Would you like to see your presentation here, made available to a global audience of researchers?
Add your own presentation or have us affordably record your next conference.
Background: Lipid profiles (LP) are commonly used to assess cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk, yet they do not differentiate between LDL subtypes. Lipoprotein(a) Lp(a) is a highly atherogenic LDL variant with pro-inflammatory and pro-thrombotic properties that significantly contribute to atherosclerosis and vascular inflammation. Despite its clinical relevance, Lp(a) is frequently overlooked, and its elevated levels—present in 20–30% of the population—pose an independent risk for CVD, even when LDL-C is within normal ranges. The underutilization of Lp(a) testing may contribute to missed opportunities for early risk stratification. This study examines the utility of integrating Lp(a) testing into routine cardiovascular risk assessments, particularly for certain at-risk populations. It evaluates the frequency of physician-ordered Lp(a) testing, the prevalence of elevated Lp(a) levels, and its implications for otherwise healthy individuals. Methods: A systematic literature review of various study types was conducted to assess research on Lp(a) testing patterns, prevalence, and its association with CVD risk. PubMed, Google Scholar, and OpenEvidence were utilized. Keywords used in the search included “Lipoprotein(a),” “cardiovascular risk,” “CVD biomarkers,” and “ordering pattern.” Studies not focused primarily on Lp(a) were excluded. Results: One study found that only 1% of patients in a large northern California health system underwent Lp(a) testing between 2010 and 2021, while another reported that just 31% of physicians routinely assessed Lp(a) levels. Elevated Lp(a) was observed in 20–30% of individuals, and even among those with LDL-C <100 mg/dL, Lp(a) levels >50 mg/dL were associated with increased atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) risk. A key limitation of this study is the lack of consideration for the cost of Lp(a) testing, which may impact physician ordering patterns and accessibility for patients. Conclusion: Standard LDL-C evaluation alone may be insufficient for comprehensive CVD risk assessment. Given the strong association between elevated Lp(a) and CVD, routine testing in at-risk populations is warranted to improve early detection and intervention strategies.