United States

Despite progress in watermarking algorithms for large language models (LLMs), real-world deployment remains limited. We argue that this gap stems from misaligned incentives among LLM providers, platforms, and end users, which manifest as three key barriers: competitive risk, detection-tool governance, and attribution issues. We revisit three classes of watermarking through this lens. \emph{Model watermarking} naturally aligns with LLM provider interests, yet faces new challenges in open-source ecosystems. \emph{LLM text watermarking} offers modest provider benefit when framed solely as an anti-misuse tool, but can gain traction in narrowly scoped settings such as dataset de-contamination or user-controlled provenance. \emph{In-context watermarking} (ICW) is tailored for trusted parties, such as conference organizers or educators, who embed hidden watermarking instructions into documents. If a dishonest reviewer or student submits this text to an LLM, the output carries a detectable watermark indicating misuse. This setup aligns incentives: users experience no quality loss, trusted parties gain a detection tool, and LLM providers remain neutral by simply following watermark instructions. We advocate for a broader exploration of incentive-aligned methods, with ICW as an example, in domains where trusted parties need reliable tools to detect misuse. More broadly, we distill design principles for incentive-aligned, domain-specific watermarking and outline future research directions. Our position is that the practical adoption of LLM watermarking requires aligning stakeholder incentives in targeted application domains and fostering active community engagement.

ACL 2026

Position: LLM Watermarking Should Align Stakeholders&#39; Incentives for Practical Adoption

### Welcome to 2025 Annual Conference of the Nations of the Americas Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics

Welcome to the 2025 meeting of the Nations of the Americas Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics! I am proud to help organize the first NAACL conference to carry the new name of our organization, one that emphasizes inclusion for all of the Americas. I am also pleased to welcome you to Albuquerque, New Mexico, a state whose unique blend of cultural influences will make for an excellent backdrop for NAACL 2025, especially with this year’s special theme on NLP in a Multicultural World. 
**[Continue reading...](https://drive.google.com/file/d/1jX-qGhqVSZZCIrAnJaz798pflu5Irrdn/view?usp=sharing)**

*- Colin Cherry, Google, NAACL 2025 General Chair* 

[![](https://assets.underline.io/markdown_image/1/image/b087f8a4dc5816d6e1a6514e59c59ac3.png)](https://drive.google.com/file/d/1T96GzPqObXrMln2BMByCSXTSizjTg69P/view?usp=sharing)

You need to log in with the email address you registered with. Access credentials have been sent to your email. 

Please be sure to check your spam and other email folders if you do not see an email confirmation right away.

Please log in to explore this event.

To access NAACL 2025 event page you are required to register. Please follow [**this link**](https://2025.naacl.org/registration/registration/) to register. Access will depend on your registration type.

Please register!

NAACL 2025

Welcome to 2025 Annual Conference of the Nations of the Americas Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics

Position: LLM Watermarking Should Align Stakeholders' Incentives for Practical Adoption

poster

It is my great pleasure and honor to welcome you to the 64th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL 2026), held in San Diego, California, USA, July 2–7, 2026. ACL 2026 continues our fields tradition of excellence in scholarship, innovation, and inclusivity, and I am deeply grateful to the many volunteers who have worked tirelessly to bring this event to life.

It is exciting to see the many developments in the field reflected at our conference, such as the advancement of large language models (born out of our community) into many application directions. This is not without challenges, partly due to unsolved problems, and partly due to misuse of the technology. All this is reflected well at ACL 2026. The conference also reflects that the field is not only about advancing technology, but also the science of fundamentally understanding language and how it is use by many different speaker communities. 
[Full Message from General Chair Philipp Koehn](https://drive.google.com/file/d/1QiJFOmMjvDgsDo3i1XzlQnImxe3RU_Cy/view?usp=sharing) 
<html><button style="display: inline-flex; align-items: center; justify-content: center; white-space: nowrap; border-radius: 9999px; font-weight: bold; background: #7c3aed; color: white; font-family: 'Space Grotesk', sans-serif; height: 40px; font-size: 16px; padding: 0 20px; border: none; cursor: pointer" onclick="window.open('https://drive.google.com/file/d/1QiJFOmMjvDgsDo3i1XzlQnImxe3RU_Cy/view?usp=sharing')">Conference Handbook</button></html>

To access this event page, you need to log in with the **email address you registered with**. Access credentials will be sent to your email from Underline - subject line "Welcome to ACL 2026". Please be sure to check your spam email folder if you do not see an email confirmation right away.

To access this event page, you are required to register.
Please complete your registration to continue.

We recommend reading [**the registration information**](https://2026.aclweb.org/registration/) first.

**Online Registration Form**: https://acl.swoogo.com/acl2026

Registration Required

The 64th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL 2026) will take place in San Diego, California, from July 2 - 7, 2026.

Conversational Large Language Models are post-trained on language that expresses specific behavioural traits, such as curiosity, open-mindedness, and empathy, and values, such as helpfulness, harmlessness, and honesty. This is done to increase utility, ensure safety, and improve the user experience of the people interacting with the model. However, values are complex and inter-related - incorporating one can modify behaviour on another. Further, incorporating certain values can make models more addictive or sycophantic, potentially having a detrimental effect on the user interacting with it. We investigate these and other unintended effects of value incorporation into models. We fine-tune models using value subsets of existing preference datasets, measuring the effect of value induction of 15 values on safety, anthropomorphism, and various QA benchmarks. We find that i) inducing values also leads to expression of other related, and sometimes contrastive values, ii) inducing positive values increases safety, and iii) all values increase anthropomorphic language use by models, making them more validating and sycophantic.

How Value Induction Reshapes LLM Behavior

User interactions with language models vary due to static properties of the user (trait) and the specific context of the interaction (state). However, existing persona datasets (like PersonaChat, PANDORA etc.) capture only trait, and ignore the impact of state. We introduce Chameleon, a dataset of 5,001 contextual psychological profiles from 1,667 Reddit users, each measured across multiple contexts. Using the Chameleon dataset, we present three key findings. First, inspired by Latent State-Trait theory, we decompose variance and find that 74% is within-person (state) while only 26% is between-person (trait). Second, we find that LLMs are state-blind: they focus on trait only, and produce similar responses regardless of state. Third, we find that reward models react to user state, but inconsistently: different models favor or penalize the same users in opposite directions. We release Chameleon to support research on affective computing, personalized dialogue, and RLHF alignment.

Beyond Fixed Psychological Personas: State Beats Trait, but Language Models are State-Blind

Personalized agents that interact with users over long periods must maintain persistent memory across sessions and update it as circumstances change. However, existing benchmarks predominantly frame long-term memory evaluation as fact retrieval from past conversations, providing limited insight into agents’ ability to consolidate memory over time or handle frequent knowledge updates.
We introduce Memora, a long-term memory benchmark spanning weeks to months long user conversations. The benchmark evaluates three memory-grounded tasks: remembering, reasoning, and recommending. To ensure data quality, we employ automated memory-grounding checks and human evaluation. We further introduce Forgetting-Aware Memory Accuracy (FAMA), a metric that penalizes reliance on obsolete or invalidated memory when evaluating long-term memory. Evaluations of four LLMs and six memory agents reveal frequent reuse of invalid memories and failures to reconcile evolving memories. Memory agents offer marginal improvements, exposing shortcomings in long-term memory for personalized agents.

From Recall to Forgetting: Benchmarking Long-Term Memory for Personalized Agents

Real-world multi-hop QA is naturally linked with ambiguity, where a single query can trigger multiple reasoning paths that require independent resolution. Since ambiguity can occur at any stage, models must navigate layered uncertainty throughout the entire reasoning chain. Despite its prevalence in real-world user queries, previous benchmarks have primarily focused on single-hop ambiguity, leaving the complex interaction between multi-step inference and layered ambiguity underexplored. In this paper, we introduce MARCH, a benchmark for their intersection, with 2,209 multi-hop ambiguous questions curated via multi-LLM verification and validated by human annotation with strong agreement. Our experiments reveal that even state-of-the-art models struggle with MARCH, confirming that combining ambiguity resolution with multi-step reasoning is a significant challenge. To address this, we propose CLARION, a two-stage agentic framework that explicitly decouples ambiguity planning from evidence-driven reasoning, significantly outperforms existing approaches, and paves the way for robust reasoning systems.

MARCH: Evaluating the Intersection of Ambiguity Interpretation and Multi-hop Inference

Large Language Models (LLMs) used in Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) can amplify demographic bias: retrievers may surface skewed context and generators can propagate that skew into decisions. Prior work typically treats fairness in retrieval or generation in isolation, leaving end-to-end fairness in RAG underexplored. We propose a post-hoc pipeline that jointly controls both stages: (i) a Fair Greedy Reranker (FGR) that builds prefix-balanced slates toward a target group mix; (ii) a Residual Slate Bias Estimator (RSBE) using signed, prefix-sensitive NDKL to quantify remaining skew; and (iii) Confidence-Gated Logit Calibration (CGLC) that converts the residual signal into small and margin-focused logit corrections without retraining. On an occupation classification task, our approach reduces retriever-side skew (lowest NDKL among baselines for both dense and sparse retrievers) and achieves the lowest generator-side disparity (e.g., Risk Difference) while largely preserving utility. The same calibration can be tuned to alternative fairness criteria (e.g., Equal Opportunity) with minimal utility loss.

Fair RAG: End-to-End Fairness Across Retrieval and Generation

Large Reasoning Models (LRMs) often suffer from the ``over-thinking'' problem, generating unnecessarily long reasoning on simple tasks. Some strategies have been proposed to mitigate this issue, such as length penalties or routing mechanisms, but they are typically heuristic and task-specific, lacking a general framework for adaptive reasoning. In this paper, we present ARM2, a unified model that adaptively balances reasoning performance and efficiency across multiple formats through a reinforcement learning framework augmented with length-aware optimization. Beyond conventional natural language inference, ARM2 integrates vision understanding, extending its applicability to multimodal. Moreover, ARM2 integrates executable code into reasoning, enabling substantial reductions in token cost while preserving task performance compared to long CoT. Experiments demonstrate that ARM2 achieves performance on par with traditional reasoning models trained with GRPO, while reducing token usage by over 70% on average. We further conduct extensive analyses to validate the effectiveness of ARM2 and the soundness of its design.

ARM2: Adaptive Reasoning Model with Vision Understanding and Executable Code

Evidence-intensive analytical reports are expected to be fact-dense, quantitatively correct, and supported by figures. Yet one-shot long-form generation with large language models (LLMs) frequently produces fluent but under-supported drafts: core facts are missed, numbers drift, and key visuals are absent, making the report hard to trust. We propose EviReport, an evidence-tracked report-writing workflow that improves reliability by (i) organizing corpus evidence into compact, traceable units and retrieves query-relevant subgraphs into retrieval-ready packages (ii) leveraging a reasoning-focused LLM sketches a high-level plan for full coverage, then a chat-based LLM sharpens it into a detailed hierarchical outline with explicit scope and ordering (iii) rive generation with a facts-first iterative loop: extracting verifiable facts, composing strictly from those facts, then triggering gap-aware append queries to fill missing evidence To evaluate both correctness and completeness, we introduce EviReportBench, a benchmark instantiated on data-rich indicator reports that measures factual accuracy (claim verification), factual coverage (quiz-based evaluation), and visual evidence integration (image recall). Across 8 topics, experiments show that EviReport consistently outperforms strong baselines in factual coverage ($2.16\times$), factual accuracy (+8.9 points), and visual evidence integration (+34 points), approaching the quality of expert-written reports across multiple dimensions.

 EviReport: From Reasoned Outlines to Evidence Tracked Long-Form Reports

Agentic retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) systems enable large language models (LLMs) to solve complex tasks through multi-step interaction with external retrieval tools. However, such multi-step interaction often involves redundant search steps, incurring substantial computational cost and latency. Prior work limits search depth (i.e., the number of search steps) to reduce cost, but this often leads to underexploration of complex questions. To address this, we first investigate how search depth affects accuracy and find a minimal sufficient search depth that defines an accuracy-efficiency trade-off, jointly determined by question complexity and the agent’s capability. Furthermore, we propose AutoSearch, a reinforcement learning framework that evaluates each search step via self-generated intermediate answers. By a self-answering mechanism, AutoSearch identifies the minimal sufficient search depth and promotes efficient search by rewarding its attainment while penalizing over-searching. In addition, reward mechanisms are introduced to stabilize search behavior and improve answer quality on complex questions. Extensive experiments on multiple benchmarks show that AutoSearch achieves a superior accuracy-efficiency trade-off, alleviating over-searching while preserving search quality.

AutoSearch: Adaptive Search Depth for Efficient Agentic RAG via Reinforcement Learning

Large Language Models (LLMs) have achieved remarkable success on reasoning benchmarks through Reinforcement Learning with Verifiable Rewards (RLVR), excelling at tasks such as math, coding, logic and puzzles. However, existing benchmarks evaluate only correctness, overlooking optimality—the ability to find the best solutions under constraints. We propose \data, the first comprehensive framework for training and evaluating LLMs on NP-hard optimization problems through quality-aware RLVR. \data provides three key components: a scalable training infrastructure with instance generators, quality verifiers, and optimal baselines across 10 tasks; a rigorous benchmark with 1,000 instances evaluating both feasibility (Success Rate) and quality (Quality Ratio); and quality-aware rewards enabling continuous improvement beyond binary correctness. Training on Qwen2.5-7B-Instruct-1M with 15K examples achieves 93.1% SR and 46.6% QR, significantly outperforming GPT-4o (29.6% SR, 14.6% QR). Beyond optimization, training on \data transfers to diverse tasks: mathematics (+2.2%), logic (+1.2%), knowledge (+4.1%), and instruction-following (+6.1%). Our analysis reveals quality-aware rewards improve solutions by 28.8% over binary rewards, and task diversity drives generalization more than data quantity—offering insights into RLVR scaling for complex reasoning.

 Forge: Quality-Aware Reinforcement Learning for NP-Hard Optimization in LLMs

Code explanations are increasingly generated by large language models and used in software engineering workflows, making reliable evaluation essential. However, existing model-based and embedding-based methods often fail to distinguish correct explanations from partially or fully incorrect ones, and their similarity scores are poorly calibrated and do not reflect meaningful differences in explanation quality. To address this, we propose ODASim(Orderly, Dstinctive, and Absolute Similarity), a model-agnostic graded fine-tuning framework for embedding models that learns calibrated similarity representations between code and explanations. To support fine-grained supervision and evaluation, we also introduce ODA-X, a novel benchmark for code-to-explanation quality grading, comprising code–explanation pairs graded similarity labels derived from strategic perturbations of gold explanations. We apply our ODASim approach to multiple embedding models and evaluate it on two benchmarks: widely popular CodeXGLUE and our proposed benchmark ODA-X, spanning four programming languages - Python, Java, JavaScript, and Go. Results show that our method achieves up to 35% improvement in F1 score and 85% reduction in Expected Calibration Error (ECE), enabling reliable evaluation of code to explanation quality.

Downloads

Next from ACL 2026

How Value Induction Reshapes LLM Behavior

Similar lecture

From Intentions to Techniques: A Comprehensive Taxonomy and Challenges in Text Watermarking for Large Language Models