Canada

Counterfactual explanations shed light on the decisions of black-box models by explaining
how an input can be altered to obtain a favourable decision from the model (e.g., when a loan application has been rejected).
However, as noted recently, counterfactual explainers may lack robustness in the sense that a minor change
in the input can cause a major change in the explanation. This can cause confusion on the user side and
open the door for adversarial attacks. In this paper, we study some sources of non-robustness. 
While there are fundamental reasons for why an explainer that returns a single counterfactual cannot be
robust in all instances, we show that some interesting robustness guarantees can be given by reporting 
multiple rather than a single counterfactual. Unfortunately, the number of counterfactuals that need to
be reported for the theoretical guarantees to hold can be prohibitively large. We therefore propose an approximation
algorithm that uses a diversity criterion to select a feasible number of most relevant explanations and study its robustness empirically. Our experiments indicate that our method improves the
state-of-the-art in generating robust explanations, while maintaining other desirable properties
and providing competitive computational performance.

AAAI 2024

Promoting Counterfactual Robustness through Diversity

explainable machine learning

counterfactuals

robustness

### Welcome to ACL 2023, the 61st Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics! 
 The conference will be held in Toronto, Canada, July 9-14, 2023. 
Following the succession of the recent conferences in our field, ACL 2023 will adopt a hybrid format.
While the impact of Covid has considerably diminished in terms of traveling, obtaining visas to Canada
entails a very long process. Moreover, the global economic conditions pose challenges for many individuals to travel to conferences. Recognizing these circumstances, we know many participants may not be
able to attend the conference in person. Therefore, we are committed to providing a great virtual platform
so everyone has the opportunity to interact with other participants and enjoy the conference. Based on the
current registered participants, approxiately 30% have chosen to attend the conference virtually. Whether
you join us in person or virtually, we sincerely hope everyone has a remarkable conference experience. 
This General Chair’s message is where I express my gratitude to the many individuals who have made
enormous contributions to the conference over the past year.

Read [**ACL 2023 General Chair's message**](https://docs.google.com/document/d/1WobYM7norbG4dI48s75HfJoD89qgX5a_F-6U8AteLSA/edit?usp=sharing/) in full.

##### **[Conference Handbook](https://2023.aclweb.org/downloads/acl2023-handbook.pdf)**

ACL 2023

The Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL) is the premier international scientific and professional society for people working on computational problems involving human language, a field often referred to as either computational linguistics or natural language processing.

technical paper

We are pleased to announce the Thirty-Eighth AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence (AAAI-24), which will be held in Vancouver, British Columbia at the Vancouver Convention Centre – West Building from 20-27 February, 2024.

The purpose of the AAAI conference series is to promote research in Artificial Intelligence (AI) and foster scientific exchange between researchers, practitioners, scientists, students, and engineers across the entirety of AI and its affiliated disciplines. AAAI-24 will feature technical paper presentations, special tracks, invited speakers, workshops, tutorials, poster sessions, senior member presentations, competitions, and exhibit programs, and a range of other activities to be announced.

We expect for AAAI-24 to be an in-person conference – one author of all accepted papers will be expected to present work in person unless there are exceptional circumstances that prevent this.

In order to access the AAAI-24 event page you need to register [here](https://aaai.org/aaai-conference/registration/)

The purpose of the AAAI conference series is to promote research in Artificial Intelligence (AI) and foster scientific exchange between researchers, practitioners, scientists, students, and engineers across the entirety of AI and its affiliated disciplines. 

Discriminative learning effectively predicts true object class for image classification. However, it often results in false positives for outliers, posing critical concerns in applications like autonomous driving and video surveillance systems. Previous attempts to address this challenge involved training image classifiers through contrastive learning using actual outlier data or synthesizing outliers for self-supervised learning. Furthermore, unsupervised generative modeling of inliers in pixel space has shown limited success for outlier detection. In this work, we introduce a quantile-based maximum likelihood objective for learning the inlier distribution to improve the outlier separation during inference. Our approach fits a normalizing flow to pre-trained discriminative features and detects the outliers according to the evaluated log-likelihood. The experimental evaluation demonstrates the effectiveness of our method as it surpasses the performance of the state-of-the-art unsupervised methods for outlier detection. The results are also competitive compared with a recent self-supervised approach for outlier detection. Our work allows to reduce dependency on well-sampled negative training data, which is especially important for domains like medical diagnostics or remote sensing.

Quantile-Based Maximum Likelihood Training for Outlier Detection

Informative sample selection in active learning (AL) helps a machine learning system attain optimum performance with minimum labeled samples, thus improving human-in-the-loop computer-aided diagnosis systems with limited labeled data. Data augmentation is highly effective for enlarging datasets with less labeled data. Combining informative sample selection and data augmentation should leverage their respective advantages and improve performance of AL systems. We propose a novel approach to combine informative sample selection and data augmentation for multi-label active learning. Conventional informative sample selection approaches have mostly focused on the single-label case which do not perform optimally in the multi-label setting. We improve upon state-of-the-art multi-label active learning techniques by representing disease labels as graph nodes, use graph attention transformers (GAT) to learn more effective inter-label relationships and identify most informative samples. We generate transformations of these informative samples which are also informative. Experiments on public chest xray datasets show improved results over state-of-the-art multi-label AL techniques in terms of classification performance, learning rates, and robustness. We also perform qualitative analysis to determine the realism of generated images.

Combining Graph Transformers Based Multi-Label Active Learning and Informative Data Augmentation for Chest Xray Classification | VIDEO

We tackle the problem of feature unlearning from a pre-trained image generative model: GANs and VAEs. Unlike a common unlearning task where an unlearning target is a subset of the training set, we aim to unlearn a specific feature, such as hairstyle from facial images, from the pre-trained generative models. As the target feature is only presented in a local region of an image, unlearning the entire image from the pre-trained model may result in losing other details in the remaining region of the image. To specify which features to unlearn, we collect randomly generated images that contain the target features. We then identify a latent representation corresponding to the target feature and then use the representation to fine-tune the pre-trained model. Through experiments on MNIST, CelebA, and FFHQ datasets, we show that target features are successfully removed while keeping the fidelity of the original models. Further experiments with an adversarial attack show that the unlearned model is more robust under the presence of malicious parties.

Feature Unlearning for Pre-trained GANs and VAEs | VIDEO

Ensuring the safety of Reinforcement Learning (RL) is crucial for its deployment in real-world applications. Nevertheless, managing the trade-off between reward and safety during exploration presents a significant challenge. Improving reward performance through policy adjustments may adversely affect safety performance. In this study, we aim to address this conflicting relationship by leveraging the theory of gradient manipulation. Initially, we analyze the conflict between reward and safety gradients. Subsequently, we tackle the relationship between reward and safety optimization by proposing a soft switching policy optimization method, for which we provide convergence analysis. Based on our theoretical examination, we provide a safe RL framework to overcome the aforementioned challenge, and we develop a \textit{Safety-MuJoCo Benchmark} to assess the performance of safe RL algorithms. Finally, we evaluate the effectiveness of our method on the \textit{Safety-MuJoCo Benchmark} and a popular safe benchmark, \textit{Safety Gymnasium}. Experimental results demonstrate that our algorithms outperform several state-of-the-art baselines in terms of balancing reward and safety optimization.

Balance Reward and Safety Optimization for Safe Reinforcement Learning: A Perspective of Gradient Manipulation

Randomized smoothing is currently the state-of-the-art method that provides certified robustness for deep neural networks. However, due to its excessively conservative nature, this method of incomplete verification often cannot achieve an adequate certified radius on real-world datasets. One way to obtain a larger certified radius is to use an input-specific algorithm instead of using a fixed Gaussian filter for all data points. Several methods based on this idea have been proposed, but they either suffer from high computational costs or gain marginal improvement in certified radius. In this work, we show that by exploiting the quasiconvex problem structure, we can find the optimal certified radii for most data points with slight computational overhead. This observation leads to an efficient and effective input-specific randomized smoothing algorithm. We conduct extensive experiments and empirical analysis on CIFAR-10 and ImageNet. The results show that the proposed method significantly enhances the certified radii with low computational overhead.

Towards Large Certified Radius in Randomized Smoothing Using Quasiconcave Optimization | VIDEO

We examine machine learning models in a setup where individuals have the choice to share optional personal information with a decision-making system, as seen in modern insurance pricing models. Some users consent to their data being used whereas others object and keep their data undisclosed. In this work, we show that the decision not to share data can be considered as information in itself that should be protected to respect users' privacy. This observation raises the overlooked problem of how to ensure that users who protect their personal data do not suffer any disadvantages as a result. To address this problem, we formalize protection requirements for models which only use the information for which active user consent was obtained. This excludes implicit information contained in the decision to share data or not. We offer the first solution to this problem by proposing the notion of Protected User Consent (PUC), which we prove to be loss-optimal under our protection requirement. We observe that privacy and performance are not fundamentally at odds with each other and that it is possible for a decision maker to benefit from additional data while respecting users' consent. To learn PUC-compliant models, we devise a model-agnostic data augmentation strategy with finite sample convergence guarantees. Finally, we analyze the implications of PUC on challenging real datasets, tasks, and models.

I Prefer Not to Say: Protecting User Consent in Models with Optional Personal Data

Identifying safe areas is a key point to guarantee trust for systems that are based on Deep Neural Networks (DNNs). To this end, we introduce the AllDNN-Verification problem: given a safety property and a DNN, enumerate the set of all the regions of the property input domain which are safe, i.e., where the property does hold. Due to the #P-hardness of the problem, we propose an efficient approximation method called ε-ProVe. Our approach exploits a controllable underestimation of the output reachable sets obtained via statistical prediction of tolerance limits, and can provide a tight —with provable probabilistic guarantees— lower estimate of the safe areas. Our empirical evaluation on different standard benchmarks shows the scalability and effectiveness of our method, offering valuable insights for this new type of verification of DNNs.

Enumerating Safe Regions in Deep Neural Networks with Provable Probabilistic Guarantees

For ensuring the safety of users by protecting the privacy,  the traditional privacy-preserving bandit algorithm aiming to maximize the mean reward has been widely studied in scenarios such as online ride-hailing, advertising recommendations, and personalized healthcare. However, classical bandit learning is irresponsible in such practical applications as they fail to account for risks in online decision-making and ignore external system information. This paper firstly proposes  privacy protected mean-volatility utility as the objective of bandit learning and proves its responsibility, because it aims at achieving the maximum probability of utility by considering the risk.  Theoretically, our proposed responsible bandit learning is expected to achieve the fastest rate of $O(\frac{1}{\epsilon\sqrt{n}})$ and generates more statistical power than classical normality-based test. Finally, simulation studies provide supporting evidence for the theoretical results and demonstrate stronger performance when using stricter privacy budgets.

Responsible Bandit Learning via Privacy-Protected Mean-Volatility Utility | VIDEO

Toxic content detection is crucial for online services to remove inappropriate content that violates community standards. To automate the detection process, prior works have proposed varieties of machine learning (ML) approaches to train Language Models (LMs) for toxic content detection. However, both their accuracy and transferability across datasets are limited. Recently, Large Language Models (LLMs) have shown promise in toxic content detection due to their superior zero-shot and few-shot in-context learning ability as well as broad transferability on ML tasks.
However, efficiently designing prompts for LLMs remains challenging. Moreover, the high run-time cost of LLMs may hinder their deployments in production. To address these challenges, in this work, we propose BD-LLM, a novel and efficient approach to bootstrapping and distilling LLMs for toxic content detection. 
Specifically, we design a novel prompting method named Decision-Tree-of-Thought (DToT) to bootstrap LLMs' detection performance and extract high-quality rationales. DToT can automatically select more fine-grained context to re-prompt LLMs when their responses lack confidence. Additionally, we use the rationales extracted via DToT to fine-tune student LMs. Our experimental results on various datasets demonstrate that DToT can improve the accuracy of LLMs by up to 4.6%. Furthermore, student LMs fine-tuned with rationales extracted via DToT outperform baselines on all datasets with up to 16.9% accuracy improvement, while being more than 60x smaller than conventional LLMs. Finally, we observe that student LMs fine-tuned with rationales exhibit better cross-dataset transferability.

Efficient Toxic Content Detection by Bootstrapping and Distilling Large Language Models

While explainability is a desirable characteristic of increasingly complex black-box models, modern explanation methods have been shown to be inconsistent and contradictory. The semantics of explanations is not always fully understood - to what extent do explanations "explain" a decision and to what extent do they merely advocate for a decision? Can we help humans gain insights from explanations accompanying correct predictions and not over-rely on incorrect predictions advocated for by explanations? With this perspective in mind, we introduce the notion of dissenting explanations: conflicting predictions with accompanying explanations. We first explore the advantage of dissenting explanations in the setting of model multiplicity, where multiple models with similar performance may have different predictions. In such cases, providing dissenting explanations could be done by invoking the explanations of disagreeing models. Through a pilot study, we demonstrate that dissenting explanations reduce overreliance on model predictions, without reducing overall accuracy. Motivated by the utility of dissenting explanations we present both global and local methods for their generation.

Downloads

Next from AAAI 2024

Quantile-Based Maximum Likelihood Training for Outlier Detection

Similar lecture

Counterfactuals of Counterfactuals: a back-translation-inspired approach to analyse counterfactual editors

.css-70qvj9{display:-webkit-box;display:-webkit-flex;display:-ms-flexbox;display:flex;-webkit-align-items:center;-webkit-box-align:center;-ms-flex-align:center;align-items:center;}Downloads

Next from AAAI 2024

Quantile-Based Maximum Likelihood Training for Outlier Detection

Similar lecture

Counterfactuals of Counterfactuals: a back-translation-inspired approach to analyse counterfactual editors

Downloads