China

As MT becomes commonplace, understanding how the general public perceives and relies on imperfect MT becomes critical. This paper contributes to the EMNLP 2025 theme of interdisciplinary recontextualization by bringing Human-Computer Interaction (HCI) methods to study these questions. We present a human study conducted in a public museum (n=452), investigating how fluency and adequacy errors impact bilingual and non-bilingual users&#39; reliance on MT during casual use. Our findings reveal that non-bilingual users often over-rely on MT due to a lack of evaluation strategies and alternatives, while experiencing the impact of errors can prompt users to reassess future reliance. This highlights the need for MT evaluation and NLP explanation techniques to promote MT literacy. More broadly, this work illustrates recontextualizing NLP to address its societal implications.

EMNLP 2025

Toward Machine Translation Literacy: How Lay Users Perceive and Rely on Imperfect Translations

user-centered research

machine translation reliance

machine translation literacy

## Welcome!
"I am excited to welcome you to this year’s edition of the Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing! Importantly, it marks the 30th edition of EMNLP. With over 8,000 submissions, more than 3,000 accepted papers, and thousands of attendees, we have come a long way from that first
workshop, which had 14 accepted papers. As the field looks ahead, Suzhou is the fitting location for celebrating this milestone: rooted in a long literary tradition, yet modern and forward-looking, and home to a large share of the NLP community."<br>

*Message from the General Chair, Dirk Hovy*





<br>

Celebrate 30 Years of EMNLP! 
EMNLP 2025 will be held in Suzhou, China from November 5th to November 9th, 2025.

As MT becomes commonplace, understanding how the general public perceives and relies on imperfect MT becomes critical. This paper contributes to the EMNLP 2025 theme of interdisciplinary recontextualization by bringing Human-Computer Interaction (HCI) methods to study these questions. We present a human study conducted in a public museum (n=452), investigating how fluency and adequacy errors impact bilingual and non-bilingual users' reliance on MT during casual use. Our findings reveal that non-bilingual users often over-rely on MT due to a lack of evaluation strategies and alternatives, while experiencing the impact of errors can prompt users to reassess future reliance. This highlights the need for MT evaluation and NLP explanation techniques to promote MT literacy. More broadly, this work illustrates recontextualizing NLP to address its societal implications.

poster

Personalized content moderation can protect users from harm while facilitating free expression by tailoring moderation decisions to individual preferences rather than enforcing universal rules. However, content moderation that is fully personalized to individual preferences, no matter what these preferences are, may lead to even the most hazardous types of content being propagated on social media. In this paper, we explore this risk using hate speech as a case study. Certain types of hate speech are illegal in many countries. We show that, while fully personalized hate speech detection models increase overall user welfare (as measured by user-level classification performance), they also make predictions that violate such legal hate speech boundaries, especially when tailored to users who tolerate highly hateful content. To address this problem, we enforce legal boundaries in personalized hate speech detection by overriding predictions from personalized models with those from a boundary classifier. This approach significantly reduces legal violations while minimally affecting overall user welfare. Our findings highlight both the promise and the risks of personalized moderation, and offer a practical solution to balance user preferences with legal and ethical obligations.

Personalization up to a Point: Why Personalized Content Moderation Needs Boundaries, and How We Can Enforce Them

The faithful transfer of contextually-embedded meaning remains one of the most persistent challenges in contemporary machine translation (MT) and is particularly evident when dealing with culture-bound terms—expressions or concepts deeply rooted in specific languages or cultures, resisting direct linguistic transfer. Existing computational approaches to explicitating such terms have focused exclusively on in-text solutions, overlooking paratextual apparatus such as footnotes and endnotes systematically employed by professional translators. In this paper, we formalize Genette (1997)'s theory of paratexts from literary and translation studies to introduce the novel task of paratextual explicitation for MT. We construct a dataset of 560 expert-aligned paratexts from four English translations of the classical Chinese literary collection _Liaozhai_ and evaluate LLMs in implicit and explicit reasoning modes on both choice and content of explicitation. Experiments using three intrinsic prompting and one agentic retrieval method establish the inherent difficulty of this task, with human evaluation showing that LLM-generated paratexts improve audience comprehension 91.7% of the time, but with markedly less effectiveness than translator-authored ones. Our findings demonstrate the potential of paratextual explicitations for cultural mediation and advancing MT beyond surface-level equivalence, with promising extensions to monolingual explanation and personalized adaptation.

Liaozhai through the Looking-Glass: On Paratextual Explicitation of Culture-Bound Terms in Machine Translation

Distinguishing LLM-generated text from human-written is a key challenge for safe and ethical NLP, particularly in high-stakes settings such as persuasive online discourse. While recent work focuses on detection, real-world use cases also demand interpretable tools to help humans understand and distinguish LLM-generated texts. To this end, we present an analysis framework comparing human- and LLM-generated arguments using two easily-interpretable feature sets: general-purpose linguistic features (e.g., lexical richness, syntactic complexity) and domain-specific features related to argument quality (e.g., logical soundness, engagement strategies). Applied to */r/ChangeMyView* arguments by humans and three LLMs, our method reveals clear patterns: LLM-generated counter-arguments show lower type-token and lemma-token ratios but higher emotional intensity — particularly in anticipation and trust. They more closely resemble textbook-quality arguments — cogent, justified, explicitly respectful toward others, and positive in tone. Moreover, counter-arguments generated by LLMs converge more closely with the original post's style and quality than those written by humans. Finally, we demonstrate that these differences enable a lightweight, interpretable, and highly effective classifier for detecting LLM-generated comments in CMV.

AI Argues Differently: Distinct Argumentative and Linguistic Patterns of LLMs in Persuasive Contexts

Recently, autonomous agents built on large language models (LLMs) have experienced significant development and are being deployed in real-world applications. Through the usage of tools, these systems can perform actions in the real world. Given the agents' practical applications and ability to execute consequential actions, such autonomous systems can cause more severe damage than a standalone LLM if compromised. While some existing research has explored harmful actions by LLM agents, our study approaches the vulnerability from a different perspective. We introduce a new type of attack that causes malfunctions by misleading the agent into executing repetitive or irrelevant actions. Our experiments reveal that these attacks can induce failure rates exceeding 80% in multiple scenarios. Through attacks on implemented and deployable agents in multi-agent scenarios, we accentuate the realistic risks associated with these vulnerabilities. To mitigate such attacks, we propose self-examination defense methods. Our findings indicate these attacks are more difficult to detect compared to previous overtly harmful attacks, highlighting the substantial risks associated with this vulnerability.

Breaking Agents: Compromising Autonomous LLM Agents Through Malfunction Amplification

The detection of audio deepfakes (ADD) has become increasingly important due to the rapid evolution of generative speech models. However, progress in this field remains uneven across languages, particularly for low-resource languages like Portuguese, which lack high-quality datasets. In this paper, we introduce BRSpeech-DF, the first publicly available ADD dataset for Portuguese, encompassing both Brazilian and European variants. The dataset contains over 459,000 utterances, including a smaller portion of real speech from 62 speakers and a large collection of synthetic samples generated using multiple zero-shot text-to-speech (TTS) models, each conditioned on the original speaker's voice. By providing this resource, our objective is to support the development of robust, multilingual detection systems, thereby advancing equity in speech forensics and security research. BRSpeech-DF addresses a significant gap in annotated data for underrepresented languages, facilitating more inclusive and generalizable advancements in synthetic speech detection.

BRSpeech-DF: A Deep Fake Synthetic Speech Dataset for Portuguese Zero-Shot TTS

Weakly supervised learning aims to reduce the cost of labeling data by using expert-designed labeling rules. However, existing methods require experts to design effective rules in a single shot, which is difficult in the absence of proper guidance and tooling. Therefore, it is still an open question whether experts should spend their limited time writing rules or instead providing instance labels via active learning. In this paper, we investigate how to exploit an expert's limited time to create effective supervision. First, to develop practical guidelines for rule creation, we conduct an exploratory analysis of diverse collections of existing expert-designed rules and find that rule precision is more important than coverage across datasets. Second, we compare rule creation to individual instance labeling via active learning and demonstrate the importance of both across 6 datasets. Third, we propose an interactive learning framework, INTERVAL, that achieves efficiency by automatically extracting candidate rules based on rich patterns (e.g., by prompting a language model), and effectiveness by soliciting expert feedback on both candidate rules and individual instances. Across 6 datasets, INTERVAL outperforms state-of-the-art weakly supervised approaches by 7% in F1. Furthermore, it requires as few as 10 queries for expert feedback to reach F1 values that existing active learning methods cannot match even with 100 queries.

Interactive Machine Teaching by Labeling Rules and Instances

Large Language Models (LLMs) fine-tuned via Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback (RLHF) and Reinforcement Learning with Verifiable Rewards (RLVR) significantly improve the alignment of human-AI values and further raise the upper bound of AI capabilities, particularly in reasoning-intensive, long-context Chain-of-Thought (long-CoT) tasks. However, existing RLHF (or RLVR) frameworks commonly face challenges such as inference bottlenecks and complexity barriers, restricting their accessibility for newcomers. To bridge this gap, we introduce \textbf{OpenRLHF}, a user-friendly, scalable, and easy-to-learn open-source RLHF framework built upon Ray, vLLM, DeepSpeed, and HuggingFace Transformers, featuring a simplified design, clear code structure, and comprehensive documentation to facilitate entry for researchers and practitioners. Experimental results show that OpenRLHF achieves superior training efficiency with speedups ranging from 1.22× to 1.68× across different model sizes compared to state-of-the-art frameworks, while requiring significantly fewer lines of code for implementation. OpenRLHF is publicly available at \url{https://github.com/OpenRLHF/OpenRLHF}, and has already been adopted by leading institutions to accelerate RLHF research and learning.

OpenRLHF: A Ray-based Easy-to-use, Scalable and High-performance RLHF Framework

Feature attribution methods, such as SHAP and LIME, explain machine learning model predictions by quantifying the influence of each input component. When applying feature attributions to explain language models, a basic question is defining the interpretable components. Traditional feature attribution methods, commonly treat individual words as atomic units. This is highly computationally inefficient for long-form text and fails to capture semantic information that spans multiple words. To address this, we present CafGa, an interactive tool for generating and evaluating feature attribution explanations at customizable granularities. CafGa supports customized segmentation with user interaction and visualizes the deletion and insertion curves for explanation assessments. Through a user study involving participants of various expertise, we confirm CafGa's usefulness, particularly among LLM practitioners. Explanations created using CafGa were also perceived as more useful compared to those generated by two fully automatic baseline methods: PartitionSHAP and MExGen, suggesting the effectiveness of the system.

CafGa: Customizing Feature Attributions to Explain Language Models

The paper presents KMatrix-2, an open-source toolkit that supports comprehensive heterogeneous knowledge collaborative enhancement for Large Language Models (LLMs). As the successor of KMatrix, our toolkit offers powerful modular components and typical enhancement patterns for convenient construction of mainstream knowledge-enhanced LLMs systems. Besides, it provides uniﬁed knowledge integration and joint knowledge retrieval methods to achieve more comprehensive heterogeneous knowledge collaborative enhancement. Compared with KMatrix which mainly focuses on descriptive knowledge, this work additionally considers procedural knowledge. Moreover, systematic inter-context and context-memory knowledge conflict resolution methods are offered for better knowledge integration. Some key research questions in heterogeneous knowledge-enhanced Large Language Models systems are analyzed, and our toolkit's capability in building such systems is validated.

KMatrix-2: A Comprehensive Heterogeneous Knowledge Collaborative Enhancement Toolkit for Large Language Model

Autoformalization serves a crucial role in connecting natural language and formal reasoning. This paper presents MASA, a novel framework for building multi-agent systems for autoformalization driven by Large Language Models (LLMs). MASA leverages collaborative agents to convert natural language statements into their formal representations. The architecture of MASA is designed with a strong emphasis on modularity, flexibility, and extensibility, allowing seamless integration of new agents and tools to adapt to a fast-evolving field. We showcase the effectiveness of MASA through use cases on real-world mathematical definitions and experiments on formal mathematics datasets. This work highlights the potential of multi-agent systems powered by the interaction of LLMs and theorem provers in enhancing the efficiency and reliability of autoformalization, providing valuable insights and support for researchers and practitioners in the field.

Downloads

Next from EMNLP 2025

Personalization up to a Point: Why Personalized Content Moderation Needs Boundaries, and How We Can Enforce Them

Similar lecture

Translation in the Hands of Many: Centering Lay Users in Machine Translation Interactions