Ireland

Existing self-explaining models typically favor extracting the shortest possible rationales — snippets of an input text “responsible for” corresponding output — to explain the model prediction, with the assumption that shorter rationales are more intuitive to humans. How- ever, this assumption has yet to be validated. Is the shortest rationale indeed the most human- understandable? To answer this question, we design a self-explaining model, LimitedInk, which allows users to extract rationales at any target length. Compared to existing baselines, LimitedInk achieves compatible end- task performance and human-annotated rationale agreement, making it a suitable representation of the recent class of self-explaining models. We use LimitedInk to conduct a user study on the impact of rationale length, where we ask human judges to predict the sentiment label of documents based only on LimitedInk- generated rationales with different lengths. We show rationales that are too short do not help humans predict labels better than randomly masked text, suggesting the need for more careful design of the best human rationales

ACL 2022

Are Shortest Rationales the Best Explanations for Human Understanding?

rationale length control

human understanding

interpretability

# Welcome everyone to ACL 2022!

The 60th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics is taking place May 22-27, 2022 as a hybrid event, in Dublin and online. We are happy to welcome all of you to this anniversary edition with an almost 50-50 in-person and virtual participation. 
The main conference program features oral presentations, in-person and virtual posters and demo sessions, a plenary session for our best paper presentations and awards, three amazing keynote events and two new initiatives of invited talks: Spotlight Talks for Young Rising Stars (STIRS) and The Next Big Idea Talks. Posters (including Findings of ACL 2022) and demos are grouped by areas for both the in-person and the virtual sessions. For the virtual component, the talks will be on Zoom and the posters and the demos will be in GatherTown. The Student Research Workshop will have an oral session and a poster session as part of Poster Session 1. The program also features eight Tutorials and 28 Workshops. 

 
We wish you a wonderful conference! 
[**The ACL 2022 Organizing Committee**](https://www.2022.aclweb.org/organisers)
 
[**Conference Handbook**](https://drive.google.com/file/d/1_BUCMfhMVrjG9E2e71aHdHeE28KSje0l/view?usp=sharing) 
[**Mini Handbook**](https://drive.google.com/file/d/1qlBKl0wzmlVF1oCeMQl3BahLd9nLP5Ce/view?usp=sharing) 
[**Posters and Demo guides**](https://drive.google.com/file/d/1UucMAoCNncIOaH1rMMDa0owuG9qgvJTG/view?usp=sharing)

The Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL) is the premier international scientific and professional society for people working on computational problems involving human language, a field often referred to as either computational linguistics or natural language processing (NLP). 

poster

Pretrained language models such as BERT have achieved remarkable success in several NLP tasks. With the wide adoption of BERT in real-world applications, researchers begin to investigate the implicit biases encoded in the BERT. In this paper, we assess the implicit stock market preferences in BERT and its finance domain-specific model FinBERT. We find some interesting patterns. For example, the language models are overall more positive towards the stock market, but there are significant differences in preferences between a pair of industry sectors, or even within a sector. Given the prevalence of NLP models in financial decision making systems, this work raises the awareness of their potential implicit preferences in the stock markets. Awareness of such problems can help practitioners improve robustness and accountability of their financial NLP pipelines \footnote{Code and data for this work are available at \url{https://github.com/MattioCh/Buy-Tesla-Sell-Ford}}.

Buy Tesla, Sell Ford: Assessing Implicit Stock Market Preference in Pre-trained Language Models

A Temporal Knowledge Graph (TKG) is a sequence of KGs corresponding to
different timestamps. TKG reasoning aims to predict potential facts in the
future given the historical KG sequences. One key of this task is to mine and
understand evolutional patterns of facts from these sequences. The
evolutional patterns are complex in two aspects, length-diversity and
time-variability. Existing methods for TKG reasoning focus on modeling fact
sequences of a fixed length, which cannot discover complex evolutional
patterns that vary in length. Furthermore, these models are all trained
offline, which cannot well adapt to the changes of evolutional patterns from
then on. Thus, we propose a new model, called Complex Evolutional Network
(CEN), which uses a length-aware Convolutional Neural Network (CNN) to handle
evolutional patterns of different lengths via an easy-to-difficult curriculum
learning strategy. Besides, we propose to learn the model under the online
setting so that it can adapt to the changes of evolutional patterns over time.
Extensive experiments demonstrate that CEN obtains substantial performance
improvement under both the traditional offline and the proposed online
settings.

Complex Evolutional Pattern Learning for Temporal Knowledge Graph Reasoning

The success of a natural language processing (NLP) system on a task does not amount to fully understanding the complexity of the task, typified by many deep learning models. One such question is: can a black-box model make logically consistent predictions for transitive relations? Recent studies suggest that pre-trained BERT can capture lexico-semantic clues from words in the context. However, to what extent BERT captures the transitive nature of some lexical relations is unclear. From a probing perspective, we examine WordNet word senses and the IS-A relation, which is a transitive relation. That is, for senses A, B, and C, A is-a B and B is-a C entail A is-a C. We aim to quantify how much BERT agrees with the transitive property of IS-A relations, via a minimalist probing setting. Our investigation reveals that BERT’s predictions do not fully obey the transitivity property of the IS-A relation.

Does BERT Know that the IS-A Relation Is Transitive?

To understand a story with multiple events, it is important to capture the proper relations across these events. However, existing event relation extraction (ERE) framework regards it as a multi-class classification task and do not guarantee any coherence between different relation types, such as anti-symmetry. If a phone line "died" after "storm", then it is obvious that the "storm" happened before the "died". Current framework of event relation extraction do not guarantee this coherence and thus enforces it via constraint loss function (Wang et al., 2020). In this work, we propose to modify the underlying ERE model to guarantee coherence by representing each event as a box representation (BERE) without applying explicit constraints. From our experiments, BERE also shows stronger conjunctive constraint satisfaction while performing on par or better in F1 compared to previous models with constraint injection.

Event-Event Relation Extraction using Probabilistic Box Embedding

Text-based games (TGs) are exciting testbeds for developing deep reinforcement learning techniques due to their partially observed environments and large action spaces. In these games, the agent learns to explore the environment via natural language interactions with the game simulator. A fundamental challenge in TGs is the efficient exploration of the large action space when the agent has not yet acquired enough knowledge about the environment. We propose COMMEXPL, an exploration technique that injects external commonsense knowledge, via a pretrained language model (LM), into the agent during training when the agent is the most uncertain about its next action. Our method exhibits improvement on the collected game scores during the training in four out of nine games from Jericho. Additionally, the produced trajectory of actions exhibit lower perplexity, when tested with a pretrained LM, indicating better closeness to human language.

Fire Burns, Sword Cuts: Commonsense Inductive Bias for Exploration in Text-based Games

Analyzing the temporal sequence of texts from sources such as social media, news, and parliamentary debates is a challenging problem as it exhibits time-varying scale-free properties and fine-grained timing irregularities. We propose a Hyperbolic Hawkes Attention Network (HYPHEN), which learns a data-driven hyperbolic space and models irregular powerlaw excitations using a hyperbolic Hawkes process. Through quantitative and exploratory experiments over financial NLP, suicide ideation detection, and political debate analysis we demonstrate HYPHEN’s practical applicability for modeling online text sequences in a geometry agnostic manner.

HYPHEN: Hyperbolic Hawkes Attention For Text Streams

Creating chatbots to behave like real people is important in terms of believability. Errors in general chatbots and chatbots that follow a rough persona have been studied, but those in chatbots that behave like real people have not been thoroughly investigated. We collected a large amount of user interactions of a generation-based chatbot trained from large-scale dialogue data of a specific character, i.e., "target person" and analyzed errors related to that person. We found that person-specific errors can be divided into two types: errors in attributes and those in relations, each of which can be divided into two levels: self and other. The correspondence with an existing taxonomy of errors was also investigated, and person-specific errors that should be addressed in the future were clarified.

Investigating person-specific errors in chat-oriented dialogue systems

We present a simple yet very strong baseline for Distantly Supervised Relation Extraction that also works in the multilingual setting. We support our results with interesting insights and analyses.

PARE: A Simple and Strong Baseline for Monolingual and Multilingual Distantly Supervised Relation Extraction

Distinct score is a widely used automatic metric for evaluating diversity in language generation tasks.
However, we observed that the original approach for calculating distinct scores has evident biases that tend to assign higher penalties to longer sequences.
We refine the calculation of distinct scores by scaling the number of distinct tokens based on their expectations. 
We provide both empirical and theoretical evidence to show that our method effectively removes the biases existing in the original distinct score.
Our experiments show that our proposed metric, Expectation-Adjusted Distinct (EAD), correlates better with human judgment in evaluating response diversity.

Rethinking and Refining the Distinct Metric

The emergence of multilingual pre-trained lan-guage models makes it possible to adapt to target languages with only few labeled examples. However, vanilla fine-tuning tends to achieve degenerated and unstable results, owing to the Language Interference among different languages, and Parameter Overload under the few-sample transfer learning scenarios. To address two problems elegantly, we propose S4- Tuning, a Simple CroSS-lingual Sub-network Tuning method. S4 -Tuning first detects the most essential sub-network for each target lan- guage, and only updates it during fine-tuning. In this way, the language sub-networks lower the scale of trainable parameters, and hence better suit the low-resource scenarios. Meanwhile, the commonality and characteristics across languages are modeled by the overlapping and non-overlapping parts to ease the interference among languages. Simple but effective, S4-Tuning gains consistent improvements over vanilla fine-tuning on three multi-lingual tasks involving 37 different languages in total (XNLI, PAWS-X, and Tatoeba).

Are Shortest Rationales the Best Explanations for Human Understanding?

Downloads

Next from ACL 2022

Buy Tesla, Sell Ford: Assessing Implicit Stock Market Preference in Pre-trained Language Models

Similar lecture

Evaluating Explanations: How Much do Explanations from the Teacher aid Students?