United States

Large language models (LLMs) have driven major advances across domains, yet their massive size hinders deployment in resource-constrained settings. Low-rank factorization addresses this challenge by compressing models to effectively reduce their computation and memory consumption while maintaining accuracy. While these compressed models boast benign performance and system-level advantages, their trustworthiness implications remain poorly understood. In this paper, we present the first comprehensive study of how low-rank factorization affects LLM trustworthiness across privacy, adversarial robustness, ethics, and fairness, complemented by an explainability-driven analysis of the internal mechanisms behind these trust-related changes. 

We evaluate multiple LLMs of different sizes and architectures compressed with various low-rank factorization algorithms, revealing key insights: (1) low-rank factorization preserves training data privacy but weakens the protection of personally identifiable information during conversations; (2) adversarial robustness is generally enhanced under compression; (3) ethics degrades in zero-shot prompting but partially recovers in few-shot prompting; (4) fairness declines under compression. Beyond compression, we investigate how model scale and fine-tuning affect trustworthiness. Additionally, to move beyond black-box analysis, we employ a gradient-based attribution to identify which layers of LLMs contribute most to adversarial robustness.

ACL 2026

Decomposed Trust: Privacy, Adversarial Robustness, Ethics, and Fairness in Low-Rank LLMs

We are pleased to announce the Fortieth AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence (AAAI-26), which will be held in Singapore EXPO from January 20 to January 27, 2026.

The purpose of the AAAI conference series is to promote research in Artificial Intelligence (AI) and foster scientific exchange between researchers, practitioners, scientists, students, and engineers across the entirety of AI and its affiliated disciplines. AAAI-26 will feature technical paper presentations, special tracks, invited speakers, workshops, tutorials, poster sessions, senior member presentations, competitions, and exhibit programs, and a range of other activities to be announced.

To access this event page, you need to log in with the **email address you registered with**. Access credentials will be sent to your email from Underline - subject line "Welcome to AAAI 2026". Please be sure to check your spam email folder if you do not see an email confirmation right away.

Please log in

To access this event page, you are required to register.
Please complete your registration to continue.

We recommend reading [**the registration information**](https://aaai.org/conference/aaai/aaai-26/registration/) first.

**Online Registration Form**: https://aaai.getregistered.net/conference-2026 

Registration Required

AAAI 2026

We are pleased to announce the Fortieth AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence (AAAI-26), which will be held in Singapore EXPO from January 20 to January 27, 2026.

poster

It is my great pleasure and honor to welcome you to the 64th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL 2026), held in San Diego, California, USA, July 2–7, 2026. ACL 2026 continues our fields tradition of excellence in scholarship, innovation, and inclusivity, and I am deeply grateful to the many volunteers who have worked tirelessly to bring this event to life.

It is exciting to see the many developments in the field reflected at our conference, such as the advancement of large language models (born out of our community) into many application directions. This is not without challenges, partly due to unsolved problems, and partly due to misuse of the technology. All this is reflected well at ACL 2026. The conference also reflects that the field is not only about advancing technology, but also the science of fundamentally understanding language and how it is use by many different speaker communities. 
[Full Message from General Chair Philipp Koehn](https://drive.google.com/file/d/1QiJFOmMjvDgsDo3i1XzlQnImxe3RU_Cy/view?usp=sharing) 
<html><button style="display: inline-flex; align-items: center; justify-content: center; white-space: nowrap; border-radius: 9999px; font-weight: bold; background: #7c3aed; color: white; font-family: 'Space Grotesk', sans-serif; height: 40px; font-size: 16px; padding: 0 20px; border: none; cursor: pointer" onclick="window.open('https://drive.google.com/file/d/1QiJFOmMjvDgsDo3i1XzlQnImxe3RU_Cy/view?usp=sharing')">Conference Handbook</button></html>

To access this event page, you need to log in with the **email address you registered with**. Access credentials will be sent to your email from Underline - subject line "Welcome to ACL 2026". Please be sure to check your spam email folder if you do not see an email confirmation right away.

To access this event page, you are required to register.
Please complete your registration to continue.

We recommend reading [**the registration information**](https://2026.aclweb.org/registration/) first.

**Online Registration Form**: https://acl.swoogo.com/acl2026

The 64th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL 2026) will take place in San Diego, California, from July 2 - 7, 2026.

Multimodal large language models (MLLMs) are increasingly deployed as assistants that interact through text and images, making it crucial to evaluate contextual safety when risk depends on both the visual scene and the evolving dialogue. Existing contextual safety benchmarks are mostly single-turn and often miss how malicious intent can emerge gradually or how the same scene can support both benign and exploitative goals. We introduce the Multi-Turn Multimodal Contextual Safety Benchmark (MTMCS-Bench), a benchmark of realistic images and multi-turn conversations that evaluates contextual safety in MLLMs under two complementary settings, escalation-based risk and context-switch risk. MTMCS-Bench offers paired safe and unsafe dialogues with structured evaluation. It contains over 30 thousand multimodal (image+text) and unimodal (text-only) samples, with metrics that separately measure contextual intent recognition, safety-awareness on unsafe cases, and helpfulness on benign ones. Across eight open-source and seven proprietary MLLMs, we observe persistent trade-offs between contextual safety and utility, with models tending to either miss gradual risks or over-refuse benign dialogues. Finally, we evaluate five current guardrails and find that they mitigate some failures but do not fully resolve multi-turn contextual risks.

MTMCS-Bench: Evaluating Contextual Safety of Multimodal Large Language Models in Multi-Turn Dialogues

Speech conveys not only linguistic information but also rich non-verbal vocal events such as laughing and crying. While semantic transcription is well-studied, the precise localization of non-verbal events remains a critical yet under-explored challenge. Current methods suffer from insufficient task definitions with limited category coverage and ambiguous temporal granularity. They also lack standardized evaluation frameworks, hindering the development of downstream applications. To bridge this gap, we first develop a refined taxonomy of 21 vocal events, with a new categorization into discrete (standalone) versus continuous (mixed with speech) types. Based on the refined taxonomy, we introduce WESR-Bench, an expert-annotated evaluation set (900+ utterances) with a novel position-aware protocol that disentangles ASR errors from event detection, enabling precise localization measurement for both discrete and continuous events. We also build a strong baseline by constructing a 1,700+ hour corpus, and train specialized models, surpassing both open-source audio-language models and commercial APIs while preserving ASR quality. We anticipate that WESR will serve as a foundational resource for future research in modeling rich, real-world auditory scenes.

WESR: A Benchmark and Strong Baseline for Word-level Event-Speech Recognition

Reasoning large language models (LLMs) have recently made much progress in complex problem-solving, leveraging internal reasoning (or thought) to guide their solution generation. However, existing LLM-based counseling agents, including those using Motivational Interviewing (MI), generate responses without explicitly aligning thoughts with counseling techniques, limiting their effectiveness. We propose MIThinker, a lightweight thinking model that generates therapeutic thoughts to guide MI counseling agents in strategy selection and response generation. To overcome the lack of annotated thought data, we introduce AugR1-MI, an automated pipeline that reverse-engineers counselor's thoughts from observed responses. Through two-stage training combining supervised fine-tuning and reinforcement learning, MIThinker demonstrates improved theory-of-mind assessment and strategy alignment. Comprehensive evaluations show that MindfulMI, our agent leveraging MIThinker, achieves MI competency comparable to state-of-the-art systems with an order of magnitude less computation.

MIThinker: A Plug-and-Play Policy-Optimized Thinker For Motivational Interviewing Counseling

Learning Bayesian Networks typically requires access to raw tabular data to estimate conditional probabilities. However, in many scientific domains, raw data is unavailable due to privacy concerns or general lack of access, while structured statistical summaries are increasingly accessible through large language models and published literature. We propose and evaluate five distinct strategies to reconstruct local conditional probability tables solely from statistical summaries in order to parameterize Bayesian Networks. Our comprehensive evaluation across mixed-type synthetic networks demonstrates that copula-based methods significantly outperform standard baselines, offering a viable path for knowledge integration from heterogeneous sources -- unlocking the wealth of published knowledge for causal modeling while ensuring transparency and verifiability.

Verifiable Parameterization of Bayesian Networks from Scientific Literature: Unlocking Unstructured Empirical Evidence

Model merging has emerged as an effective approach for integrating multiple task-specific fine-tuned models into a single unified model without requiring additional data-intensive training. A central challenge in model merging is to reduce task interference while preserving the task-specific capabilities of the original models. In this work, we propose PRIME, an ultra-low-rank principal-residual model merging framework that decomposes task vector merging into two complementary stages. First, ultra-low-rank principal task vector merging retains only a small fraction of singular vectors, effectively reducing task interference while preserving most of the task-specific performance. Second, orthogonal residual task vector merging incorporates the remaining components by projecting them onto the null space of the principal subspace, thereby avoiding interference while recovering additional task-relevant information. Extensive experiments on eight natural language processing tasks demonstrate that PRIME consistently outperforms existing model merging methods, achieving improvements of up to 1.18% on T5 and 1.9% on LLaMA-3.2-3B.

 PRIME: Ultra-Low-Rank Principal–Residual Model Merging

Prior work evaluates code generation bias primarily through simple conditional statements, which represent only a narrow slice of real-world programming and reveal solely overt, explicitly encoded bias. We demonstrate that this approach dramatically underestimates real-world bias by examining a more realistic task: generating machine learning (ML) pipelines. Testing both code-specialized and general-instruction large language models, we find that ML pipelines exhibit substantially greater bias than simple conditionals across all conditions: standard generation, with varying prompt-based mitigation strategies, varying numbers of attributes, and different ML pipeline difficulty levels. Even attribute selection alone, the simplest pipeline difficulty, shows higher bias compared to conditionals, demonstrating that ML pipelines inherently amplify bias beyond what isolated conditionals reveal. Critically, we uncover a stark asymmetry: models maintain equivalent bias detection performance on both simple conditionals and ML pipelines, revealing that models recognize bias equally well in both contexts yet generate significantly more biased code in ML pipelines. These findings challenge simple conditionals as valid proxies for bias evaluation and suggest current benchmarks mischaracterize model safety in practical deployment contexts.

 From If-Statements to ML Pipelines: Revisiting Bias in Code-Generation

Large reasoning models (LRMs) show strong capabilities in complex reasoning, yet their marginal gains on evidence-dependent factual questions are limited. We find this limitation is partially attributable to a reasoning–answer hit gap, where the model identifies the correct facts during reasoning but fails to incorporate them into the final response, thereby reducing factual fidelity. To address this issue, we propose MR-ALIGN, a Meta-Reasoning informed alignment framework that enhances factuality without relying on external verifiers. MR-ALIGN quantifies state-transition probabilities along the model’s thinking process and constructs a transition-aware implicit reward that reinforces beneficial reasoning patterns while suppressing defective ones at the atomic thinking segments. This re-weighting reshapes token-level signals into probability-aware segment scores, encouraging coherent reasoning trajectories that are more conducive to factual correctness. Empirical evaluations across four factual QA datasets and one long-form factuality benchmark show that MR-ALIGN consistently improves accuracy and truthfulness while reducing misleading reasoning. These results highlight that aligning the reasoning process itself, rather than merely the outputs, is pivotal for advancing factuality in LRMs.

MR-ALIGN: Meta-Reasoning Informed Factuality Alignment for Large Reasoning Models

In this paper, we show that when spoken language models (SLMs) are instructed to speak in a specific speaking style at the beginning of a multi-turn conversation, they cannot maintain the required speaking styles after several turns of interaction; we refer to this as the \textit{style amnesia} of SLMs. We focus on paralinguistic speaking styles, including emotion, accent, volume, and speaking speed. We evaluate three proprietary and two open-source SLMs, demonstrating that none of these models can maintain a consistent speaking style when instructed to do so. We further show that while SLMs can recall the style instruction when prompted in later turns, they still fail to express it, but through explicit recall can mitigate \textit{style amnesia}. In addition, SLMs struggle more when the style instruction is placed in system messages rather than user messages, even though system messages are specifically designed to provide persistent, conversation-level instructions. Our findings highlight a systematic gap in current SLMs' ability to maintain speaking styles, highlighting the need for improved style adherence in future models. Our code and evaluation data are publicly available at https://github.com/YuXiangLin1234/SLM-Style-Amnesia.

Style Amnesia: Investigating Speaking Style Degradation and Mitigation in Multi-Turn Spoken Language Models

The Unigram tokenization algorithm offers a probabilistic alternative to the greedy heuristics of Byte-Pair Encoding. Despite its theoretical elegance, its implementation in practice is complex, limiting its adoption to the SentencePiece package and adapters thereof. We bridge this gap between theory and practice by providing a clear guide to implementation and parameter choices. We also identify a simpler algorithm that accepts slightly higher training loss in exchange for improved compression.

Which Pieces Does Unigram Tokenization Really Need?

Audio language models (ALMs) are increasingly used for speech-based understanding; yet, their ability to perform semantic reasoning beyond transcription, Text-to-Audio Retrieval, Captioning, and Question-Answering accuracy remains insufficiently benchmarked. In particular, the effects of accent variation, domain shift, and semantic over-inference on audio reasoning are poorly understood. We evaluate audio language models across five semantic and paralinguistic reasoning tasks: entailment, consistency, plausibility, accent drift, and accent restraint. Collectively, these tasks assess a model’s ability to reason over spoken audio as the primary evidence source, including whether a textual hypothesis can be inferred, contradicted, or left undetermined by the audio, whether statements align or conflict with spoken content, whether claims are plausible given the discourse, and whether model predictions remain stable or appropriately constrained across accent variation. These findings highlight critical limitations in current audio reasoning evaluations and hope to provide guidance for more robust and equitable ALM design and assessment.

Downloads

Next from ACL 2026

MTMCS-Bench: Evaluating Contextual Safety of Multimodal Large Language Models in Multi-Turn Dialogues

Similar lecture

SkipCat: Rank-Maximized Low-Rank Compression of Large Language Models via Shared Projection and Block Skipping