2025 AMA Research Challenge – Member Premier Access

October 22, 2025

Virtual only, United States

Would you like to see your presentation here, made available to a global audience of researchers?
Add your own presentation or have us affordably record your next conference.

Background Intravitreal anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) therapy is widely used to treat diabetic eye disease (DED), yet systemic VEGF suppression may impair peripheral wound healing. The association between anti-VEGF treatment and risk of diabetic foot ulcers (DFUs) and lower extremity amputations (LEAs) remains unclear. We seeked to evaluate the risk of DFUs and LEAs associated with intravitreal anti-VEGF injections (IVI) in patients with DED and to compare risks among ranibizumab, aflibercept, and bevacizumab. Methods We conducted a retrospective cohort study (April 2005 - April 2025) using a multicenter, population-based electronic health records network encompassing over 120 million individuals from 71 United States healthcare organizations. Adults (≥18 years) diagnosed with DED (diabetic retinopathy or diabetic macular edema) who received ≥3 IVI were compared to those who received ≤2 injections (control group) during the study period, since prior evidence demonstrated systemic suppression of plasma VEGF levels following three monthly intravitreal injections. The exposure was IVI (ranibizumab, aflibercept, or bevacizumab). Main outcome measures included incidence of any LEAs, above-ankle LEAs, and DFUs following incident DED diagnosis. Propensity score matching (1:1) was applied to balance baseline characteristics between groups. Cox proportional hazards analyses were used to estimate hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) in the full cohort and among high-risk subgroups with proliferative diabetic retinopathy (PDR), peripheral artery disease (PAD), end-stage renal disease (ESRD), or DFUs. Results Of 448,100 patients with DED, 35,269 received ≥3 injections and 412,831 received ≤2 injections. After matching, 34,070 patients remained in each group. IVI cohort was associated with increased risk of LEA (HR 1.54, 95% CI 1.38–1.72), above-ankle LEA (HR 1.31, 95% CI 1.08–1.59), and DFU (HR 1.36, 95% CI 1.30–1.42) compared with the control group. In high-risk subgroups, IVI was associated with increased risk of LEA in patients with PDR (HR 1.44, 95% CI 1.27-1.62), PAD (HR 1.35, 95% CI 1.12–1.56), ESRD (HR 2.06, 95% CI 1.28–3.31), and DFU (HR 1.46, 95% CI 1.22–1.75). Risks were similar across anti-VEGF agents. Conclusion IVI therapy for DED was associated with increased risk of LEA, particularly with comorbid PDR, PAD, ESRD, or DFUs. These findings highlight the importance of monitoring for limb complications in patients undergoing intravitreal anti-VEGF treatment.

Next from 2025 AMA Research Challenge – Member Premier Access

Diagnostic and Therapeutic Benefits of POCUS in Assessing Musculoskeletal Pain in Primary Care Settings

Diagnostic and Therapeutic Benefits of POCUS in Assessing Musculoskeletal Pain in Primary Care Settings

2025 AMA Research Challenge – Member Premier Access

Becky Ma

22 October 2025