United States

While Hybrid Supervised Fine-Tuning (SFT) followed by Reinforcement Learning (RL) has become the standard paradigm for training LLM agents, effective mechanisms for data allocation between these stages remain largely underexplored. Current data arbitration strategies often rely on surface-level heuristics that fail to diagnose intrinsic learning needs. Since SFT targets pattern consolidation through imitation while RL drives structural adaptation via exploration, misaligning data with these functional roles causes severe optimization interference. We propose PRISM, a dynamics-aware framework grounded in Schema Theory that arbitrates data based on its degree of cognitive conflict with the model&#39;s existing knowledge. By analyzing the spatial geometric structure of gradients, PRISM identifies data triggering high spatial concentration as high-conflict signals that require RL for structural restructuring. In contrast, data yielding diffuse updates is routed to SFT for efficient consolidation. Extensive experiments on WebShop and ALFWorld demonstrate that PRISM achieves a Pareto improvement, outperforming state-of-the-art hybrid methods while reducing computational costs by up to 3.22 $\times$. Our findings suggest that disentangling data based on internal optimization regimes is crucial for scalable and robust agent alignment.

ACL 2026

Consolidation or Adaptation? PRISM: Disentangling SFT and RL Data via Gradient Concentration

It is my great pleasure and honor to welcome you to the 64th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL 2026), held in San Diego, California, USA, July 2–7, 2026. ACL 2026 continues our fields tradition of excellence in scholarship, innovation, and inclusivity, and I am deeply grateful to the many volunteers who have worked tirelessly to bring this event to life.

It is exciting to see the many developments in the field reflected at our conference, such as the advancement of large language models (born out of our community) into many application directions. This is not without challenges, partly due to unsolved problems, and partly due to misuse of the technology. All this is reflected well at ACL 2026. The conference also reflects that the field is not only about advancing technology, but also the science of fundamentally understanding language and how it is use by many different speaker communities. <br>
[Full Message from General Chair Philipp Koehn](https://drive.google.com/file/d/1QiJFOmMjvDgsDo3i1XzlQnImxe3RU_Cy/view?usp=sharing) <br><br><br>
<html><button style="display: inline-flex; align-items: center; justify-content: center; white-space: nowrap; border-radius: 9999px; font-weight: bold; background: #7c3aed; color: white; font-family: 'Space Grotesk', sans-serif; height: 40px; font-size: 16px; padding: 0 20px; border: none; cursor: pointer" onclick="window.open('https://drive.google.com/file/d/1QiJFOmMjvDgsDo3i1XzlQnImxe3RU_Cy/view?usp=sharing')">Conference Handbook</button></html>
<br><br><br><br>

To access this event page, you need to log in with the **email address you registered with**. <br>Access credentials will be sent to your email from Underline -  subject line "Welcome to ACL 2026". Please be sure to check your spam email folder if you do not see an email confirmation right away.

To access this event page, you are required to register.
Please complete your registration to continue.

We recommend reading [**the registration information**](https://2026.aclweb.org/registration/) first.

**Online Registration Form**: https://acl.swoogo.com/acl2026

Registration Required

The 64th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL 2026) will take place in San Diego, California, from July 2 - 7, 2026.

While Hybrid Supervised Fine-Tuning (SFT) followed by Reinforcement Learning (RL) has become the standard paradigm for training LLM agents, effective mechanisms for data allocation between these stages remain largely underexplored. Current data arbitration strategies often rely on surface-level heuristics that fail to diagnose intrinsic learning needs. Since SFT targets pattern consolidation through imitation while RL drives structural adaptation via exploration, misaligning data with these functional roles causes severe optimization interference. We propose PRISM, a dynamics-aware framework grounded in Schema Theory that arbitrates data based on its degree of cognitive conflict with the model's existing knowledge. By analyzing the spatial geometric structure of gradients, PRISM identifies data triggering high spatial concentration as high-conflict signals that require RL for structural restructuring. In contrast, data yielding diffuse updates is routed to SFT for efficient consolidation. Extensive experiments on WebShop and ALFWorld demonstrate that PRISM achieves a Pareto improvement, outperforming state-of-the-art hybrid methods while reducing computational costs by up to 3.22 $\times$. Our findings suggest that disentangling data based on internal optimization regimes is crucial for scalable and robust agent alignment.

technical paper

Federated learning (FL) addresses privacy and data-silo issues in the training of large language models (LLMs). Most prior work focuses on improving the efficiency of federated learning for LLMs (FedLLM). However, security in open federated environments, particularly defenses against malicious clients, remains underexplored. To investigate the security of FedLLM, we conduct a preliminary study to analyze potential attack surfaces and defensive characteristics from the perspective of LoRA updates. We find two key properties of FedLLM: 1) LLMs are vulnerable to attacks from malicious clients in FL, and 2) LoRA updates exhibit distinct behavioral patterns that can be effectively distinguished by lightweight classifiers. Based on these properties, we propose Safe-FedLLM, a probe-based defense framework for FedLLM, which constructs defenses across three levels: Step-Level, Client-Level, and Shadow-Level. The core concept of Safe-FedLLM is to perform probe-based discrimination on each client's local LoRA updates, treating them as high-dimensional behavioral features and using a lightweight classifier to determine whether they are malicious. Extensive experiments demonstrate that Safe-FedLLM effectively improves FedLLM's robustness against malicious clients while maintaining competitive performance on benign data. Notably, our method effectively suppresses the impact of malicious data without significantly affecting training speed, and remains effective even under high malicious client ratios.

Safe-FedLLM: Delving into the Safety of Federated Large Language Models

Key-Value (KV) caching is widely used in large language models (LLMs) to enable long-context inference efficiently, yet its security implications remain underexplored. We present the first systematic study of how KV cache compression interacts with jailbreak attacks, evaluating four model families under diverse jailbreak attacks. We identify a double-edged effect: (i) on one hand, compression can induce **Accidental Robustness**, where optimization-based and encoding-based attacks fail due to Malicious Semantic Eviction, where attacks' own attention redirection reduces the malicious query's cache importance, and Gradient Mismatch where discrete compression operations break jailbreak optimization. (ii) On the other hand, **Vulnerability Paradox** arises under merging-based compression for human-designed Attacks, where aggressive merging in shallow layers triggers functional head collapse, amplifying attack success rates. To address this, we propose **Safe-CAM**, a history-aware, per-head feedback merging strategy that prevents safety degradation while maintaining efficiency. Experiments show Safe-CAM fully restores safety (0\% ASR) and improves benign task performance with minimal overhead. Our study highlights that KV cache compression is not only an efficiency mechanism but also a safety-critical design factor in LLM deployment.

When Efficiency Meets Safety: A Benchmark Security Analysis of KV Cache Compression in Large Language Models

Large Language Models (LLMs) have achieved exceptional performance in complex reasoning via Chain-of-Thought (CoT), yet the associated computational costs remain prohibitive. CoT reasoning contains significant untapped efficiency potential across two dimensions: \textit{temporal redundancy}, where reasoning steps may be unnecessary, and \textit{spatial redundancy}, where computations can be performed at reduced precision. While current optimization techniques often necessitate resource-intensive fine-tuning or data curation, we introduce ASTRO (Adaptive Spatial and Temporal Redundancy Optimization), a training-free framework that simultaneously addresses both dimensions. ASTRO leverages Dewey’s reflective thinking model to segment reasoning phases, applying a progressive precision reduction strategy coupled with an entropy-based confidence mechanism for adaptive termination. Empirical results across diverse reasoning benchmarks demonstrate that ASTRO achieves up to an 11.3 $\times$ efficiency gain without compromising accuracy, highlighting the advantages of holistic multi-dimensional redundancy management over isolated optimization methods.

Adaptive Spatial and Temporal Redundancy Optimization for Efficient Reasoning in Large Language Models

Group Relative Policy Optimization (GRPO) has emerged as a promising critic-free reinforcement learning paradigm for reasoning tasks. However, standard GRPO employs a coarse-grained credit assignment mechanism that propagates group-level rewards uniformly to to every token in a sequence, neglecting the varying contribution of individual reasoning steps. We address this limitation by introducing Outcome-grounded Advantage Reshaping (OAR), a fine-grained credit assignment mechanism that redistributes advantages based on how much each token influences the model's final answer. We instantiate OAR via two complementary strategies: (1) OAR-P, which estimates outcome sensitivity through counterfactual token perturbations, serving as a high-fidelity attribution signal; (2) OAR-G, which uses an input-gradient sensitivity proxy to approximate the influence signal with a single backward pass. These importance signals are integrated with a conservative Bi-Level advantage reshaping scheme that suppresses low-impact tokens and boosts pivotal ones while preserving the overall advantage mass. Empirical results on extensive mathematical reasoning benchmarks demonstrate that while OAR-P sets the performance upper bound, OAR-G achieves comparable gains with negligible computational overhead, both significantly outperforming a strong GRPO baseline, pushing the boundaries of critic-free LLM reasoning.

Outcome-Grounded Advantage Reshaping for Fine-Grained Credit Assignment in Mathematical Reasoning

Chart-to-code generation demands strict visual precision and syntactic correctness from Vision-Language Models (VLMs). However, existing approaches are fundamentally constrained by data-centric limitations: despite the availability of growing chart-to-code datasets, simply scaling homogeneous chart-code pairs conflates visual perception with program logic, preventing models from fully leveraging the richness of multimodal supervision. We present CharTide, a novel data-centric framework that systematically redesigns both training and alignment data for chart-to-code generation. First, we construct a 2M-sample dataset via a Tri-Perspective Tuning strategy, explicitly decoupling training into visual perception, pure-text code logic, and modality fusion streams, enabling a 7B model to surpass specialized baselines using only supervised data. Second, we reformulate alignment as a data verification problem rather than a heuristic scoring task. To this end, we introduce an Inquiry-Driven RL framework grounded in the principle of information invariance: a downstream model should yield consistent answers to identical visual queries across both original and generated charts. Moving beyond rigid rule matching or VLM scoring, we employ a frozen Inspector to objectively verify generated charts through atomic QA tasks, providing verifiable reward signals based on answer accuracy. Experiments on ChartMimic, Plot2Code, and ChartX show that CharTide-7B/8B significantly outperforms open-source baselines, surpasses GPT-4o, and is competitive with GPT-5.

CharTide: Data-Centric Chart-to-Code Generation via Tri-Perspective Tuning and Inquiry-Driven Evolution

Current defenses for Large Language Models (LLMs) often suffer from a ''memory gap'': parameter-modifying methods are computationally rigid, while inference-time filters cannot retain or reuse defense knowledge across interactions. To address this, we propose SafetyMem, a novel framework that secures LLMs through a dual-component safety memory system. SafetyMem consists of Semantic Safety Memory (SSM), which consolidates diverse jailbreak attempts into a structured knowledge base of attack patterns, and Episodic Safety Memory (ESM), which maintains an evolving set of procedural rules refined from historical detection failures. Unlike static defenses, SafetyMem allows the model to ''remember'' and adapt to emerging adversarial strategies without parameter retraining. To further enhance robustness, we introduce an adversarial memory expansion mechanism that proactively generates challenging variants to solidify these memories. Experiments on standard and stealthy jailbreak benchmarks show that SafetyMem substantially reduces attack success rates while preserving efficiency and interpretability, consistently outperforming state-of-the-art baselines across multiple LLMs.

SafetyMem: Adaptive Jailbreak Defense via Dual-Component Safety Memory

Despite their impressive capabilities, large language models (LLMs) frequently generate hallucinations. Previous work shows that their internal states encode rich signals of truthfulness, yet the origins and mechanisms of these signals remain unclear. In this paper, we demonstrate that truthfulness cues arise from two distinct information pathways: (1) a Question-Anchored pathway that depends on question–answer information flow, and (2) an Answer-Anchored pathway that derives self-contained evidence from the generated answer itself. First, we validate and disentangle these pathways through attention knockout and token patching. Afterwards, we uncover notable and intriguing properties of these two mechanisms. Further experiments reveal that (1) the two mechanisms are closely associated with LLM knowledge boundaries; and (2) internal representations are aware of their distinctions. Finally, building on these insightful findings, two applications are proposed to enhance hallucination detection performance. Overall, our work provides new insight into how LLMs internally encode truthfulness, offering directions for more reliable and self-aware generative systems.

Two Pathways to Truthfulness: On the Intrinsic Encoding of LLM Hallucinations

Knowledge Tracing (KT) is essential for tracking students’ evolving knowledge states and predicting their future performance. While current graph-based methods focus on exercise-concept relations, they often overlook the inherent group structures among students. Similarly, emerging LLM-based approaches rely on individual histories, lacking the broader context of group references and contrastive evidence. As a result, existing individual-isolation paradigms fail to provide stable predictions and evidence-based explanations. To bridge this gap, we propose Micro-Community Knowledge Tracing (MicroC-KT), a framework that incorporates learning micro-environments to provide social-cognitive anchors for KT. MicroC-KT identifies latent learning communities via hypergraph modeling and generates dual-granular summaries to facilitate community matching and peer retrieval. By extracting contrastive group evidence, the model prompts an LLM to generate both accurate answer predictions and verifiable analysis reports. Experiments on four public datasets demonstrate that MicroC-KT significantly outperforms state-of-the-art baselines in predictive performance while providing more reliable and evidence-based explanations.

MicroC-KT: Modeling Community Effect via Learning Micro-Environment for Evidence-Grounded Explainable Knowledge Tracing

Instruction Following (IF) is a core capability of LLMs, requiring strict adherence to diverse constraints, ranging from verifiable ones (e.g., output length) to unverifiable ones (e.g., tone). Reinforcement learning with verifiable rewards has emerged as a paradigm for IF tasks, leveraging LLM-as-a-judge to assess unverifiable constraints. However, we empirically find that this approach remains a significant bottleneck, suffering from severe reward hacking and higher computational overhead. In this work, we first analyze the generalization capabilities of unverifiable constraints and discover that specific constraints exhibit distinct, high-generalization patterns. Motivated by this, we propose TinyJudge, a framework that employs an ensemble of specialized tiny language models (e.g., 0.6B) to provide rewards for soft constraints. By distilling expertise from frontier models into these tiny models, it achieves high-precision, lightweight evaluation. Extensive evaluations across five benchmarks demonstrate that TinyJudge outperforms the baselines by ~10% in average performance and 12% in reward precision. Crucially, it also achieves a 3× speedup in total training time. Our work provides a scalable and robust path for aligning LLMs with unverifiable human instructions.

TinyJudge: Unverifiable Constraint Alignment via Lightweight Specialist Ensembles

With the surge of online misinformation, Large Language Models (LLMs) and Reasoning Large Language Models (RLMs) serving as Automatic Fact-Checking (AFC) systems have emerged as a prominent paradigm for reliable, explainable verification. However, our empirical study reveals that this paradigm faces a critical risk asymmetry challenge when deployed in real-world under resource-constrained environments. While Hotspot Perception Ability (HPA), the capacity to dynamically allocate reasoning resources based on social impact, is essential to mitigate this risk, existing benchmarks lack the social metadata and evaluation framework to meet this urgent evaluation needs, thereby hindering the advancement of these AFC systems. To bridge this gap, we introduce TrendFact, the first benchmark capable of evaluating HPA and three fact-checking tasks. It consists of 7,643 curated samples sourced from trending platforms and professional datasets, with an evidence library containing 366,634 entries. To enable HPA assessment, we propose two novel metrics: the Explanation Consistency Score (ECS) to evaluate the reliability of verification reasoning, and the Hotspot Claim Perception Index (HCPI) to quantify the overall HPA of AFC systems. Extensive experiments demonstrate that existing AFC systems exhibit limited performance on TrendFact. Furthermore, our proposed FactISR framework effectively enhances HPA and computational efficiency for RLM-driven systems.

Downloads

Next from ACL 2026

Safe-FedLLM: Delving into the Safety of Federated Large Language Models

Similar lecture

Rethinking Expert Trajectory Utilization in LLM Post-training for Mathematical Reasoning