Morocco

We investigate self-training of large language models (LLMs), in which models are recursively trained on their own generated text. Prior studies have reported conflicting outcomes in this setting: some find evidence of performance gains (i.e., self-improvement), while others observe performance degradation (i.e., model collapse). To clarify this discrepancy, we use the OLMo-2 models as non-toy LLMs and perform multiple rounds of continual pre-training using self-generated text with varying data synthesis and filtering strategies. Our experiments show that naive self-training does not improve either perplexity on the original pre-training corpus nor downstream task performance, regardless of model size. These results suggest that model collapse observed in naive self-training is inherent to the training procedure, while self-improvement likely owes its success not to the model’s autonomous refinement but to human designed, strategic synthetic pipelines that inject external intelligence.

EACL 2026

Demystifying Mixed Outcomes of Self-Training: Pre-training Analyses on Non-Toy LLMs

interpretability and analysis of models for nlp

machine learning for nlp

resources and evaluation

language modeling

generation

Welcome to the 18th Conference of the European Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics (EACL). Continuing its mission of expanding and involving the science community of all European countries, EACL has selected the Malta community for the 18th EACL. Considering the importance of physical interaction among researchers, the conference will be held at the Hotel Radisson Blu, St. Julians, in Malta, from 17 to 22 of March, 2024. The conference will also feature the possibility to participate virtually. As the flagship European conference in the field of computational linguistics, EACL welcomes European and international researchers covering a broad spectrum of research areas that are concerned with computational approaches to natural language. 
#### [Conference Handbook](https://drive.google.com/file/d/13Wn38q0yev6U3RTgnf4Tn5T9GuAuZ-xW/view?usp=sharing) *downloadable*

To access the EACL 2024 event page you need to register [**here**](https://acl.swoogo.com/EACL2024). 

Please register!

EACL 2024

As the flagship European conference in the field of computational linguistics, EACL welcomes European and international researchers covering a broad spectrum of research areas that are concerned with computational approaches to natural language.

poster

#### *Message from the General Chair, Aline Villavicencio*
I’m delighted and honoured to welcome you to the 19th Conference of the European Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics (EACL 2026), taking place in the beautiful city of Rabat, in Morocco, in March 24-29, 2026. EACL is the flagship European conference of the Association and EACL 2026 proudly continues our field’s tradition of excellence in scholarship, innovation, and inclusivity. I am deeply grateful to the many volunteers whose dedication, generosity, and tireless efforts have made this conference possible.
For the first time EACL is being hosted in the African continent. This is an important milestone for our community, and we are grateful to our Moroccan hosts for enabling this historic moment by bringing this edition of EACL to Rabat. We are also delighted that the Second Arabic NLP School is co-located with EACL. We hope attendees enjoy this wonderful opportunity to strengthen ties with the Computational Linguistics communities across the African continent. *[Read full message](https://drive.google.com/file/d/14NlmHvwM6fPJuMmOvVh7K0vtQbEyv3SZ/view?usp=sharing)* 

<html><button style="display: inline-flex; align-items: center; justify-content: center; white-space: nowrap; border-radius: 9999px; font-weight: bold; background: #7c3aed; color: white; font-family: 'Space Grotesk', sans-serif; height: 40px; font-size: 16px; padding: 0 20px; border: none; cursor: pointer" onclick="window.open('https://underline.io/events/522/reception','_blank')">Go to Workshops and Tutorials Program</button></html>

To access this event page, you need to log in with the **email address you registered with**. Access credentials will be sent to your email from Underline - subject line "Welcome to EACL 2026". Please be sure to check your spam email folder if you do not see an email confirmation right away.

Please log in

To access this event page, you are required to register.
Please complete your registration to continue.

We recommend reading [**the registration information**](https://2026.eacl.org/registration/) first.

**Online Registration Form**: https://acl.swoogo.com/eacl2026

Registration Required

Welcome to the 19th Conference of the European Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics (EACL). EACL 2026 will be held in Rabat, Morocco, from March 24–29, 2026. 

Explaining why content is hateful using natural language is crucial for fostering transparency in automated content moderation systems. However, evaluating the quality of such explanations remains an open challenge. General-purpose reward models (RMs), commonly used for scoring natural language outputs, are typically optimized for broad notions of safety. We argue that this optimization penalizes situations where references to stereotypes or offensive content are essential for faithful hate speech explanations. To address this gap, we introduce SBIC-Explain, a human-validated dataset of 370,788 LLM generated NLEs for offensive content, spanning three levels of human-annotated contextual richness: Tier 1: text-only, Tier 2: + classification-aware, and Tier 3: + semantics-informed. We hypothesize that as human-annotated context increases, explanations should better reflect human preferences. Yet, we find that existing RMs systematically assign lower scores to more contextually rich (and often more offensive) explanations, revealing a misalignment between model preferences and explanatory fidelity for this context. We propose HARM (Hate-Aware Reward Model), a RM that integrates interpretable signals to better align reward scores with the needs of hate speech explanation. HARM outperforms general-purpose baselines, improving NLE pair-wise preference.

HARM: Learning Hate-Aware Reward Model for Evaluating Natural Language Explanations of Offensive Content

Length generalization is the ability of language models to maintain performance on inputs longer than those seen during pretraining. In this work, we introduce a simple yet powerful position encoding (PE) strategy, Random Float Sampling (RFS), that generalizes well to lengths unseen during pretraining or fine-tuning. In particular, instead of selecting position indices from a predefined discrete set, RFS uses randomly sampled continuous values, thereby avoiding out-of-distribution (OOD) issues on unseen lengths by exposing the model to diverse indices during training. Since assigning indices to tokens is a common and fundamental procedure in widely used PEs, the advantage of RFS can easily be incorporated into, for instance, the absolute sinusoidal encoding, RoPE, and ALiBi. Experiments corroborate its effectiveness by showing that RFS results in superior performance in length generalization tasks as well as zero-shot commonsense reasoning benchmarks.

Position Encoding with Random Float Sampling Enhances Length Generalization of Transformers

Argument Mining (AM) aims to identify and interpret argumentative structures in unstructured text, with Argument Component Classification (ACC) as a core task. Despite significant advances, most ACC approaches rely on manually pre-segmented inputs, an assumption that rarely holds in practice due to the high cost and effort of expert human annotation, creating a major bottleneck for scalable AM systems. In this work, we focus on the foundation Argument Component Segmentation (ACS) task by proposing a fine-grained, paired-tag annotation schema that explicitly distinguishes between relevant and surrounding content, thus overcoming the limitations of previous single-separator approaches. Leveraging small and open Large Language Models (LLMs) fine-tuned on our paired-tag annotation schema, we can perform ACS with quality comparable to human expert annotators across multiple benchmark datasets. We further validate our approach on the downstream ACC task, showing that automated segmentation with fine-tuned LLMs yields ACC performances comparable to pipelines relying on human annotations. These findings suggest that reliable automated ACS via LLMs is both feasible and effective, paving the way for more scalable AM pipelines without human intervention.

Argument Component Segmentation with Fine-Tuned Large Language Models

Deep neural network classifiers for dysarthria impairment severity face limitations regarding interpretability and treatment guidance. To overcome these, we introduce CLINIC-GENIE, an explainable two-stage framework consisting of: (1) CLINIC, a dysarthria severity classification model combining acoustic and speech embeddings with Clinically Explainable Acoustic Features (CEAFs); and (2) GENIE, a module translating CEAFs and their Shapley values into intuitive natural language explanations via a large language model. CLINIC achieved a balanced accuracy of 0.952 (17.3\% improvement over using CEAFs alone), and certified speech-language pathologists rated explanations from CLINIC-GENIE with an average fidelity score of 4.94, confirming enhanced clinical utility.

Diagnosis of Dysarthria Severity and Explanation Generation Using XAI-Enhanced CLINIC-GENIE on Diadochokinetic Tasks

The paper extends the Data Movement Distance (DMD) -- a metric defined to measure the locality in computer memory -- to text by defining a normalized version called nDMD. A key feature of nDMD is a new term designed to better characterize low-frequency tokens. By evaluating nDMD on English subset of the M4 dataset and GenAI detection shared task, the paper shows three key findings. First, nDMD is systematically higher in human-written text than in machine-generated text. Second, nDMD-based features not only outperform frequency baselines but also improve overall performance when combined. Finally, the proposed DMD normalization is more effective in distinguishing human and machine text than alternative approaches.

Ranking Human and LLM Texts Using Locality Statistics

The first pre-processing step for constructing web-crawled LLM pre-training datasets involves extracting text from HTML. Despite the immense diversity of web content, existing open-source datasets predominantly apply a single fixed extractor on all webpages. In this work, we investigate whether this practice leads to suboptimal dataset coverage. We first show that while different extractors yield similar performance on standard language understanding tasks, the pages surviving a fixed filtering pipeline can differ substantially. This suggests a simple intervention: by taking a Union over different extractors, we can increase the token yield of DCLM-Baseline by up to 71% while maintaining benchmark performance. We further show that for structured content such as tables and codeblocks, extractor choice significantly impacts downstream task performance, with differences up to 8 percentage points (p.p.) on WikiTQ and 2 p.p. on HumanEval.

Beyond a Single Extractor: Re-thinking HTML-to-Text Extraction for LLM Pre-training

The discourse around toxicity and LLMs in NLP largely revolves around detection tasks. This work shifts the focus to evaluating LLMs' _reasoning_ about toxicity&mdash;from their explanations that justify a stance&mdash;to enhance their trustworthiness in downstream tasks. Despite extensive research on explainability, it is not straightforward to adopt existing methods to evaluate free-form toxicity explanation due to their over-reliance on input text perturbations, among other challenges. To account for these, we propose a novel, theoretically-grounded multi-dimensional criterion (HAF), that measures the extent to which LLMs' free-form toxicity explanations align with those of a rational human under ideal conditions. We develop six metrics, based on uncertainty quantification, to comprehensively evaluate HAF of LLMs' toxicity explanations with no human involvement, and highlight how "non-ideal" the explanations are. We conduct several experiments on three Llama models (of size up to 70B) and an 8B Ministral model on five diverse toxicity datasets. Our results show that while LLMs generate plausible explanations to simple prompts, their reasoning about toxicity breaks down when prompted about the nuanced relations between the complete set of reasons, the individual reasons, and their toxicity stances, resulting in inconsistent and irrelevant responses. We open-source our [code](https://anonymous.4open.science/r/safte-7AE0/) and [LLM-generated explanations](https://anonymous.4open.science/r/safte-7AE0/haf_results/HAF_sample_data.xlsx).

Argument-Based Consistency in Toxicity Explanations of LLMs

Recent advances in large language models have enabled mental health dialogue systems, yet existing approaches remain predominantly reactive, lacking systematic user state modeling for proactive therapeutic exploration. We introduce PsyProbe, a dialogue system designed for the exploration phase of counseling that systematically tracks user psychological states through the PPPPPI framework (Presenting, Predisposing, Precipitating, Perpetuating, Protective, Impact) augmented with cognitive error detection. PsyProbe combines State Builder for extracting structured psychological profiles, Memory Construction for tracking information gaps, Strategy Planner for Motivational Interviewing behavioral codes, and Response Generator with Question Ideation and Critic/Revision modules to generate contextually appropriate, proactive questions. We evaluate PsyProbe with 27 participants in real-world Korean counseling scenarios, including automatic evaluation across ablation modes, user evaluation, and expert evaluation by a certified counselor. The full PsyProbe model consistently outperforms baseline and ablation modes in automatic evaluation. User evaluation demonstrates significantly increased engagement intention and improved naturalness compared to baseline. Expert evaluation shows that PsyProbe substantially improves core issue understanding and achieves question rates comparable to professional counselors, validating the effectiveness of systematic state modeling and proactive questioning for therapeutic exploration.

PsyProbe: Proactive and Interpretable Dialogue through User State Modeling for Exploratory Counseling

LLM agents have become increasingly sophisticated, especially in the realm of cybersecurity. Researchers have shown that LLM agents can exploit real-world vulnerabilities when given a description of the vulnerability and toy capture-the-flag problems. However, these agents still perform poorly on real-world vulnerabilities that are unknown to the agent ahead of time (zero-day vulnerabilities). In this work, we show that teams of LLM agents can exploit real-world, zero-day vulnerabilities. Prior agents struggle with exploring many different vulnerabilities and long-range planning when used alone. To resolve this, we introduce HPTSA, a system of agents with a planning agent that can launch subagents. The planning agent explores the system and determines which subagents to call, resolving long-term planning issues when trying different vulnerabilities. We construct a benchmark of 14 real-world vulnerabilities and show that our team of agents improve over prior agent frameworks by up to 4.3X.

Teams of LLM Agents can Exploit Zero-Day Vulnerabilities

Antimicrobial resistance is a growing global health threat, driving interest in nanoparticle-based alternatives to conventional antibiotics. Inorganic nanoparticles with intrinsic antibacterial properties show significant promise; however, efficiently identifying relevant studies from the rapidly expanding literature remains a major challenge. This step is crucial for enabling computational approaches that aim to model and predict nanoparticle efficacy based on physicochemical and structural features. In this study, we explore the effectiveness of traditional machine learning and deep learning methods for classifying scientific abstracts in the domain of nanoparticle-based antimicrobial research. We introduce a novel, manually annotated corpus of 7,910 articles, curated to distinguish intrinsic antibacterial nanoparticles from studies focusing on drug carriers or surface-bound applications. Our comparative evaluation shows that a fine-tuned BERT model achieves the highest overall F1 score of 0.79 on the test set, while simpler models such as SVMs with TF-IDF features remain highly competitive, highlighting their utility in low-resource settings. The dataset and best-performing models are made publicly available to support future research in nanoparticle-based therapeutics and automated literature mining.

Downloads

Next from EACL 2026

HARM: Learning Hate-Aware Reward Model for Evaluating Natural Language Explanations of Offensive Content

Similar lecture

Self-training Strategies for Sentiment Analysis: An Empirical Study