United States

This study evaluated the Collaborative Approach to Learning Medicine (CALM) program at Rutgers New Jersey Medical School, a peer-to-peer educational support initiative for first-year medical students. A pre-post study was conducted in the 2022-2023 academic year, analyzing survey responses from 47 participants. Pre-survey results indicated students&#39; perceptions of the program, with question banks being the most effective resource (mean score: 4.2) and student-led tutoring as the least effective (mean score: 3.5). After participation, the effectiveness of overview sessions, review sessions, and anatomy course videos significantly increased (p&lt;.05). Qualitative feedback emphasized improving question quantity and quality. This study highlights the CALM program&#39;s effectiveness in peer-to-peer teaching while recommending resource allocation to enhance frequently used components.

AMA Research Challenge 2023

Perceptions of Medical Students Towards the Effectiveness of the Collaborative Approach to Learning Medicine Program

Welcome to the **largest national, multi-specialty research** event featuring research from more than 750 medical students, residents, fellows, and international medical graduates.

Use the buttons below or navigation menu to access the event.
 

[![](https://assets.underline.io/markdown_image/1/image/20e1e77aa954efeac7a15d84c85eb383.jpg)](https://underline.io/events/468/sessions?searchGroup=all)
 
[![](https://assets.underline.io/markdown_image/1/image/068522d81aca0b68a369787c7dfccd1b.jpg)](https://underline.io/events/468/posters?searchGroup=all)
 
[![](https://assets.underline.io/markdown_image/1/image/d3971ece79d5e5575b178bdc2c8bbfae.jpg)](https://underline.io/events/468/help-desk)
 

#### Event Details

The 2024 American Medical Association Research Challenge includes a poster symposium hall and a semifinals hall with the top scored research. **Log in at any time throughout the event to:**

* **View posters and presentations** on a variety of topics and specialties
* **Score posters in the semifinals** to help decide the top five finalists (AMA member exclusive opportunity)
* **Connect with participants** and provide feedback to help advance their research

At the conclusion of this event, the AMA will announce the top five finalists who will advance to the AMA Research Challenge finals, present their research to an elite panel of judges, and compete to win a $10,000 grand prize presented by Laurel Road. 

### Grand Prize Sponsor

AMA would like to thank Laurel Road for sponsoring a $10,000 grand prize for the winner of the AMA Research Challenge. Laurel Road is not involved in winner selection process. The winner will be announced on February 20, 2025 during the AMA Research Challenge finals. Payment of the grand prize will be directly from Laurel Road. See the AMA Research Challenge Official Rules for terms and conditions.

[![](https://assets.underline.io/uploads/markdown_image/1/image/611e331d4a0eba0920f240cfc04b4d77.png)](https://www.laurelroad.com/)

You need to log in with the email address you registered with. Access credentials have been sent to your email. 

Please be sure to check your spam and other email folders if you do not see an email confirmation right away.

Please log in to explore this event.

**There is no registration fee for this event! **

If you have used the AMA Research Challenge platform previously, please click the ‘Log-in’ button below. If you do not remember your password, please click “forgot password” and follow prompts to reset your password. After resetting your password, please refresh your webpage to access the platform.

Register to explore research in a variety of topics. AMA members get exclusive access to score posters in the semifinals. 

**Please use this link [here](https://www.ama-assn.org/member-benefits/events/ama-research-challenge) to register for free.**

Registration Is Required

AMA Research Challenge 2024 

Join the AMA Research Challenge poster symposium and semifinals to explore top research posters and score posters in the semifinals (an AMA member exclusive opportunity).

This study evaluated the Collaborative Approach to Learning Medicine (CALM) program at Rutgers New Jersey Medical School, a peer-to-peer educational support initiative for first-year medical students. A pre-post study was conducted in the 2022-2023 academic year, analyzing survey responses from 47 participants. Pre-survey results indicated students' perceptions of the program, with question banks being the most effective resource (mean score: 4.2) and student-led tutoring as the least effective (mean score: 3.5). After participation, the effectiveness of overview sessions, review sessions, and anatomy course videos significantly increased (p<.05). Qualitative feedback emphasized improving question quantity and quality. This study highlights the CALM program's effectiveness in peer-to-peer teaching while recommending resource allocation to enhance frequently used components.

poster

Welcome to the **largest national, multi-specialty research** event featuring research from nearly 700 medical students, residents, fellows, and international medical graduates.

Use the buttons below or navigation menu to access the event.
 


[![](https://assets.underline.io/uploads/markdown_image/1/image/3e33a8c754cc49610b30950617d813e7.png)](https://underline.io/events/434/sessions?searchGroup=all)
 
[![](https://assets.underline.io/uploads/markdown_image/1/image/551404d429c4e274f9a54cbdd7081918.png)](https://underline.io/events/434/posters?searchGroup=all)
 
[![](https://assets.underline.io/uploads/markdown_image/1/image/677d92f566b880cebd36905fc738fc10.png)](https://underline.io/events/434/lounge)
 
[![](https://assets.underline.io/uploads/markdown_image/1/image/c7392833c7261c3874c5b43fa2f4df19.png)](https://underline.io/events/434/help-desk)
 

#### Event Details

The 2023 American Medical Association Research Challenge includes a poster symposium hall and a semifinals hall with the top scored research. **Log in at any time throughout the event to:**

* **View posters and presentations** on a variety of topics and specialties
* **Score posters in the semifinals** to help decide the top five finalists (AMA member exclusive opportunity)
* **Connect with participants** and provide feedback to help advance their research
* **Attend education sessions** with physician experts on key research topics

At the conclusion of this event, the AMA will announce the top five finalists who will advance to the AMA Research Challenge finals, present their research to an elite panel of judges, and compete to win a $10,000 grand prize sponsored by Laurel Road. 

### Grand Prize Sponsor

AMA would like to thank Laurel Road for sponsoring a $10,000 grand prize for the winner of the AMA Research Challenge. Laurel Road is not involved in the judging or scoring process to select the winner. The winner will be announced on February 4, 2024 during the AMA Research Challenge finals. Payment of the grand prize will be directly from Laurel Road. See the AMA Research Challenge Official Rules for terms and conditions.

![](https://assets.underline.io/uploads/markdown_image/1/image/611e331d4a0eba0920f240cfc04b4d77.png)

**There is no registration fee for this event! **

Register to explore research in a variety of topics. AMA members get exclusive access to score posters in the semifinals.

**Please use this link [here](https://www.ama-assn.org/about/events/ama-research-challenge) to register for free.**

Join the AMA Research Challenge poster symposium and semifinals to explore top research posters, score posters in the semifinals (an AMA member exclusive opportunity) and attend education sessions with experienced physicians to learn tips to advance your research and career. 

Background
Given increasing competition for residency positions and emphasis on USMLE performance in residency application evaluation, medical students must often prioritize studying for the USMLE over other responsibilities. There has been an explosion in the number and availability of USMLE test preparation resources over the past two decades as students use these resources for board exam preparation and as a supplement to their medical school curriculum. With increased pressure to excel in both school and board exams, these resources have become an increasingly valuable, yet expensive necessity for students. To date, comprehensive review of the number of students using third-party resources across multiple-institutions has not been performed. This systematic review aims to determine the commercial third-party resources used by medical students as supplements to the standard medical curriculum or as aids in USMLE board exam preparation.
Methods
A systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. A comprehensive search strategy designed by a medical librarian was used to retrieve articles from Embase.com, Ovid-Medline All, Scopus, Web of Science, and ERIC (ProQuest). Inclusion criteria was original research articles centered in US medical schools that included information on student use of third-party commercial resources. The meta-analysis was performed for resources that had a minimum of three studies investigating student use of that resource. Effect size was computed for each study and a pooled effect summary with 95% confidence intervals was calculated to summarize across studies.
Results
A total of 1056 citations were screened with 19 full-text studies included in this review. Of these, 21% had a study population comprised of osteopathic medical students, 79% had a study population comprised of allopathic medical students, and 5% was comprised of both. 22 unique third-party resources were examined across all studies, with meta-analysis revealing the three most common commercial resources used by medical students to be First Aid, UWorld, and Pathoma with effect summaries of 78.22% (39.20%-117.23%), 75.96% (53.61%-98.31%), and 63.64% (36.86%-90.42%) respectively. 
Conclusion
In this systematic review and meta-analysis, we synthesized findings from 19 different studies investigating the use of 22 commercial third-party resources by medical students with the most popular being First Aid, UWorld, and Pathoma. In light of the widespread utilization of third-party resources, medical faculty should consider adapting their curriculum to better cater to the learning needs of students and establish systems that ensure equitable access to verified commercial resources.

Unlocking Medical Student Success: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Third-Party Resources Used as Supplements for Medical Education and USMLE Board Preparation 

Background
Imposter Phenomenon (IP) involves a pattern where individuals doubt their skills and worry they will be exposed as frauds. Students who experience IP tend to discount positive feedback and their accomplishments. Furthermore, IP predisposes to depression, anxiety, and suicidal ideation. Of concern, the estimated prevalence of IP in medical students ranges from 22.5%-46.6%. Despite this, there is scant empirical literature exploring IP in clinical medical students. The few studies that exist suggest that aspects of medical education may contribute to IP, but there is currently little longitudinal data exploring this. Therefore, the purpose of this study is to assess IP in third-year medical students prior to and after clerkships. 
Methods
A single class of medical students was surveyed immediately prior to (Time 1) and after clerkships (Time 2) using the Clance Imposter Phenomenon Scale. Data was analyzed using Wilcoxon signed-rank tests to determine significant differences in IP. After Time 2, students participated in semi-structured interviews to assess their personal experiences with IP. Interviews were conducted using a predesigned interview guide consisting of nine open ended questions. Thematic analysis was performed to determine protective and contributing factors to IP. 
Results
Of the 141 students, 18 students took both surveys and 10 participated in semi-structured interviews. There was no statistically significant difference in IP scores (p=0.970), with scores indicating “frequent imposter feelings”. Thematic analysis of student responses revealed protective factors such as increasing confidence, safe learning environments, and role model/peer interactions. Contributing factors included making comparisons to other students, perceived knowledge gaps, and evolving/new stressors. 
Conclusion
Medical students in our study reported frequent imposter feelings, with no significant difference in scores. These scores are comparable to other studies examining IP during clerkships. Students in our study suggested that while they built confidence in the clinical domain, other stressors elicited feelings of doubt and imposterism, such as upcoming board exams. Furthermore, comparisons to other students and perceived knowledge gaps can elicit these feelings. Despite this, students found that conversations with mentors and peers can build comradery and reduce feelings of IP. As other studies have noted, institutional culture is important. Students in our study suggested that preceptors who create a safe learning environment helped reduce IP feelings. Institutions may benefit from encouraging this type of dynamic, while also creating opportunities for students to build comradery during clerkships. 




A Mixed-Methods Longitudinal Assessment of Imposter Phenomenon in Third-Year Medical Students

Background:
Wayne State University School of Medicine administers an annual Independent Student Analysis (ISA) survey to gauge student feedback on a continuous spectrum. One topic of dissatisfaction in previous ISA surveys was financial aid and debt management counseling. WSUSOM currently has two financial aid officers in place for the M1-M4 class, approximately 1,200 students. The financial aid office provides information from their website rather than a one-on-one customized approach. Updates regarding deadlines to fill for FAFSA, scholarships, and resources for debt management are sent to students via newsletters quarterly. 

This study aims to gather and analyze student data using the ISA survey to develop long-term solutions to improve the student body’s experience with debt management and financial aid.

Methods:
Since there was proven dissatisfaction with financial aid on the previous ISA, the committee decided to remeasure this item. A Likert scale was used, and students were given the range option between “very satisfied” and “very dissatisfied. Students were also given a free response portion to offer narrative feedback. The survey was then analyzed, and free-response answers were appropriately coded. Following the survey analysis, the committee brainstormed and presented solutions to the administration. They then worked together to implement the suggested solutions. 

Results:
A total of 963 students from all four classes (M1-M4), responded to the survey question about the adequacy of debt management offered to students, which was a 99.6% response rate. The results showed that 20.5% of these students were either “dissatisfied” or “very dissatisfied.” In comparison, 41.7% were “satisfied” or “very satisfied” with students’ debt management counseling services. 

Comparably, 962 total students from all classes responded to the survey question about the quality of finance, with 23.8% combined “dissatisfied “or “very dissatisfied” and 56.8% students either “satisfied” or very satisfied” about the quality of financial aid administrative services being provided.

Conclusion 
Improved financial education resources are needed to prepare students for life after medical school. Debt management counseling should be integral to M1 orientation and frequently offered at information sessions and one-on-one counseling appointments. To improve students’ satisfaction, the ISA committee suggested continued efforts to improve services provided by the financial aid administration. This includes increasing personnel to attend to students’ needs, increasing the frequency of the financial aid newsletter distribution, publicizing pertinent information about financial resources, and increasing appointment times for students needing immediate assistance. Additionally, having a more transparent scholarship application process was suggested.


Student Perceptions on Debt Management and Financial Aid Counseling: Solutions for Administration

**Scoring is only possible in the semifinals hall**

**Abstract:**



Spectrum: An Early Exposure Program

Attitudes toward Remote Medical Education at an Urban Allopathic Medical School During the COVID-19 Pandemic

Introduction: The AAMC Core Competencies require graduating medical students to be able to counsel patients on sensitive conversations, yet many graduates feel unprepared to apply these skills in a clinical setting. The University of Connecticut has introduced virtual patient encounters into our preclinical curriculum to augment medical students' ability to counsel on sensitive topics. Methods: We developed a didactic module including pre-class reading, a virtual encounter on firearm ownership, and a team-based learning session for first-year medical students. Students completed live standardized patient (SP) encounters before and after completing the module. SP encounters were assessed using the Master Interview Rating Scale (MIRS). To assess the impact of the virtual patient encounter, MIRS scores before and after the didactic module were compared between the intervention group and control group, who did not complete the virtual module. Results: Compared to the control group, students completing the virtual encounter demonstrated a statistically significant improvement in MIRS scoring associated with the following criteria: types of questions asked (p<0.001), verbal facilitation (p=0.003), empathy (p<0.001), motivation for change (p=0.001), and shared decision making (p=0.002) during SP encounters. Both groups showed similar scores on these MIRS criteria before the virtual curriculum was implemented; the control group did not demonstrate a significant improvement on their second attempt. Discussion: Our findings suggest virtual patient encounters are an effective method for teaching medical students to counsel on sensitive topics. Medical schools should consider incorporating virtual patients into preclinical curricula to model challenging conversations in a cost-effective and standardized manner.

Closing the Gap in Medical Student Counseling: A Virtual Curriculum

Background: 
25-hydroxyvitamin D (vitamin D) inadequacy has been shown to be associated with an increased risk of progressing from prediabetes to diabetes. Although clinical trials have demonstrated vitamin D supplementation can lower the risk of developing diabetes for prediabetic patients, the actual factors associated with vitamin D supplementation usage for prediabetic individuals have yet to be fully elucidated. The goal of this study is to investigate demographic and socioeconomic factors associated with vitamin D supplement usage among prediabetic individuals in the United States to better understand the barriers this population faces in supplement access and utilization.

Methods:
In this cross-sectional study, the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey results between 2011 and 2018 were analyzed. 3,424 prediabetic adults over the age of 20 without liver or kidney disease were isolated. The outcome of vitamin D supplement intake level was classified as “Low” (<400 International Units [IU]), “Medium” (400-800 IU), or “High” (>800 IU). An ordinal logistic regression was performed with the predictor variables of age, gender, race, education, insurance, and family income to poverty ratio while controlling for serum vitamin D concentration, vitamin D dietary intake, and body mass index. 

Results:
Significant predictors of higher levels of vitamin D supplementation included being female (Odds Ratio [OR]: 1.735, 95% Confidence Interval [CI]: 1.409 – 2.135), and income (OR: 1.148, 95% CI: 1.049 – 1.257). Furthermore, increases in education level were correlated with greater odds of higher vitamin D supplementation levels: High school (HS) graduates OR: 1.696, 95% CI: 1.109 – 2.594), Individuals with at least some college experience (OR: 1.752, 95% CI: 1.124 – 2.730), and College graduates (OR: 1.778, 95% CI: 1.129 – 2.800).

Conclusion:
Although the cross-sectional nature of the analysis precludes drawing causative conclusions, these findings suggest that being female, greater family income, and increased education level may be associated with higher levels of vitamin D supplementation in the prediabetic population in the United States. Further investigations may uncover reasons behind these relationships and the differential utilization of vitamin D supplementation. Understanding the drivers and barriers for vitamin D supplementation among prediabetic patients can guide public health efforts in protecting against the progression from prediabetes to diabetes.

Factors Associated With Vitamin D Supplementation in the Prediabetic Population

Background: Over the past few decades, pharmaceutical drug prices have fluctuated for a variety of reasons, such as inflation, manufacturer changes, and legislative policies. The purpose of this study is to track price changes for a specific set of drugs commonly prescribed to a large portion of the adult patient population in order to analyze historical factors contributing to pricing trends, as well as to serve as an informative tool for future and current pharmaceutical consumers. 

Methods: The IBM Micromedex® Redbook was queried to obtain the manufacturers and prices of five generic drugs (warfarin, atorvastatin calcium, amlodipine besylate, alprazolam, levothyroxine sodium) and four of their respective trade name drugs, excluding warfarin (Lipitor, Norvasc, Xanax, Synthroid). The Average Wholesale Price (AWP) and corresponding dates of these drugs’ production and sales were graphed on a scatter plot, with a trendline included to visualize the behavior of price changes over time.

Results: The AWP unit price of warfarin increased 236% from 1988 to 2020. The AWP unit price of Lipitor™ increased 659% from 1998 to 2021, while its generic counterpart atorvastatin calcium increased 5% from 2011 to 2022. The AWP unit price of Norvasc™ increased 644% from 1992 to 2022, while its generic counterpart amlodipine besylate decreased 0.03% from 2007 to 2020. The AWP unit price of Xanax™ increased 1811% from 1988 to 2022 while its generic counterpart alprazolam increased 3069% from 1993 to 2018. The AWP unit price of Synthroid™ increased 1654% from 1988 to 2022 while its generic counterpart levothyroxine sodium increased 1046% from 1991 to 2020. 

Conclusion: The rate of increase in these drugs’ AWP unit prices, notably for the trade name counterparts, exceeds that of the corresponding inflation rate in the United States for their specific manufacturing and sale time periods. The larger than expected increase in price could be attributed to legislative policy changes rather than microeconomic changes and inflation. However, this study is limited in the choice of drugs studied and database utilized, as the IBM Micromedex® Redbook only provides information on products approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration. Future studies could expand the studied drug selection or compare rate of increase in the U.S. to that of other countries. Overall, AWP unit prices for trade name drugs commonly prescribed to adult populations are increasing at a rate greater than natural inflation. 


Historical Analysis of Generic and Trade-Name Pharmaceutical Drug Prices

Background: Effective and efficient communication between physicians and patients is a major component of healthcare. As the U.S. population continues to grow, the Limited English Proficiency (LEP) population also continues to grow. Language barriers play a role in health disparities among LEP populations. LEP patients tend to report decreased patient satisfaction, they are less likely to obtain the recommended preventive care services and/or testing such as mammograms, pap smears, colon cancer screenings, and influenza vaccinations. Although LEP patients are less likely to have regular preventive screenings, they are more likely to have unnecessary testing when at the emergency department, more likely to be hospitalized, and have longer hospital stays when compared to English-speaking patients. They have a decreased understanding of diagnosis and treatment options, poorer adherence to treatment and follow-up for chronic illnesses, and increased medication complications. Therefore, LEP populations are at higher risk of poorer health outcomes. Furthermore, due to a language barrier, physicians may misunderstand a LEP patient’s symptoms, which may lead to diagnostic tests that are unnecessary. The purpose of this review was to explore interventions aimed at improving healthcare access and preventive screening services among LEP populations in the U.S.

Methods: A systematic literature search was performed from 1995 to 2020 using online medical, public health, and social science databases. These databases included: PubMed, JSTOR, Access Medicine, Google Scholar, OVID (MEDLINE), and Clinical Key. Older literature was used to understand if there have been any changes in language accessible services throughout the last 25 years. A total of 24 articles were utilized for this review.

Results: An analysis of the literature revealed past interventions focused on increasing healthcare education among LEP patients, increasing patient-physician communication by using bilingual physicians, increasing access to language services with mobile translation applications, and adapting evidence-based interventions as well as the P3 (Practice-, Provider-, and Patient level) Model.

Conclusion: Effective interventions working to increase language accessible services and build rapport with LEP patients by using bilingual physicians and mobile translating applications have been shown to increase healthcare access among LEP populations. It is essential that physicians take these findings into consideration to avoid adverse outcomes. Current research has not considered the impact of communication barriers on cancer diagnosis and treatment among LEP populations. Future efforts should focus on understanding how language barriers impact health outcomes among LEP cancer patients.

A Review of Interventions Addressing Ways to Improve Healthcare Access and Preventative Screening Services among Limited English Proficiency Population in the United States

Introduction
The CDC’s “Adult Obesity Maps in 2022” suggests that the southern parts of the United States (US) have the highest prevalence rates of obesity(1). Similarly, the Health Resources and Services Administration identifies the Southern states as having the highest numbers of medically underserved areas(2).
The health implications of obesity are numerous, with some affecting reproductive ability in both genders. With infertility on the rise, studies have examined the numerous modalities that implicate obesity in female infertility. One such route associates the increased adipose tissue with reduced oocyte maturation by promoting functional hyperandrogenism and hyper-estrogenism, which triggers anovulation(3).
This study was devised to investigate the landscape across the different regions in the US and detect correlations between female infertility and obesity. The hypothesis was that the southern region would have the highest correlation between female infertility and obesity compared to other regions across the US.
Methods
This cross-sectional study used the NIH’s ‘All of Us’ Researcher Workbench to first create a workspace titled “Incidence of female infertility due to obesity in US regions.” Next two cohorts were devised containing all ages, ethnicities, and races. The first group, the control cohort, included “female infertility” participants and excluded “sex assigned at birth – male” participants. The second group, the variable cohort, consisted of participants with both “obesity” and “female infertility” while excluding “sex assigned at birth – male” participants.
The US was divided into four regions based on zip code. The first three digits of each participant’s zip code were logged and localized to the Midwest, Northeast, South, or West. The Midwest consisted of participants from Wisconsin, Michigan, Iowa, Illinois, Indiana, and Ohio. The Northeast region had participants from Pennsylvania, New York, and the District of Columbia. The South had participants from Louisiana, Texas, Mississippi, Alabama, Georgia, Tennessee, South Carolina, Virginia, Florida, and Arkansas. The West region had participants from California, Washington, Colorado, Arizona, Utah, and New Mexico.
Two datasets were then created using the control cohort and the variable cohort, respectively, and then the zip code socioeconomic status data was extracted. The participant’s data was coded into the Python analysis software. Various data points were also recorded and analyzed. For each dataset consisting of one cohort, the length of the entire code was run, and for the control cohort and for the variable cohort. Next, a code was run to extract all zip codes with the number of participants included in each zip code. After all the data was extracted, each participant’s zip code was assigned to their appropriate region. All the data was then put into Microsoft Excel. The number of participants with both female infertility and obesity was then compared to the number of females with infertility only and compared against each region to establish a correlation percentage.
Statistical analysis used Chi-Square and focused on identifying degrees of freedom.
Results
In the control group, the number of participants who qualified for infertile females was 2,754, with 1,182 participants from the Midwest, 1,062 from the Northeast, 279 from the South, and 231 from the West. For the variable cohort, 1,198 participants were concurrently infertile and obese females. This data was also sub-grouped based on region: the Midwest with 481 participants, the Northeast with 491 participants, the South had 133 participants, and the West had 93 participants. Each variable group number was subsequently divided by its respective control group’s number of infertile female participants. The percentages for each region were: Midwest (28.9%), Northeast (31.6%), South (32.3%), and West (28.7%).
The results suggest that the Southern US region has the highest percentage of concurrently infertile and obese females compared to the rest of the country, while the lowest is the West. Chi-squared results yielded 467.376 with 3 degrees of freedom. These findings were statistically significant (two-tailed P value < 0.0001).
Conclusion
Our study utilized the NIH ‘All of Us’ Researcher Workbench to demonstrate the variation among the different United States regions and their correlations between females who are both obese and infertile. Knowing that the southern region of the United States has (A) the highest rates of obesity, (B) the highest rates of medically unserved communities, in addition to (C) the highest rate of concurrent female infertility and obesity, this study serves as a platform to stress the need for increased awareness of the implications of obesity. Increasing access to health education and medical care across the country, especially in the southern states, focusing on managing obesity may help improve infertility.

References
1. “Adult Obesity Prevalence Maps.” Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 17 Mar. 2023, www.cdc.gov/obesity/data/prevalence-maps.html.
2. Map Gallery, https://data.hrsa.gov/maps/map-gallery.
3. Gambineri, A., Laudisio, D., Marocco, C. et al. Female infertility: which role for obesity?. Int J Obes Supp 9, 65–72 (2019).
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41367-019-0009-1
4. The All of Us Research Program is supported by the National Institutes of Health, Office of the Director: Regional Medical Centers: 1 OT2 OD026549; 1
OT2 OD026554; 1 OT2 OD026557; 1 OT2 OD026556; 1 OT2 OD026550; 1 OT2 OD 026552; 1 OT2 OD026553; 1 OT2 OD026548; 1 OT2 OD026551;
1 OT2 OD026555; IAA #: AOD 16037; Federally Qualified Health Centers: HHSN 263201600085U; Data and Research Center: 5 U2C OD023196;
Biobank: 1 U24 OD023121; The Participant Center: U24 OD023176; Participant Technology Systems Center: 1 U24 OD023163; Communications and
Engagement: 3 OT2 OD023205; 3 OT2 OD023206; and Community Partners: 1 OT2 OD025277; 3 OT2 OD025315; 1 OT2 OD025337; 1 OT2
OD025276. In addition, the All of Us Research Program would not be possible without the partnership of its participants.

Premium content

Next from AMA Research Challenge 2023

Unlocking Medical Student Success: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Third-Party Resources Used as Supplements for Medical Education and USMLE Board Preparation

Similar lecture

STAT! Learning – A peer tutoring program designed for the clinical rotation year