China

LLMs have shown strong performance on human-centric reasoning tasks. While previous evaluations have explored whether LLMs can infer intentions or detect deception, they often overlook the individualized reasoning styles that influence how people interpret and act in social contexts. Social deduction games (SDGs) provide a natural testbed for evaluating individualized reasoning styles, where different players may adopt diverse but contextually valid reasoning strategies under identical conditions. To address this, we introduce InMind, a cognitively grounded evaluation framework designed to assess whether LLMs can capture and apply personalized reasoning styles in SDGs. InMind enhances structured gameplay data with round-level strategy traces and post-game reflections, collected under both Observer and Participant modes. It supports four cognitively motivated tasks that jointly evaluate both static alignment and dynamic adaptation. As a case study, we apply InMind to the game Avalon, evaluating 11 state-of-the-art LLMs. General-purpose LLMs, even GPT-4o frequently rely on lexical cues, struggling to anchor reflections in temporal gameplay or adapt to evolving strategies. In contrast, reasoning-enhanced LLMs like DeepSeek-R1 exhibit early signs of style-sensitive reasoning. These findings reveal key limitations in current LLMs’ capacity for individualized, adaptive reasoning, and position InMind as a step toward cognitively aligned human–AI interaction.

EMNLP 2025

InMind: Evaluating LLMs in Capturing and Applying Individual Human Reasoning Styles

human–ai interaction

cognitive annotations

individualized reasoning styles

## Welcome!
"I am excited to welcome you to this year’s edition of the Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing! Importantly, it marks the 30th edition of EMNLP. With over 8,000 submissions, more than 3,000 accepted papers, and thousands of attendees, we have come a long way from that first
workshop, which had 14 accepted papers. As the field looks ahead, Suzhou is the fitting location for celebrating this milestone: rooted in a long literary tradition, yet modern and forward-looking, and home to a large share of the NLP community."<br>

*Message from the General Chair, Dirk Hovy*





<br>

Celebrate 30 Years of EMNLP! 
EMNLP 2025 will be held in Suzhou, China from November 5th to November 9th, 2025.

poster

The social impact of Natural Language Processing (NLP) is increasingly important, with a rising community focus on initiatives related to NLP for Social Good (NLP4SG). Indeed, in recent years, almost 20% of all papers in the ACL Anthology address topics related to social good as defined by the UN Sustainable Development Goals (Adauto et al., 2023). In this study we take an author- and venue-level perspective to map the landscape of NLP4SG, quantifying the proportion of work addressing social good concerns both within and beyond the ACL community, by both core ACL contributors and non-ACL authors. With this approach we discover two surprising facts about the landscape of NLP4SG. First, ACL authors are dramatically more likely to do work addressing social good concerns when publishing in venues outside of ACL. Second, the vast majority greater than 80% – of publications using NLP techniques to address concerns of social good are done by non-ACL authors in venues outside of ACL. We discuss the implications of these findings on agenda-setting considerations for the ACL community related to NLP4SG.

Good Intentions Beyond ACL: Who Does NLP for Social Good, and Where?

**Warning: This paper contains content that may involve potentially harmful behaviours, discussed strictly for research purposes.** Jailbreak attacks can hinder the safety of Large Language Model (LLM) applications, especially chatbots. Studying jailbreak techniques is an important AI red teaming task for improving the safety of these applications. In this paper, we introduce TombRaider, a novel jailbreak technique that exploits the ability to store, retrieve, and use historical knowledge of LLMs. TombRaider employs two agents, the inspector agent to extract relevant historical information and the attacker agent to generate adversarial prompts, enabling effective bypassing of safety filters. We intensively evaluated TombRaider on six popular models. Experimental results showed that TombRaider could outperform state-of-the-art jailbreak techniques, achieving nearly 100% attack success rates (ASRs) on bare models and maintaining over 55.4% ASR against defence mechanisms. Our findings highlight critical vulnerabilities in existing LLM safeguards, underscoring the need for more robust safety defences.

TombRaider: Entering the Vault of History to Jailbreak Large Language Models

Large language models (LLMs) can produce fluent but factually incorrect outputs, and has limited ability to attribute their claims to source material. This undermines their reliability, particularly in multi-hop and high-stakes domains such as medicine. We propose Tree-of-Quote (ToQ) prompting, a structured framework that decomposes complex questions into subquestions, generates quotes to support each step, and selectively advances reasoning based on quote quality. We also introduce FQ-Score, a unified metric that captures answer correctness, attribution fidelity, and reasoning quality. Experiments on StrategyQA, 2WikiMultiHopQA, MuSiQue, MoreHopQA, and MedQA demonstrate that ToQ improves factuality and attribution over standard prompting baselines. To validate FQ-Score as a proxy for human judgment, we conduct two reader studies with clinicians on medical questions, and observe strong correlations. Both clinician scores and FQ-Scores also indicate a preference for ToQ over baselines due to a combination of greater correctness, completeness, and logical flow. Our results suggest ToQ is a promising approach for building more trustworthy and auditable LLM systems. Code to run ToQ, FQ-Score, and prompt templates will be made available on GitHub.

Tree-of-Quote Prompting Improves Factuality and Attribution in Multi-Hop and Medical Reasoning

Misinformation spans various domains, but detection methods trained on specific domains often perform poorly when applied to others. With the rapid development of Large Language Models (LLMs), researchers have begun to utilize LLMs for cross-domain misinformation detection. However, existing LLM-based methods often fail to adequately analyze news in the target domain, limiting their detection capabilities. More importantly, these methods typically rely on manually designed decision rules, which are limited by domain knowledge and expert experience, thus limiting the generalizability of decision rules to different domains. To address these issues, we propose a Multi-Agent Framework for cross-domain misinformation detection with Automated Decision Rule Optimization (MARO). Under this framework, we first employs multiple expert agents to analyze target-domain news. Subsequently, we introduce a question-reflection mechanism that guides expert agents to facilitate higher-quality analysis. Furthermore, we propose a decision rule optimization approach based on carefully designed cross-domain validation tasks to iteratively enhance decision rule effectiveness across domains. Experimental results and analysis on commonly used datasets demonstrate that MARO achieves significant improvements over existing methods.

A Multi-Agent Framework with Automated Decision Rule Optimization for Cross-Domain Misinformation Detection

The rapid advancement of large language models has intensified public concerns about the potential misuse. Therefore, it is important to build trustworthy AI-generated text detection systems. Existing methods neglect stylistic modeling and mostly rely on static thresholds, which greatly limits the detection performance. In this paper, we propose the Mixture of Stylistic Experts (MoSEs) framework that enables stylistics-aware uncertainty quantification through conditional threshold estimation. MoSEs contain three core components, namely, the Stylistics Reference Repository (SRR), the Stylistics-Aware Router (SAR), and the Conditional Threshold Estimator (CTE). For input text, SRR can activate the appropriate reference data in SRR and provide them to CTE. Subsequently, CTE jointly models the linguistic statistical properties and semantic features to dynamically determine the optimal threshold. With a discrimination score, MoSEs yields prediction labels with the corresponding confidence level. Our framework achieves an average improvement 11.34% in detection performance compared to baselines. More inspiringly, MoSEs shows a more evident improvement 39.15% in the low-resource case.

MoSEs: Uncertainty-Aware AI-Generated Text Detection via Mixture of Stylistics Experts with Conditional Thresholds

Eliminating toxicity from Large Language Models (LLMs) is crucial for ensuring user safety. However, current methods have limitations in the analysis and utilization of toxic samples, failing to fully harness their potential. Through comparative analysis of toxic and safe samples, we discover that toxic samples exhibit diversity and, within this diversity, there lies specificity. These findings suggest that leveraging these characteristics of toxic samples could enhance the performance of algorithms in detoxifying LLMs. To this end, we propose a novel diverse detoxification framework, DivDetox, which comprises two innovative components: a Multi-Category-Induced Personalized Sample Generation (MPSG) strategy and a Scaled Contrastive DPO (SC-DPO) approach. The former is designed to elicit a variety of personalized toxic responses from the LLM, while the latter is constructed to precisely and fully utilize these toxic responses. Experiments on benchmark datasets across different model scales and different detoxification tasks verify the effectiveness of our architecture.

Detoxifying Large Language Models via the Diversity of Toxic Samples

Large language models (LLMs) can rewrite the N-best hypotheses from a speech-to-text model, often fixing recognition or translation errors that traditional rescoring cannot. Yet research on generative error correction (GER) has been focusing on monolingual automatic speech recognition (ASR), leaving its multilingual and multitask potential underexplored. We introduce CoVoGER, a benchmark for GER that covers both ASR and speech-to-text translation (ST) across 15 languages and 28 language pairs. CoVoGER is constructed by decoding Common Voice~20.0 and CoVoST-2 with Whisper of three model sizes and SeamlessM4T of two model sizes, providing 5-best lists obtained via a mixture of beam search and temperature sampling. We evaluated various instruction-tuned LLMs, including commercial models in zero-shot mode and open-sourced models with LoRA fine-tuning, and found that the mixture decoding strategy yields the best GER performance in most settings. CoVoGER will be released to promote research on reliable language-universal speech-to-text GER.

CoVoGER: A Multilingual Multitask Benchmark for Speech-to-text Generative Error Correction with Large Language Models

Legal judgment prediction (LJP), which enables litigants and their lawyers to forecast judgment outcomes and refine litigation strategies, has emerged as a crucial legal NLP task. Existing studies typically utilize legal facts, i.e., facts that have been established by evidence and determined by the judge, to predict the judgment. However, legal facts are often difficult to obtain in the early stages of litigation, significantly limiting the practical applicability of fact-based LJP. To address this limitation, we propose a novel legal NLP task: \textit{legal fact prediction} (LFP), which takes the evidence submitted by litigants for trial as input to predict legal facts, thereby empowering fact-based LJP technologies to perform prediction in the absence of ground-truth legal facts. We also propose the first benchmark dataset, LFPBench, for evaluating the LFP task. Our extensive experiments on LFPBench demonstrate the effectiveness of LFP-empowered LJP and highlight promising research directions for LFP.

Legal Fact Prediction: The Missing Piece in Legal Judgment Prediction

Large Language Models (LLMs) are known to lack cultural representation and overall diversity in their generations, from expressing opinions to answering factual questions. To mitigate this problem, we propose multilingual prompting: a prompting method which generates several variations of a base prompt with added cultural and linguistic cues from several cultures, generates responses, and then combines the results. Building on evidence that LLMs have language-specific knowledge, multilingual prompting seeks to increase diversity by activating a broader range of cultural knowledge embedded in model training data. Through experiments across multiple models (GPT-4o, GPT-4o-mini, LLaMA 70B, and LLaMA 8B), we show that multilingual prompting consistently outperforms existing diversity-enhancing techniques such as high-temperature sampling, step-by-step recall, and personas prompting. Further analyses show that the benefits of multilingual prompting vary with language resource level and model size, and that aligning the prompting language with the cultural cues reduces hallucination about culturally-specific information.

Multilingual Prompting for Improving LLM Generation Diversity

Large Language Models often generate factually incorrect or outdated knowledge, prompting the emergence of model editing methods for precise knowledge updates. However, current mainstream locate-then-edit approaches exhibit a progressive performance decline during sequential editing, due to inadequate mechanisms for long-term knowledge preservation. To tackle this, we formulate the sequential editing problem as a constrained stochastic programming. Given the challenges posed by cumulative preservation error constraints and the gradually revealed editing tasks, we propose \textbf{LyapLock}. It integrates queuing theory and Lyapunov optimization to decompose the long-term constrained programming into tractable stepwise subproblems for efficient solving. This represents the first model editing framework with rigorous theoretical guarantees that maintains long-term knowledge preservation constraints while achieving asymptotically optimal editing performance. Experimental results show that our framework scales sequential editing capacity to 10,000 edits while stabilizing general capabilities and boosting average editing efficacy by 11.89% over SOTA baselines. Our code is released on https://anonymous.4open.science/r/LyapLock-7AC7.

Downloads

Next from EMNLP 2025

Good Intentions Beyond ACL: Who Does NLP for Social Good, and Where?

Similar lecture

Dissecting Logical Reasoning in LLMs: A Fine-Grained Evaluation and Supervision Study