France

Numerous studies have been conducted to bolster the role that wink face emoticon (; )) and tongue face emoticon (: P) play in indicating ironic intention in computer-mediated communication (CMC). By contrast, meagre research has been channeled in the direction of emoji-based ironic markers, particularly in cultures other than English, such as Chinese culture. The present study attempts to explore emoji-based comments in WeChat app among Chinese teenagers from both the perspectives of language production and language comprehension. Two experiments are carried out in order to look at what emojis are ironic in signaling speaker’s intention and to what extent these ironic markers will affect the perceived sarcasm as well as the emotional impact of the comments respectively. The first experiment conducts a free response task among 238 native Chinese high school students in order to sort out the emojis that can indicate ironic intention. The results show that wink face emoji and tongue face emoji are less preferable for Chinese teenagers in emoji-based CMC, nor do the two emojis show any significant effect on marking ironic intention; instead, smile face emoji and tears-of-joy emoji  are more likely to be included in sarcastic comments to indicate ironic intention among Chinese teens. Experiment 2 is a rating task set among a new sample of 253 high school students for the purpose of detecting the role the two emojis play in the comprehension and emotional impact of sarcastic and literal comments, for both praise and criticism conditions. The results reveal that 1) emojis are not only compensatory to ironic meaning when accompany the text, but contributory to the conversation in CMC as well, revealing that a stand-alone emoji could function as a response sentence on its own and work out the intended meaning of the recipient; and 2) The emojis exert influence on both the comprehension and emotional impact depending on the surrounding text they appear in. For the degree of sarcasm of the two emojis, both smile face emoji and tear-of- joy emoji exert significant influence on literal texts, making the literal comments more sarcastic in meaning; as for the influences on sarcastic texts, smile face makes sarcastic comments more sarcastic in meaning, whereas tear-of-joy emoji relieves text’s degree of sarcasm and makes sarcastic comments less sarcastic. In regard to the positivity of the two emojis, smile face emoji makes all literal utterances and sarcastic criticism texts less positive but makes sarcastic praise more positive; while tear-of-joy emoji makes all types of texts more positive but makes literal praise less positive. Overall, our findings reveal that different from Western cultures in which positive emoticons ( ; ), : P ; (EMO+) ) tend to be clues for irony, negatively labelled smile face emoji and neutral tear-of-joy emoji are indicators of ironic intention among Chinese teenagers. Compared with emoticons, Emojis are nuanced and visually-detailed graphics that may be more open to interpretation.


Languaging Diversity 2021

What emojis are ironic markers? A survey on Chinese teenagers in WeChat app

wechat

language comprehension

language production

emoji

irony

sarcasm

# Welcome everyone to ACL 2022!

The 60th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics is taking place May 22-27, 2022 as a hybrid event, in Dublin and online. We are happy to welcome all of you to this anniversary edition with an almost 50-50 in-person and virtual participation. <br><br>
The main conference program features oral presentations, in-person and virtual posters and demo sessions, a plenary session for our best paper presentations and awards, three amazing keynote events and two new initiatives of invited talks: Spotlight Talks for Young Rising Stars (STIRS) and The Next Big Idea Talks.  Posters (including Findings of ACL 2022) and demos are grouped by areas for both the in-person and the virtual sessions. For the virtual component, the talks will be on Zoom and the posters and the demos will be in GatherTown. The Student Research Workshop will have an oral session and a poster session as part of Poster Session 1. The program also features eight Tutorials and 28 Workshops. <br><br>

<br><br>
We wish you a wonderful conference! <br><br>
[**The ACL 2022 Organizing Committee**](https://www.2022.aclweb.org/organisers)
<br><br>
[**Conference Handbook**](https://drive.google.com/file/d/1_BUCMfhMVrjG9E2e71aHdHeE28KSje0l/view?usp=sharing)<br>
[**Mini Handbook**](https://drive.google.com/file/d/1qlBKl0wzmlVF1oCeMQl3BahLd9nLP5Ce/view?usp=sharing)<br>
[**Posters and Demo guides**](https://drive.google.com/file/d/1UucMAoCNncIOaH1rMMDa0owuG9qgvJTG/view?usp=sharing)


ACL 2022

The Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL) is the premier international scientific and professional society for people working on computational problems involving human language, a field often referred to as either computational linguistics or natural language processing (NLP). 

technical paper

## **The Linguistic Construction of Emotional Challenges in a Changing Society**


**Languaging Diversity** is the itinerating conference of the [I-Land Interuniversity Research Centre](https://www.unior.it/index2.php?content_id=14038&content_id_start=1&titolo=i-land-research-centre&parLingua=ENG), an international independent and interdisciplinary center for advanced studies in Linguistics, Social Sciences and the Humanities with a focus on the key notions of identity and diversity, from a linguistic, cultural, and gender studies perspective, in and across cultures. 

Following the six successful events hosted by the Universities of Naples (2013), Catania (2014), Macerata (2016), Cagliari (2017), Antwerp (2018) and Teruel (2019), the seventh edition of the Languaging Diversity Conference (LD2021) will be organized by the University of Lille, France. Due to the COVID-19 ongoing pandemic, the event will be held exclusively online via the virtual conference management platform [Underline](https://underline.io/).


**Focus **

The 7th edition of the Languaging Diversity Conference (LD2021) focuses on the emotional challenges that result from the social innovations of the last two decades, and on the way such experiences are expressed in discourse. Conference convenors invite papers and posters that investigate the intersection of emotion, communication and social change, also within the framework of digital communication. The contributions presented at the LD2021 conference will explore the expression of emotion(s) at the different levels of linguistic description (phonological, morphological, syntactic, lexical, semantic, pragmatic, discursive), and in texts and contexts related to traditional and digital genres in different domains, including (but not restricted to) health, medicine and science, media, politics, the law, academia, the world of corporate and institutional work, education and learning. 


**Conference convenors**

* Giuditta Caliendo, Université de Lille & STL, France
* Maarten Lemmens, Université de Lille & STL, France
* Mégane Lesuisse, Université de Lille & STL, France

 
**Scientific Committee**

* Giuseppe Balirano, Università degli Studi di Napoli ‘l’Orientale’, Italy
* Henry Hernandez Bayter, Université de Lille & STL, France
* Stéphanie Caët, Université de Lille & STL, France
* Giuditta Caliendo, Université de Lille & STL, France
* Bert Cappelle, Université de Lille & STL, France
* Paola Catenaccio, Università degli Studi di Milano, Italy
* Emmanuelle Canut, Université de Lille & STL, France
* Stefania D’Avanzo, Università degli Studi della Campania ‘Luigi Vanvitelli’, Italy
* Ilse Depraetere, Université de Lille & STL, France
* Emilia Di Martino, Università degli Studi ‘Suor Orsola Benincasa’, Italy
* Antonio Fruttaldo, Università degli Studi di Napoli ‘l’Orientale’, Italy
* Dariusz Galasiński, Uniwersytet Wrocławski, Poland
* Kim Grego, Università degli Studi di Milano, Italy
* Siria Guzzo, Università degli Studi di Salerno, Italy
* Geert Jacobs, Universiteit Gent, Belgium
* Samantha Laporte, Université de Lille & STL, France
* Maarten Lemmens, Université de Lille & STL, France
* Mégane Lesuisse, Université de Lille & STL, France
* Jeannette Littlemore, University of Birmingham, UK
* Julien Longhi, Université de Cergy-Pontoise, France
* Corinne Oster, Université de Lille & CECILLE, France
* Paolo Mairano, Université de Lille & STL, France
* Antonella Napolitano, Università del Sannio, Italy
* Maria Cristina Nisco, Università degli studi di Napoli ‘Parthenope’, Italy
* Annick Rivens Mompean, Université de Lille & STL, France 
* Margaret Rasulo, Università degli Studi della Campania ‘Luigi Vanvitelli’, Italy
* Catherine Ruchon,Université Sorbonne Paris Nord -Pléiade, France
* Hans-Jörg Schmid, LMU München, Germany
* Jerome Tessuto, Università degli Studi della Campania ‘Luigi Vanvitelli’, Italy


[**Organizing Committee**](https://ld2021.sciencesconf.org/)

* Giuditta Caliendo, Université de Lille & STL, France
* Justin Duquesnoy, Université de Lille & STL, France
* Océane Foubert, Université de Lille & STL, France
* Lola Marinato, Université de Lille & STL, France
* Maarten Lemmens, Université de Lille & STL, France
* Mégane Lesuisse, Université de Lille & STL, France
* Sayf-Eddine Mohamed, Université de Lille & STL, France

**Keynote Speakers**

**Maïa Ponsonnet**
<iframe width=640 height=360 style="border:0;" scrolling="no" src="https://screencast-o-matic.com/watch/crQUbGV6Kgz" allowfullscreen="true"></iframe>

**Jeannette Littlemore**
<iframe width=640 height=360 style="border:0;" scrolling="no" src="https://screencast-o-matic.com/watch/cr6i2TVX2d0" allowfullscreen="true"></iframe>

**Andrea Scarantino**
<iframe width=640 height=360 style="border:0;" scrolling="no" src="https://screencast-o-matic.com/watch/crQUbEV6KgI" allowfullscreen="true"></iframe>

To access the **Languaging Diversity 2021** conference, please remember to [register.](https://ld2021.sciencesconf.org/registration) 

Languaging Diversity  is the itinerating conference of the I-Land Interuniversity Research Centre, an international independent and interdisciplinary center for advanced studies in Linguistics, Social Sciences and the Humanities with a focus on the key notions of identity and diversity, from a linguistic, cultural, and gender studies perspective, in and across cultures. 

COVID-19 Emergency Remote Teaching (ERT, Karakaya, 2020) has rightfully been described as “an unprecedented challenge in university teaching” (Nuere & de Miguel, 2020), requiring lecturers wordlwide to adapt or devise entirely new syllabi and testing methods in a very short period of time (Bryson & Andres, 2020; Major, 2020), and for a length of time that has already exceeded the most conservative estimates (d’Orville, 2020).  
 
This study investigates a relatively unexplored area of ERT, i.e. interactive problem solving in the  online  and  blended  academic  classroom,  with  specific  reference  to  (1)  positive  and corrective  feedback  by  the  teacher;  (2)  student  live  feedback  through  open  microphone questions  asked  during  class;  (3)  face-saving  and  other  repair  strategies  by  both  teacher  and students. We concentrate specifically on pragmatic accidents directly associated with technological gaps or failures (i.e. connection speed or lack thereof; digital divide in terms of both computer/ network access and skills) and strategies used to bridge them.   
 
To  achieve  this  aim,  we  consider  an  intensive  introductory  course  of  English  Language  and Linguistics taught at the University of Bologna (Italy) by the author of this study, and addressed to freshmen of the BA degree courses in Foreign Languages  and Literatures and Languages, Cultures  and  Markets  of  Asia  and  Mediterranean  Africa  between  September  and  November 2020, for a total of 30 academic hours. Following university policy and Italian special COVID-19  laws  in  force  at  the  end  of  2020,  the  first  half  of  the  course  was  taught  full  distance, 
synchronically on Microsoft Teams, while the second part was administered “live”, with part of the audience present in the physical classroom, and the rest connected online from home on the  same  videoconferencing  platform.  Lessons  were  videorecorded  and  transcribed  using Microsoft  Stream,  and  subsequently  stored  on  the  Sketch  Engine  (Kilgarriff  et  al.,  2014)  to create a fully POS-tagged and lemmatized corpus in English, with some occasional instances of code-switching and code-mixing in Italian.  
  
The results show that the level of interactivity is higher (Luporini, 2020) than it was the case prepandemically in a very popular course (i.e.  about 400 students/annum) like the one under analysis (Fusari, 2021), as students tend to take and keep the floor, either by speaking on-record, or by writing in the Microsoft Teams chat, on average 11.3 times for each 90 minutes lecture. Feedback is overwhelmingly more positive than corrective on the teacher’s part, and most repair strategies hinge on self-deprecating humour or discourse situational irony, sometimes eliciting spontaneous laughter in the “live” classroom, and heart-shaped emoticons in the remote one. This may leave the analyst under the impression that students enjoyed this learning experience significantly  more  than  the  traditional  academic  lecture.  However,  on  a  closer  look,  all  that glitters is not gold: the data also betray a high level of anxiety on the part of all participants, as testified  by  the  remarkable  frequency  of  hesitations,  apologies,  repetitions,  false  starts,  and other expressions of uncertainty and doubt. To conclude, some hypotheses are advanced about the challenges and opportunities of ERT in academic settings.

References

Bryson, J. & Andres L. (2020). Covid-19 and rapid adoption and improvisation of online teaching: curating resources for extensive  versus  intensive  online  learning  experiences.  Journal  of  Geography  in  Higher  Education  44(4),  608-623.  
  
d’Orville, H. (2020). COVID‑19 causes unprecedented educational disruption: Is there  a road towards a  new  normal?. Prospects 49, 11-15.  
  
Fusari, S. (2021, forthcoming). Student-teacher e-mail interaction as asynchronous dialogue in an academic setting. In L. Caronia  (ed).  Language  and  interaction  at  home  and  school  (pp.  355-381).  Amsterdam  &  Philadelphia:  John Benjamins Publishing Company.  
 
Karakaya, K. (2020).  Design considerations in emergency remote teaching during the COVID-19 pandemic: a human-centered approach. Educational Technology Research and Development 65, 125-145.
  
Kilgarriff, A., Baisa, V., Bušta, J., Jakubíček, M., Kovář, V., Michelfeit, J., Rychlý,  P.  &  Suchomel,  V.  (2014).  The Sketch Engine: Ten Years On. Lexicography 1(1), 7-36.  
  
Luporini, A. (2020). Implementing an online English linguistics course during the Covid-19 emergency in Italy: Teacher’s and students’ perspectives. ASp 78, 75-88. Retrieved from https://journals.openedition.org/asp/6682 . 
 
Major, C. (2020). Innovations in teaching and learning during a time of crisis. Innovative Higher Education 45, 265–266.  
  
Nuere, S. & de Miguel L. (2020). The digital/ technological connection with COVID‑19: An unprecedented challenge in university teaching.  Technology, Knowledge  and Learning.  Retrieved from  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10758-020-
09454-6 .

Problem solving in the COVID-19 ERT university classroom

This paper explores the meaning of really polar questions and wh-the hell questions in TED talks as compared with MICASE. The meaning of questions is generally defined in relation to their answers. Questions are assumed to request information in conversation exchange (Sadock and Zwicky 1985). An answer is supposed to fill an epistemic gap. The paper investigates the role of questions in a discourse context where no information can be obtained from the addressee. The nature of responses is analysed. 
Epistemic really in a positive polar question triggers an epistemic bias of opposite polarity. As a verum operator, really adds the negative implicature that the speaker expected the negative answer to be true. The speaker ""asks for conclusive evidence for p"" (Romero and Han 2004), so as to get a confirmation of their original belief. This confirmation cannot be obtained in TED talks. We show that really questions serve to dispel commonly held beliefs by allowing the speaker to introduce conclusive evidence for not-p in the subsequent discourse and to steer the common ground to a new knowledge state. This discursive function of really polar questions is salient in TED talks as opposed to MICASE.
In content questions, the the hell phrase also conveys a negative implicature, i.e. ""the speaker's negative attitude toward the content of the question"" (den Dikken and Giannakidou 2002). The hell conveys two types of expressivity (Celle, Jugnet, and Lansari 2021) that derive from intensification. Emotional expressivity correlates with the speaker's attitude to p, which may rank high either along a scale of ignorance or incongruity. Iconic expressivity enacts emotion when a scale of performativity is involved. It is mostly associated with storytelling sequences inserted in the narrative. Both types of expressivity are attested in TED talks.
 In sum, really questions and wh-the hell questions contribute to achieving joint attention (Battich & Geurts (2020) in the knowledge-sharing process based  by arousing the addressee's interest. The disconfirmation of prior expectations is intended to create an anticipation on the part of the addressee.

Negative bias in questions in TED talks

In 1950, Akira Kurosawa directed a movie entitled “Rashomon”, depicting contradicting viewpoints of a single death event. In this study we argue that the Rashomon effect hypothesis can increase our understanding of the role emotions play in knowledge-building communication. Our goal is to understand the gaps between emotional intentions and the emotional interpretations of other participants, and their relation to civic conversations. Additionally, we explore the intersubjective ways in which recognition of expressions of emotions are made in digital, written, contentious conversations. Findings from this study offer new insights into the emotional components, expressive, and interpretive practice in such conversations and reemphasize the value and challenges of understanding emotional presence in digital discussions on civic issues.

Emotion recognition in digital discussions and civic learning processes

As is known, “[t]he word “nostalgia” comes from two Greek roots: νόστος, nóstos (“return home”) and ἄλγος, álgos (“longing”) (Boym, 2001). The word was invented in the 17th century by Johannes Hofer and soon it became very popular.
Nostalgia is an ambiguous phenomenon: it could be seen negatively, as it “fuelled populism and nationalist identity politics” (Menke, Schwarzenegger, 2016: 2), or “as a creative and progressive resource, a tool for commodification, or an agent for identity and community building to articulate cultural or generational belonging” (ibid., p. 2). Nostalgia may be seen also as an emotion. According to Havlena and Holak (1991: 323), it refers back to an earlier period in the individual's life and draws on biased or selective recall of past experiences. Nostalgia may be described as ""a painful yearning to return home” and it is broadly used in advertising, marketing and PR.
It is not only a manipulative technique, which is popular among PR specialists, politicians, journalists, etc. Nostalgia is also a means of overcoming the psychological consequences of the isolation, anxiety and trauma during the beginning of the COVID-19 crisis in Bulgaria since March 2020 because of its potential to bond with others (Niemeyer, Wentz, 2014: 129), to increase optimism and to mobilise people for action (FioRito and Routledge, 2020).
The aim of the study is to present nostalgia as a strategy for dealing with the state of emergency at the time of the first lockdown in Bulgaria during the COVID-19 crisis when nostalgic winds, memories of the past and literary reminiscences proved to be a successful strategy for dealing with physical isolation. The research questions include 1) a presentation of the nostalgic modes in Facebook and Twitter and a thematic classification of the initiatives, communication strategies and topics in the public space, oriented towards the past; 2) a quantitative analysis within the classified groups aiming to reveal the most frequent model; 3) revealing the reasons for their success as communicative and social messages through their meaning in social media during the emergency situation.
In order to achieve the above goals, a set of methods and approaches is used in the analysis and classification, as well as in the explanation of the reasons for the nostalgic convertibility in the public space, especially intensified during the COVID-19 crisis. Such a complicated phenomenon insists on using an interdisciplinary approach, especially the apparatuses of discourse analysis and content analysis. To investigate the cultural shaping of the nostalgic posts, to explain their social use in an emergency situation and to conceptualize the research data the multimodal analysis theories are also applied (Jovanovic, van Leeuwen, 2018, Ben Moussa et al., 2020, etc.).
The data includes public posts on social media (Facebook, Twitter), published in the period from 15.03.2020, when the state of emergency in connection with COVID-19 was declared in Bulgaria, until 13.05.2020, when it was terminated. We have collected multimodal posts with a nostalgic nuance, representing the longing for the previous lifestyle. We divide them into thematic groups, including historical memories, personal memories, nostalgic games, literary reminiscences, etc. A quantitative analysis within the groups is made aiming to reveal the most frequent model. As the combinations between different groups have been observed they are also presented.  We discuss as well the linguistic and visual characteristics of these messages to find the reasons for their popularity.
The results so far indicate that nostalgia through its diverse manifestation on social media manages to unite people in the presence of physical isolation, to remind them of past experiences and thus to save them from emotional stress which the COVID-19 constrictions and fears may cause. Social media and modern technologies make it possible to create new products based on old, forgotten stories or memories that live a new meaningful life in the specific COVID-19 situation.

References: 
Ben Moussa, M., Benmessaoud, S., Douai, A. (2020) Internet memes as “tactical” social action: A multimodal critical discourse analysis approach. International Journal of Communication, 14, 5920–5940. 
Boym, Sv. (2001) Adoptation and elaboration from Svetlana Boym, The Future of Nostalgia, Basic Books, NY 2001. Retrieved July 15, 2021, from: http://monumenttotransformation.org/atlas-of-transformation/html/n/nostalgia/nostalgia-svetlana-boym.html
FioRito, TA, Routledge, C. (2020) Is nostalgia a past or future-oriented experience? Affective, behavioral, social cognitive, and neuroscientific evidence. Front. Psychol, 11, 1133. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01133
Havlena, W., Holak, S. (1991) “The Good Old Days”: Observations on nostalgia and its role in consumer behavior. In R. Holman, M. Solomon, (eds.). NA - Advances in Consumer Research (Vol. 18, pp.323–329). Provo, UT: Association for Consumer Research. 
Jovanovic, D., van Leeuwen, T. (2018) Multimodal dialogue on social media, Social Semiotics, 28:5, 683–699, DOI: 10.1080/10350330.2018.1504732
Menke, M., Schwarzenegger, C. (2016) Media, communication and nostalgia. Finding a better tomorrow in the yesterday? Editorial. Medien & Zeit, 4, 2–5.
Niemeyer, K., Wentz, D. (2014) Nostalgia is not what it used to be: serial nostalgia and nostalgic television series. In: Niemeyer, K. (ed). Media and Nostalgia: Yearning for the Past, the Present and the Future (pp. 129–138). London: Palgrave McMillan.


Nostalgia as a means of dealing with emotional challenges during the first part of the COVID-19 crisis in Bulgaria Cultural Studies

If countless researchers in the most disparate fields have been investigating Covid-19 from different perspectives, that is because it brought about one of the biggest societal revolution of the 21st century. Through lockdown restrictions, curfews and social distancing, not only it compromised our daily lives, but also the economy and communication sectors at large. In order to contribute to the understanding of this global phenomenon, this research tries to analyse how Covid impacted the advertising industry in the UK by analysing from a multimodal and social semiotic perspective the #StayHomeHeroes digital ad and hashtag created by Iris and the Heroes charity to economically support the NHS in the fight against Covid-19. This presentation raises three points: how both Covid and the media revolution changed societies and communication; the emotional challenges that Covid brought about and the linguistic and semiotic manifestations of this sensitive time, all through a focus on advertising.

#StayHomeHeroes: Hilarious yet bonding print advertising strategies to fight against COVID-19

Metaphorical representation of the pandemic in the German press
Theoretical background
The key role of metaphors in shaping not only cognition but also the emotional attitude towards specific phenomena is particularly relevant in specialised domains directly affecting the lives of individuals, such as medicine (e.g. Sontag 1990; Schiefer 2005; Schachtner 1999; 2001). According to the traditional Conceptual Metaphor Theory, as it was originally formulated by Lakoff and Johnson (1980), metaphors always imply a cognitive cross-domain mapping, which is in turn reflected in language use: Abstract phenomena (the target domains) are conceptualised in terms of others, typically more concrete (the source domains), and they are linguistically expressed accordingly. Moreover, those metaphors are embodied, i.e. they rely on bodily experiences. The relationship between emotions and metaphors can be therefore analysed from different perspectives. On the one hand, emotions themselves can be considered as abstract categories expressed through metaphors: An example could be the conceptualisation of anger as hot fluid in a container (also implying that the body itself is a container) or as fire (Kövecses 2008: 381), which in turn originates from the way this emotion is physically experienced in the human body. On the other hand, emotions can be awakened by specific metaphors, especially when they are used “deliberately”, i.e. for specific communicative purposes (for the pragmatic approach to metaphor use and the distinction between “deliberate” and “non-deliberate” use see Steen 2008; 2015). The emotional response to metaphors in comparison with their literal counterparts has been investigated in the field of psycholinguistics and data suggesting that metaphors evoke “greater emotional response” (Semino 2021: 51) have been collected (e.g. Citron / Goldberg 2014). A study by Scherer et al. (2015) highlighted for example how “metaphorical descriptions of influenza (as a beast, riot, army, or weed) increased expressions of willingness to be vaccinated, as opposed to a literal description” (Semino 2021: 51). Given its important psychological impact, the language used in the media to portrait the Covid-19 pandemics and its political, economic as well as social consequences elicited (and still elicits) strong emotions (such as fear of the virus and the consequences of the pandemics, but also loneliness due to social distancing), which are, in turn, mostly connected to metaphors. The most famous metaphor used in medical communication is for example the war-metaphor (e.g. Bauer 2006; Semino 2021; Sontag 1990): Not surprisingly, this metaphor, which is deeply rooted in medical communication and has shown (often negative) psychological entailments (Sontag 1990), has been also used to describe the pandemics caused by the Virus SARS-CoV-2. In this regard, Semino (2021) recently presented the data collected in the “#ReframeCovid” (https://sites.google.com/view/reframecovid/home), aiming at finding alternatives to military metaphors, as this latter have been in this case criticised “for inappropriately personifying the virus as a malevolent opponent, creating excessive anxiety, potentially legitimizing authoritarian governmental measures, and implying that those who die did not fight hard enough” (Semino 2021: 50), in other words for the negative emotions they elicit and the potentially dangerous consequences that exploiting those emotions may have for the individual, social and political life. 
The study
Moving from the theoretical assumptions outlined, the aim of this pilot study is to identify on the one hand the metaphors used to describe the first months of the pandemics in the German magazines “Der Spiegel” and “Die Zeit” and on the other hand to highlight their (possible) emotional implications. The metaphorical use of lexical units is identified according to the Metaphor Identification Procedure (Pragglajez Group 2007). Following levels of analysis and research questions will be addressed: 
•	The source and target domains: What metaphors are used and what phenomena do they conceptualise? Are those metaphors novel or do they instantiate highly conventionalised, well-established framing patterns?
•	The emotional level of investigation: What emotions can be linked to those metaphors? Are emotions themselves directly addressed or expressed through metaphors? 
•	The relationship with non-verbal elements: Are there visual metaphors? Are the verbal metaphors also linked to images? 
The corpus consists in articles published by „Der Spiegel“ and “Die Zeit” in March and April 2020, i.e. during the first lockdown established to face the pandemics.
References
Bauer, Alex W. (2006): Metaphern, Bildersprache und Selbstverständnis der Medizin. In: Anaesthesist 55, 1307 - 1314. 
Citron, Francesca M. / Goldberg, Adele E. (2014): Metaphorical sentences are more emotionally engaging than their literal counterparts. In: Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 26 /11, 2585–2595.
Kövecses, Zoltán (2008): Metaphor and Emotion. In Gibbs, Raymond (ed.): The Cambridge Handbook of Metaphor and Thought. Cambridge University Press, 380-396. 
Pragglejaz Group (2007). MIP: A method for identifying metaphorically used words in discourse. Metaphor and Symbol, 22 /1, 1-39. 
Schachtner, Christina (1999): Ärztliche Praxis. Die gestaltende Kraft der Metapher. Suhrkamp. Frankfurt a.M. 
Schachtner, Christina (2001): Krankheits- und Gesundheitsbilder Metaphern als strukturierende Strukturen. In: Journal für Psychologie 9/4, 61–74. 
Scherer, Aaron M. / Scherer, Laura D. / Fagerlin, Angela (2015): Getting ahead of illness. In: Medical Decision Making, 35 /1, 37–45.
Schiefer, Matthias (2005): Die metaphorische Sprache in der Medizin. Metaphorische Konzeptualisierungen in der Medizin und ihre ethischen Implikationen untersucht anhand von Arztbriefanalysen. Lit. Vienna. 
Sontag, Susan (1990): Illness and its metaphors, and AID and its metaphors. Doubleday. New York. 
Semino, Elena (2021): “Not soldiers, but Fire-fighters” – Metaphors for COVID-19. In: Health Communication, 36/1, 50-58.
Steen, Gerard (2008): The paradox of metaphor: why we need a three-dimensional model for metaphor. In: Metaphor and Symbol 23/4, 213-241. 
Steen, Gerard (2015): Developing, Testing and Interpreting Deliberate Metaphor Theory. In: Journal of Pragmatics 90, 1-6. 


Metaphorical representation of the pandemics in the German press

Exploring diversity and journalistic discourse in the pandemic: a corpus based study

How to do things with emotional expressions

Language is the most sophisticated tool humans have developed to communicate emotional experiences. However, due to their highly personal, idiosyncratic nature, such experiences can often be difficult to put into words. The dimensional aspects of emotional experiences, i.e., those involving valence, dominance and arousal can be expressed through literal language. However, once we go beyond these dimensional accounts and try to describe the subjective felt experiences of emotions it is necessary to employ metaphor. Metaphors provide information about the rich detail of human emotional experience in a way that literal language does not (Semino et al., 2017). Metaphorical skill and imagination are therefore important in communicating the nature of unshared experience and creating rapport (Reisfield & Wilson, 2004). For this reason, when talking about deep, personal emotional experiences that are difficult to describe, people often reach for metaphor, with more personal experiences leading to more creative uses of metaphor (Fainsilber & Ortony, 1987; Williams-Whitney et al., 1992). Possible reasons for this are the fact that metaphors allow us to describe ineffable experiences in more concrete, tangible, and often physical terms, and metaphors are sufficiently flexible to allow us to employ a finite set of linguistic resources to express precisely, an infinite range of experiences (Colston & Gibbs, 2021).
In this talk I present findings from four studies, which involved the analysis of metaphor in order to better understand people’s personal, emotional experiences. These experiences include: pregnancy loss; bereavement; the description of positive and negative workplace experiences; and older adults’ experiences of lockdown during Covid 19. Through these studies I reveal what metaphor analysis can tell us about: embodied grief; agency and identity; relationships with others, including the deceased; attitudes towards time, the extent to which experiences are shared by communities; and the ways in which these experiences change over time. I reflect on the benefits and drawbacks of the methods employed and discuss the ways in which findings from some of these studies have been incorporated into professional development materials that have been designed for those who support the bereaved.

References
Colston, H. L., & Gibbs, R. W. (2021). Figurative language communicates directly because it precisely demonstrates what we mean. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology/Revue Canadienne de Psychologie Expérimentale.
Fainsilber, L., & Ortony, A. (1987). Metaphorical uses of language in the expression of emotions. Metaphor and Symbol, 2(4), 239–250.
Reisfield, G. M., & Wilson, G. R. (2004). Use of metaphor in the discourse on cancer. Journal of Clinical Oncology, 22(19), 4024–4027.
Semino, E., Demjén, Z., Hardie, A., Payne, S., & Rayson, P. (2017). Metaphor, cancer and the end of life: A corpus-based study. Routledge.
Williams-Whitney, D., Mio, J. S., & Whitney, P. (1992). Metaphor production in creative writing. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 21(6).

What emojis are ironic markers? A survey on Chinese teenagers in WeChat app

Downloads

Next from Languaging Diversity 2021

Problem solving in the COVID-19 ERT university classroom

Similar lecture

Should a Chatbot be Sarcastic? Understanding User Preferences Towards Sarcasm Generation

What emojis are ironic markers? A survey on Chinese teenagers in WeChat app

.css-70qvj9{display:-webkit-box;display:-webkit-flex;display:-ms-flexbox;display:flex;-webkit-align-items:center;-webkit-box-align:center;-ms-flex-align:center;align-items:center;}Downloads

Next from Languaging Diversity 2021

Problem solving in the COVID-19 ERT university classroom

Similar lecture

Should a Chatbot be Sarcastic? Understanding User Preferences Towards Sarcasm Generation

Downloads