United States

In recent years, low-rank adaptation (LoRA) has emerged as a significant paradigm that freezes pre-trained weights and introduces small, learnable adapters instead of fine-tuning the full set of parameters. In this work, we uncover several key insights regarding the $\textit{singular}$ components of network parameters based on Singular Value Decomposition (SVD).
Firstly, the $\textit{principal}$ singular components with large singular values in pre-trained network parameters can be effectively reused during fine-tuning, whereas the $\textit{minor}$ components with smaller singular values are more task-specific and require substantial adaptation. Secondly, we first establish the theoretical connection that the uncontrolled growth of singular values in LoRA adapters leads to the forgetting of pre-trained knowledge — a well-known issue referred to as $\textit{catastrophic forgetting}$.
Building on these observations, we propose $\textbf{SCLoRA}$, which injects parameterized singular components with spectral clipping into the pre-trained model in a way that is aware of the spectral distribution of the pre-trained model. $\textbf{SCLoRA}$ effectively adapts to new tasks by focusing updates on components that require adaptation, while simultaneously alleviating catastrophic forgetting. We conduct extensive experiments and demonstrate that $\textbf{SCLoRA}$ not only improves downstream performance but also effectively retains pre-trained knowledge.

ACL 2026

Can Spectral-Clipping Enable Better Learning While Forgetting Less for Low-Rank Adaptation?

### Welcome to CogSci Conference 2025!

The 47th Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society was a hybrid meeting held in San Francisco. 

<div style="position:relative;padding-top:0;width:900px;height:500px;"><iframe style="position:absolute;border:none;width:100%;height:100%;left:0;top:0;" src="https://online.fliphtml5.com/ebtyf/amvr/"  seamless="seamless" scrolling="no" frameborder="0" allowtransparency="true" allowfullscreen="true" ></iframe></div>

#### About

The Cognitive Science Society brings together researchers from around the world who hold a common goal: understanding the nature of the human mind. The mission of the Society is to promote Cognitive Science as a discipline, and to foster scientific interchange among researchers in various areas of study, including Artificial Intelligence, Linguistics, Anthropology, Psychology, Neuroscience, Philosophy, and Education.

The Society is a non-profit professional organization and its activities include sponsoring an annual conference and publishing the journals Cognitive Science and TopiCS.

#### Our History 

* **Society Creation**<br>
The Society was incorporated as a 501(c)(3) non-profit professional organization in Massachusetts in 1979. The organizing committee included Roger Schank, Allan Collins, Donald Norman, and a number of other scholars from psychology, linguistics, computer science, and philosophy. 
<br><br>
* **Conference Creation**<br>
The first conference on cognitive science was held at La Jolla, California in August, 1979, and has occurred annually since then. The proceedings of each conference are published, and those from most years are available through Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc. The annual proceedings of the Cognitive Science Conference represent a major source of information on new work and new ideas in the scientific study of thinking. In 1990, the Society, with help from an anonymous donor, established the David Marr Prize for the best student paper at each annual meeting.
<br><br>
* **Journal Creation**<br>
The Journal, Cognitive Science, began publication in 1976, and is now published by Wiley-Blackwell. The Executive Editor is currently Richard P. Cooper of Birkbeck, University of London, and there are 18 Associate Editors and a 30-member editorial board. It serves as the premier outlet for research reports that intersect two or more disciplines. Copyrights for articles published in the journal are held by the Society. The Governing Board of the Cognitive Science Society voted in late 2006 to found a new journal, Topics in Cognitive Science (topiCS). The Editor in Chief is Wayne Gray, Cognitive Science Department, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute. The journal seeks to fill a niche not occupied by Cognitive Science Journal or other cognitive science journals. Membership in the Society includes a subscription to Cognitive Science and TopiCS. Copyrights for articles published in the journal are held by the Society.
<br><br>

#### Code of Conduct

By attending the CogSci 2025 Conference, you are required to adhere to the society’s **[Code of Conduct](https://drive.google.com/file/d/1ChPuihLy6jE_BWqfO7J2KKgX35JW2zsM/view?usp=sharing)**.
<br><br>


You need to log in with the email address you registered with. 

Login credentials were sent to you from Underline -  subject line "Welcome to the CogSci 2025 Conference". Please be sure to check your spam/promotional inbox  if you do not see an email confirmation right away.





Please log in to join this event.

To access the site, please register [**here**](https://cognitivesciencesociety.org/registration/).

If you are registered and feel like you are seeing this message by mistake, please make sure you are logged in with the same email that you registered with. 

Please register!

CogSci 2025

The 47th Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society presents the latest research across cognitive science and highlights the theme of Cognition in Context.

poster

It is my great pleasure and honor to welcome you to the 64th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL 2026), held in San Diego, California, USA, July 2–7, 2026. ACL 2026 continues our fields tradition of excellence in scholarship, innovation, and inclusivity, and I am deeply grateful to the many volunteers who have worked tirelessly to bring this event to life.

It is exciting to see the many developments in the field reflected at our conference, such as the advancement of large language models (born out of our community) into many application directions. This is not without challenges, partly due to unsolved problems, and partly due to misuse of the technology. All this is reflected well at ACL 2026. The conference also reflects that the field is not only about advancing technology, but also the science of fundamentally understanding language and how it is use by many different speaker communities. <br>
[Full Message from General Chair Philipp Koehn](https://drive.google.com/file/d/1QiJFOmMjvDgsDo3i1XzlQnImxe3RU_Cy/view?usp=sharing) <br><br><br>
<html><button style="display: inline-flex; align-items: center; justify-content: center; white-space: nowrap; border-radius: 9999px; font-weight: bold; background: #7c3aed; color: white; font-family: 'Space Grotesk', sans-serif; height: 40px; font-size: 16px; padding: 0 20px; border: none; cursor: pointer" onclick="window.open('https://drive.google.com/file/d/1QiJFOmMjvDgsDo3i1XzlQnImxe3RU_Cy/view?usp=sharing')">Conference Handbook</button></html>
<br><br><br><br>

To access this event page, you need to log in with the **email address you registered with**. <br>Access credentials will be sent to your email from Underline -  subject line "Welcome to ACL 2026". Please be sure to check your spam email folder if you do not see an email confirmation right away.

To access this event page, you are required to register.
Please complete your registration to continue.

We recommend reading [**the registration information**](https://2026.aclweb.org/registration/) first.

Registration Required

The 64th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL 2026) will take place in San Diego, California, from July 2 - 7, 2026.

Accurate assessment of critical thinking is historically limited by the Intention Behavior Gap in psychology: the disconnect between what individuals self-reported disposition and their actual practical behaviors. We try to bridge this gap with MASA (Multi-Agent Scenario-based Assessment), a framework that operationalizes cognitive assessment into an interpretable and interactive multi-agent workflow with Assessment Chain-of-Thought (AsCoT). Validating on both large-scale simulations (N=1,161) and human participants (N=70), we find that MASA aligns better with human expert ratings (r=0.882) than traditional gold-standard inventories (r=0.720), with an average cost of only $0.41 per participant. These results suggest that by shifting from self-report inventory to behavior-grounded dialogue, MASA offers a more accurate, cost-effective, and transparent solution for real-world cognitive evaluation.

 Beyond Self-Report: Bridging the Intention-Behavior Gap in Critical Thinking Assessment via Interpretable Multi-Agent System

Recent Large Reasoning Models (LRMs) have achieved remarkable progress, yet their evaluation still relies on a narrow paradigm: evaluating one question at a time. This single-question setup suffers from two major limitations: (1) vulnerability to data contamination and diminishing difficulty, forcing costly creation of new questions with significant human effort, (2) failure to evaluate models under multi-context pressure, a key requirement for real-world deployment. To bridge this gap, we present **REST** (Reasoning Evaluation through Simultaneous Testing), a stress-testing framework that exposes LRMs to multiple problems simultaneously. Beyond basic reasoning, REST evaluates two under-tested capabilities: *contextual priority allocation* and *robustness against contextual interference*. Our evaluation of more than **30** advanced reasoning models on **9** reasoning benchmarks reveals several striking findings: Even state-of-the-art (SOTA) models such as ***DeepSeek-R1 exhibit substantial performance degradation under stress testing***, challenging the prevailing assumption that "LLMs are multi-problem solvers". Crucially, ***REST demonstrates stronger discriminative power*** than existing benchmarks, revealing performance gaps among models that exhibit similar, near-ceiling performance under traditional evaluation. Some key insights emerge from our analysis: (1) the ***"overthinking trap"*** is a critical factor contributing to the performance degradation; (2) models trained with the ***"Long2Short" technique preserve more of their single-problem accuracy*** under REST, outperforming their standard-trained counterparts. These results establish REST as a cost-efficient, future-proof evaluation paradigm while reducing reliance on continuous human annotation. Code is available at https://github.com/opendatalab/REST.

REST: Stress Testing Large Reasoning Models by Asking Multiple Problems at Once

Large Vision–Language Models (LVLMs) increasingly rely on retrieval to answer knowledge-intensive multimodal questions. Existing benchmarks overlook conflicts between visual and textual evidence and the importance of generating deflections (e.g., "Sorry, I cannot answer...") when retrieved knowledge is incomplete. These benchmarks also suffer from rapid obsolescence, as growing LVLM training sets allow models to answer many questions without retrieval. We address these gaps with three contributions. First, we propose a dynamic data curation pipeline that preserves benchmark difficulty over time by filtering for genuinely retrieval-dependent samples. Second, we introduce VLM-DeflectionBench, a benchmark of 2,775 samples spanning diverse multimodal retrieval settings, designed to probe model behaviour under conflicting or insufficient evidence. Third, we define a fine-grained evaluation protocol with four scenarios that disentangle parametric memorization from retrieval robustness. Experiments across 20 state-of-the-art LVLMs indicate that models usually fail to deflect in the presence of noisy or misleading evidence. Our results highlight the need to evaluate not only what models know, but how they behave when they do not, and serve as a reusable and extensible benchmark for reliable KB-VQA evaluation. All resources will be publicly available upon publication.

Benchmarking Deflection and Hallucination in Large Vision-Language Models

Existing hierarchical text classification (HTC) methods typically use prompt tuning or contrastive learning to inject the label hierarchy into a model as prior knowledge to implicitly learn label embeddings for classification. However, such implicit learning fails to accurately reflect label geometry (i.e., feature spatial distribution of label embeddings), as it does not model hierarchy-aware geometric relations among labels. To address this issue, we propose a novel two-stage label geometry structuring and aligning framework, termed LGSA, which transforms the label hierarchy from an implicit prior into an explicit embedding. First, we propose a hierarchical geometric structuring (HGS) module that leverages a general orthogonal frame (GOF) to reconstruct an explicit label geometry conforming to the label hierarchy. The label geometry is then treated as a label prototype to guide model training. To facilitate the guidance, we thereby propose a hierarchical geometric aligning (HGA) module as a regularization term to align label geometry learned by the model with the explicit label prototype. Experiments on three real-world HTC datasets confirm that LGSA consistently outperforms existing state-of-the-art methods. The code and models are available at https://anonymous.4open.science/r/LGSA-1E0C.

LGSA: Label Geometry Structuring and Aligning for Hierarchical Text Classification

Mainstream multilingual LLMs are generally trained on a much higher proportion of English than multilingual data, raising questions about their ability to capture linguistic features particular to non-English languages or to capture information important to non-anglophone cultures. We add to a growing effort to increase multilingual sensitivity in LLMs by developing a benchmark, EIFFEL, testing mastery of French idiomatic expressions in context. We fully explain the methodology, which exploits input from native French speakers, to make it reproducible for other languages. We compare mainstream multilingual LLMs with French-focused LLMs both on standard LLM benchmarks and EIFFEL; EIFFEL brings out the benefits of higher proportions of French data and shows limitations of standard benchmarks for measuring multilingual competence.

EIFFEL: a novel benchmark to measure bias of English heavy training on French idiomatic expressions

Extracting embeddings directly from Mixture-of-Experts (MoE) models is a promising yet underexplored direction that requires no additional data or fine-tuning. While previous studies have utilized semantic compression prompts or expert routing information to improve sentence embeddings, they typically allocate a fixed number of experts uniformly across all layers and tokens, ignoring inter-layer and inter-token heterogeneity. In this work, we identify two key observations in MoE models: (1) layer-wise variations in expert homogeneity, suggesting that different layers require different expert budgets, and (2) token-wise contribution imbalance, indicating that different tokens should also be allocated different numbers of experts. To address these issues, we propose an Adaptive Expert Allocation (AEA) framework that dynamically performs both layer-wise and token-wise expert allocation to enhance embedding quality. Specifically, AEA allocates fewer experts to layers with higher homogeneity and to tokens with lower attention importance, where layer-wise homogeneity is determined by the similarity among embeddings produced by the experts in each layer. Notably, our method is plug-and-play, seamlessly integrates with existing prompt engineering methods, and introduces no additional time overhead. Experiments on the STS tasks demonstrate that AEA consistently improves embedding quality across multiple MoE models.

AEA: Adaptive Expert Allocation Improves Sentence Embeddings from Mixture-of-Experts LLM

Multimodal abductive reasoning — the generation and selection of explanatory hypotheses from partial observations — is a cornerstone of intelligence. Current evaluations of such ability in vision–language models (VLMs) are largely confined to static, single-agent tasks. Inspired by Dixit, we introduce DixitWorld, a comprehensive evaluation suite designed to deconstruct this challenge. DixitWorld features two core components: DixitArena, a dynamic, multi-agent environment that evaluates both hypothesis generation (a "storyteller" crafting cryptic clues) and hypothesis selection ("listeners" choosing the target image from decoys) under imperfect information; and DixitBench, a static QA benchmark that isolates the listener's task for efficient, controlled evaluation. Results from DixitArena reveal distinct, role-dependent behaviors: smaller open-source models often excel as creative storytellers, producing imaginative yet less discriminative clues, whereas larger proprietary models demonstrate superior overall performance, particularly as listeners. Performance on DixitBench strongly correlates with listener results in DixitArena, validating it as a reliable proxy for hypothesis selection. Our findings reveal a key trade-off between generative creativity and discriminative understanding in multimodal abductive reasoning, a central challenge for developing more balanced and capable vision-language agents.

DIXITWORLD: Evaluating Multimodal Abductive Reasoning in Vision-Language Models with Multi-Agent Dixit Gameplay

Speculative decoding accelerates autoregressive generation by letting draft tokens bypass full verification, but conventional frameworks suffer from frequent false rejections, particularly when draft models produce semantically correct but lexically divergent outputs. In this paper, we present Calibrated Speculative Decoding (CSD), a training-free framework that recovers valid tokens discarded by standard verification. Guided by the principle of "Frequency-Guided Candidate Selection and Probability-Guarded Acceptance," CSD incorporates two lightweight modules: Online Correction Memory, which aggregates historical rejections to propose recurring divergence patterns as rescue candidates, and Semantic Consistency Gating, which verifies candidate admissibility using probability ratios instead of exact token matching. Our evaluation across diverse large language models demonstrates that CSD outperforms existing methods, achieving a peak throughput speedup of 2.33x. CSD preserves model accuracy across all tasks while further boosting performance on complex reasoning datasets. These results establish CSD as a highly effective, lightweight solution for practical LLM deployments.

Calibrated Speculative Decoding: Frequency-Guided Candidate Selection for Efficient Inference

Large Language Models (LLMs) are increasingly used in education, yet their default helpfulness often conflicts with pedagogical principles. Prior work evaluates pedagogical quality via answer leakage–the disclosure of complete solutions instead of scaffolding–but typically assumes well-intentioned learners, leaving tutor robustness under student misuse largely unexplored. In this paper, we study scenarios where students behave adversarially and aim to obtain the correct answer from the tutor. We evaluate a broad set of LLM-based tutor models, including different model families, pedagogically aligned models, and a multi-agent design, under a range of adversarial student attacks. We adapt six groups of adversarial and persuasive techniques to the educational setting and use them to probe how likely a tutor is to reveal the final answer. We evaluate answer leakage robustness using different types of in-context adversarial student agents, finding that they often fail to carry out effective attacks. We therefore introduce an adversarial student agent that we fine-tune to jailbreak LLM-based tutors, which we propose as the core of a standardized benchmark for evaluating tutor robustness. Finally, we present simple but effective defense strategies that reduce answer leakage and strengthen the robustness of LLM-based tutors in adversarial scenarios.

 Evaluating Answer Leakage Robustness of LLM Tutors against Adversarial Student Attacks

Multimedia event extraction aims to jointly identify events and their arguments across multiple modalities, such as text and images, to support more comprehensive event understanding. While recent work reports steady and substantial progress, the reliability and comparability of these results critically depend on consistent and rigorous evaluation. In this work, we present the first systematic analysis of evaluation pitfalls in multimedia event extraction and identify three major sources of issues: inconsistent data processing, inconsistent task assumptions, and overly relaxed evaluation settings. We demonstrate, through a series of controlled experiments under a strict evaluation framework, that minor evaluation choices can cause large performance variations and lead to overestimation of a model’s ability to ground real-world events across modalities. Our findings highlight the need for comparable evaluation standards and encourage a shift toward more rigorous evaluation in multimedia event extraction.

Downloads

Next from ACL 2026

Beyond Self-Report: Bridging the Intention-Behavior Gap in Critical Thinking Assessment via Interpretable Multi-Agent System

Similar lecture

Singular “they” exposure increases singular interpretations in ambiguous pronouns