Singapore

In the context of Visual Question Answering (VQA) and Agentic AI, calibration refers to how closely an AI system&#39;s confidence in its answers reflects their actual correctness. This aspect becomes especially important when such systems operate autonomously and must make decisions under visual uncertainty. While modern VQA systems, powered by advanced vision-language models (VLMs), are increasingly used in high-stakes domains like medical diagnostics and autonomous navigation due to their improved accuracy, the reliability of their confidence estimates remains under-examined. Particularly, these systems often produce overconfident responses. To address this, we introduce AlignVQA, a debate-based multi-agent framework, in which diverse specialized VLM -- each following distinct prompting strategies -- generate candidate answers and then engage in two-stage interaction: generalist agents critique, refine and aggregate these proposals. This debate process yields confidence estimates that more accurately reflect the model’s true predictive performance. We find that more calibrated specialized agents produce better aligned confidences. Furthermore, we introduce a novel differentiable calibration-aware loss function called AlignCal designed to fine-tune the specialized agents by minimizing an upper bound on the calibration error. This objective explicitly improves the fidelity of each agent’s confidence estimates. Empirical results across multiple benchmark VQA datasets substantiate the efficacy of our approach, demonstrating substantial reductions in calibration discrepancies.

AAAI 2026

Refine and Align: Confidence Calibration Through Multi-Agent Interaction in VQA

multiagent systems (mas)

computer vision (cv)

machine learning (ml)

We are pleased to announce the Fortieth AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence (AAAI-26), which will be held in Singapore EXPO from January 20 to January 27, 2026.

The purpose of the AAAI conference series is to promote research in Artificial Intelligence (AI) and foster scientific exchange between researchers, practitioners, scientists, students, and engineers across the entirety of AI and its affiliated disciplines. AAAI-26 will feature technical paper presentations, special tracks, invited speakers, workshops, tutorials, poster sessions, senior member presentations, competitions, and exhibit programs, and a range of other activities to be announced.<br><br>

To access this event page, you need to log in with the **email address you registered with**. <br>Access credentials will be sent to your email from Underline -  subject line "Welcome to AAAI 2026". Please be sure to check your spam email folder if you do not see an email confirmation right away.

Please log in

To access this event page, you are required to register.
Please complete your registration to continue.

We recommend reading [**the registration information**](https://aaai.org/conference/aaai/aaai-26/registration/) first.

**Online Registration Form**: https://aaai.getregistered.net/conference-2026 

Registration Required

We are pleased to announce the Fortieth AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence (AAAI-26), which will be held in Singapore EXPO from January 20 to January 27, 2026.

In the context of Visual Question Answering (VQA) and Agentic AI, calibration refers to how closely an AI system's confidence in its answers reflects their actual correctness. This aspect becomes especially important when such systems operate autonomously and must make decisions under visual uncertainty. While modern VQA systems, powered by advanced vision-language models (VLMs), are increasingly used in high-stakes domains like medical diagnostics and autonomous navigation due to their improved accuracy, the reliability of their confidence estimates remains under-examined. Particularly, these systems often produce overconfident responses. To address this, we introduce AlignVQA, a debate-based multi-agent framework, in which diverse specialized VLM -- each following distinct prompting strategies -- generate candidate answers and then engage in two-stage interaction: generalist agents critique, refine and aggregate these proposals. This debate process yields confidence estimates that more accurately reflect the model’s true predictive performance. We find that more calibrated specialized agents produce better aligned confidences. Furthermore, we introduce a novel differentiable calibration-aware loss function called AlignCal designed to fine-tune the specialized agents by minimizing an upper bound on the calibration error. This objective explicitly improves the fidelity of each agent’s confidence estimates. Empirical results across multiple benchmark VQA datasets substantiate the efficacy of our approach, demonstrating substantial reductions in calibration discrepancies.

poster

The rapid advancement of Large Language Model (LLM)-driven multi-agent systems has significantly streamlined software developing tasks, enabling users with little technical expertise to develop executable applications. While these systems democratize software creation through natural language requirements, they introduce significant security risks that remain largely unexplored. We identify two risky scenarios: Malicious User with Benign Agents (MU-BA) and Benign User with Malicious Agents (BU-MA). We introduce the Implicit Malicious Behavior Injection Attack (IMBIA), demonstrating how multi-agent systems can be manipulated to generate software with concealed malicious capabilities beneath seemingly benign applications, and propose Adv-IMBIA as a defense mechanism. Evaluations across ChatDev, MetaGPT, and AgentVerse frameworks reveal varying vulnerability patterns, with IMBIA achieving attack success rates of 93%, 45%, and 71% in MU-BA scenarios, and 71%, 84%, and 45% in BU-MA scenarios. Our defense mechanism reduced attack success rates significantly, particularly in the MU-BA scenario.
Further analysis reveals that compromised agents in the coding and testing phases pose significantly greater security risks, while also identifying critical agents that require protection against malicious user exploitation.
Our findings highlight the urgent need for robust security measures in multi-agent software development systems and provide practical guidelines for implementing targeted, resource-efficient defensive strategies.

Shadows in the Code: Exploring the Risks and Defenses of LLM-based Multi-Agent Software Development Systems

As large language models (LLMs) are increasingly deployed across culturally diverse regions, ensuring that their responses align with users’ cultural norms has become a critical challenge. Existing approaches to cultural alignment primarily rely on prompting or data-augmentation-based supervised finetuning, which teach models to follow norms indirectly through example-based supervision. However, these methods are difficult to scale and often fail to generalize, particularly in low-resource cultural settings.
In this work, we propose CultureRL, a culture-norm-driven reinforcement learning framework that directly encodes cultural principles into model behavior. Rather than relying on output imitation, CultureRL provides normative feedback during training, enabling the model to internalize high-level cultural rules. It consists of two key components: (1) Norm Pool Construction (NPC), which clusters data from the World Values Survey into abstract cultural concepts to form a structured and retrievable norm pool; and (2) Norm Cluster-based Reward Mechanism (NCRM), which retrieves the relevant norm for each input and uses an external reward model to assess conformity, guiding model updates through cultural alignment.
We evaluate CultureRL in both one-for-one (per-culture) and one-for-all (multi-culture) settings across nine cultures and three benchmarks. Results show that CultureRL consistently outperforms strong baselines, especially in terms of cultural consistency and adaptability.

CultureRL: Internalizing Cultural Principles in Large Language Models via Norm-Driven Reinforcement Learning

Scalable oversight protocols aim to empower evaluators to verify the output of AI models more capable than themselves. However, human evaluators are subject to biases that can lead to systematic errors. In a reanalysis of prior work that appeared to demonstrate the efficacy of simple protocols, we find that human evaluators possessing knowledge absent from models likely contributed to their positive results, which is an advantage that diminishes as models continue to scale in capability. We also report the results of two experiments examining the performance of simple oversight protocols where evaluators know that the model is "correct most of the time, but not all of the time'', finding no overall advantage for the tested protocols. In our main experiment, participants in both groups became more confident in the system’s answers after conducting online research, even when those answers were incorrect. These findings underscore the importance of testing the degree to which oversight protocols are robust to evaluator biases, whether they outperform a strategy of simple deference to the model being evaluated, and whether their performance scales with increasing problem difficulty and model capability.

Confirmation Bias: A Challenge for Scalable Oversight

In self-consuming generative models that train on their own outputs, alignment with user preferences becomes a recursive rather than one-time process. In this paper, we provide the first formal foundation for analyzing the long-term effects of such recursive retraining on alignment. Under a two-stage curation mechanism based on the Bradley–Terry (BT) model, we model alignment as an interaction between two factions: the Model Owner, who filters which outputs should be learned by the model, and the Public User, who determines which outputs are ultimately shared and retained through interactions with the model. Our analysis reveals three structural convergence regimes: consensus collapse, compromise on shared optima, and asymmetric refinement, depending on the degree of preference alignment. We prove a fundamental impossibility theorem: no recursive BT-based curation mechanism can simultaneously preserve diversity, ensure symmetric influence, and eliminate dependence on initialization. Framing the process as dynamic social choice, we show that alignment is not a static goal but an evolving equilibrium shaped by power asymmetries and path dependence.

The Alignment Game: A Theory of Long-Horizon Alignment Through Recursive Curation

Generating long, coherent text remains a challenge for large language models (LLMs), as they lack hierarchical planning and structured organization in discourse generation. We introduce Structural Alignment, a novel method that aligns LLMs with human-like discourse structures to enhance long-form text generation. By integrating linguistically grounded discourse frameworks into reinforcement learning, our approach guides models to produce coherent and well-organized outputs. We employ a dense reward scheme within a Proximal Policy Optimization framework, assigning fine-grained, token-level rewards based on the discourse distinctiveness relative to human writing. Two complementary reward models are evaluated: the first improves readability by scoring surface-level textual features to provide explicit structuring, while the second reinforces deeper coherence and rhetorical sophistication by analyzing global discourse patterns through hierarchical discourse motifs, outperforming both standard and RLHF-enhanced models in tasks such as essay generation and long-document summarization. All training data and code will be publicly released.

Align to Structure: Aligning Large Language Models with Structural Information

Deep learning (DL) models are increasingly deployed in safety-critical applications such as face recognition, autonomous driving, and medical diagnosis. Despite their impressive accuracy, they remain vulnerable to adversarial examples - subtle perturbations that can cause incorrect predictions, i.e., the robustness issues. While adversarial training improves robustness against known attacks, it often fails to generalize to unseen or stronger threats, revealing a critical gap in robustness generalization. In this work, we propose a dual-model fuzzing framework to enhance generalized robustness in DL models. Central to our method is a lightweight metric, the Lagrangian Information Bottleneck (LIB), which guides entropy-based mutation toward semantically meaningful and high-risk regions of the input space. The executor uses a resistant model and a more error-prone vulnerable model; their prediction consistency forms the basis of agreement mining, a label-free oracle for isolating decision-boundary samples. To ensure fuzzing effectiveness, we further introduce a task-driven seed selection strategy (e.g., SSIM for vision) that filters out low-quality inputs. We implement a prototype, TWINFUZZ, and evaluate it on six benchmark datasets and nine DL models. Compared with state-of-the-art testing approaches, TWINFUZZ achieves superior improvements in both training-specific and generalized robustness.

TWINFUZZ: Dual-Model Fuzzing for Robustness Generalization in Deep Learning

Abuse detection in e-commerce platforms is critical for preventing operational losses, particularly for transaction types vulnerable to abuse such as Return-to-Origin (RTO) in Cash-on-Delivery (COD) workflows. Detecting such abuse accurate, real-time decisions to intercept malicious orders before placement, imposing stringent sub-second latency requirements on deployed systems. In this work, we present TRUST, a deployed, production-scale abuse detection system based on a unified architecture of heterogeneous Graph Neural Networks (GNNs) and Transformer-based sequence encoders. This design enables joint reasoning over multi-relational entity interactions and temporal behavioural signals, allowing the model to combine complementary information for effective abuse detection when either modality is sparse or absent. TRUST processes millions of transactions daily with an average inference latency of ~25 ms, achieving a ~9.6% absolute precision improvement over a strong XGBoost baseline in live RTO detection. We report systematic ablation studies across both graph and sequence stages, evaluating GNN variants, sampling strategies, sequence lengths, and positional encoding schemes to guide architectural choices. Deployed end-to-end in a high-throughput environment, TRUST demonstrates that GNN–Transformer cascades can deliver state-of-the-art accuracy, scalability, and operational reliability in real-world abuse detection, offering a reproducible blueprint for similar industry-scale applications.

TRUST: Transaction Risk via Unified Sequence and Topology

Maintenance of mission-critical industrial assets is frequently hindered by fragmented data, inconsistent record-keeping, and limited access to analytical expertise, resulting in reactive rather than predictive practices. We present \textit{CodeReAct}, an AI-powered agentic framework deployed in large-scale facilities to automate event analysis and work order (WO) management.CodeReAct extends the ReAct paradigm by embedding executable Python code within the Thought--Action--Observation (TAO) loop, enabling natural language interaction, grounding heterogeneous alerts and work orders into structured Business Objects (BOs), and dynamically invoking analytic functions for forecasting, anomaly correlation, and maintenance recommendations. This architecture reduces manual data science intervention, improves adaptability, and supports reuse across asset types. 

Deployed in a mission-critical data center and productionized in Maximo, CodeReAct manages pumps, chillers, AHUs, compressors, cooling towers, and other mechanical and electrical systems. Evaluation with 36 representative maintenance utterances showed that outer-loop reflection and adaptive temperature improved task completion by up to 20%, while ablation studies confirmed the importance of reasoning in addition to code execution. Business validation revealed seasonal failure patterns, bundling opportunities, and predictive accuracy trends. In production, site engineers reported 25--40% faster diagnostics, fewer unplanned downtime events, and reduced reliance on specialized analysts. Lessons learned highlight the importance of structured BOs for grounding analytics, runtime safeguards to mitigate hallucinations, and adaptive model control for consistent execution. These results demonstrate how deployed agentic AI can deliver measurable business value in predictive and strategic maintenance planning.

Deployed AI Agents for Industrial Asset Management: CodeReAct Framework for Event Analysis and Work Order Automation

Automatically extracting engaging and high-quality humorous scenes from cinematic titles is pivotal for creating captivating video previews and snackable content, boosting user engagement on streaming platforms. Long-form cinematic titles, with their extended duration and complex narratives, challenge scene localization, while humor’s reliance on diverse modalities and its nuanced style add further complexity. This paper introduces an end-to-end system for automatically identifying and ranking humorous scenes from long-form cinematic titles,
featuring shot detection, multimodal scene localization, and humor tagging optimized for cinematic content. Key innovations include a novel scene segmentation approach combining visual and textual cues, improved shot representations via guided triplet mining, and a multimodal humor tagging framework leveraging both audio and text modalities. Our system achieves an 18.3% AP improvement over state-of-the-art scene detection on the OVSD dataset and an F1 score of 0.834 for detecting humor in long text. Extensive evaluations across five cinematic titles demonstrate 87% of clips extracted by our pipeline are intended to be funny, while 98% of scenes are accurately localized. With successful generalization to trailers, these results showcase the pipeline’s potential to enhance content creation workflows, improve user engagement, and streamline snackable content generation for diverse cinematic media formats.

Automatic Funny Scene Extraction from Long-form Cinematic Videos

We introduce Trauma THOMPSON, a dataset and suite of benchmarks designed to accelerate the development of AI-powered copilots for real-time decision-making in emergency and resource-limited medical settings. This work proposes a method to address a critical bottleneck for future deployment: models trained on simulation may not work well in the real world. The dataset features 3,717 unscripted, first-person video clips of five emergency procedures, uniquely including "just-in-time" (JIT) interventions that mirror the improvisational nature of field medicine. To obtain realistic patient data without ethical issues and identity concerns that medical data often counter, we also propose TraumaGen, a novel framework for generating photorealistic patient and wound images from manikins while preserving clinical context. We establish benchmarks for action recognition, anticipation, and visual question answering (VQA), evaluating state-of-the-art models to demonstrate the challenges and potential of our dataset. By focusing on realism and improvisation, Trauma THOMPSON provides a crucial resource and a clear path toward developing and validating robust AI assistants for future deployment in real-world emergency care. The dataset is available at https://anonymous.4open.science/r/dataset-58F3.

Downloads

Next from AAAI 2026

Shadows in the Code: Exploring the Risks and Defenses of LLM-based Multi-Agent Software Development Systems

Similar lecture

AlignVQA: Debate-Driven Multi-Agent Calibration for Vision Language Models