China

Cyberbullying (CB) involves complex relational dynamics that are often oversimplified as a binary classification task. Existing youth-focused CB datasets rely on scripted role-play, lacking conversational realism and ethical youth involvement, with little or no evaluation of their social plausibility. To address this, we introduce a \textbf{youth-in-the-loop} dataset ``\textbf{BullyBench}&#39;&#39; developed by adolescents (ages 15–16) through an ethical co-research framework. We introduce a structured \textbf{intrinsic} quality evaluation with \textbf{experts-in-the-loop} (social scientists, psychologists, and content moderators) for assessing realism, relevance, and coherence in youth CB data. Additionally, we perform \textbf{extrinsic} baseline evaluation of this dataset by benchmarking encoder- and decoder-only language models for multi-class CB role classification for future research. A three-stage annotation process by young adults refines the dataset into a gold-standard test benchmark, a high-quality resource grounded in minors’ lived experiences of CB detection. Code and data are available for review \footnote{\url{https://github.com/youthcodesign/emnl-industry-track-submission} Please note, labels for BullyBench will be made available after review.}.

EMNLP 2025

BullyBench: Youth &amp; Experts-in-the-loop Framework for Intrinsic and Extrinsic Cyberbullying NLP Benchmarking

cyberbullying; benchmarking; youth created dataset; llm conversation generation

Truth and Responsibility
“Truth and Responsibility” is a call to reimagine anthropology to meet the demands of the present moment. The imperative to bear witness, take action, and be held accountable to the truths we write and circulate invites us to reflect on our responsibility in reckoning with disciplinary histories, harms, and possibilities. To whom are we giving evidence and toward what ends? For whom are we writing? To whom are we accountable, and in what ways? We are thrilled to announce the theme of the 2021 AAA Annual Meeting to be held in Baltimore, MD: Truth and Responsibility.

Many consider anthropology to be a holistic social science dedicated to cross-cultural understanding as a way to reduce bigotry and more fully comprehend “what it means to be human.” Others push against this readily circulated origin story, arguing that “human” remains a highly contested, political category—evident as the presumed set of rights and protections associated with the “human” continue to be stripped away violently in the communities in which some of us live and work. Which violent histories and epistemologies must anthropologists take responsibility for in telling truth(s) about the discipline’s development? How do the dual histories of settler colonialism and slavery continue to influence anthropological thought and practices? In these political times, how can anthropologists throughout the globe work to secure a capacious, progressive vision of the human? How might movements for anti-racism, decoloniality, queer liberation, and healing such as #BlackLivesMatter, #ProtectMaunaKea, and #MeToo push a future anthropology out of the ashes of the anthropological past? Finally, what are the limits and possibilities of the anthropological imagination?

Across subfields, we find truths in patterns of human behavior, language, evolution, and cultural worlds. Industry-positioned anthropologists do this by extending the boundaries of the discipline not as an administrative solution to job shortages but as a source of intervention and knowledge production. Increasingly, anthropologists who make use of the scientific method question how status and identity help to decide which facts come to represent truth. How might quantitative researchers use our methods to identify patterned truths, and what responsibility do we hold in challenging conventional wisdom about these patterns? What responsibility do we have to both our colleagues and larger publics, to push toward increased transparency and ethical grounding in our data collection, analysis, and presentation?

Pedagogy is a key medium for the communication of anthropological truths. Which (and whose) truths are foregrounded in our curricula? What are the possibilities for a liberatory pedagogy in a precarious, “post-truth” era? Conferences, museums, organizing spaces, and classrooms are sites where pedagogy and various forms of communication can help us interrogate the performativity of truth. How might anthropologists conceive of truth performances? Might visual, aural, and choreographic performances during AAA sessions offer anthropologists alternative genres for truth-telling and truth-making that provoke discussions about responsibility?

In accordance with the urgency of the year’s theme, the questions posed in this call for papers do not have easy answers. The hope is that those who submit proposals will take up these questions and engage in collective thinking and imagining about the truths we hold, the truths we challenge, and the responsibilities we bear in co-creating a free and more equitable world. All panel proposals should have a statement about how the panel has incorporated the goals of equity, diversity, and inclusion, and/or analysis of power.

Executive Session proposals have already been selected and speak directly to the theme “Truth and Responsibility.” To practice the critical reflexivity this call for papers invites, we asked that Executive Session submissions explicitly address the diversity of session participants, such as organizational/institutional affiliation, career stage, race, ethnicity, disability, sexuality, class, religion, national identity, and gender. Proposals for Executive Sessions that demonstrated a commitment to equity and inclusion and/or a clear analysis of power (i.e. anti-imperialist, anti-white supremacist, decolonial, anti-ableist, feminist, anti-transphobic, anti-xenophobic, etc) were given priority. We are excited to be in conversation with residents of the Baltimore region and look forward to the discussions, performances, and actions generated by the dynamic group of anthropologists attending the 2021 AAA Annual Meeting.

AAA Annual Meeting 2021

“Truth and Responsibility” is a call to reimagine anthropology to meet the demands of the present moment. The imperative to bear witness, take action, and be held accountable to the truths we write and circulate invites us to reflect on our responsibility in reckoning with disciplinary histories, harms, and possibilities. To whom are we giving evidence and toward what ends? For whom are we writing? To whom are we accountable, and in what ways? We are thrilled to announce the theme of the 2021 AAA Annual Meeting to be held in Baltimore, MD: Truth and Responsibility.

Cyberbullying (CB) involves complex relational dynamics that are often oversimplified as a binary classification task. Existing youth-focused CB datasets rely on scripted role-play, lacking conversational realism and ethical youth involvement, with little or no evaluation of their social plausibility. To address this, we introduce a \textbf{youth-in-the-loop} dataset ``\textbf{BullyBench}'' developed by adolescents (ages 15–16) through an ethical co-research framework. We introduce a structured \textbf{intrinsic} quality evaluation with \textbf{experts-in-the-loop} (social scientists, psychologists, and content moderators) for assessing realism, relevance, and coherence in youth CB data. Additionally, we perform \textbf{extrinsic} baseline evaluation of this dataset by benchmarking encoder- and decoder-only language models for multi-class CB role classification for future research. A three-stage annotation process by young adults refines the dataset into a gold-standard test benchmark, a high-quality resource grounded in minors’ lived experiences of CB detection. Code and data are available for review \footnote{\url{https://github.com/youthcodesign/emnl-industry-track-submission} Please note, labels for BullyBench will be made available after review.}.

BullyBench: Youth & Experts-in-the-loop Framework for Intrinsic and Extrinsic Cyberbullying NLP Benchmarking

poster

## Welcome!
"I am excited to welcome you to this year’s edition of the Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing! Importantly, it marks the 30th edition of EMNLP. With over 8,000 submissions, more than 3,000 accepted papers, and thousands of attendees, we have come a long way from that first
workshop, which had 14 accepted papers. As the field looks ahead, Suzhou is the fitting location for celebrating this milestone: rooted in a long literary tradition, yet modern and forward-looking, and home to a large share of the NLP community."<br>

*Message from the General Chair, Dirk Hovy*





<br>

Celebrate 30 Years of EMNLP! 
EMNLP 2025 will be held in Suzhou, China from November 5th to November 9th, 2025.

Rapid developments of large language models have revolutionized many NLP tasks on English data, unfortunately, the models and their evaluations for low-resource languages are being overlooked, especially for languages in South Asia. Although there are more than 650 languages in South Asia, many of them either have very limited computational resources or are missing from existing language models. Thus, a concrete question to be answered is: *Can we assess the current stage and challenges to inform our NLP community and facilitate model developments for South Asian languages?* In this survey, we have comprehensively examined current efforts and challenges of NLP models for South Asian languages by retrieving studies since 2020 with a focus on transformer-based models, such as BERT, T5, and GPT. We present advances and gaps across 3 essential aspects: data, model, and tasks, such as available data sources, fine-tuning strategies, and domain applications. Our findings highlight substantial issues, such as missing data in critical domains (e.g., health), code-mixing, and missing standardized evaluation. Our survey will raise awareness within the NLP community for more targeted data curation, unify benchmarks tailored to cultural and linguistic nuances of South Asia, and encourage an equitable representation of South Asian languages.

Bhaasha, Bhāṣā, Zaban: A Survey for Low-Resourced Languages in South Asia – Current Stage and Challenges

Recent advances in large language models (LLMs) have opened the door to culture-aware language tasks. We introduce the novel problem of adapting wine reviews across Chinese and English, which goes beyond literal translation by incorporating regional taste preferences and culture-specific flavor descriptors. In a case study on cross-cultural wine review adaptation, we compile the \textbf{first} parallel corpus of professional reviews, containing 8k Chinese and 16k Anglophone reviews. We benchmark both neural-machine-translation baselines and state-of-the-art LLMs with automatic metrics and human evaluation. For the latter, we propose three culture-oriented criteria—Cultural Proximity, Cultural Neutrality, and Cultural Genuineness—to assess how naturally a translated review resonates with target-culture readers. Our analysis shows that current models struggle to capture cultural nuances, especially in translating wine descriptions across different cultures. This highlights the challenges and limitations of translation models in handling cultural content.

Do LLMs Understand Wine Descriptors Across Cultures? A Benchmark for Cultural Adaptations of Wine Reviews

Large Language Models (LLMs) have shown strong capabilities in zero-shot reasoning and generalization to new tasks. However, the zero-shot performance of general LLMs on complex tasks, such as multi-hop reasoning, remains suboptimal, while reasoning LLMs suffer from hallucinations and unfaithfulness. In this paper, to handle these limitations, we introduce a novel structure analysis method that helps LLMs better understand the question structure and guide the problem-solving process. We demonstrate that existing reasoning strategies, such as Chain-of-Thought and ReAct, significantly benefit from the LLM’s inherent understanding of semantic structure. We further ground our method in the theory of probabilistic graphical models to support its effectiveness. To enhance the reasoning process, we augment the structure analysis with refinement and retrieval capabilities, forming a multi-agent reasoning system called Structure-oriented Autonomous Reasoning Agents (SARA). Extensive experiments show that SARA significantly improves zero-shot performance on knowledge-intensive and mathematical tasks. Remarkably, our approach makes a general LLM competitive with dedicated reasoning models in several benchmarks and demonstrates strong robustness against corrupted reasoning paths.

Advancing Reasoning with Off-the-Shelf LLMs: A Semantic Structure Perspective

Large language models (LLMs) often struggle with visualization tasks like plotting diagrams, charts, where success depends on both code correctness and visual semantics. Existing instruction-tuning datasets lack execution-grounded supervision and offer limited support for iterative code correction, resulting in fragile and unreliable plot generation. We present **VisCode-200K**, a large-scale instruction tuning dataset for Python-based visualization and self-correction. It contains over 200K examples from two sources: (1) validated plotting code from open-source repositories, paired with natural language instructions and rendered plots; and (2) 45K multi-turn correction dialogues from Code-Feedback, enabling models to revise faulty code using runtime feedback. We fine-tune Qwen2.5-Coder-Instruct on VisCode-200K to create **VisCoder**, and evaluate it on PandasPlotBench. VisCoder significantly outperforms strong open-source baselines and approaches the performance of proprietary models like GPT-4o-mini. We further adopt a self-debug evaluation protocol to assess iterative repair, demonstrating the benefits of feedback-driven learning for executable, visually accurate code generation.

VisCoder: Fine-Tuning LLMs for Executable Python Visualization Code Generation

The self-attention mechanism is key to the success of transformers in recent large language models (LLMs). However, the quadratic computational cost, O(n²), with respect to the input sequence length n poses a significant obstacle to further improvement and scalability in longer contexts. In this work, we leverage the convolution-like structure of attention matrices to develop an efficient approximation method for attention computation using convolution matrices. We propose a mathsfconv basis system, analogous to the rank basis, and show that any lower triangular matrix can be decomposed as a sum of structured convolution matrices in this basis. We then design a fast algorithm to approximate the attention matrix using a sum of k convolution matrices. This enables us to compute attention during \emph{inference} via Fast Fourier Transforms (FFT) in O(knd log n) time, where d is the hidden dimension, achieving nearly linear time complexity, n¹⁺o⁽¹⁾, in practical scenarios where kd = no⁽¹⁾. Furthermore, both \emph{training forward} and \emph{backward gradient} computations can be performed in n¹⁺o⁽¹⁾ time as well. We provide theoretical guarantees on runtime and approximation error and conduct preliminary experiments to evaluate the effectiveness of our approach. We hope this new paradigm for accelerating attention computation in transformer models facilitates their application to longer contexts.

Conv-Basis: A New Paradigm for Efficient Attention Inference and Gradient Computation in Transformers

Large language models (LLMs) demonstrate strong reasoning capabilities but are expensive to run at inference time, limiting their practical deployment. We propose Offloaded Reasoning (OR), a modular strategy where a lightweight model generates intermediate reasoning traces that are then used by a larger model to produce the final answer. We further introduce Offloaded Reasoning with Refinement (ORR), where the large model first edits or improves the reasoning trace before answering. Unlike token-level acceleration methods, OR and ORR operate at the reasoning level and require no retraining of the large model. Experiments on GSM8K and Math500 show that OR achieves up to 8x faster inference than full large-model reasoning with minimal accuracy loss, while ORR recovers or exceeds full accuracy at substantially lower cost. Our results highlight the potential of modular, delegation-based reasoning for building more efficient and adaptable LLM systems.

Offloaded Reasoning: Efficient Inference for Large Language Models via Modular Reasoning and Refinement

Preference optimization methods like DPO have achieved remarkable performance in LLM alignment. However, the evaluation for these methods relies on a single response and overlooks other potential outputs, which could also be generated in real-world applications within this hypothetical space. To address this issue, this paper presents a Hypothesis-based PrEference-aware AnaLysis Framework (HEAL), a novel evaluation paradigm that formulates preference alignment as a re-ranking process within hypothesis spaces. The framework incorporates two complementary metrics: ranking accuracy for evaluating ordinal consistency and preference strength correlation for assessing continuous alignment. To facilitate this framework, we develop UniHypoBench, a unified hypothesis benchmark constructed from diverse instruction-response pairs. Through extensive experiments based on HEAL, with a particular focus on the intrinsic mechanisms of preference learning, we demonstrate that current preference learning methods can effectively capture preferences provided by proxy models while simultaneously suppressing negative samples. These findings contribute to preference learning research through two significant avenues. Theoretically, we introduce hypothesis space analysis as an innovative paradigm for understanding preference alignment. Practically, HEAL offers researchers robust diagnostic tools for refining preference optimization methods, while our empirical results identify promising directions for developing more advanced alignment algorithms capable of comprehensive preference capture.

HEAL: A Hypothesis-Based Preference-Aware Analysis Framework

While reasoning and multilingual capabilities in Language Models (LMs) have achieved remarkable progress in recent years, their integration into a unified paradigm—multilingual reasoning—is at a nascent stage. Multilingual reasoning requires language models to handle logical reasoning across languages while addressing misalignment, biases, and challenges in low-resource settings. This survey provides the first in-depth review of multilingual reasoning in LMs. In this survey, we provide a systematic overview of existing methods that leverage LMs for multilingual reasoning, specifically outlining the challenges, motivations, and foundational aspects of applying language models to reason across diverse languages. We provide an overview of the standard data resources used for training multilingual reasoning in LMs and the evaluation benchmarks employed to assess their multilingual capabilities. Next, we analyze various state-of-the-art methods and their performance on these benchmarks. Finally, we explore future research opportunities to improve multilingual reasoning in LMs, focusing on enhancing their ability to handle diverse languages and complex reasoning tasks.

A Survey of Multilingual Reasoning in Language Models

Large Language Models (LLMs) are increasingly relied upon for solving complex reasoning tasks in domains such as mathematics, logic, and multi-step question answering. A growing line of work seeks to improve reasoning quality by scaling inference time compute particularly through Process Reward Models (PRMs), used to reward the reasoning at intermediate steps. While effective, these methods introduce substantial computational overhead, especially when generating large numbers of solutions in parallel. In this paper, we investigate whether PRMs can be used mid-generation to provide early signals that enable the rejection of suboptimal candidates before full generation of step is complete. We introduce the hypothesis that PRMs are also Partial Reward Models, meaning that the scores they assign to partially completed reasoning step are predictive of final output quality. This allows for principled early rejection based on intermediate token-level signals. We support this hypothesis both theoretically, by proving that the risk of discarding optimal beams decreases exponentially with generation length and empirically, by demonstrating a strong correlation between partial and final rewards across multiple reward models. On math reasoning benchmarks, our method achieves up to 1.4 times – 9 times reduction in inference FLOPs without degrading final performance. These results suggest that early rejection is a powerful mechanism for improving the compute-efficiency of reasoning in LLMs.

Accelerating LLM Reasoning via Early Rejection with Partial Reward Modeling

Testing is essential to modern software engineering for building reliable software. Given the high costs of manually creating test cases, automated test case generation, particularly methods utilizing large language models, has become increasingly popular. These neural approaches generate semantically meaningful tests that are more maintainable compared with traditional automatic testing methods like fuzzing. However, the diversity and volume of unit tests in current datasets are limited, especially for newer but important languages. In this paper, we present a novel data augmentation technique, FuzzAug, that introduces the benefits of fuzzing to large language models by introducing valid testing semantics and providing diverse coverage-guided inputs. Doubling the size of training datasets, FuzzAug improves the performance from the baselines significantly. This technique demonstrates the potential of introducing prior knowledge from dynamic software analysis to improve neural test generation, offering significant enhancements in neural test generation.

Downloads

Next from EMNLP 2025

Bhaasha, Bhāṣā, Zaban: A Survey for Low-Resourced Languages in South Asia – Current Stage and Challenges

Similar lecture

Negotiating Charity and Humanitarianism in the Youth Volunteers' Practices in the Palestinian Refugee Camps of Jordan

.css-70qvj9{display:-webkit-box;display:-webkit-flex;display:-ms-flexbox;display:flex;-webkit-align-items:center;-webkit-box-align:center;-ms-flex-align:center;align-items:center;}Downloads

Next from EMNLP 2025

Bhaasha, Bhāṣā, Zaban: A Survey for Low-Resourced Languages in South Asia – Current Stage and Challenges

Similar lecture

Negotiating Charity and Humanitarianism in the Youth Volunteers' Practices in the Palestinian Refugee Camps of Jordan

Downloads