United States

Chain-of-Thought (CoT) prompting has significantly advanced the reasoning capabilities of Large Language Models (LLMs), yet it often incurs substantial computational costs due to “over-reasoning”—the generation of redundant, verbose, or irrelevant steps. While existing reasoning step evaluators effectively detect logical fallacies and factual errors, our analysis reveals a critical blind spot: they fail to penalize “valid but inefficient” reasoning steps that inflate token usage without contributing to the solution. To systematically diagnose this limitation, we introduce RIV-GSM8K, a diagnostic benchmark injected with five distinct types of inefficiencies, including circular reasoning and excessive decomposition. Diagnostic experiments reveal that state-of-the-art evaluators struggle to distinguish these inefficiencies from necessary reasoning. To address this gap, we propose CAID (Context-Aware Information Density), a training-free metric grounded in information theory that identifies low-utility steps. To validate the metric’s practical utility, we apply it within PACE, a post-hoc compression strategy. Additional control experiments show that the gains of PACE are not explained by trivial pruning: compared with random step removal and PRM-based compression baselines, it preserves accuracy at substantially higher compression rates. Empirical results on GSM8K, StrategyQA, and ARC-Challenge demonstrate that PACE reduces token consumption by 31–53% while maintaining accuracy, confirming that CAID successfully distills informational “froth” from reasoning chains without compromising deductive validity.

ACL 2026

 Valid ≠ Necessary: Diagnosing Latent Inefficiency in Chain-of-Thought

### Welcome!
The 62nd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL 2024) will take place in Bangkok, Thailand from August 11th to 16th, 2024. Our Virtual Poster Sessions will take place online Thursday, August 22, 2024.

You are required to register for this event. **Please register [here](https://2024.aclweb.org/registration). **

If you have already registered, please check your inbox for an email from Underline granting you access to ACL 2024 content.

Please register!

ACL 2024

The 62nd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL 2024) will take place in Bangkok, Thailand from August 11th to 16th, 2024. More information will be announced soon.

poster

It is my great pleasure and honor to welcome you to the 64th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL 2026), held in San Diego, California, USA, July 2–7, 2026. ACL 2026 continues our fields tradition of excellence in scholarship, innovation, and inclusivity, and I am deeply grateful to the many volunteers who have worked tirelessly to bring this event to life.

It is exciting to see the many developments in the field reflected at our conference, such as the advancement of large language models (born out of our community) into many application directions. This is not without challenges, partly due to unsolved problems, and partly due to misuse of the technology. All this is reflected well at ACL 2026. The conference also reflects that the field is not only about advancing technology, but also the science of fundamentally understanding language and how it is use by many different speaker communities. 
[Full Message from General Chair Philipp Koehn](https://drive.google.com/file/d/1QiJFOmMjvDgsDo3i1XzlQnImxe3RU_Cy/view?usp=sharing) 
<html><button style="display: inline-flex; align-items: center; justify-content: center; white-space: nowrap; border-radius: 9999px; font-weight: bold; background: #7c3aed; color: white; font-family: 'Space Grotesk', sans-serif; height: 40px; font-size: 16px; padding: 0 20px; border: none; cursor: pointer" onclick="window.open('https://drive.google.com/file/d/1QiJFOmMjvDgsDo3i1XzlQnImxe3RU_Cy/view?usp=sharing')">Conference Handbook</button></html>

To access this event page, you need to log in with the **email address you registered with**. Access credentials will be sent to your email from Underline - subject line "Welcome to ACL 2026". Please be sure to check your spam email folder if you do not see an email confirmation right away.

To access this event page, you are required to register.
Please complete your registration to continue.

We recommend reading [**the registration information**](https://2026.aclweb.org/registration/) first.

**Online Registration Form**: https://acl.swoogo.com/acl2026

Registration Required

The 64th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL 2026) will take place in San Diego, California, from July 2 - 7, 2026.

Reinforcement learning (RL) has demonstrated considerable promise in enhancing large language models. However, its application to Mixture-of-Experts (MoE) architectures is frequently hindered by training instability, primarily stemming from token-level misalignment in expert assignments between current and behavior policies. Existing approaches often oscillate between overly coarse sequence-level importance sampling, which ignores token-specific discrepancies, and restrictive expert-selection constraints that suppress beneficial policy exploration. To bridge this gap, we propose Expert Relative Policy Optimization (ERPO), which introduces expert-level importance sampling. By grouping tokens according to their routing assignments, ERPO mitigates the high variance of token-level importance sampling while overcoming the token-agnostic limitations of sequence-level methods. Furthermore, ERPO leverages this expert-centric granularity to introduce an Expert-Selection Entropy Reward, which dynamically adjusts routing uncertainty based on task-specific feedback. This unique mechanism ensures a rigorous alignment between reward signals and policy updates—a capability inherently unattainable by traditional importance sampling methods. Experimental results demonstrate that ERPO significantly outperforms strong baselines across multiple reasoning tasks, highlighting the efficacy of tailoring RL objectives to the structural inductive biases of MoE models.

 Improved Policy Optimization for Mixture-of-Experts Models: Importance Sampling and Rewarding from an Expert-Centric Perspective

Large Language Models have recently shown impressive capabilities in reasoning and code generation, making them promising tools for natural language interfaces to relational databases. However, existing approaches often fail to generalize in complex, real-world settings due to the highly database-specific nature of SQL reasoning, which requires deep familiarity with unique schemas, ambiguous semantics, and intricate join paths. To address this challenge, we introduce a novel two-stage LLM-based framework that decouples knowledge acquisition from query generation. In the Exploration Stage, the system autonomously constructs a database-specific knowledge base by navigating the schema with a Monte Carlo Tree Search–inspired strategy, generating triplets of schema fragments, executable queries, and natural language descriptions as usage examples. In the Deployment Stage, a dual-agent system leverages the collected knowledge as in-context examples to iteratively retrieve relevant information and generate accurate SQL queries in response to user questions. This design enables the agent to proactively familiarize itself with unseen databases and handle complex, multi-step reasoning. Extensive experiments on large-scale benchmarks demonstrate that our approach significantly improves accuracy over strong baselines, highlighting its effectiveness and generalizability.

SQLAgent: Learning to Explore Before Generating as a Data Engineer

Authorship verification (AV) is the task of determining whether two texts were written by the same author and has been studied extensively, predominantly for English data. In contrast, large-scale benchmarks and systematic evaluations for other languages remain scarce. We address this gap by introducing GerAV, a comprehensive benchmark for German AV comprising over 400k labeled text pairs. GerAV is built from Twitter and Reddit data, with the Reddit part further divided into in-domain and cross-domain message-based subsets, as well as a profile-based subset. This design enables controlled analysis of the effects of data source, topical domain, and text length. Using the provided training splits, we conduct a systematic evaluation of strong baselines and state-of-the-art models and find that our best approach, a fine-tuned large language model, outperforms recent baselines by up to 0.09 absolute F1 score and surpasses GPT-5 in a zero-shot setting by 0.08. We further observe a trade-off between specialization and generalization: models trained on specific data types perform best under matching conditions but generalize less well across data regimes, a limitation that can be mitigated by combining training sources. Overall, GerAV provides a challenging and versatile benchmark for advancing research on German and cross-domain AV.

 GerAV: Towards New Heights in German Authorship Verification using Fine-Tuned LLMs on a New Benchmark

Large language model (LLM) agents augmented with external tools often struggle as number of tools grow large and become domain-specific. In such settings, ambiguous tool descriptions and under-specified agent instructions frequently lead to tool mis-selection and incorrect slot/value instantiation. We hypothesize that this is due to two root causes: generic, one-size-fits-all prompts that ignore tool-specific nuances, and underspecified tool schemas that lack clear guidance on when and how to use each tool and how to format its parameters. We introduce Joint Tool-Prompt Reflective Optimization (JTPRO), a framework for improving tool-calling reliability in trace-supervised settings by iteratively using rollout-driven reflection to co-optimize global instructions and per-tool schema/argument descriptions for accurate tool selection and argument instantiation in large tool inventories. JTPRO is designed to preserve only tool-local cues needed for correct disambiguation and slot filling. We evaluate JTPRO across multi-tool benchmarks, which account for different number of tools using three metrics: Tool Selection Accuracy (TSA), Slot Filling Accuracy(SFA), and Overall Success Rate(OSR) (correct tool + correct slots + correct values). JTPRO consistently outperforms strong baselines, including CoT-style agents, and reflective prompt optimizers such as GEPA by 5%–20% (relative) on OSR. Ablations show that joint optimization of instructions and tool schemas is more effective and robust than optimizing either component in isolation.

JTPRO: A Joint Tool–Prompt Reflective Optimization Framework for Language Agents

The growing ubiquity of Extended Reality (XR) is driving Conversational Recommendation Systems (CRS) toward visually immersive experiences. We formalize this paradigm as Immersive CRS (ICRS), where recommended items are highlighted directly in the user’s scene-based visual environment and augmented with in-situ labels. While item recommendation has been widely studied, the problem of how to select and evaluate which information to present as immersive labels remains an open problem. To this end, we introduce a principled categorization of information needs into explicit intent satisfaction and proactive information needs and use these to define novel evaluation metrics for item label selection. We benchmark IR-, LLM-, and VLM-based methods across three datasets and ICRS scenarios: fashion, movie recommendation, and retail shopping. Our evaluation reveals three important limitations of existing methods: (1) they fail to leverage scenario-specific information modalities (e.g., visual cues for fashion, metadata for retail), (2) they present redundant information that is visually inferable, and (3) they poorly anticipate users’ proactive information needs from explicit dialogue alone. In summary, this work provides both a novel evaluation paradigm for in-situ item labeling in ICRS and highlights key challenges for future work.

Evaluating Scene-based In-Situ Item Labeling for Immersive Conversational Recommendation

Style representation learning is a powerful tool for authorship analysis and modeling writing style, yet the latent nature of learned representations makes them difficult to interpret. Recent work has attempted to explain these representations by generating natural language descriptions with large language models (LLMs) conditioned on input text. However, such descriptions are often prone to the LLM's biases and hallucinations, and they lack an explicit objective and practical utility. In this work, we propose a novel framework for interpreting style representations through style-eliciting prompts: natural language instructions designed to steer LLMs to generate text that reflects specific stylistic attributes. We curate 1,010 distinct style features spanning 26 stylistic categories and construct a dataset by prompting an LLM to generate text conditioned on these features. Using this data, we train a decoder to generate a style prompt from the style representation of the generated text. We evaluate our approach on three tasks: (1) recovering original style prompts from generated text, (2) generating text in the same style using the recovered prompts, and (3) steering LLM outputs to match the style of human-written texts. Experiments demonstrate that our method consistently outperforms strong baselines that directly prompt LLMs with target text, achieving superior performance in both style description and style imitation. These results highlight style-eliciting prompts can provide a practical and interpretable interface to stylistic information encoded in style representations.

 Interpreting Style Representations via Style-Eliciting Prompts

Hallucinations—generating responses inconsistent with the visual input—remain a critical limitation of large vision-language models (LVLMs), especially in open-ended tasks such as image captioning and visual reasoning. In this work, we probe the layer-wise generation dynamics that drive hallucinations and propose a training-free mitigation strategy. Employing the Logit Lens, we examine how LVLMs construct next-token distributions across decoder layers, uncovering a pronounced commitment-depth gap: truthful tokens accumulate probability mass on their final candidates earlier than hallucinatory ones. Drawing on this discovery, we introduce Context Embedding injection (CEI), a lightweight method that harnesses the hidden state of the last input token—the context embedding—as a grounding signal to maintain visual fidelity throughout decoding and curb hallucinations. Evaluated on the CHAIR, AMBER, and MMHal-Bench benchmarks (with a maximum token length of 512), CEI outperforms state-of-the-art baselines across three LVLMs, with its dynamic variant yielding the lowest overall hallucination rates. By integrating novel mechanistic insights with a scalable intervention, this work advances the mitigation of hallucinations in LVLMs. Data and code are available at https://github.com/mehrdadfazli/CEI.

Inject to Heal: Alleviating hallucination in LVLMs via Context Embedding Injection

Despite the growing adoption of large language models (LLMs) in scientific research workflows, automated support for academic rebuttal, a crucial step in academic communication and peer review, remains largely underexplored. Existing approaches typically rely on off-the-shelf LLMs or simple pipelines, which struggle with long-context understanding and often fail to produce targeted and persuasive responses. In this paper, we propose **DRPG**, an agentic framework for automatic academic rebuttal generation that operates through four steps: Decompose reviews into atomic concerns, Retrieve relevant evidence from the paper, Plan rebuttal strategies, and Generate responses accordingly. Notably, the Planner in DRPG reaches over 98% accuracy in identifying the most feasible rebuttal direction. Experiments on data from top-tier conferences demonstrate that DRPG significantly outperforms existing rebuttal pipelines and achieves performance beyond the average human level using only an 8B model. Our analysis further demonstrates the effectiveness of the planner design and its value in providing multi-perspective and explainable suggestions. We also showed that DRPG works well in a more complex multi-round setting. These results highlight the effectiveness of DRPG and its potential to provide high-quality rebuttal content and support the scaling of academic discussions.

DRPG (Decompose, Retrieve, Plan, Generate): An Agentic Framework for Academic Rebuttal

Recent Large Audio-Language Models (LALMs) integrate acoustic capabilities into reasoning, yet whether they reliably ground clinical judgments in audible evidence remains unproven. We introduce \underline{\textbf{CliniCAST}} (\textbf{Clini}cal \textbf{C}ontrolled \textbf{A}coustic \textbf{S}ynthetic \textbf{T}riage), a controlled benchmark that disentangles clinically meaningful acoustic cues from lexical content and speaker demographics. CliniCAST comprises 5{,}856 synthetic samples across 12 disease conditions: 4{,}800 audio samples forming 2{,}400 tagged--untagged pairs for five-level emergency triage, and 1{,}056 audio--text inconsistent samples in which reassuring speech is paired with high-risk acoustic cues. Evaluating a diverse suite of audio-capable foundation models, we find that LALMs exhibit fragile acoustic grounding and a pronounced ``text dominance'' failure mode: reassuring lexical content suppresses response to audible distress signals even under safety-critical conditions. Age and gender interactions are weak across conditions, indicating that the primary failure mode is insufficient cross-modal integration rather than demographic bias. These results suggest current LALMs are not yet robust enough for high-stakes medical triage, and motivate training objectives that explicitly enforce reliance on clinically grounded audible evidence.

CliniCAST: Benchmarking Acoustic Grounding and Text Dominance in Medical Triage

Large Language Models (LLMs) are increasingly employed in various question-answering tasks. However, recent studies showcase that LLMs are susceptible to persuasion and could adopt counterfactual beliefs.
We present a systematic evaluation of LLM susceptibility to persuasion under the \emph{Source--Message--Channel--Receiver} (SMCR) communication framework. 
Across six mainstream Large Language Models (LLMs) and three domains (factual knowledge, medical QA, and social bias), we analyze how different persuasive strategies influence stated belief stability over multiple interaction turns.
We further examine whether verbalized confidence prompting (i.e., eliciting self-reported confidence scores) affects resistance to persuasion.
Results show that the smallest model (Llama 3.2-3B) exhibits extreme compliance, with 82.5\% of belief changes occurring at the first persuasive turn (average end turn of 1.1--1.4).
Contrary to expectations, verbalized confidence prompting \emph{increases} vulnerability by accelerating belief erosion rather than enhancing robustness. 
Finally, an exploratory study of adversarial fine-tuning reveals highly model-dependent effectiveness: GPT-4o-mini achieves near-complete robustness (98.6\%) and Mistral~7B improves substantially (35.7\% $\rightarrow$ 79.3\%), but Llama models remain highly susceptible ($<$14\% RQ1) even when fine-tuned on their own failure cases. 
Together, these findings highlight substantial model-dependent limits of current robustness interventions and offer guidance for developing more trustworthy LLMs\footnote{\url{https://github.com/muyuhuatang/llm_stated_belief}}.

Downloads

Next from ACL 2026

Improved Policy Optimization for Mixture-of-Experts Models: Importance Sampling and Rewarding from an Expert-Centric Perspective

Similar lecture

The Impact of Reasoning Step Length on Large Language Models