France

In 1950, Akira Kurosawa directed a movie entitled “Rashomon”, depicting contradicting viewpoints of a single death event. In this study we argue that the Rashomon effect hypothesis can increase our understanding of the role emotions play in knowledge-building communication. Our goal is to understand the gaps between emotional intentions and the emotional interpretations of other participants, and their relation to civic conversations. Additionally, we explore the intersubjective ways in which recognition of expressions of emotions are made in digital, written, contentious conversations. Findings from this study offer new insights into the emotional components, expressive, and interpretive practice in such conversations and reemphasize the value and challenges of understanding emotional presence in digital discussions on civic issues.

Languaging Diversity 2021

Emotion recognition in digital discussions and civic learning processes

civic conversations

digital conversations

emotion recognition

[![](https://assets.underline.io/uploads/markdown_image/1/image/81a3c0317d24f663b49b996875024d45.png)](https://aclanthology.org/volumes/2022.coling-1/)



### THE CONFERENCE WE KNOW AND WE WANT.
**COLING**, the International Conference on Computational Linguistics, is one of the premier conferences for the natural language processing and computational linguistics.

First established in 1965, the biennial COLING conference is held in diverse parts of the globe and attracts participants from both top-ranked research centers and emerging countries. Today, the most important developments in our field are taking place not only in universities and academic research institutes but also in industrial research departments including tech-startups. COLING provides opportunities for all these communities to showcase their exciting discovery.

In fall of 2022, COLING will be held in Gyeongju in a hybrid format. All participants can either present at the venue site or join virtually. As more people get vaccinated, we are happy to provide safer environments for our colleagues. We believe that COLING 2022 will be one of the conferences, free from the pandemic. The hybrid format gives presenters and sponsors a valuable opportunity to promote their companies in both an online and in-person venue. For the first time in a long time, customers can interact with their sponsor's products first-hand. The online venue, too, gives sponsors the chance to network with those unable to attend the in-person session.

The hybrid format ultimately lends itself to greater exposure for our sponsors: COLING2022 will let you reach more potential partners and customers than ever before!<br><br><br>

To gain access to this event page you are required to register.<br> Find more information and pay the registration fee on event the organizer’s website **[https://coling2022.org/reg](https://coling2022.org/reg)**

COLING 2022

COLING, the International Conference on Computational Linguistics, is one of the premier conferences for the natural language processing and computational linguistics.

technical paper

## **The Linguistic Construction of Emotional Challenges in a Changing Society**


**Languaging Diversity** is the itinerating conference of the [I-Land Interuniversity Research Centre](https://www.unior.it/index2.php?content_id=14038&content_id_start=1&titolo=i-land-research-centre&parLingua=ENG), an international independent and interdisciplinary center for advanced studies in Linguistics, Social Sciences and the Humanities with a focus on the key notions of identity and diversity, from a linguistic, cultural, and gender studies perspective, in and across cultures. 

Following the six successful events hosted by the Universities of Naples (2013), Catania (2014), Macerata (2016), Cagliari (2017), Antwerp (2018) and Teruel (2019), the seventh edition of the Languaging Diversity Conference (LD2021) will be organized by the University of Lille, France. Due to the COVID-19 ongoing pandemic, the event will be held exclusively online via the virtual conference management platform [Underline](https://underline.io/).


**Focus **

The 7th edition of the Languaging Diversity Conference (LD2021) focuses on the emotional challenges that result from the social innovations of the last two decades, and on the way such experiences are expressed in discourse. Conference convenors invite papers and posters that investigate the intersection of emotion, communication and social change, also within the framework of digital communication. The contributions presented at the LD2021 conference will explore the expression of emotion(s) at the different levels of linguistic description (phonological, morphological, syntactic, lexical, semantic, pragmatic, discursive), and in texts and contexts related to traditional and digital genres in different domains, including (but not restricted to) health, medicine and science, media, politics, the law, academia, the world of corporate and institutional work, education and learning. 


**Conference convenors**

* Giuditta Caliendo, Université de Lille & STL, France
* Maarten Lemmens, Université de Lille & STL, France
* Mégane Lesuisse, Université de Lille & STL, France

 
**Scientific Committee**

* Giuseppe Balirano, Università degli Studi di Napoli ‘l’Orientale’, Italy
* Henry Hernandez Bayter, Université de Lille & STL, France
* Stéphanie Caët, Université de Lille & STL, France
* Giuditta Caliendo, Université de Lille & STL, France
* Bert Cappelle, Université de Lille & STL, France
* Paola Catenaccio, Università degli Studi di Milano, Italy
* Emmanuelle Canut, Université de Lille & STL, France
* Stefania D’Avanzo, Università degli Studi della Campania ‘Luigi Vanvitelli’, Italy
* Ilse Depraetere, Université de Lille & STL, France
* Emilia Di Martino, Università degli Studi ‘Suor Orsola Benincasa’, Italy
* Antonio Fruttaldo, Università degli Studi di Napoli ‘l’Orientale’, Italy
* Dariusz Galasiński, Uniwersytet Wrocławski, Poland
* Kim Grego, Università degli Studi di Milano, Italy
* Siria Guzzo, Università degli Studi di Salerno, Italy
* Geert Jacobs, Universiteit Gent, Belgium
* Samantha Laporte, Université de Lille & STL, France
* Maarten Lemmens, Université de Lille & STL, France
* Mégane Lesuisse, Université de Lille & STL, France
* Jeannette Littlemore, University of Birmingham, UK
* Julien Longhi, Université de Cergy-Pontoise, France
* Corinne Oster, Université de Lille & CECILLE, France
* Paolo Mairano, Université de Lille & STL, France
* Antonella Napolitano, Università del Sannio, Italy
* Maria Cristina Nisco, Università degli studi di Napoli ‘Parthenope’, Italy
* Annick Rivens Mompean, Université de Lille & STL, France 
* Margaret Rasulo, Università degli Studi della Campania ‘Luigi Vanvitelli’, Italy
* Catherine Ruchon,Université Sorbonne Paris Nord -Pléiade, France
* Hans-Jörg Schmid, LMU München, Germany
* Jerome Tessuto, Università degli Studi della Campania ‘Luigi Vanvitelli’, Italy


[**Organizing Committee**](https://ld2021.sciencesconf.org/)

* Giuditta Caliendo, Université de Lille & STL, France
* Justin Duquesnoy, Université de Lille & STL, France
* Océane Foubert, Université de Lille & STL, France
* Lola Marinato, Université de Lille & STL, France
* Maarten Lemmens, Université de Lille & STL, France
* Mégane Lesuisse, Université de Lille & STL, France
* Sayf-Eddine Mohamed, Université de Lille & STL, France

**Keynote Speakers**

**Maïa Ponsonnet**
<iframe width=640 height=360 style="border:0;" scrolling="no" src="https://screencast-o-matic.com/watch/crQUbGV6Kgz" allowfullscreen="true"></iframe>

**Jeannette Littlemore**
<iframe width=640 height=360 style="border:0;" scrolling="no" src="https://screencast-o-matic.com/watch/cr6i2TVX2d0" allowfullscreen="true"></iframe>

**Andrea Scarantino**
<iframe width=640 height=360 style="border:0;" scrolling="no" src="https://screencast-o-matic.com/watch/crQUbEV6KgI" allowfullscreen="true"></iframe>

To access the **Languaging Diversity 2021** conference, please remember to [register.](https://ld2021.sciencesconf.org/registration) 

Languaging Diversity  is the itinerating conference of the I-Land Interuniversity Research Centre, an international independent and interdisciplinary center for advanced studies in Linguistics, Social Sciences and the Humanities with a focus on the key notions of identity and diversity, from a linguistic, cultural, and gender studies perspective, in and across cultures. 

COVID-19 Emergency Remote Teaching (ERT, Karakaya, 2020) has rightfully been described as “an unprecedented challenge in university teaching” (Nuere & de Miguel, 2020), requiring lecturers wordlwide to adapt or devise entirely new syllabi and testing methods in a very short period of time (Bryson & Andres, 2020; Major, 2020), and for a length of time that has already exceeded the most conservative estimates (d’Orville, 2020).  
 
This study investigates a relatively unexplored area of ERT, i.e. interactive problem solving in the  online  and  blended  academic  classroom,  with  specific  reference  to  (1)  positive  and corrective  feedback  by  the  teacher;  (2)  student  live  feedback  through  open  microphone questions  asked  during  class;  (3)  face-saving  and  other  repair  strategies  by  both  teacher  and students. We concentrate specifically on pragmatic accidents directly associated with technological gaps or failures (i.e. connection speed or lack thereof; digital divide in terms of both computer/ network access and skills) and strategies used to bridge them.   
 
To  achieve  this  aim,  we  consider  an  intensive  introductory  course  of  English  Language  and Linguistics taught at the University of Bologna (Italy) by the author of this study, and addressed to freshmen of the BA degree courses in Foreign Languages  and Literatures and Languages, Cultures  and  Markets  of  Asia  and  Mediterranean  Africa  between  September  and  November 2020, for a total of 30 academic hours. Following university policy and Italian special COVID-19  laws  in  force  at  the  end  of  2020,  the  first  half  of  the  course  was  taught  full  distance, 
synchronically on Microsoft Teams, while the second part was administered “live”, with part of the audience present in the physical classroom, and the rest connected online from home on the  same  videoconferencing  platform.  Lessons  were  videorecorded  and  transcribed  using Microsoft  Stream,  and  subsequently  stored  on  the  Sketch  Engine  (Kilgarriff  et  al.,  2014)  to create a fully POS-tagged and lemmatized corpus in English, with some occasional instances of code-switching and code-mixing in Italian.  
  
The results show that the level of interactivity is higher (Luporini, 2020) than it was the case prepandemically in a very popular course (i.e.  about 400 students/annum) like the one under analysis (Fusari, 2021), as students tend to take and keep the floor, either by speaking on-record, or by writing in the Microsoft Teams chat, on average 11.3 times for each 90 minutes lecture. Feedback is overwhelmingly more positive than corrective on the teacher’s part, and most repair strategies hinge on self-deprecating humour or discourse situational irony, sometimes eliciting spontaneous laughter in the “live” classroom, and heart-shaped emoticons in the remote one. This may leave the analyst under the impression that students enjoyed this learning experience significantly  more  than  the  traditional  academic  lecture.  However,  on  a  closer  look,  all  that glitters is not gold: the data also betray a high level of anxiety on the part of all participants, as testified  by  the  remarkable  frequency  of  hesitations,  apologies,  repetitions,  false  starts,  and other expressions of uncertainty and doubt. To conclude, some hypotheses are advanced about the challenges and opportunities of ERT in academic settings.

References

Bryson, J. & Andres L. (2020). Covid-19 and rapid adoption and improvisation of online teaching: curating resources for extensive  versus  intensive  online  learning  experiences.  Journal  of  Geography  in  Higher  Education  44(4),  608-623.  
  
d’Orville, H. (2020). COVID‑19 causes unprecedented educational disruption: Is there  a road towards a  new  normal?. Prospects 49, 11-15.  
  
Fusari, S. (2021, forthcoming). Student-teacher e-mail interaction as asynchronous dialogue in an academic setting. In L. Caronia  (ed).  Language  and  interaction  at  home  and  school  (pp.  355-381).  Amsterdam  &  Philadelphia:  John Benjamins Publishing Company.  
 
Karakaya, K. (2020).  Design considerations in emergency remote teaching during the COVID-19 pandemic: a human-centered approach. Educational Technology Research and Development 65, 125-145.
  
Kilgarriff, A., Baisa, V., Bušta, J., Jakubíček, M., Kovář, V., Michelfeit, J., Rychlý,  P.  &  Suchomel,  V.  (2014).  The Sketch Engine: Ten Years On. Lexicography 1(1), 7-36.  
  
Luporini, A. (2020). Implementing an online English linguistics course during the Covid-19 emergency in Italy: Teacher’s and students’ perspectives. ASp 78, 75-88. Retrieved from https://journals.openedition.org/asp/6682 . 
 
Major, C. (2020). Innovations in teaching and learning during a time of crisis. Innovative Higher Education 45, 265–266.  
  
Nuere, S. & de Miguel L. (2020). The digital/ technological connection with COVID‑19: An unprecedented challenge in university teaching.  Technology, Knowledge  and Learning.  Retrieved from  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10758-020-
09454-6 .

Problem solving in the COVID-19 ERT university classroom

This paper explores the meaning of really polar questions and wh-the hell questions in TED talks as compared with MICASE. The meaning of questions is generally defined in relation to their answers. Questions are assumed to request information in conversation exchange (Sadock and Zwicky 1985). An answer is supposed to fill an epistemic gap. The paper investigates the role of questions in a discourse context where no information can be obtained from the addressee. The nature of responses is analysed. 
Epistemic really in a positive polar question triggers an epistemic bias of opposite polarity. As a verum operator, really adds the negative implicature that the speaker expected the negative answer to be true. The speaker ""asks for conclusive evidence for p"" (Romero and Han 2004), so as to get a confirmation of their original belief. This confirmation cannot be obtained in TED talks. We show that really questions serve to dispel commonly held beliefs by allowing the speaker to introduce conclusive evidence for not-p in the subsequent discourse and to steer the common ground to a new knowledge state. This discursive function of really polar questions is salient in TED talks as opposed to MICASE.
In content questions, the the hell phrase also conveys a negative implicature, i.e. ""the speaker's negative attitude toward the content of the question"" (den Dikken and Giannakidou 2002). The hell conveys two types of expressivity (Celle, Jugnet, and Lansari 2021) that derive from intensification. Emotional expressivity correlates with the speaker's attitude to p, which may rank high either along a scale of ignorance or incongruity. Iconic expressivity enacts emotion when a scale of performativity is involved. It is mostly associated with storytelling sequences inserted in the narrative. Both types of expressivity are attested in TED talks.
 In sum, really questions and wh-the hell questions contribute to achieving joint attention (Battich & Geurts (2020) in the knowledge-sharing process based  by arousing the addressee's interest. The disconfirmation of prior expectations is intended to create an anticipation on the part of the addressee.

Negative bias in questions in TED talks

Cyberspace is often accused of dehumanizing interpersonal relationships. However, it is, in fact, the theatre of new forms of expression of emotions. Emotional reactions, which are by nature spontaneous, are here carefully formulated. In cyberspace, when the user has an emotional reaction and wants to communicate it to his interlocutor, he will automatically take into account the context in which he is expressing himself. He will, therefore, tend to modulate the expression of his emotions according to the person he is talking to, the type of conversation they are having and the means of communication they are using.
Computer-mediated communication has inevitably changed how the individual relates to the world and those around him. In particular, the notions of time and space have changed dramatically (Kramsch, 2009). The spatio-temporal shift, which characterises virtual interactions, allows users to hide their identity and the subjective motivation to communicate. In other words, users can create any kind of reality and identity through more or less truthful statements. Moreover, this discrepancy strongly influences the way interlocutors interact and express their emotions. Kramer et al. (2014) showed how an emotion expressed on Facebook influences the emotions of other users. Exposure to a large number of positive messages will lead users to post positive messages.
When the user interacts in cyberspace, the emotions he is feeling dissipate instantly, before he has time to express them in writing. This is because emotions only last a few milliseconds. Therefore, the user can, more or less voluntarily, decide how to verbalize his emotional reactions. Thus, virtual communication can be considered as emotive communication. Contrary to emotional communication, where the individual expresses his emotion at the very moment he feels it, emotive communication is characterised by the description of the emotion once it has dissipated (Plantin, 2011). In other words, emotive communication is closer to the notions of performance, rhetoric and persuasion (Arndt and Janney, 1991). Emotions can, therefore, be staged to influence the speaker’s reactions and behaviour.
This contribution aims at investigating three different types of hate speech produced and spread on the Internet: jihadist propaganda, anti-migrant and antisemitic messages. More precisely, the goal is to examine the way the expression of emotions (pathos) contribute to both creating a reliable and legitimate éthos, and reinforcing the arguments advanced by the speaker (logos) (Perelman and Olbrecht-Tyteca, 1988). Since in hate speech the other plays a crucial role, particular attention will be paid to the notion of otherness. Staszak (2008) defines otherness as “the results of a discursive process by which a dominant in-group (“Us”, the Self) constructs one or many dominated out-groups (“Them”, Other) by stigmatizing a difference – real or imagined – presented as a negation of identity and thus a motive for potential discrimination” (p. 2). According to Lagorgette and Larrivée (2004), when the target of hate speech (i.e., the other) is not the speaker’s addressee, the addressee is a witness of the target’s diminishment. Therefore, this may allow the speaker to either create or reinforce the coalition with the addressee, that is the in-group (Goffman, 1967). This contribution then questions the way the expression of both positive and negative emotions allows the user to distance the in-group from the out-group (Van Dijk, 2006). Furthermore, we will see how cyberspace influences the delimitation of the border drown between the in-group and the out-group. 
Three corpora were then collected: as far as jihadist propaganda is concerned, the study was conducted on the French jihadist online magazine Dar al-Islam. As far the anti-migrants and antisemitic discourses, the two corpora were collected from user-generated comments on YouTube. The reason is twofold: on the one hand, YouTube’s represents “a large repository of user-generated information” (Madden et al., 2013, p. 698); on the other hand, social networks would nurture the emergence of hate speech (Monnier and Seoane, 2019). In order to identify the specificities of each corpus as well as their differences and similarities, a qualitative discursive analysis was conducted. We will see how, in jihadist propaganda, the in-group is presented as a community chosen by God whose goal is to fight the disbelievers, whereas in both anti-migrants and antisemitic discourse, the in-group is perceived as a victim of the out-group. However, contrary to migrants, who are presented as inferior, Jews are seen as a powerful and rich community. By identifying and analysing both the differences and similarities of these three types of hate speech, this study aims at determining the core elements of the verbalisation of hate speech on the Internet.

The use of emotions in online hate speech: between discursive strategy and manipulation

This presentation will draw on documentation work carried out with speakers of the Dalabon and Kriol languages of northern Australia since the mid-2000s. Dalabon is a severely endangered language of the Gunwinyguan family (non-Pama-Nyungan) (Evans, Merlan & Tukumba 2004). Kriol is an English-based creole spoken 20 to 30,000 people in the central north of Australia (Schultze-Berndt, Meakins & Angelo 2013). The descendants of Dalabon speakers have now adopted Kriol as their day-to-day language. 

In the first part of the talk, I will discuss the underpinnings and implications of attending to emotional language among the Dalabon-speaking communities. I will then dive into the specificities of emotional language in Dalabon, highlighting the prevalence of the linguistic embodiment of emotions (Ponsonnet 2014; Ponsonnet & Laginha in press); as well as a preference for discourse strategies based on avoidance when it comes to managing negative emotions (Rimé 2009). 

In the last part of the talk, I will consider Kriol, and whether the adoption of a new language may have influenced the way people talk about emotions (Woodbury 1998). One observation is that in terms of communication potential, Kriol speakers have developed means to talk about emotions in a very similar fashion as in Dalabon (Ponsonnet 2020). On the other hand, there is evidence that discourse practices evolve to accommodate less avoidant emotion-management strategies in emerging contexts (Rodriguez Louro & Collard 2021). 


Emotion, discourse, and linguistic diversity: Emotions in grammar and discourse in northern Australia

Impression management is a complex, productive phenomenon which occurs in every human interaction. Social-psychological and pragmatic research pays attention to the different aspects, levels and discursive features of impression management (Goffman 1959; Gordon 2011; Leary 1995; Nemesi 2011). According to social psychology, impression management is a universal attempt by means of which the interlocutor projects consciously or unconsciously a certain image about herself (eg. Schlenker 1980). Interlocutors can apply various strategies in the course of impression management, there are various taxonomies regarding the impression management strategies or tactics (Fiske 2004; Jones&Pittman 1982; Leary 1995), which are based on the presumed motivation of the interlocutors. For example, Jones and Pittman (1982) differentiate the strategy of intimidation, ingratiation, self-promotion, exemplification and supplication, while Leary (1995) proposes different tactics such as self-presentation, remembering and forgetting, attitude statements, public attributions, social associations, conformity and compliance, and highlights the role of nonverbal behaviour and physical environment. Tedeschi and Riess (1981) divides strategies into two groups. These are the assertive and defensive impression management strategies: the interlocutors attempts to create, maintain but also to protect their impression in case of threatening their image. Besides, even the type or genre of interaction can modify the patterns of impression management therefore legal discourse, political discourse, interviews and daily conversation require different strategies because the interlocutor needs to satisfy distinct expectations (Archer 2018; Lipovsky 2006; Molek-Kozakowska 2013; Nemesi 2011).			
This study presents a complex definition of impression management focusing on the intentional and evaluational aspects. The definition is based on social psychological and pragmatic approaches. In addition, the present paper also proposes an extended taxonomy to determine the impression management strategies in a new genre, namely political debate shows which belong to the semi-institutionalised discourse type (Ilie 2001, 2006). The goal of this genre is the collation of different ideas and argumentation of political issues. The participants are aware of the presence of the internal and external audience therefore they form their projected image by the use of language, the choice of linguistic tools and behaviour patterns in order to affect the audience’s opinion about a political person, a party or ideology. The special properties of this type of semi-institutionalised discourses reveal new impression management strategies which are not covered by the previous taxonomies. The compiled multimodal corpus contains fifteen videos (appr. 600 minutes) from Hungarian political debate shows where the participants are politicians, journalists, and political experts. These videos are taken from different political debate shows therefore the debate shows and their channels support different political ideologies. The study uses the conventional transcription of conversation analysis by Jefferson (2004). On the basis of the corpus, the study differentiates seven main impression management tactics which include subcategories. The categories are built simultaneously with the processing of the videos and set up with heuristic method. The proposed taxonomy contains tactics such as identity projection, verbal aggression, expressing erudition, referring to authority, goading other’s curiosity, expressing attitudes, revisualising certain events. The study shows that there are several linguistic items which help to reveal certain kinds of impression management. The defined impression management tactics take the political identity, or even the personal and collective identity into consideration. Moreover, these tactics follow the desired properties of a political performer in the Hungarian culture. The proposed taxonomy offers a wide scope to the phenomenon of  impression management in political discourse because it lays on the cooperative–competitive continuum of linguistic behaviour. It is divided into two main aspects such as positive self-presentation and negative other-presentation (cf. van Dijk 1998). This paper also aims to demonstrate that behind the assertive or defensive strategies, impression management tactics may belong to the offensive linguistic behaviour depending on the socio-cultural and discoursive contexts. The suggested categories may provide a deeper insight into the possible intentions, motivations and cultural patterns underlying the utterances in public talks.
References:
Archer, Dawn 2018. Impression management in the Early Modern English courtroom. Journal of Historical Pragmatics 19: (2) 205–222. 
Fiske, Susan T. 2004. Social Beings: A Core Motive Approach to Social Psychology. New York: John Wiley&Sons Inc.
Goffman, Erving 1959. The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life. New York: Doubleday.
Gordon, Cynthia 2011. Impression management on reality TV: Emotion in parental accounts. Journal of Pragmatics 43: 3551–3564.
Ilie, Cornelia 2001. Semi-institutional discourse: The case of talk shows. Journal of Pragmatics 33: 209–254.
Ilie, Cornelia 2006: Talk Shows. In: Brown, Keith (ed.) Encyclopedia of Language & Linguistics. Second Edition. Volume 12. Oxford: Elsevier, 489–494.
Jefferson, Gail 2004. Glossary of transcript symbols with an introduction. In: Lerner, Gene H. (szerk.) Conversation Analysis: Studies from the First Generation. (Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 125). Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company, 13–31.
Jones, Edward E. – Thane S. Pittman 1982. Toward a general theory of strategic self-presentation. In: Suls, Jerry (eds.) Psychological perspectives on the self (Vol. 1). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum, 231–262.
Leary, Mark R. 1995. Self-presentation: Impression Management and Interpersonal Behavior. Madison: Brown & Benchmark Publishers.
Lipovsky, Caroline 2006. Candidates’ negotiation of their expertise in job interviews. Journal of Pragmatics 38: 1147–1174.
Molek-Kozakowska, Katarzyna 2013. The late-night TV talk show as a strategic genre in American political campaigning. In: Cap, Piotr – Urszula Okulska (szerk.) Analyzing Genres in Political Communication. DAPSAC Vol. 50. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamin Publishing Company, 321–344.
Nemesi, Attila László 2011. Benyomáskeltési stratégiák, énmegjelenítési taktikák. [Impression management strategies, self-presentation tactics]. In: Nemesi Attila László. Nyelv, nyelvhasználat, kommunikáció. Budapest: Loisir Kiadó, 91–134.
Schlenker, Barry R. 1980. Impression Management. The Self-concept, Social Identity, and Interpersonal Relations. Monterey: Brooks/Cole Publishing Company.
Tedeschi, James T. – Marc Reiss 1981. Verbal strategies in impression management. In: Antaki, Charles (ed.) The psychology of ordinary explanations of social behavior. London: Academic Press, 271–326.
van Dijk, Teun A. 1998. Ideology: A Multidisciplinary Approach. London: SAGE. 


Impression management tactics in Hungarian political debate shows

Metaphorical representation of the pandemic in the German press
Theoretical background
The key role of metaphors in shaping not only cognition but also the emotional attitude towards specific phenomena is particularly relevant in specialised domains directly affecting the lives of individuals, such as medicine (e.g. Sontag 1990; Schiefer 2005; Schachtner 1999; 2001). According to the traditional Conceptual Metaphor Theory, as it was originally formulated by Lakoff and Johnson (1980), metaphors always imply a cognitive cross-domain mapping, which is in turn reflected in language use: Abstract phenomena (the target domains) are conceptualised in terms of others, typically more concrete (the source domains), and they are linguistically expressed accordingly. Moreover, those metaphors are embodied, i.e. they rely on bodily experiences. The relationship between emotions and metaphors can be therefore analysed from different perspectives. On the one hand, emotions themselves can be considered as abstract categories expressed through metaphors: An example could be the conceptualisation of anger as hot fluid in a container (also implying that the body itself is a container) or as fire (Kövecses 2008: 381), which in turn originates from the way this emotion is physically experienced in the human body. On the other hand, emotions can be awakened by specific metaphors, especially when they are used “deliberately”, i.e. for specific communicative purposes (for the pragmatic approach to metaphor use and the distinction between “deliberate” and “non-deliberate” use see Steen 2008; 2015). The emotional response to metaphors in comparison with their literal counterparts has been investigated in the field of psycholinguistics and data suggesting that metaphors evoke “greater emotional response” (Semino 2021: 51) have been collected (e.g. Citron / Goldberg 2014). A study by Scherer et al. (2015) highlighted for example how “metaphorical descriptions of influenza (as a beast, riot, army, or weed) increased expressions of willingness to be vaccinated, as opposed to a literal description” (Semino 2021: 51). Given its important psychological impact, the language used in the media to portrait the Covid-19 pandemics and its political, economic as well as social consequences elicited (and still elicits) strong emotions (such as fear of the virus and the consequences of the pandemics, but also loneliness due to social distancing), which are, in turn, mostly connected to metaphors. The most famous metaphor used in medical communication is for example the war-metaphor (e.g. Bauer 2006; Semino 2021; Sontag 1990): Not surprisingly, this metaphor, which is deeply rooted in medical communication and has shown (often negative) psychological entailments (Sontag 1990), has been also used to describe the pandemics caused by the Virus SARS-CoV-2. In this regard, Semino (2021) recently presented the data collected in the “#ReframeCovid” (https://sites.google.com/view/reframecovid/home), aiming at finding alternatives to military metaphors, as this latter have been in this case criticised “for inappropriately personifying the virus as a malevolent opponent, creating excessive anxiety, potentially legitimizing authoritarian governmental measures, and implying that those who die did not fight hard enough” (Semino 2021: 50), in other words for the negative emotions they elicit and the potentially dangerous consequences that exploiting those emotions may have for the individual, social and political life. 
The study
Moving from the theoretical assumptions outlined, the aim of this pilot study is to identify on the one hand the metaphors used to describe the first months of the pandemics in the German magazines “Der Spiegel” and “Die Zeit” and on the other hand to highlight their (possible) emotional implications. The metaphorical use of lexical units is identified according to the Metaphor Identification Procedure (Pragglajez Group 2007). Following levels of analysis and research questions will be addressed: 
•	The source and target domains: What metaphors are used and what phenomena do they conceptualise? Are those metaphors novel or do they instantiate highly conventionalised, well-established framing patterns?
•	The emotional level of investigation: What emotions can be linked to those metaphors? Are emotions themselves directly addressed or expressed through metaphors? 
•	The relationship with non-verbal elements: Are there visual metaphors? Are the verbal metaphors also linked to images? 
The corpus consists in articles published by „Der Spiegel“ and “Die Zeit” in March and April 2020, i.e. during the first lockdown established to face the pandemics.
References
Bauer, Alex W. (2006): Metaphern, Bildersprache und Selbstverständnis der Medizin. In: Anaesthesist 55, 1307 - 1314. 
Citron, Francesca M. / Goldberg, Adele E. (2014): Metaphorical sentences are more emotionally engaging than their literal counterparts. In: Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 26 /11, 2585–2595.
Kövecses, Zoltán (2008): Metaphor and Emotion. In Gibbs, Raymond (ed.): The Cambridge Handbook of Metaphor and Thought. Cambridge University Press, 380-396. 
Pragglejaz Group (2007). MIP: A method for identifying metaphorically used words in discourse. Metaphor and Symbol, 22 /1, 1-39. 
Schachtner, Christina (1999): Ärztliche Praxis. Die gestaltende Kraft der Metapher. Suhrkamp. Frankfurt a.M. 
Schachtner, Christina (2001): Krankheits- und Gesundheitsbilder Metaphern als strukturierende Strukturen. In: Journal für Psychologie 9/4, 61–74. 
Scherer, Aaron M. / Scherer, Laura D. / Fagerlin, Angela (2015): Getting ahead of illness. In: Medical Decision Making, 35 /1, 37–45.
Schiefer, Matthias (2005): Die metaphorische Sprache in der Medizin. Metaphorische Konzeptualisierungen in der Medizin und ihre ethischen Implikationen untersucht anhand von Arztbriefanalysen. Lit. Vienna. 
Sontag, Susan (1990): Illness and its metaphors, and AID and its metaphors. Doubleday. New York. 
Semino, Elena (2021): “Not soldiers, but Fire-fighters” – Metaphors for COVID-19. In: Health Communication, 36/1, 50-58.
Steen, Gerard (2008): The paradox of metaphor: why we need a three-dimensional model for metaphor. In: Metaphor and Symbol 23/4, 213-241. 
Steen, Gerard (2015): Developing, Testing and Interpreting Deliberate Metaphor Theory. In: Journal of Pragmatics 90, 1-6. 


Metaphorical representation of the pandemics in the German press

Exploring diversity and journalistic discourse in the pandemic: a corpus based study

How to do things with emotional expressions

Language is the most sophisticated tool humans have developed to communicate emotional experiences. However, due to their highly personal, idiosyncratic nature, such experiences can often be difficult to put into words. The dimensional aspects of emotional experiences, i.e., those involving valence, dominance and arousal can be expressed through literal language. However, once we go beyond these dimensional accounts and try to describe the subjective felt experiences of emotions it is necessary to employ metaphor. Metaphors provide information about the rich detail of human emotional experience in a way that literal language does not (Semino et al., 2017). Metaphorical skill and imagination are therefore important in communicating the nature of unshared experience and creating rapport (Reisfield & Wilson, 2004). For this reason, when talking about deep, personal emotional experiences that are difficult to describe, people often reach for metaphor, with more personal experiences leading to more creative uses of metaphor (Fainsilber & Ortony, 1987; Williams-Whitney et al., 1992). Possible reasons for this are the fact that metaphors allow us to describe ineffable experiences in more concrete, tangible, and often physical terms, and metaphors are sufficiently flexible to allow us to employ a finite set of linguistic resources to express precisely, an infinite range of experiences (Colston & Gibbs, 2021).
In this talk I present findings from four studies, which involved the analysis of metaphor in order to better understand people’s personal, emotional experiences. These experiences include: pregnancy loss; bereavement; the description of positive and negative workplace experiences; and older adults’ experiences of lockdown during Covid 19. Through these studies I reveal what metaphor analysis can tell us about: embodied grief; agency and identity; relationships with others, including the deceased; attitudes towards time, the extent to which experiences are shared by communities; and the ways in which these experiences change over time. I reflect on the benefits and drawbacks of the methods employed and discuss the ways in which findings from some of these studies have been incorporated into professional development materials that have been designed for those who support the bereaved.

References
Colston, H. L., & Gibbs, R. W. (2021). Figurative language communicates directly because it precisely demonstrates what we mean. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology/Revue Canadienne de Psychologie Expérimentale.
Fainsilber, L., & Ortony, A. (1987). Metaphorical uses of language in the expression of emotions. Metaphor and Symbol, 2(4), 239–250.
Reisfield, G. M., & Wilson, G. R. (2004). Use of metaphor in the discourse on cancer. Journal of Clinical Oncology, 22(19), 4024–4027.
Semino, E., Demjén, Z., Hardie, A., Payne, S., & Rayson, P. (2017). Metaphor, cancer and the end of life: A corpus-based study. Routledge.
Williams-Whitney, D., Mio, J. S., & Whitney, P. (1992). Metaphor production in creative writing. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 21(6).

Emotion recognition in digital discussions and civic learning processes

Downloads

Next from Languaging Diversity 2021

Problem solving in the COVID-19 ERT university classroom

Similar lecture

MuCDN: Mutual Conversational Detachment Network for Emotion Recognition in Multi-Party Conversations

Emotion recognition in digital discussions and civic learning processes

.css-70qvj9{display:-webkit-box;display:-webkit-flex;display:-ms-flexbox;display:flex;-webkit-align-items:center;-webkit-box-align:center;-ms-flex-align:center;align-items:center;}Downloads

Next from Languaging Diversity 2021

Problem solving in the COVID-19 ERT university classroom

Similar lecture

MuCDN: Mutual Conversational Detachment Network for Emotion Recognition in Multi-Party Conversations

Downloads