New Zealand

Rotimi O. Arise, Aderounmu I. Ganiyu and Oluwafemi O. Oguntibeju (February 5th 2014). Lipid Profile, Antidiabetic and Antioxidant Activity of Acacia ataxacantha Bark Extract in Streptozotocin-Induced Diabetic Rats, Antioxidant-Antidiabetic Agents and Human Health, Oluwafemi Oguntibeju, IntechOpen, DOI: 10.5772/57151.

We present a method that analyzes a person&#39;s negotiation behavior to automatically detect co-occurrence of tactics and combination of tactics (i.e., negotiation styles). We first identify action features consistent with use of the common negotiation tactics based on prior research in negotiation. Next, we apply regularized linear regression over a negotiation dataset to assess how effective particular tactics are in predicting the negotiation outcome. Finally, we use a supervised variant of a topic model to derive effective negotiation styles. Results from the clusters produced by the topic models provide insights regarding the effectiveness of negotiation styles that people utilize.


AAMAS 2020

A Supervised Topic Model Approach to Learning Effective Styles within Human-Agent Negotiation

explainability in human-agent systems; socially interactive agents; agents competing and collaborating with humans

AAMAS (International Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems) is the largest and most influential conference in the area of agents and multiagent systems. The aim of the conference is to bring together researchers and practitioners in all areas of agent technology and to provide a single, high-profile, internationally renowned forum for research in the theory and practice of autonomous agents and multiagent systems. AAMAS is the flagship conference of the non-profit International Foundation for Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems (IFAAMAS).

The AAMAS conference series was initiated in 2002 in Bologna, Italy as a joint event comprising the 6th International Conference on Autonomous Agents (AA), the 5th International Conference on Multiagent Systems (ICMAS), and the 9th International Workshop on Agent Theories, Architectures, and Languages (ATAL).

Subsequent AAMAS conferences have been held in Melbourne, Australia (July 2003), New York City, NY, USA (July 2004), Utrecht, The Netherlands (July 2005), Hakodate, Japan (May 2006), Honolulu, Hawaii, USA (May 2007), Estoril, Portugal (May 2008), Budapest, Hungary (May 2009), Toronto, Canada (May 2010), Taipei, Taiwan (May 2011), Valencia, Spain (June 2012), Minnesota, USA (May 2013), Paris, France (May 2014), Istanbul, Turkey (May 2015), Singapore (May 2016), São Paulo (2017) and Stockholm, Sweden (2018), Montreal (May 2019), Auckland (May 2020, Virtual), London (May 2021, Virtual).
<br>
<br>



A ticket is required to attend this event, please register using the link below:

https://aamas2022-conference.auckland.ac.nz/attending/registration/

Registration Is Required

AAMAS 2022

AAMAS (International Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems) is the largest and most influential conference in the area of agents and multiagent systems. The aim of the conference is to bring together researchers and practitioners in all areas of agent technology and to provide a single, high-profile, internationally renowned forum for research in the theory and practice of autonomous agents and multiagent systems. AAMAS is the flagship conference of the non-profit International Foundation for Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems (IFAAMAS).

We present a method that analyzes a person's negotiation behavior to automatically detect co-occurrence of tactics and combination of tactics (i.e., negotiation styles). We first identify action features consistent with use of the common negotiation tactics based on prior research in negotiation. Next, we apply regularized linear regression over a negotiation dataset to assess how effective particular tactics are in predicting the negotiation outcome. Finally, we use a supervised variant of a topic model to derive effective negotiation styles. Results from the clusters produced by the topic models provide insights regarding the effectiveness of negotiation styles that people utilize.


technical paper

AAMAS is the leading scientific conference for research in autonomous agents and multi-agent systems. The AAMAS conference series was initiated in 2002 as the merging of three respected scientific meetings: the International Conference on Multi-Agent Systems (ICMAS), the International Workshop on Agent Theories, Architectures, and Languages (ATAL), and the International Conference on Autonomous Agents (AA). The aim of the joint conference is to provide a single, high-profile, internationally-respected archival forum for scientific research in the theory and practice of autonomous agents and multi-agent systems.

Browse keynotes, discussions, panels and over 300 presentations.


AAMAS is the leading scientific conference for research in autonomous agents and multi-agent systems. The AAMAS conference series was initiated in 2002 as the merging of three respected scientific meetings: the International Conference on Multi-Agent Systems (ICMAS), the International Workshop on Agent Theories, Architectures, and Languages (ATAL), and the International Conference on Autonomous Agents (AA). 

The problem of truth discovery, i.e., of trying to find the true facts concerning a number of objects based on reports from various information sources of unknown trustworthiness, has received increased attention recently. The problem is made interesting by the fact that the relative believability of facts depends on the trust- worthiness of their sources, which in turn depends on the believability of the facts the sources report. Several algorithms for truth discovery have been proposed, but their evaluation has mainly been performed experimentally by computing accuracy against large datasets. Furthermore, it is often unclear how these algorithms behave on an intuitive level. In this talk I outline our approach to a general framework for truth discovery, which allows comparison and evaluation of algorithms based instead on their theoretical properties. To do so we pose truth discovery as a social choice problem, and formulate various axioms that any reasonable algorithm should satisfy.


An Axiomatic Approach to Truth Discovery

"The Multi-Robot Pickup and Delivery problem has received significant attention from the research community.
We focus on such problem and propose a multi-item variant, where robots can pick up multiple items at once and deliver them to their destinations in a single travel.
We propose a distributed algorithm based on a Token-Passing approach, where robots handles by themselves the allocation of tasks and generates conflict-free paths requiring weaker assumptions in comparison to previous approaches.
We evaluate our approach on two maps, one representing the ICE laboratory, a facility for Industry 4.0 located in Verona.
Our approach produces solutions comparable in quality to those produced by a centralized approach and reduces computation times significantly.
We also show a synchronization technique to the robots' movements, still based on Token-Passing. This guarantees the absence of collisions in spite of unexpected delays in path execution."


Decentralized Task Assignment for Multi-Item Pickup and Delivery in Logistic Scenarios

In many collective decision making situations, agents use voting to choose an alternative that best represents the preferences of the group. It is often assumed that voters will vote truthfully rather than expending the effort needed to manipulate the outcome in cognitively and computationally complex situations. However, being truthful is just one possible heuristic that agents may employ. We examine how real voters employ heuristics in a variety of approval voting scenarios. In particular, we consider heuristics where a voter ignores information about other voting profiles and makes their decisions based solely on how much they like each candidate. In a behavioral experiment, we show that people vote truthfully in some situations, but prioritize high utility candidates in others. We show how the structure of the voting environment affects how well each heuristic performs as well as how and when humans employ these different heuristics.


Heuristic Strategies in Uncertain Approval Voting Environments

An underlying assumption of Stackelberg Games (SGs) is perfect rationality of the players. However, in real-life situations the followers (thieves, poachers, smugglers), as humans in general, may act not in a perfectly rational way, since their decisions may be affected by biases of various kinds which bound rationality of their decisions. One of the popular models of bounded rationality is Anchoring Theory (AT) which claims that humans have a tendency to flatten probabilities of available options, i.e. they perceive a distribution of these probabilities as being closer to the uniform distribution than it really is. We propose an efficient formulation of AT in sequential extensive-form SGs suitable for Mixed-Integer Linear Program solution methods and compare the results of its implementation in five state-of-the-art methods for solving sequential SGs.


Anchoring Theory in Sequential Stackelberg Games

Online advertising campaigns are typically launched for a customer across multiple touch points (scenarios) before the conversion of his final purchase. To maximize the advertisers’ revenue, it requires the platform to develop its advertising strategy based on the consumers’ behavioral trajectories in the previous scenarios. Meanwhile, it is also critical to maintain the interpretability of the models on the conversion rate; however, modern reinforcement learning based solutions fail to do so due to their black-box modeling on the consumer intents. In this paper, we model consumer’s purchase intention as a latent variable, and formulate the advertising problem as a partially observed Markov Decision Process (POMDP). We incorporate the expectation maximization (EM) algorithms for solving the optimal POMDP. Our extensive experiments based on large-scale real-world data demonstrate that our method provides superior performance over several baselines. Apart from the improved advertising performance, our method is able to offer interpretation on the attribution of the conversion.


Sequential Advertising Agent with Interpretable User Hidden Intents

Aggregation of Support-Relations of BAFs

In this work we present a novel approach for transfer-guided exploration in reinforcement learning that is inspired by the human tendency to leverage experiences from similar encounters in the past while navigating a new task. Given an optimal policy in a related task-environment, we show that its bisimulation distance from the current task-environment gives a lower bound on the optimal advantage of state-action pairs in the current task-environment. Transfer-guided Exploration (ExTra) samples actions from a Softmax distribution over these lower bounds. In this way, actions with potentially higher optimum advantage are sampled more frequently. In our experiments on gridworld environments, we demonstrate that given access to an optimal policy in a related task-environment, ExTra can outperform popular domain-specific exploration strategies viz. epsilon greedy, Model-Based Interval Estimation - Exploration Based (MBIE-EB), Pursuit and Boltzmann in terms of sample complexity and rate of convergence. We further show that ExTra is robust to choices of source task and shows a graceful degradation of performance as the dissimilarity of the source task increases. We also demonstrate that ExTra, when used alongside traditional exploration algorithms, improves their rate of convergence. Thus it is capable of complementing the efficacy of traditional exploration algorithms.


ExTra: Transfer-guided Exploration

Neural networks that output the parameters of a diagonal Gaussian distribution are widely used in reinforcement learning tasks with continuous action spaces. They have had considerable success in single-agent domains and even in some multi-agent tasks. However, general multi-agent tasks often require mixed strategies whose distributions cannot be well approximated by Gaussians or their mixtures. This paper proposes an alternative for policy representation based on normalizing flows. This approach allows for greater flexibility in action distribution representation beyond mixture models. We demonstrate their advantage over standard methods on a set of imitation learning tasks modeling human driving behaviors in the presence of other drivers.


Normalizing Flow Model for Policy Representation in Continuous Action Multi-agent Systems

Multi-agent coordination is prevalent in many real-world applications. However, such coordination is challenging due to its combinatorial nature. An important observation in this regard is that agents in the real world often only directly affect a limited set of neighbouring agents. Leveraging such loose couplings among agents is key to making coordination in multi-agent systems feasible.
In this work, we focus on learning to coordinate.
Specifically, we consider the multi-agent multi-armed bandit framework, in which fully cooperative loosely-coupled agents must learn to coordinate their decisions to optimize a common objective. 
We propose multi-agent Thompson sampling (MATS), a new Bayesian exploration-exploitation algorithm that leverages loose couplings. We empirically show that MATS outperforms the state-of-the-art algorithm, MAUCE, on two synthetic benchmarks with Bernoulli-distributed rewards. Our results show that MATS improves significantly upon state-of-the-art coordination methods in terms of performance, demonstrating the value of using MATS in applications with sparse neighbourhood structures.


Thompson Sampling for Factored Multi-Agent Bandits

Despite the success of deep reinforcement learning in a variety type of games such as Board games, RTS, FPS, and MOBA games, sports games (SPG) like basketball have been seldom studied. Basketball is one of the most popular and challenging sports games due to its long-time horizon, sparse rewards, complex game rules, and multiple roles with different capabilities. Although these problems could be partially alleviated by common methods like hierarchical reinforcement learning through a decomposition of the whole game into several subtasks based on game rules (such as attack, defense), these methods tend to ignore the strong correlations between these subtasks and could have difficulty in generating reasonable poli- cies across the whole basketball match. Besides, the existence of multiple agents adds extra challenges to such game. In this work, we propose an integrated curriculum training approach (ICTA) which is composed of two parts. The first part is for handling the correlated subtasks from the perspective of a single player, which contains several weighted cascading curriculum learners that can smoothly unify the base curriculum training of corresponding sub- tasks together using a Q-value backup mechanism with a weight factor. The second part is for enhancing the cooperation ability of the basketball team, which is a curriculum switcher that focuses on learning the switch of the cooperative curriculum within one team by taking over collaborative actions such as passing from single- player’s action spaces. Our method is then applied to a commercial online basketball game named Fever Basketball (FB). Results show that ICTA significantly outperforms the built-in AI and reaches up to around 70% win-rate than online human players during a 300-day evaluation period.


Downloads

Next from AAMAS 2020

An Axiomatic Approach to Truth Discovery

Similar lecture

Deep Learnable Strategy Templates for Multi-Issue Bilateral Negotiation

.css-70qvj9{display:-webkit-box;display:-webkit-flex;display:-ms-flexbox;display:flex;-webkit-align-items:center;-webkit-box-align:center;-ms-flex-align:center;align-items:center;}Downloads

Next from AAMAS 2020

An Axiomatic Approach to Truth Discovery

Similar lecture

Deep Learnable Strategy Templates for Multi-Issue Bilateral Negotiation

Downloads