Austria

This paper introduces MISS-QA, the first benchmark specifically designed to evaluate the ability of models to interpret schematic diagrams within scientific literature. MISS-QA comprises 3,000 expert-annotated examples over 983 scientific papers. In this benchmark, models are tasked with interpreting schematic diagrams that illustrate research overviews and answering corresponding information-seeking questions based on the broader context of the paper. To ensure reliable and consistent evaluation, we propose an automated evaluating protocol powered by open-source LLMs trained on human-scored data. We assess the performance of 18 frontier multimodal foundation models, including o1, Claude-3.5, Llama-3.2-Vision, and Qwen2-VL. We reveal a significant performance gap between these models and human experts on MISS-QA. Our analysis of model performance on unanswerable questions and our detailed error analysis further highlight the strengths and limitations of current models, offering key insights to enhance models in comprehending multimodal scientific literature.

ACL 2025

Can Multimodal Foundation Models Understand Schematic Diagrams? An Empirical Study on Information-Seeking QA over Scientific Papers

scientific information seeking

multimodal qa

benchmark dataset

### Welcome to The 63rd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL 2025)

Message from the General Chair: 
*It is my great pleasure and honor to welcome you to the 63rd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL 2025), held in beautiful Vienna, Austria, from July 27 to August 1, 2025. ACL2025continues our field’s tradition of excellence in scholarship, innovation, and inclusivity, and I am deeply grateful to the many volunteers who have worked tirelessly to bring this event to life.* 
[Read more](https://drive.google.com/file/d/1GI_hvOpjswAuYdUTromfeDiPpCcqidwg/view?usp=sharing)

To access this event page, you need to log in with the **email address you registered with**. Access credentials will be sent to your email from Underline - subject line "Welcome to ACL 2025". Please be sure to check your spam email folder if you do not see an email confirmation right away.

Please log in

To access this event page, you need to log in with the **email address you registered with**. 

Welcome to The 63rd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL 2025)

poster

Emerging large reasoning models (LRMs), such as DeepSeek-R1 models, leverage long chain-of-thought (CoT) reasoning to generate structured intermediate steps, enhancing their reasoning capabilities. However, long CoT does not inherently guarantee safe outputs, potentially leading to harmful consequences such as the introduction of security vulnerabilities in code or the spread of misinformation. Current research on large language model (LLM) safety usually focuses on short-answer responses, overlooking the long CoT style outputs of LRMs. To bridge this gap, we conduct a systematic study of LRM safety. First, we investigate safety evaluators calibrated against human annotations. Using our newly developed metrics, we thoroughly assess the safety of 12 state-of-the-art LRMs on StrongReject and WildJailbreak datasets. Our results show that LRMs are not safe compared to their reasoning advance. Further, we perform a fine-grained analysis of the reasoning trace and final answer. We find that three decoding strategies-ZeroThink, LessThink, and MoreThink-can improve model safety without additional training. However, these strategies either use constrained reasoning traces or incur high inference costs. To better strengthen LRM safety, we introduce SafeChain, the first-of-its-kind safety training dataset in CoT style. We fine-tune two LRMs with SafeChain, showing that it not only enhances model safety but also preserves performance across 6 reasoning benchmarks.

SafeChain: Safety of Language Models with Long Chain-of-Thought Reasoning Capabilities

Mixture-of-experts (MoEs) have been adopted for reducing inference costs by sparsely activating experts in large language models (LLMs). Despite these reductions, the massive number of parameters in MoEs still makes them expensive to serve. Conventionally, unstructured or structured pruning has been considered to reduce number of parameters. Our key contribution is exploring the interpolation between structured and unstructured pruning, to propose a novel structured-then-unstructured (STUN) approach outperforming both of structured or unstructured pruning, especially for MoEs. In the first stage, we show a scalable expert pruning with O(1) forward pass, unlike existing work requiring $O(\frac{k^n}{\sqrt{n}})$ forward passes for $n$ experts that cannot scale for recent MoEs with hundreds of experts. We then show our expert-pruned MoEs are robust to unstructured pruning to follow. Experiments on Snowflake Arctic and Mixtral shows that our proposal is highly effective-- For Snowflake Arctic, a 480B-sized MoE with 128 experts, our method needs only one H100 and two hours to achieve nearly no loss in performance with 40% sparsity, even in generative tasks such as GSM8K, where state-of-the-art structured or unstructured pruning methods fail. The code is publicly available.

STUN: Structured-Then-Unstructured Pruning for Scalable MoE Pruning

This paper is concerned with phonetic reconstruction of the consonant system of Middle Chinese. We propose to cast the problem as a Mixed Integer Programming problem, which is able to automatically explore homophonic information from ancient rhyme dictionaries and phonetic information from modern Chinese dialects, the descendants of Middle Chinese. Numerical evaluation on a wide range of synthetic and real data demonstrates the effectiveness and robustness of the new method. We apply the method to information from Gu\v angy\`un (Author's note: The Gu\v angy\`un here is Chinese Pinyin in Latex, for HTML code, it should be Gu&#462;ngy&ugrave;n) and 20 modern Chinese dialects to obtain a new phonetic reconstruction result. A linguistically-motivated discussion of this result is also provided.

Phonetic Reconstruction of the Consonant System of Middle Chinese via Mixed Integer Optimization

Coreference resolution (CR) endeavors to match pronouns, noun phrases, etc. with their referent entities, acting as an important step for deep text understanding. Presently available CR datasets are either small in scale or restrict coreference resolution to a limited text span. In this paper, we present NovelCR, a large-scale bilingual benchmark designed for long-span coreference resolution. NovelCR features extensive annotations, including 148k mentions in NovelCR-en and 311k mentions in NovelCR-zh. Moreover, the dataset is notably rich in long-span coreference pairs, with 85% of pairs in NovelCR-en and 83% in NovelCR-zh spanning across three or more sentences. Experiments on NovelCR reveal a large gap between state-of-the-art baselines and human performance, highlighting that NovelCR remains an open issue.

NovelCR: A Large-Scale Bilingual Dataset Tailored for Long-Span Coreference Resolution

Hallucination occurs when large language models exhibit behavior that deviates from the boundaries of their knowledge during response generation. To address this critical issue, previous learning-based methods attempt to finetune models but are limited by off-policy sampling and coarse-grained feedback. In this paper, we present Reinforcement Learning for Hallucination (RLFH), an on-policy self-alignment approach that enables LLMs to actively explore their knowledge boundaries and self-correct generation behavior through fine-grained feedback signals. RLFH introduces a self-assessment framework where the policy serves as its own judge. Through this framework, responses are automatically decomposed into atomic facts and their truthfulness and informativeness are assessed against external knowledge sources. The resulting fine-grained feedback at the statement level are then converted into token-level dense reward signals. This enables online reinforcement learning to achieve precise and timely optimization without human intervention. Comprehensive evaluations on HotpotQA, SQuADv2, and Biography benchmarks validate RLFH’s effectiveness in hallucination mitigation.

On-Policy Self-Alignment with Fine-grained Knowledge Feedback for Hallucination Mitigation

Data visualizations, such as charts and histograms, are essential for analyzing and exploring data, enabling the effective communication of insights. While existing methods have been proposed to translate natural-language descriptions into visualization queries, they focus solely on spoken languages, overlooking sign languages, which comprise about 200 variants used by 70 million Deaf and Hard-of-Hearing (DHH) individuals. To fill this gap, this paper proposes Sign2Vis, a sign-language interface for data visualization, aimed at empowering the DHH community to engage with data analysis. We first construct a paired dataset that includes sign-language pose videos, paired with their corresponding visualization queries. Subsequently, we evaluate a variety of models, including both pipeline-based and end-to-end approaches, using the newly created dataset. Extensive experiments, coupled with a user study involving 15 participants, demonstrate the effectiveness of our proposed Sign2Vis. Finally, we share key insights from our evaluation and call for the development of more user-friendly techniques and tools to support the DHH community in conducting more effective interactive data analytics.

Sign2Vis: Automated Data Visualization from Sign Language

Role-Playing Agent (RPA) is an increasingly popular type of LLM Agent that simulates human-like behaviors in a variety of tasks. But how should we evaluate an RPA? It is hard because of the wide variety of task requirements and the different designs of RPA. This paper aims to propose an evidence-based, actionable, and generalizable evaluation design guideline for LLM-based RPA by systematically reviewing 1,676 papers published between Jan. 2021 and Dec. 2024. Our analysis synthesizes in total six agent attributes, seven task attributes, and seven evaluation metrics from existing literature. From this finding, we propose an RPA evaluation design guideline to support future researchers in designing their own evaluations in a more systematic and consistent manner.

Towards a Design Guideline for RPA Evaluation: A Survey of Large Language Model-Based Role-Playing Agents

Conversational agents are increasingly woven into individuals' personal lives, yet users often underestimate the privacy risks involved. The moment users share information with these agents (e.g., LLMs), their private information becomes vulnerable to exposure. In this paper, we characterize the notion of contextual privacy for user interactions with LLMs. It aims to minimize privacy risks by ensuring that users (sender) disclose only information that is both relevant and necessary for achieving their intended goals when interacting with LLMs (untrusted receivers). Through a formative design user study, we observe how even "privacy-conscious" users inadvertently reveal sensitive information through indirect disclosures.

Based on insights from this study, we propose a locally-deployable framework that operates between users and LLMs, and identifies and reformulates out-of-context information in user prompts. Our evaluation using examples from ShareGPT shows that lightweight models can effectively implement this framework, achieving strong gains in contextual privacy while preserving the user's intended interaction goals through different approaches to classify information relevant to the intended goals.

Protecting Users From Themselves: Safeguarding Contextual Privacy in Interactions with Conversational Agents

Addressing gender bias and maintaining logical coherence in machine translation remains challenging, particularly when translating between natural gender languages, like English, and genderless languages, such as Persian, Indonesian, and Finnish. We introduce the Translate-with-Care (TWC) dataset, comprising 3,950 challenging scenarios across six low- to mid-resource languages, to assess translation systems' performance. Our analysis of diverse technologies, including GPT-4, mBART-50, NLLB-200, and Google Translate, reveals a universal struggle in translating genderless content, resulting in gender stereotyping and reasoning errors. All models preferred masculine pronouns when gender stereotypes could influence choices. Google Translate and GPT-4 showed particularly strong bias, favoring male pronouns 4-6 times more than feminine ones in leadership and professional success contexts. Fine-tuning mBART-50 on TWC substantially resolved these biases and errors, led to strong generalization, and surpassed proprietary LLMs while remaining open-source. This work emphasizes the need for targeted approaches to gender and semantic coherence in machine translation, particularly for genderless languages, contributing to more equitable and accurate translation systems.

Translate With Care: Addressing Gender Bias, Neutrality, and Reasoning in Large Language Model Translations

Cognitive tasks originally developed for humans are now increasingly used to study language models. While applying these tasks is often straightforward, interpreting their results can be challenging. In particular, when a model underperforms, it is often unclear whether this results from a limitation in the cognitive ability being tested or a failure to understand the task itself. A recent study argues that GPT 3.5’s declining performance on 2-back and 3-back tasks reflects a working memory capacity limit similar to humans (Gong et al., 2024). By analyzing a range of open-source language models of varying performance levels on these tasks, we show that the poor performance is due at least in part to a limitation in task comprehension and task set maintenance. We challenge the best-performing model with progressively harder versions of the task (up to 10-back) and experiment with alternative prompting strategies, before analyzing model attentions. Our larger aim is to contribute to the ongoing conversation around refining methodologies for the cognitive evaluation of language models.

Downloads

Next from ACL 2025

SafeChain: Safety of Language Models with Long Chain-of-Thought Reasoning Capabilities

Similar lecture

SciVer: Evaluating Foundation Models for Multimodal Scientific Claim Verification