New Zealand

Existing approaches to coalition formation often assume that requirements associated with tasks are precisely specified by the human operator. However, prior work has demonstrated that humans, while extremely adept at solving complex problems, struggle to explicitly state their solution strategy. Further, existing approaches often ignore the fact that experts may utilize different, but equally-valid, solutions (i.e., heterogeneous strategies} to the same problem. In this work, we propose a two-part framework to address these challenges. First, we tackle the challenge of inferring implicit strategies directly from expert demonstrations of coalition formation. To this end, we model and infer such heterogeneous strategies as capability-based requirements associated with each task. Next, we propose a method capable of adaptively selecting one of the inferred strategies that best suits the target team without requiring additional training. Specifically, we formulate and solve a constrained optimization problem that simultaneously selects the most appropriate strategy given the target team&#39;s capabilities, and allocates its constituents into appropriate coalitions. We evaluate our approach against several baselines, including some that resemble existing approaches, using detailed numerical simulations, StarCraft II battles, and a multi-robot emergency-response scenario. Our results indicate that our framework consistently outperforms all baselines in terms of requirement satisfaction, resource utilization, and task success rates.

AAMAS 2022

Resource-Aware Adaptation of Heterogeneous Strategies for Coalition Formation

coalition formation

multiagent systems

heterogeneity

AAMAS (International Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems) is the largest and most influential conference in the area of agents and multiagent systems. The aim of the conference is to bring together researchers and practitioners in all areas of agent technology and to provide a single, high-profile, internationally renowned forum for research in the theory and practice of autonomous agents and multiagent systems. AAMAS is the flagship conference of the non-profit International Foundation for Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems (IFAAMAS).

The AAMAS conference series was initiated in 2002 in Bologna, Italy as a joint event comprising the 6th International Conference on Autonomous Agents (AA), the 5th International Conference on Multiagent Systems (ICMAS), and the 9th International Workshop on Agent Theories, Architectures, and Languages (ATAL).

Subsequent AAMAS conferences have been held in Melbourne, Australia (July 2003), New York City, NY, USA (July 2004), Utrecht, The Netherlands (July 2005), Hakodate, Japan (May 2006), Honolulu, Hawaii, USA (May 2007), Estoril, Portugal (May 2008), Budapest, Hungary (May 2009), Toronto, Canada (May 2010), Taipei, Taiwan (May 2011), Valencia, Spain (June 2012), Minnesota, USA (May 2013), Paris, France (May 2014), Istanbul, Turkey (May 2015), Singapore (May 2016), São Paulo (2017) and Stockholm, Sweden (2018), Montreal (May 2019), Auckland (May 2020, Virtual), London (May 2021, Virtual).
<br>
<br>



A ticket is required to attend this event, please register using the link below:

https://aamas2022-conference.auckland.ac.nz/attending/registration/

Registration Is Required

AAMAS (International Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems) is the largest and most influential conference in the area of agents and multiagent systems. The aim of the conference is to bring together researchers and practitioners in all areas of agent technology and to provide a single, high-profile, internationally renowned forum for research in the theory and practice of autonomous agents and multiagent systems. AAMAS is the flagship conference of the non-profit International Foundation for Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems (IFAAMAS).

Existing approaches to coalition formation often assume that requirements associated with tasks are precisely specified by the human operator. However, prior work has demonstrated that humans, while extremely adept at solving complex problems, struggle to explicitly state their solution strategy. Further, existing approaches often ignore the fact that experts may utilize different, but equally-valid, solutions (i.e., heterogeneous strategies} to the same problem. In this work, we propose a two-part framework to address these challenges. First, we tackle the challenge of inferring implicit strategies directly from expert demonstrations of coalition formation. To this end, we model and infer such heterogeneous strategies as capability-based requirements associated with each task. Next, we propose a method capable of adaptively selecting one of the inferred strategies that best suits the target team without requiring additional training. Specifically, we formulate and solve a constrained optimization problem that simultaneously selects the most appropriate strategy given the target team's capabilities, and allocates its constituents into appropriate coalitions. We evaluate our approach against several baselines, including some that resemble existing approaches, using detailed numerical simulations, StarCraft II battles, and a multi-robot emergency-response scenario. Our results indicate that our framework consistently outperforms all baselines in terms of requirement satisfaction, resource utilization, and task success rates.

poster

Diversity in behaviors is instrumental for robust team performance in many multiagent tasks which require agents to coordinate. Unfortunately, exhaustive search through the agents' behavior spaces is often intractable.
This paper introduces Behavior Exploration for Heterogeneous Teams (BEHT), a multi-level learning framework that enables agents to progressively explore regions of the behavior space that promote team coordination on diverse goals.
By combining diversity search to maximize agent-specific rewards and evolutionary optimization to maximize the team-based fitness, our method effectively filters regions of the behavior space that are conducive to agent coordination.
We demonstrate the diverse behaviors and synergies that are method allows agents to learn on a multiagent exploration problem.

Behavior Exploration and Team Balancing for Heterogeneous Multiagent Coordination

Efficient contact tracing and isolation is an effective strategy to control epidemics, as seen in the Ebola epidemic and COVID-19 pandemic. An important consideration in contact tracing is the budget on the number of individuals asked to quarantine---the budget is limited for socioeconomic reasons (e.g., having a limited number of contact tracers). Here, we present a Markov Decision Process (MDP) framework to formulate the problem of using contact tracing to reduce the size of an outbreak while limiting the number of people quarantined. We formulate each step of the MDP as a combinatorial problem, MinExposed, which we demonstrate is NP-Hard. Next, we develop two approximation algorithms, one based on rounding the solutions of a linear program and another (greedy algorithm) based on choosing nodes with a high (weighted) degree. A key feature of the greedy algorithm is that it does not need complete information of the underlying social contact network, making it implementable in practice. Using simulations over realistic networks, we show how the algorithms can help in {\em bending} the epidemic curve with a limited number of isolated
individuals.

Theoretical Models and Preliminary Results for Contact Tracing and Isolation


Continuous Action-space Interactive Reinforcement learning (CAIR) is a continuous action-space interactive reinforcement learning algorithm that can out-preform state-of-the-art reinforcement learning algorithms early on in training. We test CAIR in two simulated robotics environments with intuitive and easy to design heuristic teachers.

Environment Guided Interactive Reinforcement Learning: Learning from Binary Feedback in High-Dimensional Robot Task Environments

Recently, text world games have been proposed to enable artifi- cial agents to understand and reason about real-world scenarios. These text-based games are challenging for artificial agents, as it requires an understanding of and interaction using natural language in a partially observable environment. Agents observe the environment via textual descriptions designed to be challenging enough for even human players. Past approaches have not paid enough attention to the language understanding capability of the proposed agents. Typically, these approaches train from scratch, an agent that learns both textual representations and the gameplay online during training using a temporal loss function. Given the sample-inefficiency of RL approaches, it is inefficient to learn rich enough textual representations to be able to understand and reason using the textual observation in such a complicated game environment setting. In this paper, we improve the semantic understanding of the agent by proposing a simple RL with LM framework where we use transformer-based language models with Deep RL models. We perform a detailed study of our framework to demonstrate how our model outperforms all existing agents on the popular game, Zork1, to achieve a score of 44.7, which is 1.6 higher than the state-of-the- art model. Overall, our proposed approach outperforms 4 games out of the 14 text-based games, while performing comparable to the state-of-the-art models on the remaining games.

Pre-trained Language Models as Prior Knowledge for Playing Text-based Games


Training agents in cooperative settings offers the promise of AI agents able to interact effectively with humans (and other agents) in the real world. Multi-agent reinforcement learning (MARL) has the potential to achieve this goal, demonstrating success in a series of challenging problems. However, whilst these advances are significant, the vast majority of focus has been on the self-play paradigm. This often results in a coordination problem, caused by agents learning to make use of arbitrary conventions when playing with themselves. This means that even the strongest self-play agents may have very low cross-play with other agents, including other initializations of the same algorithm. In this paper we propose to solve this problem by adapting agent strategies on the fly, using a posterior belief over the other agents' strategy. Concretely, we consider the problem of selecting a strategy from a finite set of previously trained agents, to play with an unknown partner. We propose an extension of the classic statistical technique, Gibbs sampling, to update beliefs about other agents and obtain close to optimal ad-hoc performance. Despite its simplicity, our method is able to achieve strong cross-play with unseen partners in the challenging card game of Hanabi, achieving successful ad-hoc coordination without knowledge of the partner's strategy a priori.


On-the-fly Strategy Adaptation for ad-hoc Agent Coordination


Many real-world applications require an agent to make robust and deliberate decisions with multimodal information (e.g., robots with multi-sensory inputs). However, it is very challenging to train the agent via reinforcement learning (RL) due to the heterogeneity and dynamic importance of different modalities. Specifically, we observe that these issues make conventional RL methods difficult to learn a useful state representation in the end-to-end training with multimodal information. To address this, we propose a novel multimodal RL approach that can do multimodal alignment and importance enhancement according to their similarity and importance in terms of RL tasks respectively. By doing so, we are able to learn an effective state representation and consequentially improve the RL training process. We test our approach on several multimodal RL domains, showing that it outperforms state-of-the-art methods in terms of learning speed and policy quality.

Multimodal Reinforcement Learning with Effective State Representation Learning


Augmented reality (AR) technologies have been applied to human-robot collaboration (HRC) domains to enable people to visualize the state of the robots.
Current AR-based visualization strategies are manually designed. This design process requires a lot of human efforts, and domain knowledge. When too little information is visualized, human users find the AR interface not useful; when too much is visualized, they find it difficult to process the visualized information. In this paper, we develop an intelligent AR agent that learns visualization policies (what to visualize, when, and how) from demonstrations. We developed a Unity-based platform for simulating warehouse environments where human-robot teammates work on collaborative delivery tasks. We have collected a dataset that includes 6000 demonstrations of visualizing robots' current and planned behaviors. Our results from experiments with real human participants show that, compared with competitive baselines from the literature, our learned visualization strategy significantly increases the efficiency of human-robot teams in delivery tasks.

Learning Visualization Policies of Augmented Reality for Human-Robot Collaboration

**Read paper on the following link:**

https://ifaamas.org/Proceedings/aamas2022/pdfs/p1744.pdf

**Abstract:**



Autonomous Flight Arcade Challenge: Single- and Multi-Agent Learning Environments for Aerial Vehicles


When multiple humans and robots are moving in spaces like restaurants, hospitals, or banks, making the robot's movements easy to predict can help the humans co-navigate the space with the robots. Since people would be busy with their own goals, they are not paying close attention to the prior movements, or goals of multiple robots. So predictability from the robot's current position alone would help. With this in mind, we propose using an algorithm to lay out fixed paths for the different tasks the robots would do, such that predictability from only the current position alone is optimized, and motion costs are kept within acceptable bounds.

Minimizing Robot Navigation Graph For Position-Based Predictability By Humans


In network science, centrality indices are used to determine important nodes by virtue of their position in a network.
In social choice theory, voting rules are used to aggregate preferences of voters to determine the winners of an election.
Exploiting parallels between these two fields, we propose a novel approach to define network centrality indices based on voting rules.
Since formal properties of voting rules have been studied in much greater depth, this will not only lead to new applications of social choice theory but also facilitate a deeper understanding of centrality in networks.

Downloads

Next from AAMAS 2022

Behavior Exploration and Team Balancing for Heterogeneous Multiagent Coordination

Similar lecture

Augmented Democratic Deliberation: Can Conversational Agents Boost Deliberation in Social Media?

.css-70qvj9{display:-webkit-box;display:-webkit-flex;display:-ms-flexbox;display:flex;-webkit-align-items:center;-webkit-box-align:center;-ms-flex-align:center;align-items:center;}Downloads

Next from AAMAS 2022

Behavior Exploration and Team Balancing for Heterogeneous Multiagent Coordination

Similar lecture

Augmented Democratic Deliberation: Can Conversational Agents Boost Deliberation in Social Media?

Downloads