United States

Clinical dialogue systems are increasingly vital for patient education and follow-up care; however, effective responses often depend on the clinical context that patients often fail to provide in detail. Responding directly to vague messages can therefore lead to generic or clinically misaligned advice, a challenge that is particularly pronounced in post-op oral cancer (OC) care due to speech impairment and functional limitations. Moreover, post-op OC patients often experience psychological distress, making safety-aware language more likely to arise in dialogue. Dialogue systems in this setting must therefore address both clarifying missing clinical context and ensuring psychological safety. We propose a safety-aware dialogue system that applies information-gain guided clarification before RAG-based response generation and screens user utterances for emotional distress and suicidal ideation. Expert evaluations show that the proposed system improves the quality and clinical appropriateness of generated responses relative to strong baselines, while the safety module closely aligns with expert judgments on clinically concerning utterances. Furthermore, we release a clinically curated Chinese post-op OC QA dataset with expert-validated annotations, which we use throughout our experiments.

ACL 2026

Safety-Aware Dialogue System for Postoperative Oral Cancer Care with Structured Clarification and a Clinically Curated Dataset

# Welcome everyone to ACL 2022!

The 60th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics is taking place May 22-27, 2022 as a hybrid event, in Dublin and online. We are happy to welcome all of you to this anniversary edition with an almost 50-50 in-person and virtual participation. 
The main conference program features oral presentations, in-person and virtual posters and demo sessions, a plenary session for our best paper presentations and awards, three amazing keynote events and two new initiatives of invited talks: Spotlight Talks for Young Rising Stars (STIRS) and The Next Big Idea Talks. Posters (including Findings of ACL 2022) and demos are grouped by areas for both the in-person and the virtual sessions. For the virtual component, the talks will be on Zoom and the posters and the demos will be in GatherTown. The Student Research Workshop will have an oral session and a poster session as part of Poster Session 1. The program also features eight Tutorials and 28 Workshops. 

 
We wish you a wonderful conference! 
[**The ACL 2022 Organizing Committee**](https://www.2022.aclweb.org/organisers)
 
[**Conference Handbook**](https://drive.google.com/file/d/1_BUCMfhMVrjG9E2e71aHdHeE28KSje0l/view?usp=sharing) 
[**Mini Handbook**](https://drive.google.com/file/d/1qlBKl0wzmlVF1oCeMQl3BahLd9nLP5Ce/view?usp=sharing) 
[**Posters and Demo guides**](https://drive.google.com/file/d/1UucMAoCNncIOaH1rMMDa0owuG9qgvJTG/view?usp=sharing)

ACL 2022

The Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL) is the premier international scientific and professional society for people working on computational problems involving human language, a field often referred to as either computational linguistics or natural language processing (NLP). 

poster

It is my great pleasure and honor to welcome you to the 64th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL 2026), held in San Diego, California, USA, July 2–7, 2026. ACL 2026 continues our fields tradition of excellence in scholarship, innovation, and inclusivity, and I am deeply grateful to the many volunteers who have worked tirelessly to bring this event to life.

It is exciting to see the many developments in the field reflected at our conference, such as the advancement of large language models (born out of our community) into many application directions. This is not without challenges, partly due to unsolved problems, and partly due to misuse of the technology. All this is reflected well at ACL 2026. The conference also reflects that the field is not only about advancing technology, but also the science of fundamentally understanding language and how it is use by many different speaker communities. 
[Full Message from General Chair Philipp Koehn](https://drive.google.com/file/d/1QiJFOmMjvDgsDo3i1XzlQnImxe3RU_Cy/view?usp=sharing) 
<html><button style="display: inline-flex; align-items: center; justify-content: center; white-space: nowrap; border-radius: 9999px; font-weight: bold; background: #7c3aed; color: white; font-family: 'Space Grotesk', sans-serif; height: 40px; font-size: 16px; padding: 0 20px; border: none; cursor: pointer" onclick="window.open('https://drive.google.com/file/d/1QiJFOmMjvDgsDo3i1XzlQnImxe3RU_Cy/view?usp=sharing')">Conference Handbook</button></html>

To access this event page, you need to log in with the **email address you registered with**. Access credentials will be sent to your email from Underline - subject line "Welcome to ACL 2026". Please be sure to check your spam email folder if you do not see an email confirmation right away.

To access this event page, you are required to register.
Please complete your registration to continue.

We recommend reading [**the registration information**](https://2026.aclweb.org/registration/) first.

Registration Required

The 64th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL 2026) will take place in San Diego, California, from July 2 - 7, 2026.

Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) have increasingly supported omni-modal processing across text, vision, and speech. However, existing evaluation frameworks for such models suffer from critical limitations, including modality shortcuts and biased reasoning paths. To address these challenges, we propose OMHBench, a novel benchmark designed to rigorously evaluate omni-modal multi-hop reasoning. It consists of 6,144 questions with balanced reasoning paths that are jointly grounded across all three modalities. Extensive evaluation of 13 state-of-the-art models reveals that (1) a large performance gap exists between proprietary and open-source MLLMs and (2) even proprietary models exhibit high sensitivity to reasoning path variations, resulting in asymmetric omni-modal grounding. Notably, models struggle when processing the speech modality, underscoring the need for balanced, multi-hop evaluation of omni-modal intelligence.

OMHBench: Benchmarking Balanced and Grounded Omni-Modal Multi-Hop Reasoning

Large language models (LLMs) have been widely adopted in healthcare, yet they still encounter significant challenges in complex clinical decision-making scenarios. Existing benchmarks primarily assess LLM performance in single-course settings and lack systematic evaluation in multi-course scenarios, where a patient’s condition evolves over time. To address this gap, we propose ClinicalMC, a benchmark for multi-course clinical decision-making. It includes 1,275 Chinese and 5,804 English samples across four stages from admission to discharge. These stages cover triage, first-course examination/diagnosis/treatment, subsequent multi-course examination/assessment/treatment, and final diagnosis. In ClinicalMC, patients in the English dataset undergo an average of 5.11 clinical courses, whereas those in the Chinese dataset undergo 3.42. To assess LLM performance, we construct a multi-agent evaluation framework that includes patient, examiner, and doctor agents. Based on the benchmark and framework, we design two experimental settings—a single-turn static setting and a multi-turn dynamic setting—and assess three categories of LLMs: 1) closed-source LLMs like GPT-4o-mini; 2) open-source LLMs like DeepSeek-V3, and 3) medical LLMs like HuatuoGPT-o1. Through extensive evaluation, we aim to better understand LLM performance in the medical domain and support its effective deployment in healthcare.

ClinicalMC: A Benchmark for Multi-Course Clinical Decision-Making with Large Language Models

Selecting an appropriate LLM configuration for a given query is critical, yet existing routing frameworks operate within a single computational paradigm. To address this gap, we formalize the Cross-System Routing Problem, a hierarchical decision-making task that decomposes routing into intra-regime configuration selection and inter-regime system selection. Building on this, we propose BiCSRouter, a bi-level cross-system routing framework that integrates two orthogonal regimes: intensive reasoning via single-agent systems and extensive collaboration via multi-agent systems. BiCSRouter performs policy learning within each system and employs a lightweight inter-regime router that selects the optimal regime based on predicted performance and cost. Experiments on the MBPP and MATH benchmarks demonstrate that BiCSRouter outperforms 15 representative baselines across three types. On MBPP, compared to the performance ceiling of GPT-5, BiCSRouter achieves a 46\% reduction in cost with only a 2\% drop in accuracy. Finally, we show that BiCSRouter can extend to additional regimes, highlighting its generality as a cross-system routing framework.

BiCSRouter: Bi-Level Cross-System Routing for Utility-Aware LLM Inference

Tool calling requires Large Language Models (LLMs) to generate structured decisions including tool names and schema-constrained arguments, where small decoding mistakes can cause hard failures. Existing methods either rely on costly tool-use training data or only constrain syntax, leaving tool selection and argument value errors largely unsolved. We analyze tool calling failures through a Where–When lens: (Where) failures correlate with persistent uncertainty in late transformer layers, (When) uncertainty concentrates on content-bearing tokens (tool names and argument values) rather than schema tokens. Based on this, and motivated by evidence that transformer Feed Forward Networks (FFNs) act as key–value style memories that store and retrieve factual or associative mappings, we propose Memory Space Tool Retracing (MemTR), a weight-free decoding-time method that retrieves relevant tool evidence from the tool library and mixes it into the FFN-output at the uncertain layer, treating FFNs as key–value memories. Through extensive experiments on various model families (Qwen, Llama, and xLAM) and benchmarks (BFCL, ACEBench, APIBank), MemTR reduces tool calling failures by 2%–9% with only 1%–2% runtime overhead, without any fine-tuning or additional tool-use training data.

MemTR: Enhancing Tool-Calling Reliability via Uncertainty-Triggered FFN-Space Retracing

Autoregressive decoding in Large Language Models (LLMs) generates one token per step, causing high inference latency. Speculative decoding (SD) mitigates this through a guess-and-verify strategy, but existing training-free variants face trade-offs: retrieval-based drafts break when no exact match exists, while logits-based drafts lack structural guidance. We propose $\textbf{RACER}$ ($\textbf{R}$etrieval-$\textbf{A}$ugmented $\textbf{C}$ont$\textbf{e}$xtual $\textbf{R}$apid Speculative Decoding), a lightweight and training-free method that integrates retrieved exact patterns with logit-driven future cues. This unification supplies both reliable anchors and flexible extrapolation, yielding richer speculative drafts. Experiments on Spec-Bench, HumanEval, and MGSM-ZH demonstrate that RACER consistently accelerates inference, achieving more than $2\times$ speedup over autoregressive decoding, and outperforms prior training-free methods, offering a scalable, plug-and-play solution for efficient LLM decoding. Our source code is available at https://github.com/hkr04/RACER.

 RACER: Retrieval-Augmented Contextual Rapid Speculative Decoding

Self-Consistency improves reasoning reliability through multi-sample aggregation, but incurs substantial inference cost. Adaptive self-consistency methods mitigate this issue by adjusting the sampling budget; however, they rely on count-based stopping rules that treat all responses equally, often leading to unnecessary sampling. We propose \textbf{Re}liability-Aware \textbf{A}daptive \textbf{S}elf-\textbf{C}onsistency (\texttt{ReASC}), which addresses this limitation by reframing adaptive sampling from response counting to evidence sufficiency, leveraging response-level confidence for principled information aggregation. \texttt{ReASC} operates in two stages: a single-sample decision stage that resolves instances confidently answerable from a single response, and a reliability-aware accumulation stage that aggregates responses by jointly leveraging their frequency and confidence. Across five models and four datasets, \texttt{ReASC} consistently achieves the best accuracy-cost trade-off compared to existing baselines, yielding improved inference efficiency across model scales from 3B to 27B parameters. As a concrete example, \texttt{ReASC} reduces inference cost by up to 70% relative to self-consistency while preserving accuracy on GSM8K using Gemma-3-4B-it.

Reliability-Aware Adaptive Self-Consistency for Efficient Sampling in LLM Reasoning

Large Language Models (LLMs) typically come with a fixed architecture, despite growing evidence that not all layers contribute equally to every downstream task. We introduce TALE (Task-Aware Layer Elimination), an inference-time method that improves task performance by selectively removing layers that are irrelevant or detrimental for a given task. TALE optimizes task-specific performance, yielding a task-optimized architecture without retraining. Across 9 tasks and 5 model families, under both zero-shot and few-shot settings, TALE consistently matches or surpasses baseline performance while simultaneously reducing computational costs. TALE also synergizes with fine-tuning, leading to further performance improvements. Computing TALE for a new task requires modest resources, making it a practical and deployable solution for task-specialized LLM inference.

 TELL-TALE: Task Efficient LLMs with Task Aware Layer Elimination

Long-horizon agents face the challenge of growing context size during interaction with environment, which degrades the performance and stability. Existing methods typically introduce the external memory module and look up the relevant information from the stored memory, which prevents the model itself from proactively managing its memory content and aligning with the agent's overarching task objectives. To address these limitations, we propose the self-memory policy optimization algorithm (MemPO), which enables the agent (policy model) to autonomously summarize and manage their memory during interaction with environment. By improving the credit assignment mechanism based on memory effectiveness, the policy model can selectively retain crucial information, significantly reducing token consumption while preserving task performance. Extensive experiments and analyses confirm that MemPO achieves absolute F1 score gains of 25.98 over the base model and 7.1 over the previous SOTA baseline, while reducing token usage by 67.58% and 73.12%.

MemPO: Self-Memory Policy Optimization for Long-Horizon Agents

Recent advancements in the Generative Reward Model (GRM) have demonstrated its potential to enhance the reasoning abilities of LLMs through Chain-of-Thought (CoT) prompting. Despite these gains, existing implementations of GRM suffer from two critical limitations. First, CoT prompting is applied indiscriminately to all inputs regardless of their inherent complexity. This introduces unnecessary computational costs for tasks amenable to fast, direct inference. Second, existing approaches primarily rely on voting-based mechanisms to evaluate CoT outputs, which often lack granularity and precision in assessing reasoning quality. In this paper, we propose E-GRM, an efficient generative reward modeling framework grounded in model-internal uncertainty. E-GRM leverages the convergence behavior of parallel model generations to estimate uncertainty and selectively trigger CoT reasoning only when needed, without relying on handcrafted features or task-dependent signals. To improve reward fidelity, we introduce a lightweight discriminative scorer trained with a hybrid regression–ranking objective to provide fine-grained evaluation of reasoning paths. Experiments on multiple reasoning benchmarks show that E-GRM substantially reduces inference cost while consistently improving answer accuracy, demonstrating that model-internal uncertainty is an effective and general signal for efficient reasoning-aware reward modeling.

Reason Only When Needed: Efficient Generative Reward Modeling via Model-Internal Uncertainty

A fundamental challenge in creative writing lies in reconciling the inherent tension between maintaining global coherence in long-form narratives and preserving local expressiveness in short-form texts. While long-context generation necessitates explicit macroscopic planning, short-form creativity often demands spontaneous, constraint-free expression. Existing alignment paradigms, however, typically employ static reward signals and rely heavily on high-quality supervised data, which is costly and difficult to scale. To address this, we propose UniCreative, a unified reference-free reinforcement learning framework. We first introduce AC-GenRM, an adaptive constraint-aware reward model that dynamically synthesizes query-specific criteria to provide fine-grained preference judgments. Leveraging these signals, we propose ACPO, a policy optimization algorithm that aligns models with human preferences across both content quality and structural paradigms without supervised fine-tuning and ground-truth references. Empirical results demonstrate that AC-GenRM aligns closely with expert evaluations, while ACPO significantly enhances performance across diverse writing tasks. Crucially, our analysis reveals an emergent meta-cognitive ability: the model learns to autonomously differentiate between tasks requiring rigorous planning and those favoring direct generation, validating the effectiveness of our direct alignment approach.

Downloads

Next from ACL 2026

OMHBench: Benchmarking Balanced and Grounded Omni-Modal Multi-Hop Reasoning

Similar lecture

On the Safety of Conversational Models: Taxonomy, Dataset, and Benchmark