China

Across languages, numeral systems vary widely in how they construct and combine numbers. While humans consistently learn to navigate this diversity, large language models (LLMs) struggle with linguistic-mathematical puzzles involving cross-linguistic numeral systems, which humans can learn to solve successfully. We investigate why this task is difficult for LLMs through a series of experiments that untangle the linguistic and mathematical aspects of numbers in language. Our experiments establish that models cannot consistently solve such problems unless the mathematical operations in the problems are explicitly marked using known symbols (+, times, etc, as in &quot;twenty + three&quot;). In further ablation studies, we probe how individual parameters of numeral construction and combination affect performance. While humans use their linguistic understanding of numbers to make inferences about the implicit compositional structure of numerals, LLMs seem to lack this notion of implicit numeral structure. We conclude that the ability to flexibly infer compositional rules from implicit patterns in human-scale data remains an open challenge for current reasoning models.

EMNLP 2025

Investigating the interaction of linguistic and mathematical reasoning in language models using multilingual number puzzles

variable binding

multilingual number systems

mathematical reasoning

artificial intelligence

large language models

### Welcome to CogSci Conference 2025!

The 47th Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society was a hybrid meeting held in San Francisco. 

<div style="position:relative;padding-top:0;width:900px;height:500px;"><iframe style="position:absolute;border:none;width:100%;height:100%;left:0;top:0;" src="https://online.fliphtml5.com/ebtyf/amvr/"  seamless="seamless" scrolling="no" frameborder="0" allowtransparency="true" allowfullscreen="true" ></iframe></div>

#### About

The Cognitive Science Society brings together researchers from around the world who hold a common goal: understanding the nature of the human mind. The mission of the Society is to promote Cognitive Science as a discipline, and to foster scientific interchange among researchers in various areas of study, including Artificial Intelligence, Linguistics, Anthropology, Psychology, Neuroscience, Philosophy, and Education.

The Society is a non-profit professional organization and its activities include sponsoring an annual conference and publishing the journals Cognitive Science and TopiCS.

#### Our History 

* **Society Creation**<br>
The Society was incorporated as a 501(c)(3) non-profit professional organization in Massachusetts in 1979. The organizing committee included Roger Schank, Allan Collins, Donald Norman, and a number of other scholars from psychology, linguistics, computer science, and philosophy. 
<br><br>
* **Conference Creation**<br>
The first conference on cognitive science was held at La Jolla, California in August, 1979, and has occurred annually since then. The proceedings of each conference are published, and those from most years are available through Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc. The annual proceedings of the Cognitive Science Conference represent a major source of information on new work and new ideas in the scientific study of thinking. In 1990, the Society, with help from an anonymous donor, established the David Marr Prize for the best student paper at each annual meeting.
<br><br>
* **Journal Creation**<br>
The Journal, Cognitive Science, began publication in 1976, and is now published by Wiley-Blackwell. The Executive Editor is currently Richard P. Cooper of Birkbeck, University of London, and there are 18 Associate Editors and a 30-member editorial board. It serves as the premier outlet for research reports that intersect two or more disciplines. Copyrights for articles published in the journal are held by the Society. The Governing Board of the Cognitive Science Society voted in late 2006 to found a new journal, Topics in Cognitive Science (topiCS). The Editor in Chief is Wayne Gray, Cognitive Science Department, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute. The journal seeks to fill a niche not occupied by Cognitive Science Journal or other cognitive science journals. Membership in the Society includes a subscription to Cognitive Science and TopiCS. Copyrights for articles published in the journal are held by the Society.
<br><br>

#### Code of Conduct

By attending the CogSci 2025 Conference, you are required to adhere to the society’s **[Code of Conduct](https://drive.google.com/file/d/1ChPuihLy6jE_BWqfO7J2KKgX35JW2zsM/view?usp=sharing)**.
<br><br>


You need to log in with the email address you registered with. 

Login credentials were sent to you from Underline -  subject line "Welcome to the CogSci 2025 Conference". Please be sure to check your spam/promotional inbox  if you do not see an email confirmation right away.





Please log in to join this event.

To access the site, please register [**here**](https://cognitivesciencesociety.org/registration/).

If you are registered and feel like you are seeing this message by mistake, please make sure you are logged in with the same email that you registered with. 

Please register!

CogSci 2025

The 47th Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society presents the latest research across cognitive science and highlights the theme of Cognition in Context.

Across languages, numeral systems vary widely in how they construct and combine numbers. While humans consistently learn to navigate this diversity, large language models (LLMs) struggle with linguistic-mathematical puzzles involving cross-linguistic numeral systems, which humans can learn to solve successfully. We investigate why this task is difficult for LLMs through a series of experiments that untangle the linguistic and mathematical aspects of numbers in language. Our experiments establish that models cannot consistently solve such problems unless the mathematical operations in the problems are explicitly marked using known symbols (+, times, etc, as in "twenty + three"). In further ablation studies, we probe how individual parameters of numeral construction and combination affect performance. While humans use their linguistic understanding of numbers to make inferences about the implicit compositional structure of numerals, LLMs seem to lack this notion of implicit numeral structure. We conclude that the ability to flexibly infer compositional rules from implicit patterns in human-scale data remains an open challenge for current reasoning models.

poster

## Welcome!
"I am excited to welcome you to this year’s edition of the Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing! Importantly, it marks the 30th edition of EMNLP. With over 8,000 submissions, more than 3,000 accepted papers, and thousands of attendees, we have come a long way from that first
workshop, which had 14 accepted papers. As the field looks ahead, Suzhou is the fitting location for celebrating this milestone: rooted in a long literary tradition, yet modern and forward-looking, and home to a large share of the NLP community."<br>

*Message from the General Chair, Dirk Hovy*





<br>

Celebrate 30 Years of EMNLP! 
EMNLP 2025 will be held in Suzhou, China from November 5th to November 9th, 2025.

Today, Large language models (LLMs) are reshaping the norms of human communication, sometimes decoupling words from genuine human thought. This transformation is deep, and undermines the trust and interpretive norms that were historically tied to authorship. We draw from linguistic philosophy and AI ethics to detail how large-scale text generation can induce semantic drift, erode accountability, and obfuscate intent and authorship. Our work here introduces conceptual frameworks including hybrid authorship graphs (modeling humans, LLMs, and texts in a provenance network), epistemic doppelgängers (LLM-generated texts that are indistinguishable from human-authored texts), and authorship entropy. We explore mechanisms such as “proof-of-interaction” authorship verification and educational reforms to restore confidence in language. While LLMs' benefits are undeniable (broader access, increased fluency, automation, etc.), the upheavals they introduce to the linguistic landscape demand reckoning. This paper provides a conceptual lens to chart these changes.

Large Language Models Threaten Language's Epistemic and Communicative Foundations

Variation is inherent in opinion-based annotation tasks, such as sentiment or hate speech analysis. It does not only arise from errors, fatigue, or sentence ambiguity, but also from genuine differences in opinion shaped by background, experience, and culture. In this paper, we show how annotators' confidence ratings can be of great use for disentangling subjective variation from uncertainty, and how they can be approximated by behavioral gaze features. We showcase the utilization of our approach through a hate speech detection task, showing that models are affected differently by instances of uncertainty and subjectivity. We demonstrate that human gaze patterns offer valuable indicators of subjective variation and uncertainty.

Disentangling Subjectivity and Uncertainty for Hate Speech Annotation and Modeling using Gaze

Transformers often struggle to generalize to longer sequences than those seen during training - a limitation known as length extrapolation. Most existing Relative Positional Encoding (RPE) methods attempt to address this by introducing either fixed linear biases or globally learned biases, which lack the capacity to adapt to different input contexts. In this work, we propose an additive RPE, Context-Aware Biases for Length Extrapolation (CABLE), a method that learns token-specific, context-aware biases for each attention head in transformers. By dynamically adjusting positional biases based on the input sequence, CABLE overcomes the rigidity of fixed RPEs. When evaluated on sequences longer than originally trained with, GPT-2 Medium (334M parameters) with CABLE achieves lower perplexity than counterparts using other widely adopted positional encoding methods. Additionally, by applying CABLE to the BERT base model we improved performance in long-context retrieval tasks. Our method significantly enhances the extrapolation performance of existing RPE methods tested on the FineWeb-Edu-10B and WikiText-103 datasets.

Context-aware Biases for Length Extrapolation

Distinguishing between rhetorical questions and informational questions is a challenging task, as many rhetorical questions have similar surface forms to informational questions. Existing datasets, however, do not contain many questions that can be rhetorical or informational in different contexts. We introduce Studying Rhetorically Ambiguous Questions, SRAQ, a new dataset explicitly constructed to support the study of such rhetorical ambiguity. The questions in SRAQ can be interpreted as either rhetorical or informational depending on the context. We evaluate the performance of state-of-the-art language models on this dataset and find that they struggle to recognize many rhetorical questions.

Studying Rhetorically Ambiguous Questions

Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback (RLHF) aligns language models with human preferences but faces efficiency challenges. We explore two approaches leveraging human gaze prediction to enhance RLHF: (1) gaze-aware reward models and (2) gaze-based distribution of sparse rewards at token level. Our experiments show gaze-informed RLHF achieves faster convergence while maintaining or slightly improving performance, reducing computational requirements during policy optimization. Human visual attention patterns provide valuable signals for policy training, suggesting a promising direction for improving RLHF efficiency through human-like attention mechanisms.

Enhancing RLHF with Human Gaze Modeling

Editing documents and PDFs using natural language instructions is desirable for many reasons – ease of use, increasing accessibility to non-technical users, and for creativity. To do this automatically, a system needs to first understand the user’s intent and convert this to an executable plan or command, and then the system needs to identify or localize the elements that the user desires to edit. While there exist methods that can accomplish these tasks, a major bottleneck in these systems is the inability to ground the spatial edit location effectively. We address this gap through our proposed system, DELOC (Document Element LOCalizer). DELOC adapts the grounding capabilities of existing Multimodal Large Language Model (MLLM) from natural images to PDFs. This adaptation involves two novel contributions: 1) synthetically generating PDF-grounding instruction tuning data from partially annotated datasets; and 2) synthetic data cleaning via Code-NLI, an NLI-inspired process to clean data using generated Python code. The effectiveness of DELOC is apparent in the >3x zero-shot improvement it achieves over the next best Multimodal LLM, GPT-4o.

DELOC: Document Element Localizer

Comics offer a compelling yet under-explored domain for computational narrative analysis, combining text and imagery in ways distinct from purely textual or audiovisual media. We introduce ComicScene154, a manually annotated dataset of scene-level narrative arcs derived from public-domain comic books spanning diverse genres. By conceptualizing comics as an abstraction for narrative-driven, multimodal data, we highlight their potential to inform broader research on multi-modal storytelling. To demonstrate the utility of ComicScene154, we present a baseline scene segmentation pipeline, providing an initial benchmark that future studies can build upon. Our results indicate that ComicScene154 constitutes a valuable resource for advancing computational methods in multimodal narrative understanding and expanding the scope of comic analysis within the Natural Language Processing community.

ComicScene154: A Scene Dataset for Comic Analysis

The Consensual Assessment Technique (CAT) evaluates creativity through holistic expert judgments. We investigate the use of two advanced Large Language Models (LLMs), Claude-3-Opus and GPT-4o, to evaluate poetry by a methodology inspired by the CAT. Using a dataset of 90 poems, we found that these LLMs can surpass the results achieved by non-expert human judges at matching a ground truth based on publication venue, particularly when assessing smaller subsets of poems. Claude-3-Opus exhibited slightly superior performance than GPT-4o. We show that LLMs are viable tools for accurately assessing poetry, paving the way for their broader application into other creative domains.

Can Large Language Models Outperform Non-Experts in Poetry Evaluation? A Comparative Study Using the Consensual Assessment Technique

Large language models (LLMs) frequently generate confident yet inaccurate responses, introducing significant risks for deployment in safety-critical domains. We present a novel, test-time approach to detecting model hallucination through systematic analysis of information flow across model layers. We target cases when LLMs process inputs with ambiguous or insufficient context. Our investigation reveals that hallucination manifests as usable information deficiencies in inter-layer transmissions. While existing approaches primarily focus on final-layer output analysis, we demonstrate that tracking cross-layer information dynamics (mathcalLI) provides robust indicators of model reliability, accounting for both information gain and loss during computation. I improves model reliability by immediately integrating with universal LLMs without additional training or architectural modifications.

Detecting LLM Hallucination Through Layer-wise Information Deficiency: Analysis of Ambiguous Prompts and Unanswerable Questions

Human moderators in online discussions face a heterogeneous range of tasks, which go beyond content moderation, or policing. They also support and improve discussion quality, which is challenging to model (and evaluate) in NLP due to its inherent subjectivity and the scarcity of annotated resources. We address this gap by introducing PerspectiveMod, a dataset of online comments annotated for the question: *"Does this comment require moderation, and why?"* Annotations were collected from both expert moderators and trained non-experts. **PerspectiveMod** is unique in its intentional variation across (a) the level of moderation experience embedded in the source data (professional vs. non-professional moderation environments), (b) the annotator profiles (experts vs. trained crowdworkers), and (c) the richness of each moderation judgment, both in terms on fine-grained comment properties (drawn from argumentation and deliberative theory) and in the representation of the individuality of the annotator (socio-demographics and attitudes towards the task). We advance understanding of the task's complexity by providing interpretation layers that account for its subjectivity. Our statistical analysis highlights the value of collecting annotator perspectives, including their experiences, attitudes, and views on AI, as a foundation for developing more context-aware and interpretively robust moderation tools.

Downloads

Next from EMNLP 2025

Large Language Models Threaten Language's Epistemic and Communicative Foundations

Similar lecture

Re-examining the tradeoff between lexicon size and average morphosyntactic complexity in recursive numeral systems