India

Hassles and uplifts are psychological constructs of individuals&#39; positive or negative responses to daily minor incidents, with cumulative impacts on mental health. These concepts are largely overlooked in NLP, where existing tasks and models focus on identifying general sentiment expressed in text. These, however, cannot satisfy targeted information needs in psychological inquiry. To address this, we introduce Hassles and Uplifts Detection (HUD), a novel NLP application to identify these constructs in social media language.
We evaluate various language models and task adaptation approaches on a probing dataset collected from a private, real-time emotional venting platform. Some of our models achieve F scores close to 80%. We also identify open opportunities to improve affective language understanding in support of studies in psychology.

IJCNLP-AACL 2025

Hassles and Uplifts Detection on Social Media Narratives

hassles and uplifts detection

nlp application

mental health

### Welcome to CogSci Conference 2025!

The 47th Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society was a hybrid meeting held in San Francisco. 

<div style="position:relative;padding-top:0;width:900px;height:500px;"><iframe style="position:absolute;border:none;width:100%;height:100%;left:0;top:0;" src="https://online.fliphtml5.com/ebtyf/amvr/"  seamless="seamless" scrolling="no" frameborder="0" allowtransparency="true" allowfullscreen="true" ></iframe></div>

#### About

The Cognitive Science Society brings together researchers from around the world who hold a common goal: understanding the nature of the human mind. The mission of the Society is to promote Cognitive Science as a discipline, and to foster scientific interchange among researchers in various areas of study, including Artificial Intelligence, Linguistics, Anthropology, Psychology, Neuroscience, Philosophy, and Education.

The Society is a non-profit professional organization and its activities include sponsoring an annual conference and publishing the journals Cognitive Science and TopiCS.

#### Our History 

* **Society Creation**<br>
The Society was incorporated as a 501(c)(3) non-profit professional organization in Massachusetts in 1979. The organizing committee included Roger Schank, Allan Collins, Donald Norman, and a number of other scholars from psychology, linguistics, computer science, and philosophy. 
<br><br>
* **Conference Creation**<br>
The first conference on cognitive science was held at La Jolla, California in August, 1979, and has occurred annually since then. The proceedings of each conference are published, and those from most years are available through Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc. The annual proceedings of the Cognitive Science Conference represent a major source of information on new work and new ideas in the scientific study of thinking. In 1990, the Society, with help from an anonymous donor, established the David Marr Prize for the best student paper at each annual meeting.
<br><br>
* **Journal Creation**<br>
The Journal, Cognitive Science, began publication in 1976, and is now published by Wiley-Blackwell. The Executive Editor is currently Richard P. Cooper of Birkbeck, University of London, and there are 18 Associate Editors and a 30-member editorial board. It serves as the premier outlet for research reports that intersect two or more disciplines. Copyrights for articles published in the journal are held by the Society. The Governing Board of the Cognitive Science Society voted in late 2006 to found a new journal, Topics in Cognitive Science (topiCS). The Editor in Chief is Wayne Gray, Cognitive Science Department, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute. The journal seeks to fill a niche not occupied by Cognitive Science Journal or other cognitive science journals. Membership in the Society includes a subscription to Cognitive Science and TopiCS. Copyrights for articles published in the journal are held by the Society.
<br><br>

#### Code of Conduct

By attending the CogSci 2025 Conference, you are required to adhere to the society’s **[Code of Conduct](https://drive.google.com/file/d/1ChPuihLy6jE_BWqfO7J2KKgX35JW2zsM/view?usp=sharing)**.
<br><br>


You need to log in with the email address you registered with. 

Login credentials were sent to you from Underline -  subject line "Welcome to the CogSci 2025 Conference". Please be sure to check your spam/promotional inbox  if you do not see an email confirmation right away.





Please log in to join this event.

To access the site, please register [**here**](https://cognitivesciencesociety.org/registration/).

If you are registered and feel like you are seeing this message by mistake, please make sure you are logged in with the same email that you registered with. 

Please register!

CogSci 2025

The 47th Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society presents the latest research across cognitive science and highlights the theme of Cognition in Context.

Hassles and uplifts are psychological constructs of individuals' positive or negative responses to daily minor incidents, with cumulative impacts on mental health. These concepts are largely overlooked in NLP, where existing tasks and models focus on identifying general sentiment expressed in text. These, however, cannot satisfy targeted information needs in psychological inquiry. To address this, we introduce Hassles and Uplifts Detection (HUD), a novel NLP application to identify these constructs in social media language.
We evaluate various language models and task adaptation approaches on a probing dataset collected from a private, real-time emotional venting platform. Some of our models achieve F scores close to 80%. We also identify open opportunities to improve affective language understanding in support of studies in psychology.

technical paper

### Welcome to IJCNLP-AACL 2025! 
<br>It is a great honor to host this joint conference in Mumbai, India, from December 20 to 24, 2025. The joint conferences of IJCNLP and AACL are organized with alternating leadership in the Asia-Pacific region. The event is run by the Asian Federation of Natural Language Processing (AFNLP) in odd years, and by AACL in even years, while it is organized solely by ACL when the annual ACL meeting is held in the region. This year, the conference is primarily organized by AFNLP.<br>
*Kentaro Inui
MBZUAI, UAE
General Chair, IJCNLP-AACL 2025*<br>
Read full message and download the Conference Handbook [**here**](https://drive.google.com/file/d/1UTwxkAqSqI-GAoJC3wE1zZt5VP1Y8GX0/view?usp=sharing).
<br><br><br><br>

The 14th IJCNLP & 4th AACL will be held in Mumbai, India from December 20th to December 24th, 2025.

Can today’s Text-to-SQL benchmarks still stretch modern LLMs? We argue no. Spider1.0 and BIRD, painstakingly hand-built, remain small, costly, and skewed toward middle complex SQL. Meanwhile, LLM-generated corpora are inexpensive but often superficial and fragile suffering from shallow nesting, semantic drift, template fatigue, and insufficient quality check.

We address this gap with a Chain-of-Verifications framework that turns a handful of expert-labelled seeds into a large, reliably checked dataset at a fraction of the usual cost. The resulting corpus, AIGT2S, delivers: (1)18k Question–SQL pairs across 113 databases, 41–77% larger than current English sets; (2)55% queries in the Ultra band of our four-level difficulty taxonomy; (3)87.5% inter-annotator agreement; (4)≥80% labour and ≥98% monetary savings versus earlier efforts.

Baselines including GPT-4o, Llama3, RESDSQL, and MAC-SQL, achieve at most 56% execution accuracy, indicating substantial room for improvement.

High-Quality Complex Text-to-SQL Data Generation through Chain-of-Verification

In this paper, we address the persistent challenges that figurative language expressions pose for natural language processing (NLP) systems, particularly in low-resource languages such as Konkani. We present a hybrid model that integrates a pre-trained Multilingual BERT (mBERT) with a bidirectional LSTM and a linear classifier. This architecture is fine-tuned on a newly introduced annotated dataset for metaphor classification, developed as part of this work. To improve the model’s efficiency, we implement a gradient-based attention head pruning strategy. For metaphor classification, the pruned model achieves an accuracy of 78%. We also applied our pruning approach to expand on an existing idiom classification task, achieving 83% accuracy. These results demonstrate the effectiveness of attention head pruning for building efficient NLP tools in underrepresented languages.

Pruning for Performance: Efficient Idiom and Metaphor Classification in Low-Resource Konkani Using mBERT

Self-supervised speech models have demonstrated the ability to learn rich acoustic representations. However, interpreting which specific phonological or acoustic features these models leverage within their highly polysemantic activations remains challenging. In this paper, we propose a straightforward and unsupervised probing method for model interpretability. We extract the activations from the final MLP layer of a pretrained HuBERT model and train a sparse autoencoder (SAE) using dictionary learning techniques to generate an over-complete set of latent representations. Analyzing these latent codes, we observe that a small subset of high-variance units consistently aligns with phonetic events, suggesting their potential utility as interpretable acoustic detectors. Our proposed method does not require labeled data beyond raw audio, providing a lightweight and accessible tool to gain insights into the internal workings of self-supervised speech models.

Interpretable Sparse Features for Probing Self-Supervised Speech Models

Transformer based models, specially large language models (LLMs) dominate the field of NLP with their mass adoption in tasks such as text generation, summarization and fake news detection. These models offer ease of deployment and reliability for most applications, however, they require significant amounts of computational power for training as well as inference. This poses challenges in their adoption in resource-constrained applications, specially in the open-source community where compute availability is usually scarce. This work proposes a graph-based approach for Environmental Claim Detection, exploring Graph Neural Networks (GNNs) and Hyperbolic Graph Neural Networks (HGNNs) as lightweight yet effective alternatives to transformer-based models. Re-framing the task as a graph classification problem, we transform claim sentences into dependency parsing graphs, utilizing a combination of word2vec \& learnable part-of-speech (POS) tag embeddings for the node features and encoding syntactic dependencies in the edge relations. Our results show that our graph-based models, particularly HGNNs in the poincaré space (P-HGNNs), achieve performance superior to the state-of-the-art on environmental claim detection while using up to **30x fewer parameters**. We also demonstrate that HGNNs benefit vastly from explicitly modeling data in hierarchical (tree-like) structures, enabling them to significantly improve over their euclidean counterparts.

Efficient Environmental Claim Detection with Hyperbolic Graph Neural Networks

Continual learning (CL) presents a significant challenge for large pre-trained models, primarily due to catastrophic forgetting and the high computational cost of sequential knowledge updating. Parameter-Efficient Transfer Learning (PETL) methods offer reduced computational burdens but often struggle to effectively mitigate forgetting. This paper introduces Stacked Low-Rank Adaptation (SLoRA), a novel parameter-efficient approach that leverages the additive composition of task-specific, frozen low-rank adapters to enable modular continual learning with inherent support for explicit knowledge modification. SLoRA was evaluated on vision benchmarks, BERT-base, and the 1-billion-parameter Llama-3.2-1B model. Experiments demonstrated that SLoRA almost completely eliminated catastrophic forgetting, achieving a final average accuracy of 92.75\% on Llama-3.2-1B while perfectly preserving prior task performance. Furthermore, SLoRA is computationally efficient, enabling up to a 15x training speed-up over full fine-tuning with 99.7\% fewer trainable parameters per update. SLoRA offers a compelling balance of forgetting mitigation, parameter efficiency, and modularity, representing a promising direction for developing adaptable and efficient lifelong knowledgeable foundation models.

Stacked LoRA: Isolated Low-Rank Adaptation for Lifelong Knowledge Management

Reliable evaluation of Question Answering (QA) systems in low-resource Indic languages presents a significant challenge due to limited annotated datasets, linguistic diversity, and suitable evaluation metrics. Languages such as Sindhi, Manipuri, Dogri, Konkani, and Maithili are particularly underrepresented, creating difficulty in assessing Large Language Models (LLMs) on QA tasks. Existing metrics, including BLEU, ROUGE-L, and BERTScore, are effective in machine translation and high-resource settings; however, they often fail in low-resource QA due to score compression, zero-inflation, and poor scale alignment. To overcome this, LRMGS (Language-Robust Metric for Generative QA) is introduced to capture semantic and lexical agreement while preserving the score scale across languages. LRMGS is evaluated across 8 Indic languages and multiple LLMs, demonstrating consistently higher concordance with reference-based chrF++ scores, measured using the Concordance Correlation Coefficient (CCC). Experimental results indicate that LRMGS provides more accurate discrimination of system performance in very low-resource languages compared to existing metrics. This work establishes a robust and interpretable framework for evaluating QA systems in low-resource Indic languages, supporting more reliable multilingual model assessment.

LRMGS: A Language-Robust Metric for Evaluating Question Answering in Very Low-Resource Indic Languages

Aspect-based summarization aims to generate summaries that highlight specific aspects of a text, enabling more personalized and targeted summaries. However, its application to books remains unexplored due to the difficulty of constructing reference summaries for long text. To address this challenge, we propose BookAsSumQA, a QA-based evaluation framework for aspect-based book summarization. BookAsSumQA automatically generates aspect-specific QA pairs from a narrative knowledge graph to evaluate summary quality based on its question-answering performance. Our experiments using BookAsSumQA revealed that while LLM-based approaches showed higher accuracy on shorter texts, RAG-based methods become more effective as document length increases, making them more efficient and practical for aspect-based book summarization.

BookAsSumQA: An Evaluation Framework for Aspect-Based Book Summarization via Question Answering

Large language models (LLMs) excel across diverse natural language processing tasks but remain opaque and unreliable. This thesis investigates how LLM reasoning can be made both interpretable and reliable through systematic analysis of internal dynamics and targeted interventions. Unlike prior work that examines reasoning broadly, this research focuses on two representative domains: puzzle solving, where reasoning steps can be precisely tracked, and ontological inference, where hierarchical structures constrain valid reasoning. The central questions are: (1) How can systematic error patterns in domain specific reasoning be detected through layer wise probing and mitigated through targeted interventions? (2) How can probing frameworks and middle layer analyses reveal and enhance the computational mechanisms underlying inference? By combining probing methods, middle layer investigations, and probe guided interventions, the work aims to uncover interpretable reasoning patterns, identify systematic failure modes, and develop adaptive enhancement strategies. The expected outcome is a domain grounded framework that advances both theoretical understanding of neural reasoning and the design of practical, trustworthy AI systems.

Thesis Proposal: Interpretable Reasoning Enhancement in Large Language Models through Puzzle and Ontological Task Analysis

Inference-time computation is a critical yet challenging paradigm for enhancing the reasoning performance of large language models (LLMs). While existing strategies improve reasoning stability and consistency, they suffer from notable limitations: self-correction often reinforces the model's initial biases, and Multi-Agent Collaboration (MAC) often fails due to the lack of efficient coordination mechanisms, leading to collective errors. Although high-performing verifiers can detect reasoning errors, making them reliable requires substantial training. To address these challenges, we introduce a novel inference-time framework - **Adaptive Coopetition (AdCo)** - in which LLM agents utilize **an adaptive, UCB-based 'coopetition' mechanism**. At each round, agents leverage coarse verifier signals to determine whether to collaborate or compete, further iteratively refining their reasoning based on peer feedback. Without relying on high-performance verifiers, our adaptive strategy achieves significant performance gains on mathematical reasoning benchmarks, yielding **a 20\% relative improvement** over baselines on the more challenging dataset. Our approach remains robust and consistent in terms of accuracy under different sample sizes and configurations. This adaptive, signal-guided 'coopetition' framework enhances reasoning robustness by leveraging both
model knowledge diversity and reasoning trace measure, while also promoting uncertainty-driven exploration, especially when participants have comparable capabilities. From this perspective, our work offers a fresh lens on inference-time computation and paves the way for more resilient multi-agent LLM systems.

Adaptive Coopetition: Leveraging Coarse Verifier Signals for Resilient Multi-Agent LLM Reasoning

We investigate whether Large Language Models (LLMs) exhibit human-like cognitive patterns under four established frameworks from
psychology: Thematic Apperception Test (TAT), Framing Bias, Moral Foundations Theory (MFT), and Cognitive Dissonance. We evaluated several proprietary and open-source models using structured prompts and automated scoring. Our findings reveal that these models often produce coherent narratives, show susceptibility to positive framing, exhibit moral judgments aligned with Liberty/Oppression concerns, and demonstrate self-contradictions tempered by extensive rationalization. Such behaviors mirror human cognitive tendencies yet
are shaped by their training data and alignment methods. We discuss the implications for AI transparency, ethical deployment, and future
work that bridges cognitive psychology and AI safety.

Downloads

Next from IJCNLP-AACL 2025

High-Quality Complex Text-to-SQL Data Generation through Chain-of-Verification

Similar lecture

Integrating Textual and Emotional Dynamics for Accurate Detection of Mental Health Disorders in Social Media