United States

This study investigates how different moral conditions influence the general problem-solving capabilities of Large Language Models (LLMs). We aim to explore whether the role of morality as a cognitive function operating in human decision-making can be extended to LLMs. Specifically, we define distinct moral stages based on Kohlberg’s theory of moral development and design prompts to elicit model responses aligned with each corresponding condition. The validity of this alignment is verified using the Defining Issues Test, a human evaluation tool. Subsequently, models reflecting the characteristics of each condition are evaluated using the MMLU benchmark, which requires general problem-solving abilities across various domains. Experimental results show that different moral perspectives lead to changes in the model’s decision-making during general reasoning, reflected in both responses and internal representations. Notably, conditions grounded in more advanced moral stages tend to elicit more thoughtful and reflective problem-solving behavior, which is often associated with enhanced performance. Our study attempts to broaden the concept of LLM morality, which has traditionally only been considered in ethical judgment scenarios. Furthermore, it emphasizes that morality is not merely a means of ensuring safety but a crucial factor that shapes a model&#39;s behavior and thought processes.

ACL 2026

Do Morals Guide How LLMs Think? The Role of Ethical Perspectives in General Problem Solving

## Welcome!
"I am excited to welcome you to this year’s edition of the Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing! Importantly, it marks the 30th edition of EMNLP. With over 8,000 submissions, more than 3,000 accepted papers, and thousands of attendees, we have come a long way from that first
workshop, which had 14 accepted papers. As the field looks ahead, Suzhou is the fitting location for celebrating this milestone: rooted in a long literary tradition, yet modern and forward-looking, and home to a large share of the NLP community." 

*Message from the General Chair, Dirk Hovy*

EMNLP 2025

Celebrate 30 Years of EMNLP! 
EMNLP 2025 will be held in Suzhou, China from November 5th to November 9th, 2025.

This study investigates how different moral conditions influence the general problem-solving capabilities of Large Language Models (LLMs). We aim to explore whether the role of morality as a cognitive function operating in human decision-making can be extended to LLMs. Specifically, we define distinct moral stages based on Kohlberg’s theory of moral development and design prompts to elicit model responses aligned with each corresponding condition. The validity of this alignment is verified using the Defining Issues Test, a human evaluation tool. Subsequently, models reflecting the characteristics of each condition are evaluated using the MMLU benchmark, which requires general problem-solving abilities across various domains. Experimental results show that different moral perspectives lead to changes in the model’s decision-making during general reasoning, reflected in both responses and internal representations. Notably, conditions grounded in more advanced moral stages tend to elicit more thoughtful and reflective problem-solving behavior, which is often associated with enhanced performance. Our study attempts to broaden the concept of LLM morality, which has traditionally only been considered in ethical judgment scenarios. Furthermore, it emphasizes that morality is not merely a means of ensuring safety but a crucial factor that shapes a model's behavior and thought processes.

poster

It is my great pleasure and honor to welcome you to the 64th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL 2026), held in San Diego, California, USA, July 2–7, 2026. ACL 2026 continues our fields tradition of excellence in scholarship, innovation, and inclusivity, and I am deeply grateful to the many volunteers who have worked tirelessly to bring this event to life.

It is exciting to see the many developments in the field reflected at our conference, such as the advancement of large language models (born out of our community) into many application directions. This is not without challenges, partly due to unsolved problems, and partly due to misuse of the technology. All this is reflected well at ACL 2026. The conference also reflects that the field is not only about advancing technology, but also the science of fundamentally understanding language and how it is use by many different speaker communities. 
[Full Message from General Chair Philipp Koehn](https://drive.google.com/file/d/1QiJFOmMjvDgsDo3i1XzlQnImxe3RU_Cy/view?usp=sharing) 
<html><button style="display: inline-flex; align-items: center; justify-content: center; white-space: nowrap; border-radius: 9999px; font-weight: bold; background: #7c3aed; color: white; font-family: 'Space Grotesk', sans-serif; height: 40px; font-size: 16px; padding: 0 20px; border: none; cursor: pointer" onclick="window.open('https://drive.google.com/file/d/1QiJFOmMjvDgsDo3i1XzlQnImxe3RU_Cy/view?usp=sharing')">Conference Handbook</button></html>

To access this event page, you need to log in with the **email address you registered with**. Access credentials will be sent to your email from Underline - subject line "Welcome to ACL 2026". Please be sure to check your spam email folder if you do not see an email confirmation right away.

To access this event page, you are required to register.
Please complete your registration to continue.

We recommend reading [**the registration information**](https://2026.aclweb.org/registration/) first.

Registration Required

The 64th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL 2026) will take place in San Diego, California, from July 2 - 7, 2026.

We propose a lightweight explainable guardrail (LEG) method to detect unsafe prompts. LEG uses a multi-task learning architecture to jointly learn a prompt classifier and an explanation classifier, where the latter labels prompt words that explain the safe/unsafe overall decision. LEG is trained on synthetic explanation data, which is generated using a novel strategy that counteracts the confirmation biases of LLMs. Lastly, LEG's training process uses a novel loss that captures global explanation signals as a weak supervision and combines cross-entropy and focal losses with uncertainty-based weighting. LEG obtains equivalent or better performance than the state-of-the-art for both prompt classification and explainability, both in-domain and out-of-domain on three datasets, despite the fact that its model size is considerably smaller than current approaches.

A Lightweight Explainable Guardrail for Prompt Safety

Logical reasoning serves as a central capability in LLMs and includes three main forms: deductive, inductive, and abductive reasoning. In this work, we study the knowledge representations of these reasoning types in LLMs and analyze the correlations among them. Our analysis shows that each form of logical reasoning can be captured as a reasoning-specific knowledge vector in a linear representation space, yet these vectors are largely independent of each other. Motivated by cognitive science theory that these subforms of logical reasoning interact closely in the human brain, as well as our observation that the reasoning process for one type can benefit from the reasoning chain produced by another, we further propose to refine the knowledge representations of each reasoning type in LLMs to encourage complementarity between them. To this end, we design a complementary subspace-constrained refinement framework, which introduces a complementary loss that enables each reasoning vector to leverage auxiliary knowledge from the others, and a subspace constraint loss that prevents erasion of their unique characteristics. Through steering experiments along reasoning vectors, we find that refined vectors incorporating complementary knowledge yield consistent performance gains. We also conduct a mechanism-interpretability analysis of each reasoning vector, revealing insights into the shared and specific features of different reasoning in LLMs.

Knowledge Vector of Logical Reasoning in Large Language Models

Large Language Models (LLMs) are increasingly deployed as agents that invoke external tools through structured function calls. While recent work reports strong tool-calling performance under standard English-centric evaluations, the robustness of tool calling under multilingual user interactions remains underexplored. In this work, we introduce MLCL, a diagnostic benchmark, and conduct a systematic evaluation of multilingual tool calling across Chinese, Hindi, and the low-resource language Igbo. Through fine-grained error analysis, we show that many failures occur despite correct intent understanding and tool selection. We identify parameter value language mismatch as a dominant failure mode, where models generate semantically appropriate parameter values in the user’s language, violating language-invariant execution conventions. We further evaluate several inference-time system strategies and find that while these strategies substantially reduce language-induced execution errors, none of them can fully recover English-level performance.

 Lost in Execution: On the Multilingual Robustness of Tool Calling in Large Language Models

Humor holds up a mirror to social perception: what we find funny often reflects who we are and how we judge others. When language models engage with humor, their reactions expose the social assumptions they have internalized from training data. In this paper, we investigate counterfactual unfairness through humor by observing how the model’s responses change when we swap who speaks and who is addressed while holding other factors constant. Our framework spans three tasks: humor generation refusal, speaker intention inference, and relational/societal impact prediction, covering both identity-agnostic humor and identity-specific disparagement humor. We introduce interpretable bias metrics that capture asymmetric patterns under identity swaps. Experiments across state-of-the-art models reveal consistent relational disparities: jokes told by privileged speakers are refused up to 67.5% more often, judged as malicious 64.7% more frequently, and rated up to 1.5 points higher in social harm on a 5-point scale. These patterns highlight how sensitivity and stereotyping coexist in generative models, complicating efforts toward fairness and cultural alignment.

Investigating Counterfactual Unfairness in LLMs towards Identities through Humor

Charts are a universally adopted medium for data communication, yet existing chart understanding benchmarks are overwhelmingly English-centric, limiting their accessibility and relevance to global audiences. To address this limitation, we introduce PolyChartQA, the first large-scale multilingual benchmark for chart question answering, comprising 22,606 charts and 26,151 QA pairs across 10 diverse languages. PolyChartQA is constructed through a scalable pipeline that enables efficient multilingual chart generation via data translation and code reuse, supported by LLM-based translation and rigorous quality control. We systematically evaluate multilingual chart understanding with PolyChartQA on state-of-the-art LVLMs and reveal a significant performance gap between English and other languages, particularly low-resource ones. Additionally, we introduce a companion multilingual chart question answering training set, PolyChartQA-Train, on which fine-tuning LVLMs yields substantial gains in multilingual chart understanding across diverse model sizes and architectures. Together, our benchmark provides a foundation for developing globally inclusive vision-language models capable of understanding charts across diverse linguistic contexts. Codes and datasets are available on https://github.com/Road2Redemption/PolyChartQA.

POLYCHARTQA: Benchmarking Large Vision-Language Models with Multilingual Chart Question Answering

Cost-aware routing dynamically dispatches user queries to models of varying capability to balance performance and inference cost. However, the routing strategy introduces new security concern that adversaries may manipulate router to consistently select expensive high-capability models. Existing routing attacks depend either on white-box access or heuristic prompts, rendering them ineffective in real-world black-box scenarios. In this work, we propose R$^2$A, which aims to mislead black-box LLM routers to expensive models via adversarial suffix optimization. Specifically, R$^2$A deploys a hybrid ensemble surrogate router to mimic the black-box router. A suffix optimization algorithm is further adapted for the ensemble-based surrogate. Extensive experiments on multiple open-source and commercial routing systems demonstrate that R$^2$A significantly increases the routing rate to expensive models on queries of different distributions. Code and examples: https://github.com/thcxiker/R2A-Attack.

Route to Rome Attack: Directing LLM Routers to Expensive Models via Adversarial Suffix Optimization

While Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) systems are designed to enhance factual fidelity by grounding LLMs in provided sources, the application of current watermarking techniques creates a paradoxical failure mode. These methods, being inherently fact-agnostic, force the model to deviate from the very source documents it is supposed to follow. This leads to ``faithfulness hallucinations"—a critical flaw where the generated output contradicts its own grounding context. Consequently, these watermarks undermine the core value of RAG, rendering even the most secure schemes untrustworthy for high-stakes applications. To resolve this RAG-specific conflict, we introduce the Dual Factual Shield (DFS) framework, a novel architecture designed to enforce knowledge loyalty. The DFS framework employs a defense-in-depth strategy through two synergistic layers: a source-anchored algorithmic safeguard that shields critical terms from the retrieved context, and prompt-based semantic guidance that protects against factual corruption. To demonstrate its effectiveness, we enhance a state-of-the-art, spoofing-aware contrastive watermarking baseline with our framework. Experiments show that our framework drastically reduces the Knowledge Corruption Rate (KCR)—a new metric we introduce—while preserving its original high security and robustness. This work establishes a new paradigm for watermarking, evolving it from merely secure to truly trustworthy. We demonstrate that traceability and truth can, and must, coexist, paving the way for the responsible deployment of traceable AI in knowledge-critical domains.

Don’t Corrupt the Fact: A Trustworthy RAG Watermarking Framework based on Dual Factual Shield

Personalization of LLMs by sociodemographic subgroup often improves user experience, but can also introduce or amplify biases and unfair
outcomes across groups. Prior work has employed so-called personas, sociodemographic user attributes conveyed to a model, to study
bias in LLMs by relying on a single cue to prompt a persona, such as user names or explicit attribute mentions. This disregards LLM sensitivity to prompt variation and the rarity of some cues in real interactions (external validity). We compare six commonly used persona
cues across seven open and proprietary LLMs on four writing and advice tasks. While cues are overall highly correlated, they produce sub-
stantial variance in responses across personas that can change findings on persona-induced differences and bias. We therefore caution
against claims based on single persona cues, especially when they are overly explicit and have low external validity.

One Persona, Many Cues, Different Results: How Sociodemographic Cues Impact LLM Personalization

Dynamic reasoning trees can help large language models solve complex tasks by explicitly structuring intermediate decisions.
However, existing approaches often rely on manually specified subproblems or predefined decomposition patterns, which limits the effectiveness of reasoning and generalization.
To solve this problem, we propose SyRA, a hierarchical reasoning framework based on MFR theory that supports the construction of adaptive reasoning trees and reliable error correction within a single LLM. Specifically, SyRA focuses on reasoning-tree construction, dynamically controlling branching and expansion using MFR principles to enable informative, non-redundant subproblem decomposition. In addition, it introduces a residual backtracking mechanism for adaptive cross-layer error correction, allowing the model to revise earlier reasoning decisions based on downstream feedback.
Across eight reasoning benchmarks, SyRA significantly reduces logical errors and improves reasoning accuracy, while achieving a better balance between accuracy and reasoning time than the Chain-of-Thought, Decompose--Analyze--Rethink and Tree-of-Thought. Our code and dataset are available at https://github.com/Tim798-art/SyRA/tree/main/SyRA.

Minimal Free Resolution Guided Adaptive Tree Reasoning

This paper presents a novel Automated Red Teaming (ART) framework that shifts from example-based to policy-based evaluation, addressing critical limitations in scalability and validity. We define harmful content through abstract safety policies rather than specific static examples. We also introduce multiple evaluation objectives: risk coverage, semantic diversity, and fidelity, and discover Pareto trade-offs between them. We propose Jailbreak-Zero, a black-box method capable of both zero-shot generation and fine-tuned exploitation of a victim's vulnerabilities to achieve Pareto optimality. Unlike prior approaches, it does not require expert-designed strategies/prompts, but still achieves superior, human-readable attacks against open-source and proprietary models (attack success rates of 99.5\% against GPT-4o and 96.0\% against Claude 3.5), even for unseen safety policies. It retains efficacy even after victim models undergo safety alignment, and exposes controls to navigate Pareto trade-offs \textit{without} retraining. Lastly, we show that Jailbreak-Zero is the best-performing ART method at a given compute budget. Code is available at: https://github.com/hukkai/jailbreak-zero/ .

Downloads

Next from ACL 2026

A Lightweight Explainable Guardrail for Prompt Safety

Similar lecture

Structured Moral Reasoning in Language Models: A Value-Grounded Evaluation Framework