India

Inference-time computation is a critical yet challenging paradigm for enhancing the reasoning performance of large language models (LLMs). While existing strategies improve reasoning stability and consistency, they suffer from notable limitations: self-correction often reinforces the model&#39;s initial biases, and Multi-Agent Collaboration (MAC) often fails due to the lack of efficient coordination mechanisms, leading to collective errors. Although high-performing verifiers can detect reasoning errors, making them reliable requires substantial training. To address these challenges, we introduce a novel inference-time framework - **Adaptive Coopetition (AdCo)** - in which LLM agents utilize **an adaptive, UCB-based &#39;coopetition&#39; mechanism**. At each round, agents leverage coarse verifier signals to determine whether to collaborate or compete, further iteratively refining their reasoning based on peer feedback. Without relying on high-performance verifiers, our adaptive strategy achieves significant performance gains on mathematical reasoning benchmarks, yielding **a 20\% relative improvement** over baselines on the more challenging dataset. Our approach remains robust and consistent in terms of accuracy under different sample sizes and configurations. This adaptive, signal-guided &#39;coopetition&#39; framework enhances reasoning robustness by leveraging both
model knowledge diversity and reasoning trace measure, while also promoting uncertainty-driven exploration, especially when participants have comparable capabilities. From this perspective, our work offers a fresh lens on inference-time computation and paves the way for more resilient multi-agent LLM systems.

IJCNLP-AACL 2025

Adaptive Coopetition: Leveraging Coarse Verifier Signals for Resilient Multi-Agent LLM Reasoning

coopetition

upper confidence bound (ucb)

multi-agent collaboration (mac)

large language model (llm)

We are pleased to announce the Fortieth AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence (AAAI-26), which will be held in Singapore EXPO from January 20 to January 27, 2026.

The purpose of the AAAI conference series is to promote research in Artificial Intelligence (AI) and foster scientific exchange between researchers, practitioners, scientists, students, and engineers across the entirety of AI and its affiliated disciplines. AAAI-26 will feature technical paper presentations, special tracks, invited speakers, workshops, tutorials, poster sessions, senior member presentations, competitions, and exhibit programs, and a range of other activities to be announced.

To access this event page, you need to log in with the **email address you registered with**. Access credentials will be sent to your email from Underline - subject line "Welcome to AAAI 2026". Please be sure to check your spam email folder if you do not see an email confirmation right away.

Please log in

To access this event page, you are required to register.
Please complete your registration to continue.

We recommend reading [**the registration information**](https://aaai.org/conference/aaai/aaai-26/registration/) first.

**Online Registration Form**: https://aaai.getregistered.net/conference-2026 

Registration Required

AAAI 2026

We are pleased to announce the Fortieth AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence (AAAI-26), which will be held in Singapore EXPO from January 20 to January 27, 2026.

Inference-time computation is a critical yet challenging paradigm for enhancing the reasoning performance of large language models (LLMs). While existing strategies improve reasoning stability and consistency, they suffer from notable limitations: self-correction often reinforces the model's initial biases, and Multi-Agent Collaboration (MAC) often fails due to the lack of efficient coordination mechanisms, leading to collective errors. Although high-performing verifiers can detect reasoning errors, making them reliable requires substantial training. To address these challenges, we introduce a novel inference-time framework - **Adaptive Coopetition (AdCo)** - in which LLM agents utilize **an adaptive, UCB-based 'coopetition' mechanism**. At each round, agents leverage coarse verifier signals to determine whether to collaborate or compete, further iteratively refining their reasoning based on peer feedback. Without relying on high-performance verifiers, our adaptive strategy achieves significant performance gains on mathematical reasoning benchmarks, yielding **a 20\% relative improvement** over baselines on the more challenging dataset. Our approach remains robust and consistent in terms of accuracy under different sample sizes and configurations. This adaptive, signal-guided 'coopetition' framework enhances reasoning robustness by leveraging both
model knowledge diversity and reasoning trace measure, while also promoting uncertainty-driven exploration, especially when participants have comparable capabilities. From this perspective, our work offers a fresh lens on inference-time computation and paves the way for more resilient multi-agent LLM systems.

poster

### Welcome to IJCNLP-AACL 2025! 
 It is a great honor to host this joint conference in Mumbai, India, from December 20 to 24, 2025. The joint conferences of IJCNLP and AACL are organized with alternating leadership in the Asia-Pacific region. The event is run by the Asian Federation of Natural Language Processing (AFNLP) in odd years, and by AACL in even years, while it is organized solely by ACL when the annual ACL meeting is held in the region. This year, the conference is primarily organized by AFNLP. 
*Kentaro Inui
MBZUAI, UAE
General Chair, IJCNLP-AACL 2025* 
Read full message and download the Conference Handbook [**here**](https://drive.google.com/file/d/1UTwxkAqSqI-GAoJC3wE1zZt5VP1Y8GX0/view?usp=sharing).

The 14th IJCNLP & 4th AACL will be held in Mumbai, India from December 20th to December 24th, 2025.

We investigate whether Large Language Models (LLMs) exhibit human-like cognitive patterns under four established frameworks from
psychology: Thematic Apperception Test (TAT), Framing Bias, Moral Foundations Theory (MFT), and Cognitive Dissonance. We evaluated several proprietary and open-source models using structured prompts and automated scoring. Our findings reveal that these models often produce coherent narratives, show susceptibility to positive framing, exhibit moral judgments aligned with Liberty/Oppression concerns, and demonstrate self-contradictions tempered by extensive rationalization. Such behaviors mirror human cognitive tendencies yet
are shaped by their training data and alignment methods. We discuss the implications for AI transparency, ethical deployment, and future
work that bridges cognitive psychology and AI safety.

AI Through the Human Lens: Investigating Cognitive Theories in Machine Psychology

Developing effective healthcare dialog systems requires controlling conversations to offer clear insight into the system’s understanding and to address the lack of patient-oriented conversational datasets. Moreover, evaluating these systems is equally challenging and requires user studies for robust evaluation. These challenges are even more pronounced when addressing the needs of minority populations with low health literacy and numeracy. This thesis proposal focuses on designing conversational architectures that deliver self-care information to African American patients with heart failure.

Neuro-symbolic approaches provide a promising direction by integrating symbolic reasoning with the generative capabilities of Large Language Models (LLMs). In this proposal, we explore various approaches to creating a hybrid dialog model by combining the strengths of task-oriented dialog systems with the integration of neuro-symbolic rules into a Language Model (LM)/LLM-based dialog system, thereby controlling the dialog system. We propose a hybrid conversational system that uses schema graphs to control the flow of dialogue, while leveraging LLMs to generate responses grounded in these schemas. We will also conduct a user study to evaluate the system's effectiveness.

Thesis Proposal: A NeuroSymbolic Approach to Control Task-Oriented Dialog Systems

Improving the performance of neural machine translation for low-resource languages is challenging due to the limited availability of parallel corpora. However, recently available Large Language Models (LLM) have demonstrated superior performance in various natural language processing tasks, including translation. In this work, we propose to incorporate an LLM into a Machine Translation (MT) model as a prior distribution to leverage its translation capabilities. The LLM acts as a teacher, instructing the student MT model about the target language. We conducted an experiment in four language pairs: English ⇔ German and English ⇔ Hindi. This resulted in improved BLEU and COMET scores in a low-resource setting.

Enriching the Low-Resource Neural Machine Translation with Large Language Model

Large language models have the potential to generate explanations for their own predictions in a variety of styles based on user instructions. Recent research has examined whether these self-explanations faithfully reflect the models' actual behavior and has found that they often lack faithfulness. However, the question of how to improve faithfulness remains underexplored. Moreover, because different explanation styles have superficially distinct characteristics, it is unclear whether improvements observed in one style also arise when using other styles. This study analyzes the effects of training for faithful self-explanations and the extent to which these effects generalize, using three classification tasks and three explanation styles. We construct one-word constrained explanations that are likely to be faithful using a feature attribution method, and use these pseudo-faithful self-explanations for continual learning on instruction-tuned models. Our experiments demonstrate that training can improve self-explanation faithfulness across all classification tasks and explanation styles, and that these improvements also show signs of generalization to the multi-word settings and to unseen tasks. Furthermore, we find consistent cross-style generalization among three styles, suggesting that training may contribute to a broader improvement in faithful self-explanation ability.

Investigating Training and Generalization in Faithful Self-Explanations of Large Language Models

While Large Language Models (LLMs) have shown remarkable performance in various Natural Language Processing (NLP) tasks, their effectiveness seem to be heavily biased toward high-resource languages. This proposal aims to address this gap by developing efficient training strategies for low-resource languages. We propose various techniques for efficient learning in simluated low-resource settings for English. We then plan to adapt these methods for low-resource languages. We plan to experiment with both natural language generation and understanding models. We evaluate the models on similar benchmarks as the BabyLM challenge for English. For other languages, we plan to use treebanks and translation techniques to create our own silver test set to evaluate the low-resource LMs.

Thesis Proposal: Efficient Methods for Natural Language Generation/Understanding Systems

Most models struggle with deception detection in diplomatic conversations due to extreme class imbalance and a lack of "social awareness" in how speakers and listeners are represented. To our end, we present CORAL (COntextual Representation and Asymmetric Learning), a model that learns socially-aware representations—capturing both speaker behavioral traits and their power differentials (social hierarchy)—and couples them with a principled learning framework designed to handle deception’s rarity. CORAL constructs embeddings that capture two key social signals: stable speaker traits through learned signatures and dynamic interaction contexts through power differentials. These embeddings form the input to a classifier trained with a Positive-Unlabeled (PU) learning objective, designed for the asymmetric nature of deception (rare lies versus abundant, unlabeled truths). By synergizing representation and learning, CORAL achieves a state-of-the-art Macro F1-score of 0.65 on the highly imbalanced Peskov Diplomacy dataset, surpassing models that tackle these challenges in isolation. Our findings highlight that advancing socially complex NLP tasks requires aligning richer representations with objectives tailored to data asymmetry.

CORAL: A Synergistic Approach to Deception Detection with Socially-Aware Representations and Positive-Unlabeled Learning

The relationship between tokenizer algorithm (e.g., Byte-Pair Encoding (BPE), Unigram), morphological alignment, tokenization quality (e.g., compression efficiency), and downstream performance remains largely unclear, particularly for languages with complex morphology. In this paper, we conduct a comprehensive evaluation of tokenizers using small-sized BERT models---from pre-training through fine-tuning---for Telugu (agglutinative), along with preliminary evaluation in Hindi (primarily fusional with some agglutination) and English (fusional). To evaluate morphological alignment of tokenizers in Telugu, we create a dataset containing gold morpheme segmentations of 600 derivational and 7000 inflectional word forms.

Our experiments reveal two key findings for Telugu. First, the choice of tokenizer algorithm is the most significant factor influencing performance, with Unigram-based tokenizers consistently outperforming BPE across most settings. Second, while better morphological alignment shows a moderate, positive correlation with performance on text classification and structure prediction tasks, its impact is secondary to the tokenizer algorithm. Notably, hybrid approaches that use morphological information for pre-segmentation significantly boost the performance of BPE, though not Unigram. Our results further showcase the need for comprehensive intrinsic evaluation metrics for tokenizers that could explain downstream performance trends consistently.

Rethinking Tokenization for Rich Morphology: The Dominance of Unigram over BPE and Morphological Alignment

Semantic role labeling (SRL) is a fundamental task in natural language processing that is crucial for achieving deep semantic understanding. Despite the success of large language models (LLMs) in several downstream NLP tasks, key tasks such as SRL remain a challenge for LLMs. Hence, in this study, we attempt to instantiate the efficacy of LLMs for the task of SRL via Question answering. Toward that goal, we investigate the effectiveness of five different LLMs (Llama, Mistral, Qwen, OpenChat, Gemini) using zero-shot and few-shot prompting. Our findings indicate that few-shot prompting enhances the performance of all models. Although Gemini outperformed others by a margin of 11%, Qwen and Llama are not too far behind. Additionally, we conduct a comprehensive error analysis to shed light on the cases where LLMs fail. This study offers valuable insights into the performance of LLMs for structured prediction and the effectiveness of simple prompting techniques in the Question-Answering framework for SRL.

Are LLMS Good for Semantic Role Labeling via Question Answering?: A Preliminary Analysis

Sarcasm is a specific form of ironic speech which can often be hard to understand for language models due to its nuanced nature. Recent improvements in the ability of such models to detect and generate sarcasm motivate us to try a new approach to help language models perceive sarcasm as a speech style, through a human cognitive perspective. In this work, we propose a multi-hop Chain of Thought (CoT) methodology to understand the context of an utterance that follows a dialogue and to perform bidirectional style transfer on that utterance, leveraging the Theory of Mind. We use small language models (SLMs) due to their cost-efficiency and fast response-time. The generated utterances are evaluated using both LLM-as-a-judge and human evaluation, suitable to the open-ended and stylistic nature of the generations. Along with these, we also evaluate scores of automated metrics such as DialogRPT, BLEU and SBERT; drawing valuable insights from them that support our evidence. Based on this, we find that our cognitive approach to sarcasm is an effective way for language models to stylistically understand and generate sarcasm with better authenticity.

Could you BE more sarcastic? A Cognitive Approach to Bidirectional Sarcasm Understanding in Language Models

Large Language Models (LLMs) often hallucinate, generating nonsensical or false information that can be especially harmful in sensitive fields such as medicine or law. To study this phenomenon systematically, we introduce FalseCite, a curated dataset designed to capture and benchmark hallucinated responses induced by misleading or fabricated citations. Running GPT-4o-mini, Falcon-7B, and Mistral 7-B through FalseCite, we observed a noticeable increase in hallucination activity for false claims with deceptive citations, especially in GPT-4o-mini. Using the responses from FalseCite, we can also analyze the internal states of hallucinating models, visualizing and clustering the hidden state vectors. From this analysis, we noticed that the hidden state vectors, regardless of hallucination or non-hallucination, tend to trace out a distinct horn-like shape. Our work underscores FalseCite’s potential as a foundation for evaluating and mitigating hallucinations in future LLM research.

Downloads

Next from IJCNLP-AACL 2025

AI Through the Human Lens: Investigating Cognitive Theories in Machine Psychology

Similar lecture

Adaptive Coopetition: Leveraging Coarse Verifier Signals for Resilient Multi-Agent LLM Reasoning (Student Abstract)