France

The technological changes in the sphere of production that we have witnessed in the last 10 years have been of such significance as to be called “Fourth Industrial Revolution” (Industry 4.0), thus an important step beyond the “Digital Revolution” of the late 20th century. Innovations such as robotics, artificial intelligence, the internet of things, and the development of algorithms, all point in the same direction: that of reducing human intervention in the production process to a minimum. 
Indeed, fears have emerged that artificial intelligence will create a huge reserve army of labour. The working and middle classes worry that computers and machines will end up taking their jobs and this will leave individuals and families with no possibilities of earning a leaving for themselves. These fears are very real and create growing anxiety among workers. 

Nonetheless, human labour is still needed in many different moments in the process of production and distribution of the goods that we consume. Thus, we are now in a situation in which human and artificial intelligence interact, with the latter taking up the role that once was of the line manager in the Fordist factory – dictating the speed and quality of work required – in many “traditional” industries, or directly as a substitute for the employers, as it is the case in the uberised ones, such as food delivery. This situation has serious implications for workers’ rights as well as for the construal of their identity as workers. Indeed, “workers governed by AI […] often fall through the cracks of employment legislation both with respect to their employment status as well as protections from discrimination and unfair dismissal.” (Walker et al., 2021, p. 29). 

The issues of identity referred to above constitute a major problem for organising resistance to unfair practices in the “workplace”, but recently some new forms of organisation have started to emerge. 
A case in point is the attempt at organising the workforce of one of the most famous and powerful tech giants, Alphabet, which is the corporation that owns Google, among many other enterprises. Indeed, on January 4th, 2021 the new Alphabet Workers Union was launched to combine “the struggle for the soul of Alphabet with the broader working-class struggle in America and around the world” as the organisation states in its website (Alphabet Workers Union, 2021, p. Section Meet CWA). Issues of identity are addressed in the homepage of the union, with relational clauses (Halliday &amp; Matthiessen, 2004) such as “we are empathetic workers”, and “we are technologists who trust each other” (Alphabet Workers Union, 2021, sec. Home), that attach emotions and feelings to the members of the Union. 
Using language that does not shy away from feelings is something unusual in the history of organised labour, so we could say that innovation in the production process has finally produced innovation in the language of union mobilisation and its communicative techniques. 

This paper aims at describing this new, emotional language of the Alphabet Workers Union as a form of resistance to the dehumanising rule of the algorithm. It is expected that, in the process, the anxieties and fears of the workforce will be highlighted and defined. At the same time, positive feelings and emotions attached to the re-humanising experience of pursuing a shared and collective goal are also bound to emerge.
The corpus analysed in the paper is made up of texts belonging to different genres so as to fully represent the social practice of union organising in all its semiotic aspects, from the most public to the ones used for internal communication (Askehave &amp; Swales, 2001; Bhatia, 2008, 2015; Martin, 2014; Swales, 1990). The ideational and textual aspects of individual texts are analysed in depth through Systemic Functional Linguistics (Halliday &amp; Matthiessen, 2004), while the analysis of the interpersonal aspect, i.e. the way in which social relationships are enacted through linguistic choices, is undertaken through the ‘appraisal’ paradigm developed by Martin and White (2005) as a system that accounts for the use of “semantic resources used to negotiate emotions, judgements, and valuations” (Martin, 2000, p. 145). 

References

Alphabet Workers Union. (2021). Alphabet Workers Union. Alphabet Workers Union. /
Askehave, I., &amp; Swales, J. M. (2001). Genre identification and communicative purpose: A problem and a possible solution. Applied Linguistics, 22(2), 195–212. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/22.2.195
Bhatia, V. K. (2008). Towards Critical Genre Analysis. In V. K. Bhatia, J. Flowerdew, &amp; R. H. Jones (Eds.), Advances in Discourse Studies (pp. 166–177).
Bhatia, V. K. (2015). Critical Genre Analysis: Theoretical Preliminaries. HERMES - Journal of Language and Communication in Business, 27(54), 9–20.
Halliday, M., &amp; Matthiessen, C. (2004). An Introduction to Functional Grammar (3rd ed.). Hodder Education.
Martin, J. R. (2000). Beyond Exchange: APPRAISAL Systems in English. In S. Hunston &amp; G. Thompson, Evaluation in Text: Authorial Stance and the Construction of Discourse: Authorial Stance and the Construction of Discourse (pp. 142–175). Oxford University Press.
Martin, J. R. (2014). Looking out: Functional linguistics and genre. Linguistics &amp; the Human Sciences, 9(3), 307–321. https://doi.org/10.1558/lhs.v9i3.307
Martin, J. R., &amp; White, P. R. R. (2005). The language of evaluation: Appraisal in English. Palgrave Macmillan.
Swales, J. (1990). Genre Analysis: English in Academic and Research Settings. Cambridge University Press.
Walker, M., Fleming, P., &amp; Berti, M. (2021). ‘You can’t pick up a phone and talk to someone’: How algorithms function as biopower in the gig economy. Organization, 28(1), 26–43. https://doi.org/10.1177/1350508420978831


Languaging Diversity 2021

Organising in the Industry 4.0: the rise of the &quot;Empathetic Union&quot;

industry 4.0

trade unions

attitude

multimodality

Truth and Responsibility
“Truth and Responsibility” is a call to reimagine anthropology to meet the demands of the present moment. The imperative to bear witness, take action, and be held accountable to the truths we write and circulate invites us to reflect on our responsibility in reckoning with disciplinary histories, harms, and possibilities. To whom are we giving evidence and toward what ends? For whom are we writing? To whom are we accountable, and in what ways? We are thrilled to announce the theme of the 2021 AAA Annual Meeting to be held in Baltimore, MD: Truth and Responsibility.

Many consider anthropology to be a holistic social science dedicated to cross-cultural understanding as a way to reduce bigotry and more fully comprehend “what it means to be human.” Others push against this readily circulated origin story, arguing that “human” remains a highly contested, political category—evident as the presumed set of rights and protections associated with the “human” continue to be stripped away violently in the communities in which some of us live and work. Which violent histories and epistemologies must anthropologists take responsibility for in telling truth(s) about the discipline’s development? How do the dual histories of settler colonialism and slavery continue to influence anthropological thought and practices? In these political times, how can anthropologists throughout the globe work to secure a capacious, progressive vision of the human? How might movements for anti-racism, decoloniality, queer liberation, and healing such as #BlackLivesMatter, #ProtectMaunaKea, and #MeToo push a future anthropology out of the ashes of the anthropological past? Finally, what are the limits and possibilities of the anthropological imagination?

Across subfields, we find truths in patterns of human behavior, language, evolution, and cultural worlds. Industry-positioned anthropologists do this by extending the boundaries of the discipline not as an administrative solution to job shortages but as a source of intervention and knowledge production. Increasingly, anthropologists who make use of the scientific method question how status and identity help to decide which facts come to represent truth. How might quantitative researchers use our methods to identify patterned truths, and what responsibility do we hold in challenging conventional wisdom about these patterns? What responsibility do we have to both our colleagues and larger publics, to push toward increased transparency and ethical grounding in our data collection, analysis, and presentation?

Pedagogy is a key medium for the communication of anthropological truths. Which (and whose) truths are foregrounded in our curricula? What are the possibilities for a liberatory pedagogy in a precarious, “post-truth” era? Conferences, museums, organizing spaces, and classrooms are sites where pedagogy and various forms of communication can help us interrogate the performativity of truth. How might anthropologists conceive of truth performances? Might visual, aural, and choreographic performances during AAA sessions offer anthropologists alternative genres for truth-telling and truth-making that provoke discussions about responsibility?

In accordance with the urgency of the year’s theme, the questions posed in this call for papers do not have easy answers. The hope is that those who submit proposals will take up these questions and engage in collective thinking and imagining about the truths we hold, the truths we challenge, and the responsibilities we bear in co-creating a free and more equitable world. All panel proposals should have a statement about how the panel has incorporated the goals of equity, diversity, and inclusion, and/or analysis of power.

Executive Session proposals have already been selected and speak directly to the theme “Truth and Responsibility.” To practice the critical reflexivity this call for papers invites, we asked that Executive Session submissions explicitly address the diversity of session participants, such as organizational/institutional affiliation, career stage, race, ethnicity, disability, sexuality, class, religion, national identity, and gender. Proposals for Executive Sessions that demonstrated a commitment to equity and inclusion and/or a clear analysis of power (i.e. anti-imperialist, anti-white supremacist, decolonial, anti-ableist, feminist, anti-transphobic, anti-xenophobic, etc) were given priority. We are excited to be in conversation with residents of the Baltimore region and look forward to the discussions, performances, and actions generated by the dynamic group of anthropologists attending the 2021 AAA Annual Meeting.

AAA Annual Meeting 2021

“Truth and Responsibility” is a call to reimagine anthropology to meet the demands of the present moment. The imperative to bear witness, take action, and be held accountable to the truths we write and circulate invites us to reflect on our responsibility in reckoning with disciplinary histories, harms, and possibilities. To whom are we giving evidence and toward what ends? For whom are we writing? To whom are we accountable, and in what ways? We are thrilled to announce the theme of the 2021 AAA Annual Meeting to be held in Baltimore, MD: Truth and Responsibility.

The technological changes in the sphere of production that we have witnessed in the last 10 years have been of such significance as to be called “Fourth Industrial Revolution” (Industry 4.0), thus an important step beyond the “Digital Revolution” of the late 20th century. Innovations such as robotics, artificial intelligence, the internet of things, and the development of algorithms, all point in the same direction: that of reducing human intervention in the production process to a minimum. 
Indeed, fears have emerged that artificial intelligence will create a huge reserve army of labour. The working and middle classes worry that computers and machines will end up taking their jobs and this will leave individuals and families with no possibilities of earning a leaving for themselves. These fears are very real and create growing anxiety among workers. 

Nonetheless, human labour is still needed in many different moments in the process of production and distribution of the goods that we consume. Thus, we are now in a situation in which human and artificial intelligence interact, with the latter taking up the role that once was of the line manager in the Fordist factory – dictating the speed and quality of work required – in many “traditional” industries, or directly as a substitute for the employers, as it is the case in the uberised ones, such as food delivery. This situation has serious implications for workers’ rights as well as for the construal of their identity as workers. Indeed, “workers governed by AI […] often fall through the cracks of employment legislation both with respect to their employment status as well as protections from discrimination and unfair dismissal.” (Walker et al., 2021, p. 29). 

The issues of identity referred to above constitute a major problem for organising resistance to unfair practices in the “workplace”, but recently some new forms of organisation have started to emerge. 
A case in point is the attempt at organising the workforce of one of the most famous and powerful tech giants, Alphabet, which is the corporation that owns Google, among many other enterprises. Indeed, on January 4th, 2021 the new Alphabet Workers Union was launched to combine “the struggle for the soul of Alphabet with the broader working-class struggle in America and around the world” as the organisation states in its website (Alphabet Workers Union, 2021, p. Section Meet CWA). Issues of identity are addressed in the homepage of the union, with relational clauses (Halliday & Matthiessen, 2004) such as “we are empathetic workers”, and “we are technologists who trust each other” (Alphabet Workers Union, 2021, sec. Home), that attach emotions and feelings to the members of the Union. 
Using language that does not shy away from feelings is something unusual in the history of organised labour, so we could say that innovation in the production process has finally produced innovation in the language of union mobilisation and its communicative techniques. 

This paper aims at describing this new, emotional language of the Alphabet Workers Union as a form of resistance to the dehumanising rule of the algorithm. It is expected that, in the process, the anxieties and fears of the workforce will be highlighted and defined. At the same time, positive feelings and emotions attached to the re-humanising experience of pursuing a shared and collective goal are also bound to emerge.
The corpus analysed in the paper is made up of texts belonging to different genres so as to fully represent the social practice of union organising in all its semiotic aspects, from the most public to the ones used for internal communication (Askehave & Swales, 2001; Bhatia, 2008, 2015; Martin, 2014; Swales, 1990). The ideational and textual aspects of individual texts are analysed in depth through Systemic Functional Linguistics (Halliday & Matthiessen, 2004), while the analysis of the interpersonal aspect, i.e. the way in which social relationships are enacted through linguistic choices, is undertaken through the ‘appraisal’ paradigm developed by Martin and White (2005) as a system that accounts for the use of “semantic resources used to negotiate emotions, judgements, and valuations” (Martin, 2000, p. 145). 

References

Alphabet Workers Union. (2021). Alphabet Workers Union. Alphabet Workers Union. /
Askehave, I., & Swales, J. M. (2001). Genre identification and communicative purpose: A problem and a possible solution. Applied Linguistics, 22(2), 195–212. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/22.2.195
Bhatia, V. K. (2008). Towards Critical Genre Analysis. In V. K. Bhatia, J. Flowerdew, & R. H. Jones (Eds.), Advances in Discourse Studies (pp. 166–177).
Bhatia, V. K. (2015). Critical Genre Analysis: Theoretical Preliminaries. HERMES - Journal of Language and Communication in Business, 27(54), 9–20.
Halliday, M., & Matthiessen, C. (2004). An Introduction to Functional Grammar (3rd ed.). Hodder Education.
Martin, J. R. (2000). Beyond Exchange: APPRAISAL Systems in English. In S. Hunston & G. Thompson, Evaluation in Text: Authorial Stance and the Construction of Discourse: Authorial Stance and the Construction of Discourse (pp. 142–175). Oxford University Press.
Martin, J. R. (2014). Looking out: Functional linguistics and genre. Linguistics & the Human Sciences, 9(3), 307–321. https://doi.org/10.1558/lhs.v9i3.307
Martin, J. R., & White, P. R. R. (2005). The language of evaluation: Appraisal in English. Palgrave Macmillan.
Swales, J. (1990). Genre Analysis: English in Academic and Research Settings. Cambridge University Press.
Walker, M., Fleming, P., & Berti, M. (2021). ‘You can’t pick up a phone and talk to someone’: How algorithms function as biopower in the gig economy. Organization, 28(1), 26–43. https://doi.org/10.1177/1350508420978831


Organising in the Industry 4.0: the rise of the "Empathetic Union"

technical paper

## **The Linguistic Construction of Emotional Challenges in a Changing Society**


**Languaging Diversity** is the itinerating conference of the [I-Land Interuniversity Research Centre](https://www.unior.it/index2.php?content_id=14038&content_id_start=1&titolo=i-land-research-centre&parLingua=ENG), an international independent and interdisciplinary center for advanced studies in Linguistics, Social Sciences and the Humanities with a focus on the key notions of identity and diversity, from a linguistic, cultural, and gender studies perspective, in and across cultures. 

Following the six successful events hosted by the Universities of Naples (2013), Catania (2014), Macerata (2016), Cagliari (2017), Antwerp (2018) and Teruel (2019), the seventh edition of the Languaging Diversity Conference (LD2021) will be organized by the University of Lille, France. Due to the COVID-19 ongoing pandemic, the event will be held exclusively online via the virtual conference management platform [Underline](https://underline.io/).


**Focus **

The 7th edition of the Languaging Diversity Conference (LD2021) focuses on the emotional challenges that result from the social innovations of the last two decades, and on the way such experiences are expressed in discourse. Conference convenors invite papers and posters that investigate the intersection of emotion, communication and social change, also within the framework of digital communication. The contributions presented at the LD2021 conference will explore the expression of emotion(s) at the different levels of linguistic description (phonological, morphological, syntactic, lexical, semantic, pragmatic, discursive), and in texts and contexts related to traditional and digital genres in different domains, including (but not restricted to) health, medicine and science, media, politics, the law, academia, the world of corporate and institutional work, education and learning. 


**Conference convenors**

* Giuditta Caliendo, Université de Lille & STL, France
* Maarten Lemmens, Université de Lille & STL, France
* Mégane Lesuisse, Université de Lille & STL, France

 
**Scientific Committee**

* Giuseppe Balirano, Università degli Studi di Napoli ‘l’Orientale’, Italy
* Henry Hernandez Bayter, Université de Lille & STL, France
* Stéphanie Caët, Université de Lille & STL, France
* Giuditta Caliendo, Université de Lille & STL, France
* Bert Cappelle, Université de Lille & STL, France
* Paola Catenaccio, Università degli Studi di Milano, Italy
* Emmanuelle Canut, Université de Lille & STL, France
* Stefania D’Avanzo, Università degli Studi della Campania ‘Luigi Vanvitelli’, Italy
* Ilse Depraetere, Université de Lille & STL, France
* Emilia Di Martino, Università degli Studi ‘Suor Orsola Benincasa’, Italy
* Antonio Fruttaldo, Università degli Studi di Napoli ‘l’Orientale’, Italy
* Dariusz Galasiński, Uniwersytet Wrocławski, Poland
* Kim Grego, Università degli Studi di Milano, Italy
* Siria Guzzo, Università degli Studi di Salerno, Italy
* Geert Jacobs, Universiteit Gent, Belgium
* Samantha Laporte, Université de Lille & STL, France
* Maarten Lemmens, Université de Lille & STL, France
* Mégane Lesuisse, Université de Lille & STL, France
* Jeannette Littlemore, University of Birmingham, UK
* Julien Longhi, Université de Cergy-Pontoise, France
* Corinne Oster, Université de Lille & CECILLE, France
* Paolo Mairano, Université de Lille & STL, France
* Antonella Napolitano, Università del Sannio, Italy
* Maria Cristina Nisco, Università degli studi di Napoli ‘Parthenope’, Italy
* Annick Rivens Mompean, Université de Lille & STL, France 
* Margaret Rasulo, Università degli Studi della Campania ‘Luigi Vanvitelli’, Italy
* Catherine Ruchon,Université Sorbonne Paris Nord -Pléiade, France
* Hans-Jörg Schmid, LMU München, Germany
* Jerome Tessuto, Università degli Studi della Campania ‘Luigi Vanvitelli’, Italy


[**Organizing Committee**](https://ld2021.sciencesconf.org/)

* Giuditta Caliendo, Université de Lille & STL, France
* Justin Duquesnoy, Université de Lille & STL, France
* Océane Foubert, Université de Lille & STL, France
* Lola Marinato, Université de Lille & STL, France
* Maarten Lemmens, Université de Lille & STL, France
* Mégane Lesuisse, Université de Lille & STL, France
* Sayf-Eddine Mohamed, Université de Lille & STL, France

**Keynote Speakers**

**Maïa Ponsonnet**
<iframe width=640 height=360 style="border:0;" scrolling="no" src="https://screencast-o-matic.com/watch/crQUbGV6Kgz" allowfullscreen="true"></iframe>

**Jeannette Littlemore**
<iframe width=640 height=360 style="border:0;" scrolling="no" src="https://screencast-o-matic.com/watch/cr6i2TVX2d0" allowfullscreen="true"></iframe>

**Andrea Scarantino**
<iframe width=640 height=360 style="border:0;" scrolling="no" src="https://screencast-o-matic.com/watch/crQUbEV6KgI" allowfullscreen="true"></iframe>

To access the **Languaging Diversity 2021** conference, please remember to [register.](https://ld2021.sciencesconf.org/registration) 

Languaging Diversity  is the itinerating conference of the I-Land Interuniversity Research Centre, an international independent and interdisciplinary center for advanced studies in Linguistics, Social Sciences and the Humanities with a focus on the key notions of identity and diversity, from a linguistic, cultural, and gender studies perspective, in and across cultures. 

The purpose of this paper is to study how and through which strategies individuals defend their ‘personas’ in discourse from online communication of hate.
I studied, in particular, the case of the Hollywood actor Robert Downey Jr. in relation to his controversial blackface role in the action comedy Tropic Thunder (2009) and how he defended his ‘persona’ from the backlash that his role caused. In movie, in fact, Robert Downey Jr. plays an extravagant and pretentious Australian actor who decides to undergo a controversial pigmentation alteration surgery to darken his skin in order to play an African American character.
Although the movie was intended to be a metanarrative satire of the Hollywood cinema, the audience accused Robert Downey Jr. of blackface.
I studied, through a sociolinguistic analysis, how Robert Downey Jr. defended himself from such accusations of racism. The analysis was conducted on a corpus of four manually transcribed interviews, to which the American actor participated between 2008 and 2009 (for the release of the movie) and again in 2020 when the he is being asked if he “could do Tropic Thunder today”. I noticed how, in all interviews, the actor used three main strategies to protect his persona from the racist backlash:
• Abundant use of narration: the actor talks about both his private life and 'cinematic life' in order to create his own personal identity through narration [This strategy refers to Gergen's theory of a ‘Narrative Approach to Personal Identity’, according to which the sense of who we are is related to the ability to create a coherent story about ourselves];
• Use of direct speech to quote friends and relatives who had defended his role in blackface, in order to make his speech sound more authentic and sincere. [This strategy can be traced back to Davies and Harré's 'Positioning Theory', according to which individuals have the
power to place - metaphorically - themselves and others within 'positions' (or social roles) in
everyday conversations depending on the context].
• Abundant use of the first person singular, in order to clarify his own point of view,
thus minimizing any possible political intent of his blackface.
Right after the 2020 interview, the actor was criticised on Twitter and further became a victim of ‘cancel culture’ (the act of publicly humiliating individuals who acted a cancellable offence, typified by racist, sexist or homophobic remarks): photos of the actor in blackface appeared on all socia media, angering thousands of users from all over the world: as a result, the hashtag #Cancelrdj appeared in the global trends of Twitter.
Robert Downey Jr. did not respond to the attempted cancellation of his persona on Twitter: the 2020 interview remains his last and definitive statement on his participation in Tropic Thunder.

"Personas in discourse": defending cinematic Identities from online communication of hate

This study investigates the use of gender-inclusive language among Italian non-binary individuals. In English-speaking countries, the epicene pronoun ‘they’ and neo-pronouns such as ‘xe’ and ‘zim’ have been adopted by non-binary individuals and LGBTQA+ allies alike. In this debate, Romance languages are a very interesting case, since they are inflectional languages characterised by gender markers for all variable parts of speech. In Italy, activists are trying to spread language awareness to dismantle gender discrimination conveyed through language. Projects such as ‘Italiano Inclusivo’, ‘Progetto Genderqueer’, and scholars such as Gheno (2019a and 2019b) are involved in the analysis and promotion of inclusive language, while one of the most important research institutions, the Accademia della Crusca (2020), refuses to accept any alternative. It is against this background that this study analyses the state of the use of inclusive language among the Italian non-binary community. Through a survey submitted to several Italian LGBTQA+ online groups, the study investigates non-binary individuals’ preferred pronouns, their selection of suffixes when writing or speaking about themselves or other non-binary individuals, how they refer to a group of mixed binary and non-binary people, and further proposals of inclusive forms. Gender-inclusive language is more than a matter of political correctness. Understanding the mechanisms behind its use is important because interpersonal communication contributes to gender stereotyping and misgendering. 

Gender-inclusive language among Italian non-binary individuals: a survey

After being accused of sexual assault in 2018, judge Kavanaugh received support from Donald Trump who offered him his sympathy as he explained “I feel so badly for him. This is not a man who deserves this”. This kind of inappropriate and disproportionate sympathy powerful men often enjoy in cases of misogynistic behaviour is what the philosopher Kate Manne (2017, 2018) calls himpathy. English gendered neologisms naming undesirable heterosexual/cis/male behaviours have accompanied accounts of sexual and sexist violence from the last few years, amplified by social media and the #MeToo movement. As for these stories, these neologisms aim at raising awareness by making the designated behaviours more visible.
A similar linguistic phenomenon occurred in the 1970s with the emergence of feminist linguistics. Based on the observation of the androcentric nature of language, feminists suggested strategies to counter this male bias, among which: (i) neutral or feminised forms to replace male generics (e.g. fire fighter instead of fireman), also known as “gender-fair language”, and (ii) linguistic innovations to name experiences from women’s perspective (e.g. sexual harassment; Spender 1990: 182–190). While there is a large body of language and gender research on the former, the latter has received little attention.
Among the few studies, Ehrlich and King (1994) show how these linguistic innovations lost their intended feminist meanings as they became institutionalised. The authors identify strategies depoliticising these forms, such as the expansion of the definition arguing that it is originally the feminist meaning in order to ridicule the phenomenon. For example, sexual abuse is redefined as overhearing a sibling discussing sexual experimentation. The authors (1994: 73) argue: “while feminist and nonsexist linguistic innovations […] attempt to reshape the dominant social structures and attitudes, they are at the same time being shaped by these very structures”. In their study, the social structure reshaping these meanings is the press media defined as a “dominant elite” (1994: 65) in which they observe the linguistic innovations. The reappropriation of feminist-driven language change has also been observed for gender-fair forms (Baker 2010, Pauwels 2003).
The linguistic innovations from the 1970s and the recent English gendered neologisms share the same motives – increasing the visibility of specific behaviours through names. However, Ehrlich and King’s (1994) findings seem to suggest that this is a lost cause. To become more visible, these neologisms have to be used outside of the linguistic community from which they originated. In other words, they have to be diffused. Yet, their study shows that a higher degree of diffusion means a higher risk of losing the intended feminist meaning.
Drawing from these results, this paper presents a sociopragmatic analysis (Schmid 2016: 82) of English gendered neologisms naming undesirable heterosexual/cis/male behaviours coined in the current feminist movement. The study is guided by the following questions: (i) what is the degree of diffusion of the recent English gendered neologisms naming undesirable heterosexual/cis/male behaviours? and (ii) did their intended feminist meaning change as they became diffused and does it differ depending on the type of source in which they occur? The neologisms will be analysed adopting a quantitative and qualitative corpus-based approach
using the NOW (News on the Web) corpus. More specifically, the degree of diffusion will be measured in terms of frequency, number of countries in which a neologism occurs, types of sources (i.e. is it in a journal specialised in gender matters or in general media?), and domains (i.e. the topic of the article). As mentioned above, Ehrlich and King’s (1994) findings are based on the study of innovations in the press media defined as a “dominant elite”. The digital nature of the NOW corpus offers a diversity of sources as it contains web-based newspapers and magazines from 20 countries since 2010. Both mainstream media such as The Guardian or The New York Times, and alternative media such as Big Gay Picture Show and Feminism in India are present in the corpus. This diversity will not only be used to observe whether a neologism is used outside of the linguistic community in which it originated but also to compare usage throughout source types. The media plurality is essential to provide a comprehensive account of the usage of these gendered neologisms.

References
Baker, P. (2010). Will Ms ever be as frequent as Mr? A corpus-based comparison of gendered terms across four diachronic corpora of British English. Gender and Language, 4(1), 125–149.
Ehrlich, S., & King, R. (1994). Feminist meanings and the (de)politicization of the lexicon. Language in Society, 23(1), 59–76.
Manne, K. (2018, September 26). Brett Kavanaugh and America’s ‘himpathy’ reckoning. The New York Times. https://www.nytimes.com/2018/09/26/opinion/brett-kavanaugh-hearing-himpathy.html; accessed 20/03/2021
Manne, K. (2017). Down girl: The logic of misogyny. Oxford University Press.
Pauwels, A. (2003). Linguistic sexism and feminist linguistic activism. In J. Holmes & M. Meyerhoff (Eds.), The Handbook of Language and Gender (pp. 550–570). Wiley-Blackwell.
Schmid, H-J. (2016 [2005]). English morphology and word-formation: An introduction (3rd ed.). Erich Schmidt.
Spender, D. (1990 [1980]). Man made language (2nd ed.). Pandora Press.
Corpus
Davies, M. (2016-). Corpus of News on the Web (NOW). https://www.english-corpora.org/now/

Naming experiences in the current feminist movement: a sociopragmatic study of English gendered neologisms

Taboo words, also known as swear words, curse words, profanities, etc., are words socially forbidden because they are considered as extremely impolite and/or profoundly insulting. These include rude words – known as gros mots (literally “big/rude words”) in French – related to taboo domains (religion, sexuality, body waste) on the one hand, and bigoted words known as slurs on the other hand – those two subcategories overlap with slurs related to sexuality, e.g. faggot or whore. Compared to the rest of the English or French lexicon, taboo words tend to contain significantly more of the least sonorant consonants, i.e. /p/, /t/, /k/, /tʃ/, /f/, /s/, /ʃ/, /θ/, /h/, /b/, /d/, /g/ or /dʒ/ (p<0.01). How can we explain this observation?
	Sound symbolism, the notion that sounds may have a meaning (Haiman 2018: 118-119) gives us a possible explanation. There may be an unconscious form-meaning association in the mind of speakers (Bergen 2016: 52-63) between non-sonorant consonants on the one hand, and some common meaning shared by taboo words on the other hand. This meaning is probably not semantic, but rather pragmatic and emotional (Finkelstein 2018: 311, 326), and the association may be iconic: non-sonorant consonants may be iconically appropriate to express the contextual meaning of ""violation of the hearer's personal space"" (Haiman 2018: 39-59), or the emotion of aggressiveness (Yardy 2010: 12-20; 71-78) – hence this creates a selection bias towards words with such consonants, when speaker communities choose which words they forbid.
	The study of fictional taboo words from English- and French-speaking works of fiction can give us circumstantial evidence: data gathered from a variety of English-speaking films, comic books, novels, and from French-speaking comic books The Adventures of Tintin by Hergé, show a similar tendency to contain more sonorant consonants compared to the regular lexicon (p<0.05 for English, p<0.06 for French). We will present a more systematic, experimental protocol to gather similar data on fictional taboo words: we will prompt English- and French-speaking respondents to playfully invent fictional swear words – and filler words; more precisely, alien/extra-terrestrial swear words, in order to remove as much as possible the influence of real-life taboo words – because some respondents might think, even unconsciously, that a convincing fictional swear word has to be related to and/or sound like some real-life swear word. If these invented words did follow the same phonological tendency, this would give another empirical confirmation of the hypothesised, sound-symbolic association.
	This suggests that a strong, persistent, conscious sociolinguistic convention (which words are taboo and which are not) can be influenced by an unconscious form-meaning association. Moreover, it suggests that sounds may convey meaning and emotion even in the seemingly least poetic words of the lexicon. We will conclude with theoretical considerations on the numerous social implications of this, especially in relation to social class – politeness vs. impoliteness, and the use of swear words are typically influenced by social class – and domination – what does this tell us about slurs and the proposed alternatives to slurs? Can we use this knowledge to prevent or limit the harm done to the dominated groups that are targeted by slurs?

The sound of taboo: investigating a sound-symbolic association in taboo words of English and French

Language – a means of communication used by humans within a society – enables people to interact to one another, to communicate emotions, and to develop emotions into specific categories.
The relationship between language and emotion has been explored in different research fields, such as psychology, anthropology, linguistics, neuroscience. However, little corpus-based sociolinguistic research on how speakers convey their emotions in formal contexts has been carried out (Schweinberger, 2019). At present, there is little scientific consensus on the definition of emotion. From a psychological perspective, it is often assumed that emotion categories hold a universal
essence; similarly, research on the emotion of lexicon argues that language is a representation of emotion categories which already exists (Lindquist & Barrett, 2008b). Whereas, anthropological research has revealed that the degree of emotional expressivity, verbally and non-verbally varies from culture to culture (cf. Wilce, 2009).
This paper examines emotions which are conveyed by lexicon. Typically, emotions conveyed by words can be either explicit – represented by their core meaning – or implicit – represented by connotations. We first define the psychological construct of ‘emotion’, and refer to the Conceptual Act Theory (cf. Barrett, 2017), according to which basic elements represent sensations from inside (affect) and outside the body (e.g. vision), categories experienced in a given culture, and executive attention (Lindquist & Barrett, 2012). We employ sentiment analysis to investigate the social stratification of emotions. The sentiment analysis we refer to is based on the Word-Emotion Association Lexicon source (Mohammad and Turney, 2013), which comprises 10,170 lexical items. These words were assigned scores on the bases of ratings gathered through the Amazon Mechanical Turk service (see Schnoebelen &
Kuperman 2010; Yu & Lee 2014; D’Onofio & Eckert, 2020 for discussion of the validity of use of Mechanical Turk for linguistic research). Commonly, most of the carried-out sentiment analysis only distinguishes between positive vs. negative emotions. Here, however, we explore the eight specific core emotions (anger, anticipation, fear, disgust, joy, sadness, surprise, and trust) in more detail by including them in the statistical model, which is described below.
We built a small-scale corpus from web-based newspapers which contain leading articles, editorials, and letters to the editors from The Cook Island News and The Cook Islands Herald. For the quantitative analysis, we use a mixed-effects logistic regression model with a binary dependent variable: emotional vs. non-emotional lexical items. The independent variables include (a) type of emotion (positive vs. negative vs. neutral), (b) the eight core emotions, (c) class word (e.g. nous,
adjectives, verbs), (d) sex of the author, (e) author, and (f) word-frequency. The latter is one of variables involved in language processing and is commonly studied in psycholinguistics, sociolinguistics, corpus linguistics (Mickiewicz, 2019). To account for word-frequency we use the SUBTLEX-US corpus (Brysbaert & New, 2009). Both ‘author’ and ‘word’ will be included in the statistical model as random intercepts. 

The emotionality of lexicon in Cook Islands English online news

Background
Although there is no proof that older people become infected by SARS-CoV-2 more than younger people do (WHO 2020), “[e]xisting literature suggests that age is an important predictor of poor outcomes among patients with COVID-19” (Mills, Kaye, Mody 2020: 1). This leads to older adults (globally agreed upon as people aged 60 years and older, WHO 2018) having converted into an even more vulnerable social group during the 2019- global pandemic. To the physical and psychological fragilities connected with ageing, an entire new set of issues has indeed added itself to their conditions, as the virus impacted on this population harder. One such problematic aspect is the economic disadvantage at which high numbers of seniors have found themselves to be, for instance in the United States of America, “according to estimates from the Elder Index, a county-level measure of the income needed by older adults to meet basic needs” (Li, Mutchler 2020: 478). Nursing homes and long-term care institutions, by definition inhabited by elderly citizens, also contributed to making them subject to early, sudden and repeated outbreaks of the disease (Chen, Chevalier, Long 2021). Yet another demographic datum is that the older population that was either killed or severely affected, at various levels, by COVID-19 was mostly represented by women (Peterman et. al. 2020). 

Aims and methods
Whether female seniors fell victim to the pandemic more than their male counterparts due to force majeure, since women over 60 are a statistically larger group than men (UN 2019), is one of the research questions this study intends to address. Another thesis will be explored, though, according to which “COVID-19 has exacerbated issues that already left older women at a significant disadvantage compared to men” (Zycher 2020). In order to investigate and evaluate the two differing positions, a discursive analysis of information about older females who have been and are being affected by the pandemic will be carried out. The depictions and representations of this specific social group shall be reconstructed and compared against hard data, from a perspective that definitely stems from Critical Discourse Studies (e.g. Wodak, Meyer 2015; Flowerdew, Richardson 2018), but will not hesitate to delve into research from other fields such as economics, sociology, health(care) and medicine, statistics and more, whenever necessary. Studies on ageing and (female) gender (e.g. Ylänne 2012, Anderson 2019) will necessarily also be consulted. 

Material
The relationship between older women and COVID-19 will be explored in English-language a) academic research; b) texts authored, edited, published, distributed or ultimately endorsed by governmental and supra-governmental organisations (the US, the UK and other English-speaking developed countries, the EU, the WHO, etc.); c) mass media news, when reporting data and information stemming from a) and b). Due to the ample variety of text types and genres considered, and to the fact that the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic at the time of writing is far from over, though it has entered the mass vaccination phase in early 2021, the texts for analysis are expected to be collected and thus scrutinised following quality- more than quantity-based criteria. 

Expected results and relevance
The research behind this proposal is currently work-in-progress. Results are expected to contribute, firstly, to ageing studies, at the beginning of the United Nations Decade of Healthy Ageing (2021-2030); secondly, to women-focused studies – a wording suggested as preferable to ‘Women’s Studies’, because it includes not only Women’s Studies as such but also Sex and Gender Medicine (Grego et al. 2020) and socio-economic disciplines when they focus on women. The latter, non-linguistic perspectives will of course be drawn upon only insofar as they prove functional to producing remarks on the discursive constructions and social critique conveyed by language. Methodologically, it is hoped this study may add itself to those contributing to the consolidation of trans-disciplinary approaches, which by today no longer need to be considered innovative and desirable but a necessity, if research is to address increasingly complex phenomena affecting people at a global level and creating and modifying social vulnerabilities at an unprecedented pace worldwide. 

Old, female and COVID-19+: issues of age and gender in the midst of the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic

In therapeutic encounters, patients from different ethnic backgrounds are required to communicate their emotions, often in a state of distress, to therapists who may not share their idea of therapy, and who patients feel have not shared their experiences, which may have led to their mental health state (Barden and Williams, 2007; Tribe, 2014). Due to the non-proficiency in the English language, some of these patients may not be able to communicate with therapists or express their emotions as they do in their first languages (L1) (Kennedy, 2015, Pavlenko, 2006). This is because the emotion words used to describe their distress not only depend on the personal experience, but in fact the meaning of distress is often culturally linked to the language of sorrow, which tends to feel emotionally weaker when interpreted into a foreign language (Lx) (Bamberg, 1997; Costa, 2010). As a result, therapists may fail to connect with patients or misinterpret the meaning of their emotional expressions. Therefore, this paper focuses on exploring how Pakistani, Somali and Yemeni (PSY) patients in Sheffield, UK use language to articulate their emotions, the emotional words or phrases they use to describe their emotions and how culture and/or religious beliefs may influence the expressions of such emotions or affect patients’ engagement with therapy. A qualitative interpretive approach using qualitative data collection methods including participant observations and in-depth semi-structured interviews has been used in order to understand the meaning of the intercultural communication encounter.  Results showed that the use of physical complaints to express emotional distress amongst PSY patients centred mainly on the description of the heart and how it impacts both on the mind and body (Haque and Keshavarzi, 2014), which appears to be based on Islamic teaching and reflect on their personal identities (Haque and Kamil, 2012). Participants were also found to use idioms of distress and rhetorical strategies such as metaphors, Quranic verses, and analogies that were shaped by the traditional norms and cultural and religious practices of each group to communicate their emotions (Blenkiron, 2005; Tair and Edward, 2006). These lexical items, which were layered with culturally different meanings, were not always adequately interpreted or understood by therapists. These lexical items drew attention to the complexity of communicating the emotions in cross-cultural therapeutic encounters, in which the communication can be quite a difficult task to achieve between patients and therapists.

The expression of emotions and their cultural ties to Pakistani, Somali and Yemeni patients' views of the world in cross-cultural therapy

The effects of the SARS-COV-2 pandemic have been wide reaching and the ways in which communication now takes place has fallen in line with such changes. The rise in use of telecommunication is prevalent within all fields of most note education, business and of course medicine. Indeed, the way in which patients now interact with doctors also most frequently takes place through teleconsultations, business meetings take place predominately online and teaching and learning follow the same trend. 

These changes in our everyday lives have brought with them an array of emotions and psychological challenges connected to themes of isolation, fear, illness as well as depression. The discursive representation of emotions has been studied in literature in line with emotions in the workplace (Ahuja, Heizmann & Clegg, 2019; Moisander, Hirsto & Fahy, 2016), student behaviour (Zsuzsa & Bendix Petersen, 2015) as well as mental health and illness (Sointu, 2016; Pavlova & Berkers, 2020). The current circumstances have also led the scientific community to recognise and investigate the challenges connected to adapting our lives and the effects of stress in this period with particular attention paid to the amount of time spent online (Horesh & Brown, 2020). 

Indeed, this has also opened up discussion into the perception of ourselves online in our new roles, new modes of interaction as well as our physical appearance. The representation of the latter has been relatively well explored discursively particularly in terms of social media. Studies have investigated discourses connected to beauty and physical appearance in a variety of ways with a particular focus on the female body as well as the concept of body image and even body dysmorphia (Aanesen, Notøy & Berg, 2020; Lewallen & Behm-Morawitz, 2016; Khanna & Sharma, 2017). The innovative and sudden introduction of such frequent remote communication has brought the concept of our own body-image under greater scrutiny. We now find ourselves faced with our own images on the screen for prolonged periods of time (a new vision of ourselves for many) and this has led to pause for reflection on the potential psychological and  even emotional consequences in some cases. This is turn seems to be leading to a greater interest and increase in requests for cosmetic surgery, the so-called “Zoom Boom” (Meeson, 2020). 

A key purpose of plastic surgery is restoring one’s physical appearance and/or function (following trauma or cancer) or enhancing it for aesthetic purposes in the case of cosmetic surgery. However, plastic surgery is an elective field of surgery and the current circumstances have led to many cancellations and rescheduling of surgeries. Aside from the backlog of patients that then ensues, the wait can also have a drastic impact on the patient’s psychological well-being. Despite this, patients wishing to enhance their physical appearance are still considering cosmetic surgery, where possible, as the current lockdown (and smart working) makes the healing time more feasible with less downtime and time away from work (Meeson, 2020). 

Therefore, this study poses the following research questions: 
•	What kinds of discourses exist surrounding choosing to undergo cosmetic surgery during a pandemic?
•	How has the pandemic impacted on emotional moods and levels of depression during lockdown leading to a greater awareness of our physical appearance and wish to enhance it? 
•	To what extent has telecommunication influenced the choice to undergo cosmetic surgery? 
•	Has the perception of one’s self been distorted through the digital image constantly under scrutiny through remote communication?

The corpus in question will be collected through the creation of an online ethnographic sociolinguistic questionnaire which will be distributed through social networks and email as well as semi-structured sociolinguistic interviews carried out in online cosmetic surgery focus groups. The study will combine sociolinguistic analysis (Milroy & Gordon, 2003) and corpus linguistics tools (Baker, 2010) employing a qualitative, quantitative and statistical analysis in order to investigate the abovementioned research questions. The lines of enquiry will explore the social variables of gender and age and a linguistic analysis will be carried out with particular attention to the ideological, psychological as well as metaphorical content.

Results are expected to reveal that the pandemic and the diffusion of remote communication is likely influenced by the psychological effects of lockdown, lower moods and a potential distortion of one’s own perception. 

References 
Aanesen, S. M., Notøy, R., & Berg, H. (2020). The Re-shaping of Bodies: A Discourse Analysis of Feminine Athleticism. Frontiers in psychology, 11, 1751. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01751
Ahuja S, Heizmann H, Clegg S. (2019) Emotions and identity work: Emotions as discursive resources in the constitution of junior professionals’ identities. Human Relations. 72(5): 988-1009. doi:10.1177/0018726718785719
Baker, P., (2010). Sociolinguistics and Corpus Linguistics, Edinburgh University Press. 
Horesh D, Brown A.D. (2020) Traumatic stress in the age of COVID-19: A call to close critical gaps and adapt to new realities. Psychological Trauma. 12(4): 331-335. doi: 10.1037/tra0000592 
Lewallen J, Behm-Morawitz E. (2016). Pinterest or Thinterest?: Social Comparison and Body Image on Social Media. Social Media + Society, 2 (1). doi:10.1177/2056305116640559
Khanna, A., & Sharma, M. K. (2017). Selfie use: The implications for psychopathology expression of body dysmorphic disorder. Industrial psychiatry journal, 26(1), 106–109. https://doi.org/10.4103/ipj.ipj_58_17
Meeson, S. (2020). Why plastic-surgery demand is booming amid lockdown. Available at: https://www.bbc.com/worklife/article/20200909-why-plastic-surgery-demand-is-booming-amid-lockdown (Last accessed 27.02.2021)
Milroy. L. & Gordon, M. (2003). Sociolinguistics: Method and Interpretation. Blackwell Publishing. 
Moisander, J.K., Hirsto, H, Fahy K.M. (2016) Emotions in Institutional Work: A Discursive Perspective. Organization Studies. 37(7): 963-990. doi:10.1177/0170840615613377
Pavlova, A. & Berkers, P. (2020). Mental health discourse and social media: Which mechanisms of cultural power drive discourse on Twitter. Social science & medicine (1982), 263 doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2020.113250
Sointu, E. (2016). Discourse, Affect and Affliction. The Sociological Review. 64(2): 312-328. doi: 10.1111/1467-954X.12334
Zsuzsa, M. & Bendix Petersen, E. (2015) Complicating ‘student behaviour’: exploring the discursive constitution of ‘learner subjectivities’  Emotional and Behavioural Difficulties, 20:1, 20-34, doi: 10.1080/13632752.2014.947097



The "Zoom boom" in cosmetic surgery: a corpus-based linguistic analysis

Contemporary research in the field of media and communication underlines the importance of ‘subcultures of consumption’ (Schouten and McAlexander, 1995), ‘brand communities’ (Muniz and O’Guinn, 2001), or ‘consumer tribes’ (Cova, Kozinets and Shankar, 2007) in addressing potential buyers. These studies additionally acknowledge that one of the most important and successful strategies adopted in selling specific products is represented by the creation in buyers of a desire for belonging that “may be satisfied through social interaction surrounding products or services” (Mardon, Molesworth and Grigore, 2018, pp. 1-2). Such feeling of belongingness is based on the discursive creation of ‘tribes’ whose members are bound together by “shared emotions, styles of life, new moral beliefs and consumption practices” (Cova and Cova, 2001, p. 67). And nowadays, online platforms and social networking sites (SNSs) have increasingly provided digital ‘spaces’ where tribe members may construct and experience a collective identity which is conveyed predominantly via linguistic cues and genre constraints that allow members to recognise themselves and be recognised as belonging to that community and, most notably in the case of consumption practices, in the products that are being sold to them.
On the basis of this background, the present study wants to investigate the particular case of YouTube beauty gurus, an online consumer-centred community that focuses on beauty-related issues addressed via vlogs (García-Rapp, 2017; Riboni, 2017a, 2017b, 2020). In particular, the specific evaluative resources and generic constraints will be highlighted that define the contours of the linguistic practices adopted by the online beauty community embodied in the ‘emotion work’ (Hochschild, 1983) that manages and regulates viewers’ feelings so as to enhance interpersonal relationships, resulting in ‘emotional labour’, i.e. the commodification of feelings of belongingness. Therefore, the ensuing investigation will examine the generic structure and discursive ‘tribe’ construction found in beauty product reviews uploaded by the most popular and influential beauty gurus on YouTube. In analysing such data, special attention will be paid to the construction of digital landscapes for culture-specific communities of affective practice (Balirano, 2020) so as to better understand how people forge alignments and negotiate meanings through digital practices (Zappavigna and Martin, 2018, p. 4).

References
Balirano, Giuseppe 2020. Of Rainbow Unicorns: The Role of Bonding Queer Icons in Contemporary LGBTIQ+ Re-Positionings. Ocula 21 (22), 46–60. DOI:10.12977/ocula2020-7.
Cova, Bernard / Cova, Veronique 2001. Tribal Aspects of Postmodern Consumption Research: The Case of French In‐Line Roller Skaters. Journal of Consumer Behaviour: An International Research Review 1 (1), 67–76.
Cova, Bernard / Kozinets, Robert V. / Shankar, Avi 2007. “Tribes, Inc.: The New World of Tribalism”. In Cova, Bernard / Kozinets, Robert V. / Shankar, Avi (eds), Consumer Tribes. London/New York: Routledge, pp. 3–26.
García-Rapp, Florencia 2017. ‘Come Join and Let’s Bond’: Authenticity and Legitimacy Building on YouTube’s Beauty Community. Journal of Media Practice 18 (2-3), 120–137.
Hochschild, A. (1983). The Managed Heart: Commercialization of Human Feeling. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
Mardon, Rebecca, / Molesworth, Mike / Grigore, Georgiana 2018. YouTube Beauty Gurus and the Emotional Labour of Tribal Entrepreneurship. Journal of Business Research 92, 443–454.
Muniz, Albert M. / O’Guinn, Thomas C. 2001. Brand Community. Journal of Consumer Research 27 (4), 412–432.
Riboni, Giorgia 2017a. Between Professionalism and Amateurship: Makeup Discourse on YouTube. Lingue Culture Mediazioni 4 (1), 117–134.
Riboni, Giorgia 2017b. The YouTube Makeup Tutorial Video: A Preliminary Linguistic Analysis of the Language of “Makeup Gurus”, Lingue e Linguaggi 21, 189–205.
Riboni, Giorgia 2020. Discourses of Authenticity on YouTube: From the Personal to the Professional. Milan: Edizioni Universitarie di Lettere Economia Diritto. 
Schouten, John W. / McAlexander, James H. 1995. Subcultures of Consumption: An Ethnography of the New Bikers. Journal of Consumer Research 22 (1), 43–61.
Zappavigna, Michele / Martin, James R. 2018. #Communing Affiliation: Social Tagging as a Resource for Aligning around Values in Social Media. Discourse, Context & Media 22, 4–12. DOI: 10.1016/j.dcm.2017.08.001.


The emotional labour of beauty standards: the case of YouTube beauty gurus

It has often been pointed out that metaphor is particularly important among linguistic expressions of evaluation. However, there have been very few studies investigating the relation between evaluation and metaphor, this is explored in this study in the context of online news reports. The aim of this study, conducted within the framework of Cognitive Linguistics, is the analysis of the mechanisms of evaluation operating in metaphors related to the concept of ANGER. 
This corpus-assisted study explores the metaphorical representations of the Tunisian Revolution of 2011 in a French news outlet. The study is based on the Conceptual Metaphor Theory (CMT) developed by Lakoff and Johnson (1980) and the rhetorically, cognitively and corpus-oriented approach to metaphor known as Critical Metaphor Analysis (CMA) developed by Charteris-Black (2004). 
The analysis aims to explore the attitudinal evaluation of the metaphorical representation of the emotion of ANGER in social movements. The results revealed that ANGER is mostly conceptualised as a force of nature, and that expressions of ANGER are evaluated as insecurity and dissatisfaction.

Downloads

Next from Languaging Diversity 2021

"Personas in discourse": defending cinematic Identities from online communication of hate

Similar lecture

Who Cares? The Truth About Precariousness and Care Work in the Contemporary U.S.

.css-70qvj9{display:-webkit-box;display:-webkit-flex;display:-ms-flexbox;display:flex;-webkit-align-items:center;-webkit-box-align:center;-ms-flex-align:center;align-items:center;}Downloads

Next from Languaging Diversity 2021

"Personas in discourse": defending cinematic Identities from online communication of hate

Similar lecture

Who Cares? The Truth About Precariousness and Care Work in the Contemporary U.S.

Downloads