2025 AMA Research Challenge – Member Premier Access

October 22, 2025

Virtual only, United States

Would you like to see your presentation here, made available to a global audience of researchers?
Add your own presentation or have us affordably record your next conference.

Background Pediatric atopic dermatitis (AD) has been linked to later metabolic dysfunction, including obesity, dyslipidemia, etc. Systemic type-2-cytokine blockade with dupilumab may confer long-term protective metabolic effects in AD patients, but longitudinal studies in children receiving modern biologic therapy compared to topicals remain scarce. We compare short and long-term incidences of 23 metabolic disorders in pediatric AD managed with dupilumab, high-potency corticosteroids (HPCS), low/medium-potency corticosteroids (LMCS), topical calcineurin inhibitors (TCI), targeted non-steroidal topicals (crisaborole or ruxolitinib), or no therapy.

Methods We queried the TriNetX Global Network for patients <18 years carrying ICD-10 code L20 for AD. The index date was the first prescription or AD-related encounter, and baseline was the 12 months prior. Cohort sizes were: dupilumab 12,871; untreated 144,655; HPCS 45,992; LMCS 514,970; TCI 40,814; targeted topicals 9,408; any topical 634,356. Each comparator was 1:1 propensity-score matched to the dupilumab cohort on age, sex, race/ethnicity, and baseline metabolic diagnoses. All standardized mean differences were <0.01.

Outcomes were assessed at 6 months, 1, 3, and 5 years, and any time after index. Logistic regression provided odds ratios (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI); Kaplan-Meier curves, log-rank tests, and proportional-hazards diagnostics provided time-to-event differences. Two-sided p<.05 signified significance. Analyses were conducted in R 4.3 and TriNetX; de-identified data rendered our study IRB-exempt.

Results Within 1 year of treatment-onset, dupilumab showed numerically higher—but frequently non-significant odds for metabolic dysfunction compared with topicals (e.g., overweight/obesity OR 1.225, 95% CI 0.857-1.751 at 6 months vs TCI).

However, ~30 months post-index, Kaplan-Meier curves diverged; dupilumab seemed to confer a protective metabolic effect versus all comparators. By 5 years, dupilumab exhibited lower risk for nearly all metabolic outcomes. Versus the aggregated topical cohort, for example, 5-year ORs were 0.417 for overweight/obesity, 0.435 for dyslipidemia, 0.605 for elevated glucose, and 0.554 for acanthosis nigricans (all p<.001). This protective association continued beyond 5 years.

Protective associations were similar against HPCS, LMCS, and TCI, and modestly attenuated against targeted non-steroidal topicals. No comparator showed excess late metabolic risk relative to dupilumab.

Conclusion Our analysis with this large real-world pediatric cohort suggests dupilumab may increase early metabolic dysfunction (frequently without statistical significance), while conferring pronounced long-term protective metabolic effects compared with topical-only management or no therapy, supporting the hypothesis that sustained interleukin-4/13 inhibition may favorably alter metabolic risk trajectories in pediatric AD. Prospective studies adjusting for disease severity and further mechanistic studies may help confirm this causality and elucidate the underlying mechanisms.

Next from 2025 AMA Research Challenge – Member Premier Access

Anatomical Risk Mapping of Peripheral Nerves in Acupuncture via Ultrasound

Anatomical Risk Mapping of Peripheral Nerves in Acupuncture via Ultrasound

2025 AMA Research Challenge – Member Premier Access

Michael O'Connell

22 October 2025