United States

Large language model agents rely on in-context policy documents encoding diverse business rules. As businesses scale, these documents grow, creating substantial computational overhead and motivating internalization methods that embed policy into model priors. Prior work focuses on generic prompts, but we find agentic policies span multiple complexity levels and demand heavier reasoning, posing greater challenges. We introduce an agentic benchmark generator with Controllable Complexity in agent policy across four levels, enabling systematic evaluation of agents under increasing complexity and providing a testbed for policy internalization. Our analysis shows that workflow-governing policy specifications are the hardest to reason over, and that SFT on gold trajectories with chain-of-thought is data-hungry and struggles at high complexity. We propose Category-Aware Policy Continued Pretraining, an automated pipeline that analyzes policies, extracts key specifications, categorizes them into factual, behavioral, and conditional types, and isolates those driving workflow complexity. This enables targeted “therapy” by synthesizing specialized training data for each type and improving internalization via an autoregressive pretraining loss. Extensive experiments show our synthetic data and objective consistently improve performance. Combined with SFT, our method outperforms the baseline across different settings, especially in data-sparse and high-complexity regimes, with gains up to 41% and 22% on Qwen-3-32B. Overall, we achieve 97.3% prompt reduction on our benchmark, and on $\tau$
-Bench we further improve performance while reducing prompt requirements with very limited SFT data.

ACL 2026

Analyzing and Internalizing Complex Policy Documents for LLM Agents

It is my great pleasure and honor to welcome you to the 64th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL 2026), held in San Diego, California, USA, July 2–7, 2026. ACL 2026 continues our fields tradition of excellence in scholarship, innovation, and inclusivity, and I am deeply grateful to the many volunteers who have worked tirelessly to bring this event to life.

It is exciting to see the many developments in the field reflected at our conference, such as the advancement of large language models (born out of our community) into many application directions. This is not without challenges, partly due to unsolved problems, and partly due to misuse of the technology. All this is reflected well at ACL 2026. The conference also reflects that the field is not only about advancing technology, but also the science of fundamentally understanding language and how it is use by many different speaker communities. <br>
[Full Message from General Chair Philipp Koehn](https://drive.google.com/file/d/1QiJFOmMjvDgsDo3i1XzlQnImxe3RU_Cy/view?usp=sharing) <br><br><br>
<html><button style="display: inline-flex; align-items: center; justify-content: center; white-space: nowrap; border-radius: 9999px; font-weight: bold; background: #7c3aed; color: white; font-family: 'Space Grotesk', sans-serif; height: 40px; font-size: 16px; padding: 0 20px; border: none; cursor: pointer" onclick="window.open('https://drive.google.com/file/d/1QiJFOmMjvDgsDo3i1XzlQnImxe3RU_Cy/view?usp=sharing')">Conference Handbook</button></html>
<br><br><br><br>

To access this event page, you need to log in with the **email address you registered with**. <br>Access credentials will be sent to your email from Underline -  subject line "Welcome to ACL 2026". Please be sure to check your spam email folder if you do not see an email confirmation right away.

To access this event page, you are required to register.
Please complete your registration to continue.

We recommend reading [**the registration information**](https://2026.aclweb.org/registration/) first.

**Online Registration Form**: https://acl.swoogo.com/acl2026

Registration Required

The 64th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL 2026) will take place in San Diego, California, from July 2 - 7, 2026.

poster

End-to-end GUI agents for real desktop environments require large amounts of high-quality interaction data, yet collecting human demonstrations is expensive and existing synthetic pipelines often suffer from limited task diversity or noisy, goal-drifting trajectories. We present a trajectory expansion framework Anchor that bootstraps scalable desktop supervision from a small set of verified seed demonstrations. Starting from each seed, we identify branch points that correspond to meaningful state changes and propose new, state-grounded task variants conditioned on the current GUI context. An executing agent then follows the proposed instructions to generate new trajectories, while a verifier enforces task completion via state-aware checks and trajectory-level consistency. To improve supervision quality, we further apply task-conditioned step-level filtering to remove ungrounded actions and denoise post-branch segments to maintain coherent intent. Experiments on standard desktop benchmarks, OSWorld and WindowsAgentArena, show that models fine-tuned on our expanded corpus achieve consistent improvements over zero-shot agents and representative synthesis baselines, and generalize across applications and operating systems.

Anchor: Branch-Point Data Generation for GUI Agents

Current text anonymization evaluation relies on span-based metrics that fail to capture what an adversary could actually infer, and assumes a single data subject, ignoring multi-subject scenarios. To address these limitations, we present SPIA (Subject-level PII Inference Assessment), the first benchmark that shifts the unit of evaluation from text spans to individuals, comprising 675 documents across legal and online domains with novel subject-level protection metrics. Extensive experiments show that even when over 90% of PII spans are masked, subject-level inference protection drops as low as 33%, leaving the majority of personal information recoverable through contextual inference. Furthermore, target-subject-focused anonymization leaves non-target subjects substantially more exposed than the target subject. We show that subject-level inference-based evaluation is essential for ensuring safe text anonymization in real-world settings.

Subject-level Inference for Realistic Text Anonymization Evaluation

The post-training stage of Large Language Models (LLMs) typically involves Supervised Fine-Tuning (SFT) followed by preference alignment to ensure LLM to generate safe, helpful, and instruction-aligned content. The SFT model critically serves as both the initialization and reference model for subsequent preference alignment. However, an essential yet often neglected question is the optimal selection of the SFT checkpoint for this role. We show that checkpoint selection substantially affects final performance, and that the common practice of choosing the minimum validation-loss checkpoint often fails, due to a fundamental conflict between SFT’s focus on imitation and alignment’s goal of response discriminability. To this end, we propose RewardRank, a simple, effective, training-free metrics for estimating initial implicit alignment between reference model and preference objective. Empirical evidence suggests that, using our selected model as reference can gain up to 67.6% relative increase on length-controlled win rate on the popular Zephyr recipe comparing to baselines.

Select Before Use: On the Importance of Reference Model Selection in Preference Alignment

Nearly all human work is collaborative; thus, the evaluation of real-world NLP applications often requires multiple dimensions that align with diverse human perspectives. As real human evaluator resources are often scarce and costly, the emerging "LLM-as-a-judge" paradigm sheds light on a promising approach to leverage LLM agents to believably simulate human evaluators. Yet, to date, existing LLM-as-a-judge approaches face two limitations: persona descriptions of agents are often arbitrarily designed, and the frameworks are not generalizable to other tasks. To address these challenges, we propose MAJ-EVAL, a Multi-Agent-as-Judge evaluation framework that can automatically construct multiple evaluator personas with distinct dimensions from relevant text documents (e.g., research papers), instantiate LLM agents with the personas, and engage in-group debates with multi-agents to generate multi-dimensional feedback. Our evaluation experiments in both the educational and medical domains demonstrate that MAJ-EVAL can generate evaluation results that better align with human experts’ ratings compared with conventional automated evaluation metrics and existing LLM-as-a-judge methods.

Multi-Agent-as-Judge: Aligning LLM-Agent-Based Automated Evaluation with Multi-Dimensional Human Evaluation

Reward modeling lies at the core of reinforcement learning from human feedback (RLHF), yet most existing reward models rely on scalar or pairwise judgments that fail to capture the multifaceted nature of human preferences. Recent studies have explored \emph{rubrics-as-rewards} (RaR) that uses structured criteria to capture multiple dimensions of response quality. However, producing rubrics that are both reliable and scalable remains a key challenge. In this work, we introduce OpenRubrics, a diverse, large-scale collection of (prompt, rubric) pairs for training rubric-generation and rubric-based reward models. To elicit discriminative and comprehensive evaluation signals, we introduce \emph{Contrastive Rubric Generation} (CRG), which derives both hard rules (explicit constraints) and principles (implicit qualities) by contrasting preferred and rejected responses. We further remove noisy rubrics via preserving preference–label consistency. Across multiple reward-modeling benchmarks, our rubric-based reward model, Rubric-RM, surpasses strong size-matched baselines by 8.4%. These gains transfer to policy models on instruction-following and biomedical benchmarks.
The {model weights} and {datasets} are publicly available at \href{https://huggingface.co/OpenRubrics/models}{https://huggingface.co/OpenRubrics}.

OpenRubrics: Towards Scalable Synthetic Rubric Generation for Reward Modeling and LLM Alignment

Recent text embedding models are often adapted to specialized domains via contrastive pre-finetuning (PFT) on a naive collection of scattered, heterogeneous tasks. However, this approach often introduces task-induced bias alongside domain knowledge, leading to uncontrolled representation shifts that distort the pretrained embedding geometry and cause substantial performance degradation.
To address this issue, we propose REZE, a representation regularization framework that explicitly controls representation shift during embedding pre-finetuning. REZE operates on the relations of anchor-positive pairs and decomposes them in an eigenspace. It then measures task-wise dispersion along each eigencomponent to identify task-variant directions and applies adaptive soft-shrinkage to suppress task-induced noise while preserving task-invariant semantic structure, without inference-time overhead. Experiments across multiple embedding backbones and specialized benchmarks show that REZE outperforms standard pre-finetuning and isotropy-oriented post-hoc regularization in most settings, remaining stable where existing PFT variants collapse. Embedding space analyses further confirm that REZE induces controlled shifts aligned with the original embedding manifold, underscoring representation shift control as a key principle for robust embedding pre-finetuning under heterogeneous supervision.

REZE: Representation Regularization for Domain-adaptive Text Embedding Pre-finetuning

Small language models (SLMs) enable scalable tool-augmented multi-agent systems where multiple SLMs handle subtasks orchestrated by a powerful coordinator. However, they struggle with tool-use tasks, particularly in selecting appropriate tools and identifying correct parameters. A common failure mode is \textit{schema misalignment}: models hallucinate plausible tool names that are absent from the provided tool schema, due to different naming conventions internalized during pretraining. Rather than training models to adapt to unfamiliar schemas, we propose adapting schemas to align with models' pretrained knowledge. We introduce \textbf{PA-Tool} (Pretraining-Aligned Tool Schema Generation), a training-free method that leverages peakedness, a signal used in contamination detection that indicates pretraining familiarity, to rename tool components. By generating multiple candidates and selecting the candidate with the highest peakedness, PA-Tool identifies pretraining-aligned naming patterns. Experiments on MetaTool and RoTBench show improvements of up to 17\%, with schema misalignment errors reduced by 80\%. PA-Tool enables small models to substantially improve tool-use accuracy without retraining, showing that schema-level interventions can unlock the tool-use potential of resource-efficient models. Our code is available at \url{https://github.com/holi-lab/PA-Tool}.

Don't Adapt Small Language Models for Tools; Adapt Tool Schemas to the Models

Existing evaluation of Large Language Models (LLMs) on static benchmarks is vulnerable to data contamination and leaderboard overfitting, critical issues that obscure true model capabilities. To address this, we introduce LLMEval-Fair, a framework for dynamic evaluation of LLMs. LLMEval-Fair is built on a proprietary bank of 220k graduate-level questions, from which it dynamically samples unseen test sets for each evaluation run. Its automated pipeline ensures integrity via contamination-resistant data curation, a novel anti-cheating architecture, and a calibrated LLM-as-a-judge process achieving 90% agreement with human experts, complemented by a relative ranking system for fair comparison. An 30-month longitudinal study of nearly 60 leading models reveals a performance ceiling on knowledge memorization and exposes data contamination vulnerabilities undetectable by static benchmarks. The framework demonstrates exceptional robustness in ranking stability and consistency, providing strong empirical validation for the dynamic evaluation paradigm. LLMEval-Fair offers a robust and credible methodology for assessing the true capabilities of LLMs beyond leaderboard scores, promoting the development of more trustworthy evaluation standards.

LLMEval-Fair: A Large-Scale Longitudinal Study on Robust and Fair Evaluation of Large Language Models

Understanding and inferring causal relationships from texts is a core aspect of human cognition and is essential for advancing large language models (LLMs) towards artificial general intelligence. Existing work evaluating LLM causal reasoning primarily relies on synthetic or simplified texts with explicitly stated causal relationships. These texts typically feature short passages and few causal relations, failing to reflect the complexities of real-world reasoning. In this paper, we investigate whether LLMs are capable of inferring causal relationships from real-world texts. We develop a benchmark drawn from real-world academic literature, which includes diverse texts with respect to length, complexity (different levels of explicitness, number of causal events and relationships), and domain. To the best of our knowledge, our benchmark is the first-ever real-world dataset for this task. Our experiments on this dataset show that LLMs face significant challenges in inferring causal relationships from real-world text, with the best-performing model achieving an average F$_1$ score of only 0.535. Through systematic analysis across aspects of real-world text (explicitness, number of causal events and relationships, length of text, domain), our benchmark offers targeted insights for further research into advancing LLM causal reasoning. Our code and dataset can be found at https://github.com/Ryan-Saklad/ReCITE.

Can Large Language Models Infer Causal Relationships from Real-World Text?

Membership inference attacks (MIAs) are a canonical way to assess a machine learning model's privacy properties. Although several attempts have been made to evaluate MIAs on language models, the extant literature has suffered numerous difficulties in constructing clean evaluations to test new techniques. In particular, subtle distribution shifts between member and non-member sets can undermine the statistical validity of MIAs; recent work has underscored this by showing that ``blind'' methods with no access to the underlying model can perform far better than published methods on the same benchmarks. This paper constructs a benchmark for principled evaluation of MIAs against LLMs, by leveraging the insight that training data before and after a fixed point during training are drawn from the same distribution. Therefore, all open-source models with intermediate checkpoints and public training data can be converted into MIA testbeds. We apply our framework to a half-dozen published attacks on the Pythia and OLMo family of models, from 70M to 7B parameters. To facilitate further privacy research, we open-source a modular library for designing and implementing attacks in this setting: https://github.com/safr-ai-lab/pandora_llm.

Downloads

Next from ACL 2026

Anchor: Branch-Point Data Generation for GUI Agents

Similar lecture

Mixed-Policy GRPO for Text-to-SQL with Off-Policy Data Generation