in efficiently enhancing LLM alignment.

Model Extrapolation Expedites Alignment

Stance detection is a pivotal task in Natural Language Processing (NLP), identifying textual attitudes toward various targets. Despite advances in using Large Language Models (LLMs), challenges persist due to hallucination-models generating plausible yet inaccurate content. Addressing these challenges, we introduce MPVStance, a framework that incorporates Multi-Perspective Verification (MPV) with Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) across a structured five-step verification process. Our method enhances stance detection by rigorously validating each response from factual accuracy, logical consistency, contextual relevance, and other perspectives. Extensive testing on the SemEval-2016 and VAST datasets, including scenarios that challenge existing methods and comprehensive ablation studies, demonstrates that MPVStance significantly outperforms current models. It effectively mitigates hallucination issues and sets new benchmarks for reliability and accuracy in stance detection, particularly in zero-shot, few-shot, and challenging scenarios.

Downloads

Next from ACL 2025

Synergistic Weak-Strong Collaboration by Aligning Preferences

Similar lecture

LLaMA-Based Models for Aspect-Based Sentiment Analysis