China

Argumentative essay generation (AEG) is a complex task that requires advanced semantic understanding, logical reasoning, and organized integration of perspectives. Despite showing a promising performance, current efforts often overlook the dynamical and hierarchical nature of structural argumentative planning, and struggle with flexible rhetorical expression, leading to limited argument divergence and rhetorical optimization. Inspired by human debate behavior and Bitzer&#39;s rhetorical situation theory, we propose a debate-driven rhetorical framework for argumentative writing. The uniqueness lies in three aspects: (1) dynamic assesses the divergence of viewpoints and progressively reveals the hierarchical outline of arguments based on a depth-then-breadth paradigm, improving the perspective divergence within argumentation; (2) simulates human debate through iterative defender-attacker interactions, improving the logical coherence of arguments; (3) incorporates Bitzer&#39;s rhetorical situation theory to flexibly select appropriate rhetorical techniques, enabling the rhetorical expression. Experiments on four benchmarks validate that our approach significantly improves logical depth, argumentative diversity, and rhetorical persuasiveness over existing state-of-the-art models.

EMNLP 2025

Plan Dynamically, Express Rhetorically: A Debate-Driven Rhetorical Framework for Argumentative Writing

rhetorical situation theory

argumentative writing

large language models

## Welcome!
"I am excited to welcome you to this year’s edition of the Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing! Importantly, it marks the 30th edition of EMNLP. With over 8,000 submissions, more than 3,000 accepted papers, and thousands of attendees, we have come a long way from that first
workshop, which had 14 accepted papers. As the field looks ahead, Suzhou is the fitting location for celebrating this milestone: rooted in a long literary tradition, yet modern and forward-looking, and home to a large share of the NLP community."<br>

*Message from the General Chair, Dirk Hovy*





<br>

Celebrate 30 Years of EMNLP! 
EMNLP 2025 will be held in Suzhou, China from November 5th to November 9th, 2025.

Argumentative essay generation (AEG) is a complex task that requires advanced semantic understanding, logical reasoning, and organized integration of perspectives. Despite showing a promising performance, current efforts often overlook the dynamical and hierarchical nature of structural argumentative planning, and struggle with flexible rhetorical expression, leading to limited argument divergence and rhetorical optimization. Inspired by human debate behavior and Bitzer's rhetorical situation theory, we propose a debate-driven rhetorical framework for argumentative writing. The uniqueness lies in three aspects: (1) dynamic assesses the divergence of viewpoints and progressively reveals the hierarchical outline of arguments based on a depth-then-breadth paradigm, improving the perspective divergence within argumentation; (2) simulates human debate through iterative defender-attacker interactions, improving the logical coherence of arguments; (3) incorporates Bitzer's rhetorical situation theory to flexibly select appropriate rhetorical techniques, enabling the rhetorical expression. Experiments on four benchmarks validate that our approach significantly improves logical depth, argumentative diversity, and rhetorical persuasiveness over existing state-of-the-art models.

poster

Sparse Autoencoders (SAEs) have been proposed as an unsupervised approach to learn a decomposition of a model’s latent space. This enables useful applications, such as fine-grained steering of model outputs without requiring labeled data. Current steering methods identify SAE features to target by analyzing the input tokens that activate them. However, recent work has highlighted that activations alone do not fully describe the effect of a feature on the model’s output. In this work we draw a distinction between two types of features: input features, which mainly capture patterns in the model’s input, and output features, those that have a human-understandable effect on the model’s output. We propose input and output scores to characterize and locate these types of features, and show that high values for both scores rarely co-occur in the same features. These findings have practical implications: After filtering out features with low output scores, steering with SAEs results in a 2–3x improvement, matching the performance of existing supervised methods.

SAEs Are Good for Steering – If You Select the Right Features

Large language models (LLMs) have achieved impressive performance across natural language processing (NLP) tasks. As real-world applications increasingly demand longer context windows, continued pretraining and supervised fine-tuning (SFT) on long-context data has become a common approach. While the effects of data length in continued pretraining have been extensively studied, their implications for SFT remain unclear. In this work, we systematically investigate how SFT data length influences LLM behavior on short-context tasks. Counterintuitively, we find that long-context SFT improves short-context performance, contrary to the commonly observed degradation from long-context pretraining. To uncover the underlying mechanisms of this phenomenon, we first decouple and analyze two key components, Multi-Head Attention (MHA) and Feed-Forward Network (FFN), and show that both independently benefit from long-context SFT. We further study their interaction and reveal a knowledge preference bias: long-context SFT promotes contextual knowledge, while short-context SFT favors parametric knowledge, making exclusive reliance on long-context SFT suboptimal. Finally, we demonstrate that hybrid training mitigates this bias, offering explainable guidance for fine-tuning LLMs.

When Long Helps Short: How Context Length in Supervised Fine-tuning Affects Behavior of Large Language Models

Bit-flip errors (BFEs) are hardware faults where individual bits in memory or processing units are unintentionally flipped. These errors pose a significant threat to neural network reliability because even small changes in model parameters can lead to large shifts in outputs. Large language models (LLMs) are particularly vulnerable on resource-constrained or outdated hardware. Such hardware often lacks error-correction mechanisms and faces aging issues, leading to instability under the vast parameter counts and heavy computational loads of LLMs. While the impact of BFEs on traditional networks like CNNs is relatively well-studied, their effect on the complex architecture of transformers remains largely unexplored. Firstly, this paper presents a comprehensive systematic analysis of BFE vulnerabilities in key LLM components, revealing distinct sensitivities across parameters, activations, and gradients during fine-tuning and inference. Secondly, based on our findings, we introduce a novel defense strategy FlipGuard: (i) exponent bit protection, and (ii) a self-correction based fine-tuning mechanism, to address BFE consequences. FlipGuard minimizes performance degradation while significantly enhancing robustness against BFEs. Experiments demonstrate a 9.27 reduction in accuracy drop under 1 BFEs on the SST-2 dataset using BERT, and a 36.35-point improvement in perplexity on the Wikitext-103 dataset using GPT-2, compared to unprotected models. These results show the potential of our approach in enabling reliable LLM deployment on diverse and less reliable hardware platforms.

Bit-Flip Error Resilience in LLMs: A Comprehensive Analysis and Defense Framework

Large Language Models (LLMs) are capable of generating persuasive Natural Language Explanations (NLEs) to justify their answers. However, the faithfulness of these explanations should not be readily trusted at face value. Recent studies have proposed various methods to measure the faithfulness of NLEs, typically by inserting perturbations at the explanation or feature level. We argue that these approaches are neither comprehensive nor correctly designed according to the established definition of faithfulness. Moreover, we highlight the risks of grounding faithfulness findings on out-of-distribution samples. In this work, we leverage a causal mediation technique called activation patching, to measure the faithfulness of an explanation towards supporting the explained answer. Our proposed metric, Causal Faithfulness quantifies the consistency of causal attributions between explanations and the corresponding model outputs as the indicator of faithfulness. We experimented across models varying from 2B to 27B parameters and found that models that underwent alignment-tuning tend to produce more faithful and plausible explanations. We find that Causal Faithfulness is a promising improvement over existing faithfulness tests by taking into account the model’s internal computations and avoiding out-of-distribution concerns that could otherwise undermine the validity of faithfulness assessments.

Towards Faithful Natural Language Explanations: A Study Using Activation Patching in Large Language Models

Sequence classification is essential in NLP for understanding and categorizing language patterns in tasks like sentiment analysis, intent detection, and topic classification. Transformer-based models, despite achieving state-of-the-art performance, have inherent limitations due to quadratic time and memory complexity, restricting their input length. Although extensive efforts have aimed at reducing computational demands, processing extensive contexts remains challenging. To overcome these limitations, we propose ResFormer, a novel neural network architecture designed to model varying context lengths efficiently through a cascaded methodology. ResFormer integrates an reservoir computing network featuring a non-linear readout to effectively capture long-term contextual dependencies in linear time. Concurrently, short-term dependencies within sentences are modeled using a conventional Transformer architecture with fixed-length inputs. Experiments demonstrate that ResFormer significantly outperforms baseline models of DeepSeek-Qwen and ModernBERT, delivering an accuracy improvement of up to +22.3% on the EmoryNLP dataset and consistent gains on MultiWOZ, MELD, and IEMOCAP. In addition, EchoFormer exhibits reduced memory consumption, underscoring its effectiveness and efficiency in modeling extensive contextual information.

ResFormer: All-Time Reservoir Memory for Long Sequence Classification

We investigate how large language models (LLMs) perform latent multi-hop reasoning in prompts like "Wolfgang Amadeus Mozart's mother's spouse is". To analyze this process, we introduce logit flow, an interpretability method that traces how logits propagate across layers and positions toward the final prediction. Using logit flow, we identify four distinct stages in single-hop knowledge prediction: (A) entity subject enrichment, (B) entity attribute extraction, (C) relation subject enrichment, and (D) relation attribute extraction. Extending this analysis to multi-hop reasoning, we find that failures often stem from the relation attribute extraction stage, where conflicting logits reduce prediction accuracy. To address this, we propose back attention, a novel mechanism that enables lower layers to leverage higher-layer hidden states from different positions during attention computation. With back attention, a 1-layer transformer achieves the performance of a 2-layer transformer. Applied to five LLMs, back attention improves accuracy on five reasoning datasets, demonstrating its effectiveness in enhancing latent multi-hop reasoning ability.

Back Attention: Understanding and Enhancing Multi-Hop Reasoning in Large Language Models

Large pre-trained language models have demonstrated impressive capabilities, but there is still much to learn about how they operate. In this study, we conduct an investigation of the autoregressive transformer’s ability to perform basic addition operations. Specifically, by using causal analysis we found that a few different attention heads in the middle layers control the addition carry, with each head processing carries of different lengths. Due to the lack of global focus on the sequence within these attention heads, the model struggles to handle long-sequence addition tasks. By performing inference intervention on mistral-7B, partial task performance can be restored, with the accuracy on 20-digit long-sequence additions from 2% to 38%. Through fine-tuning, a new mechanism branches out for handling complex cases, yet it still faces challenges with length generalization. Our research reveals how the models perform basic arithmetic task, and further provides insights into the debate on whether these models are merely statistical.

How do autoregressive transformers solve full addition?

This paper investigates the enhancement of reasoning capabilities in language models through token-level multi-model collaboration. Our approach selects the optimal tokens from the next token distributions provided by multiple models to perform autoregressive reasoning. Contrary to the assumption that more models yield better results, we introduce a distribution distance-based dynamic selection strategy (DDS) to optimize the multi-model collaboration process. To address the critical challenge of vocabulary misalignment in multi-model collaboration, we propose the concept of minimal complete semantic units (MCSU), which is simple yet enables multiple language models to achieve natural alignment within the linguistic space. Experimental results across various benchmarks demonstrate the superiority of our method. The codes will be released soon.

Dynamic Collaboration of Multi-Language Models based on Minimal Complete Semantic Units

Various studies have attempted to remove sensitive or private knowledge from a language model to prevent its unauthorized exposure. However, prior studies have overlooked the inherent complexity and interconnectedness of knowledge, which requires careful examination. To resolve this problem, we first define a new concept called superficial unlearning, which refers to the phenomenon where an unlearning method either fails to erase the interconnected knowledge it should remove or unintentionally erases irrelevant knowledge. Based on the definition, we introduce a novel benchmark, FaithUn, to analyze and evaluate the faithfulness of unlearning in real-world knowledge QA settings. Furthermore, we propose a novel unlearning method, KLUE, which updates only knowledge-related neurons to achieve faithful unlearning. KLUE leverages a regularized explainability method to localize contextual knowledge neurons, updating only these neurons using carefully selected unforgotten samples. Experimental results demonstrate that existing unlearning methods fail to ensure faithful unlearning, while our method shows significant effectiveness in real-world QA unlearning.

FaithUn: Toward Faithful Forgetting in Language Models by Investigating the Interconnectedness of Knowledge

Despite the remarkable capabilities of large language models, current training paradigms inadvertently foster sycophancy—alignment with user-provided information, regardless of factual accuracy. In this paper, we introduce SMART (Sycophancy Mitigation through Adaptive Reasoning Trajectories), reconceptualizing sycophancy as a reasoning optimization problem rather than an output alignment issue. SMART employs a two-stage approach: (1) Uncertainty-Aware Adaptive Monte Carlo Tree Search (UA-MCTS), which dynamically adjusts exploration based on state-level uncertainty; and (2) progress-based reinforcement learning that distills these improved reasoning patterns into model adaptation. Through extensive experiments, we show that SMART significantly outperforms existing baselines in effectively reducing sycophancy while maintaining performance on out-of-distribution inputs. These findings demonstrate the importance of optimizing internal reasoning processes for developing aligned truthful AI assistant.

Downloads

Next from EMNLP 2025

SAEs Are Good for Steering – If You Select the Right Features

Similar lecture

A Generalizable Rhetorical Strategy Annotation Model Using LLM-based Debate Simulation and Labelling