United States

Purpose:
KCC2, part of the SLC12 family of proteins, is a potassium-chloride cotransporter essential for neuronal function by regulating GABA signaling through chloride gradients. Recent studies suggest that downregulation of KCC2 may contribute to symptoms observed in opioid use disorder (OUD) which sees hyperpolarization of the postsynaptic cleft. While the idea of increasing chloride flux via KCC2 to stabilize the concentration gradient serves as a promising therapeutic target, few small-molecule agonists targeting KCC2 have been identified, and no definitive binding sites have been characterized. This study employs a machine-learning approach to build a model KCC2 protein, identify its possible active sites, and quantitatively characterize the intermolecular interactions with a library of ligands.

Methods:
An in-silico model of KCC2 was generated using published cryo-EM structural data from the RCSB Protein Data Bank. The protein surface was analyzed for potential active sites by evaluating parameters such as size, depth, hydrophobicity, and capacity for intermolecular interactions, including hydrogen bonding and Van der Waals forces. Ligand models for experimental agonists and FDA-approved negative controls were prepared, forming a small-molecule library. This library was screened against the identified binding sites using a rigid docking protocol. Ligand interactions were scored based on parameters including Van der Waals energy, Coulomb energy, hydrophobicity, and hydrogen bonding potential.

Results:
Surface analysis revealed nine potential active sites on KCC2 with SiteScores ranging from 0.895 to 0.979, indicating high reliability in distinguishing drug-binding regions. The highest-scoring site was located in the transmembrane domain encompassing SER896-PHE1090. Common key residue interactions among all agonist candidates involved HIE1051 (Pi-Pi stacking), ASN1086 (hydrogen bonding), and PHE1090 (Pi-Pi stacking). Agonist candidates averaged a more energetically favorable docking score of -4.5228, compared to -3.6087 seen with negative controls, supporting the increased specificity of these binding sites.

Conclusion:
While these findings are promising, it is noted that the docking scores for our library of ligand candidates are not as highly scored as other protein:ligand interactions (ibuprofen covalent binding to cyclooxygenase-2 results in a docking score of -10.3 using the same experimental parameters). Finally, we acknowledge the need for binding and functional assays need to be performed to validate on-target protein:ligand activity. Overall, these findings provide insights for the rational design of novel KCC2-targeted therapeutics, offering avenues for developing treatments optimized for increasing KCC2 activity, and consequently, symptoms associated with OUD.

AMA Research Challenge 2025 

Machine-Learning-Assisted KCC2 Protein Modeling and Small Molecule Drug Screening for the Rational Design of Therapeutics Against Opioid Use Disorder

Colleagues and Friends:

I am very happy to welcome you to the 14th annual Canadian Neuroscience Meeting, and to the first virtual edition of our meeting. I want to highlight the important work the CAN meeting chair, **Roger Thompson** and co-chair, **Alyson Fournier**, did to put together the great program we are offering this year. Moving to a virtual format required a complete re-design of the program, and both Roger and Alyson did a splendid job in providing us with an appealing and well adapted program for our first virtual event. I wish to thank them for this very important effort.

Highlights of this year’s scientific meeting include invited speakers **Michael Hausser, Franck Polleux, Gwyneth Card, Magdalena Götz**and Brain Prize winner **Huda Zoghbi**. Plenary and parallel symposia, proposed by our members complete our diverse [scientific program.](https://can-acn.org/meeting-2021/program-2021/)

The 2021 Advocacy session, chaired and organized by CAN advocacy committee chair **Karun Singh**, will feature a special lecture and question period with Member of Parliament and past Science Minister **Kirsty Duncan**. This will be followed by a short overview of CAN’s advocacy activities over the last year. We invite you to participate in this session for insight from Dr. Duncan on the workings of Parliament Hill, and to learn more about what CAN has been doing to promote neuroscience research in Canada.

We are also excited to host **Lisa Willis** in the Equity Diversity and Inclusion session, organized by EDI committee chair **Jibran Khokhar**.

A special highlight of our meeting will be the lectures by award-winning young neuroscientists. We are please to host the CAN 2020 Young Investigator Award winner **Mihaela Iordanova**, and CAN 2021 Young Investigator Award winners **Aaron Phillips** and **Tabrez Siddiqui**. Highlights will also include presentation by the top three winners of the CAN-CIHR-INMHA Brain Star Award winners, **Claire Gizowski, Nuria Daviu Abant** and **Lukas Tamayo-Orrego**.

Independently organized satellite symposia complement and complete this exciting program, check them out here: https://can-acn.org/meeting-2021/2021-satellite-symposia/

Some of the most engaging sessions are always the poster sessions featuring the work of our trainees, so make sure to log in to Gather Town during the poster sessions to chat with the presenters.
We hope you enjoy this program, and look forward to welcoming you, virtually.

Shernaz Bamji

President of the Canadian Association for Neuroscience

![](https://assets.underline.io/uploads/markdown_image/1/image/b9aea25343a87d5aac3b9367dc780974.jpg)



Please head to https://can-acn.org/meeting-2021/registration-2021/ to register. 

CAN-ACN 2021

14th Canadian Neuroscience Meeting from August 23rd-25th

poster

Congratulations to all the researchers who have qualified for the AMA Research Challenge virtual poster symposium and semifinals!

Welcome to the **largest national, multi-specialty research event** featuring research from nearly 1,000 medical students, residents, fellows, and international medical graduates across six topic areas - basic science, clinical and translational research, clinical vignettes, health systems science, medical education, and public health and health policy.

#### Access the Event
Use the buttons below or navigation menu to access the event. 

[![](https://assets.underline.io/markdown_image/1/image/d4076f2146939317a29eb9f69c53ad41.png)](https://underline.io/events/506/sessions?searchGroup=all)
[![](https://assets.underline.io/markdown_image/1/image/6bcee0b523a4874c4292ca0415d88dde.png)](https://underline.io/events/506/posters?searchGroup=all)

#### Event Details
The 2025 AMA Research Challenge includes the following symposium halls:
* **Semifinals hall:** Features research from 54 medical students, residents and international medical graduates that received top scores during first round scoring. 
* **Poster symposium hall:** Features research from nearly 1,000 medical students, residents and international medical graduates categorized by topics and subtopics.

**Here’s how to participate:**
* **View posters and presentations** on a variety of topics and specialties
* **Score posters in the semifinals** to help decide the top five finalists (AMA member exclusive opportunity)
* **Connect with presenters** and provide feedback to help advance their research
* **New this year: Watch live poster presentations** by topic area and engage directly with researchers

At the conclusion of this event, the AMA announced the top five finalists who advanced to the AMA Research Challenge final round, presented their research to an elite panel of judges, and competed to win a $10,000 grand prize presented by Laurel Road.

**Addison Shenk, a fourth-year medical student from Edward Via Virginia College of Osteopathic Medicine, was the winner of the 2025 AMA Research Challenge and was awarded the grand prize of $10,000, presented by Laurel Road.**

#### A message from Dr. Bobby Mukkamala, AMA President
<div style="position: relative; width: 100%; padding-bottom: 56.25%; height: 0; overflow: hidden;">
  <iframe 
    src="https://underline.io/embed/136894-ama-video?t=0"
    title="AMA Welcome Video"
    allowfullscreen
    style="position: absolute; top: 0; left: 0; width: 100%; height: 100%; border: 0;">
  </iframe>
</div>


#### Recognized Institutions
In 2025, 1,400 abstracts were submitted across six topic areas representing 174 medical schools and more than 150 residency and health care institutions. [See if your institution is represented this year!](https://drive.google.com/file/d/1eFrTqCmCeobx9pr5drJK2hllvsIpFNOY/view?usp=drive_link)

#### Grand Prize Sponsor
AMA would like to thank Laurel Road, a brand of KeyBank, for sponsoring a $10,000 grand prize for the winner of the AMA Research Challenge. Laurel Road and KeyBank are not involved in winner selection process. The winner will be announced during the AMA Research Challenge final round. Payment of the grand prize will be directly from Laurel Road/KeyBank. See the [AMA Research Challenge Official Rules for terms and conditions](https://www.ama-assn.org/system/files/research-challenge-official-rules.pdf).

[![](https://assets.underline.io/uploads/markdown_image/1/image/611e331d4a0eba0920f240cfc04b4d77.png)](https://www.laurelroad.com/)

#### Code of Conduct
<html>
AMA has a code of conduct for its meetings – we ask all attendees to adhere to this code to participate in this year’s meeting. Please read and <a href="https://www.ama-assn.org/about/code-conduct" target="_blank">learn more here</a> about your conduct requirements.
<br><br>
	</html>
	

#### Semifinals Judges

You need to log in with the email address you registered with. Access credentials have been sent to your email. 

Please be sure to check your spam and other email folders if you do not see an email confirmation right away.

Need help? Contact us at <support@underline.io>.

Please log in to explore this event.

If you have used the AMA Research Challenge platform previously, please click the ‘Log-in’ button below. If you do not remember your password, please click “forgot password” and follow prompts to reset your password. After resetting your password, please refresh your webpage to access the platform. 

Register to explore research in a variety of topics. AMA members get exclusive access to score posters in the semifinals. 

**Please use [this link here](https://www.ama-assn.org/member-benefits/events/ama-research-challenge) to register for free. **

Registration Is Required

Join the AMA Research Challenge poster symposium and semifinals to explore top research posters and score posters in the semifinals (an AMA member exclusive opportunity).

Abstract Title
Age, Biological Sex, and Supine Blood Pressure
Background
Blood pressure is a prevalent modifiable risk factor for cardiovascular disease (CVD) and increases with age. Compared with traditional seated brachial blood pressure (BP), supine BP (brachial and aortic) has a greater association with CVD outcomes. However, the significance of biological sex on age-related supine BP is unknown. We hypothesize the relationship between age and supine BP will be sex specific.
Methods
A sample of 316 apparently healthy adults (165 Females, range: 20-84 years; 151 Males, range: 20-87 years) was used to assess the association of biological sex with supine BP. Data were analyzed using bivariate correlations between age and supine brachial and central (aortic) BP. Partial correlations were used to adjust for traditional risk factors (total cholesterol, low-density lipoprotein [LDL], high-density lipoprotein [HDL], triglycerides, and blood glucose), body composition (body mass index [BMI], waist circumference), and vascular endpoints (augmentation index (AIx), AIx at heart rate 75, carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity (cfPWV)). Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) was used to compare group mean differences amongst young (18-44 yr), middle age (45-65 yr), and older (65+ yr) females and males.
Results
A positive correlation for age and supine brachial systolic BP (bSBP) and central SBP (cSBP) was identified in females (bSBP, r =.468; cSBP, r =.571, p<.05) and males (bSBP, r =.317; cSBP, r =.577, p<.05). Age remained correlated with supine bSBP and cSBP in females (bSBP, r =.166; cSBP, r =.174, p<.05), but not males (bSBP, r =.067; cSBP, r =.128, p>.05) after adjusting for traditional risk factors, body composition, and vascular endpoints. Supine bSBP of young females (117 ± 2 mmHg) was lower than middle-aged (125 ± 2 mmHg) and older (138 ± 2.8 mmHg) females (p<.05), and young males (126 ± 1 mmHg) was lower than older males (136 ± 2 mmHg, p<.05). Supine bSBP in young females was lower than in young males (p<.05), but not between older females and males (p>.05). A main effect of age (p<.05) was observed with supine cSBP.
Conclusion
Supine brachial and central BP are related to age in females independent of traditional CVD risk factors, but not males. Therefore, utilizing supine blood pressure may provide additional insight for CVD risk assessment in females.

Age, Biologic Sex, and Supine Blood Pressure

Background
Cholangiocarcinoma, a rare but deadly cancer of the bile ducts, has a low incidence in the US, 1.26 cases per 100,000 annually. Often diagnosed at an advanced stage, the median survival of 6 to 7 months may improve with early detection by screening. Our collaborators, van Haag, et al. applied machine learning to UK Biobank data to design a risk assessment score. This “TOP5” model utilizes the 5 most associated factors of cholangiocarcinoma (age, elevated GGT, complications of cirrhosis, cholangitis, and bile duct obstruction) to identify at-risk individuals and improve prognosis. We aimed to utilize TriNetX, an ultra-large scale clinical database, to externally verify this screening tool and evaluate its predictive value.

Methods
TriNetX contains electronic health records from over 150 million de-identified patients. Using GGT values and ICD codes for TOP5 criteria (incorporating age into subsequent analysis), we created three cohorts of interest: a “healthy” population of patients with no identified risk factors for cholangiocarcinoma; an “at-risk” population with at least one general risk factor, but none of the TOP5; and a cohort with one general risk factor plus two of the TOP5 criteria, an elevated GGT lab value plus another, named “GGT +1” cohort. Patients with pancreatic cancer were excluded due to errors in diagnostic overlap with cholangiocarcinoma. Propensity score matching was utilized to reduce the influence of other identified covariates: demographics, BMI, diabetes, etc. Cholangiocarcinoma (ICD: C22.1, C24) must have occurred at least 1 year after the index event, to exclude non-detected cancer at enrollment.

Results
In females, 200 outcomes occurred among ~73,000 “GGT +1” patients, 37 in ~75,000 “at risk,” and ≤10 in ~75,000 “healthy.” In males, 312 outcomes were observed in ~74,000 “GGT +1,” 66 in ~77,000 “at risk,” and ≤10 in ~80,000 “healthy.”
Compared to the “healthy” cohort, “GGT +1” hazard ratios (HR) were 77.1 (95% CI: 24.7-241.2) for females and 95.1 (35.5-255.1) for males. Compared to the “at risk” group, “GGT+1” HRs were 7.6 (5.3-10.7) for females and 6.5 (5.0-8.5) for males.

Conclusion
The GGT +1 group demonstrated a higher incidence of cholangiocarcinoma compared to at-risk and healthy populations. Analyses revealed strong associations, evidenced by high hazard ratios, suggesting the predictive utility of the TOP5 model as a screening tool. Future directions include applying the model to prospectively collected data to further validate predictive performance. This study, limited by reliance on ICD-based data, may prove unreliable from incorrect charting.

Cholangiocarcinoma Risk in a Real-World Population: Validation of a TOP5 Model Derivative

Background: Group A Streptococcal (GAS) pharyngitis is a common cause of sore throat, but complications like post-streptococcal reactive arthritis (PSRA) are less frequently recognized, particularly in adults with atypical presentations. PSRA typically presents with early-onset, nonmigratory joint pain and limited response to NSAIDs. This case highlights an atypical presentation of PSRA in a young adult, emphasizing the difficulty in diagnosing this condition.

Case Presentation: A 28-year-old female who presented with a sore throat, non-pruritic rash, dysuria, and acute left ankle pain that impaired weight-bearing. Initial rapid strep and mononucleosis tests were negative, and she was prescribed cephalexin. The following day, she returned with worsening joint pain and persistent dysuria; a repeat rapid strep test was positive, and treatment was switched to amoxicillin-clavulanate and topical NSAIDs. Laboratory results revealed elevated inflammatory markers (ESR 51 mm/hr, CRP 36 mg/L), normal ASO titer, low MCH/MCHC, mildly elevated TSH, and negative autoimmune and STI panels. Follow-up bloodwork six weeks later showed resolution of TSH without intervention, new-onset normocytic anemia, and vitamin D insufficiency.

Discussion: This case illustrates an atypical manifestation of PSRA in an adult: afebrile, initially false-negative for GAS, and presenting with monoarticular arthritis and dysuria in the absence of urinary infection. The diagnostic course was further complicated by the normal ASO titer and the evolving lab profile. This report underscores the limitations of current diagnostic tools such as RADTs and ASO in identifying streptococcal complications in non-classic cases. Clinical judgment, repeat testing, and ongoing assessment played a critical role in this patient’s care. This case underscores the limitations of current diagnostic tools and highlights the need for improved diagnostic strategies and follow-up in adult patients with evolving symptoms and initial negative testing.


A Diagnostic Challenge: Atypical Streptococcal Infection with Monoarticular Arthritis and Dysuria

Background
Iododerma is a rare cutaneous condition that results from exposure to high levels of iodine, often from imaging contrast, medications like amiodarone, or topical antiseptics. Its nonspecific clinical presentation and histological resemblance to infectious conditions make for a challenging diagnosis.

Case Presentation
A 64-year-old female with multiple chronic conditions, including stage 4 CKD, atrial fibrillation, and HFpEF, was admitted for right lower lobe pneumonia and underwent contrast-enhanced CT imaging. She subsequently developed multiple painful, non-pruritic, purpuric skin lesions, initially appearing on her left arm and later spreading to both upper extremities over 4 days. She was transferred to SLU for rheumatology and dermatology evaluation due to concern for vasculitis. Physical exam revealed purpuric skin lesions, erosions, crusting, and scattered bruising on both forearms and the right posterior arm. Based on this presentation, the initial differentials included several neutrophilic dermatoses, such as Sweet’s syndrome and EED, vasculitis, and deep fungal or atypical mycobacterial infections. The workup included a shave biopsy of lesions from the right posterior upper arm and punch biopsies of lesions from bilateral anterior forearms. Skin biopsies revealed ulceration, necrosis, acanthosis, and dense dermal neutrophilic infiltrates with vacuole-like structures resembling Cryptococcus. However, GMS, tissue Gram, and Fite stains all returned negative. An iodine level was also obtained and returned significantly elevated at 10,074.4 micrograms per liter. In the context of her recent contrast exposure and histological findings, her elevated iodine levels supported the diagnosis of iododerma. The patient was treated with a 30-day course of oral prednisone. There has been no recurrence of the skin lesions after discontinuation of the prednisone.

Discussion
Iododerma can present a diagnostic challenge due to its rarity and histopathological features resembling Cryptococcoid-like structures pointing towards infectious dermatoses. In this case, the clinical picture and histology initially suggested a fungal infection, but negative stains and a history of recent iodine exposure helped guide the diagnostic process towards iododerma. Ultimately, iododerma is a diagnosis of exclusion that requires careful integration of clinical history, histopathological examinations, and other lab testing. Early corticosteroid treatment is the recommended treatment and can lead to favorable outcomes.

Iododerma Mimicking Cryptococcoid Neutrophilic Dermatosis

Background 
Euglycemic diabetic ketoacidosis (DKA) is a unique variant of diabetic ketoacidosis that presents in patients with normal or mildly elevated blood glucose levels, defined as a serum glucose concentration < 250 mg/dL. As euglycemic DKA has an association with newer diabetes treatments, it becomes increasingly important for clinicians to develop an awareness and further recognize its presentation to prevent serious complications and adverse patient outcomes. 
Case Presentation 
A 61-year-old female with type II diabetes and coronary artery disease presented to the emergency department with chest pain, fatigue, and a bilateral upper extremity rash that had worsened over two days. She was afebrile and hemodynamically stable. EKG and troponins were normal. Physical exam was unremarkable except for a bilateral urticarial rash extending from the hands to the forearms. Her initial labs showed a high anion gap metabolic acidosis (bicarbonate 12 mmol/L, anion gap 19 mmol/L) with a glucose of 164 mg/dL. CBC was normal. She was treated with hydroxyzine, methylprednisolone, and famotidine. 
Overnight, her symptoms improved, but her morning labs showed persistent acidosis (anion gap 17 mmol/L, bicarbonate 16 mmol/L) and a glucose of 229 mg/dL. Ketones were 1.49 mmol/L, and venous blood gas revealed pH 7.2, pCO₂ 38 mmHg, HCO₃ 16.7 mmol/L. A diagnosis of euglycemic DKA was made, likely triggered by her use of Dapagliflozin. She was treated with IV insulin, D5W fluids, and discontinuation of her SGLT-2 inhibitor. Her condition stabilized, and she was discharged after three days. 
Discussion 
Despite normal glucose levels, patients with euglycemic DKA exhibit typical DKA features: metabolic acidosis, ketonemia, and an elevated anion gap. The diagnosis is often missed due to the absence of significant hyperglycemia. While traditionally associated with type I diabetes, euglycemic DKA also occurs in type II diabetes, particularly in patients on SGLT-2 inhibitors or those with precipitating factors such as fasting. The mechanism involves insulin deficiency and elevated counterregulatory hormones, leading to increased lipolysis and ketogenesis. Concurrent glycosuria induced by SGLT-2 inhibitors contributes to the misleading euglycemia. 
Symptoms typically include nausea, vomiting, abdominal pain, and general malaise. Treatment consists of IV fluids, insulin, and electrolyte management, with close monitoring of the patient’s clinical and laboratory status. 


Unmasking the Hidden Culprit: A Presentation of Euglycemic DKA

Background:
Chronic subdural hematoma (CSDH) is a common condition in the elderly, often resulting from minor head trauma. While surgical evacuation remains the standard treatment, recurrence rates up to 20% have driven interest in middle meningeal artery (MMA) embolization as a minimally invasive alternative. By targeting the MMA’s role in supplying the neo-membranes associated with CSDH, embolization interrupts the cycle of hemorrhage and inflammation. Although MMA embolization is generally safe, rare complications may occur, including contrast-induced neurotoxicity (CIN), a transient neurological syndrome that arises after iodinated contrast exposure, once other causes have been excluded.

Case Presentation:
An 82-year-old female with a history of hypertension, hyperlipidemia, and ovarian cancer presented with progressive bifrontal headache two months after a fall. Neurological examination was non-focal. Non-contrast head computed tomography (CT) revealed a 1.7 cm left-sided acute-on-chronic subdural hematoma with mass effect. Laboratory evaluation, including coagulation studies, was unremarkable. The patient underwent elective left MMA embolization under conscious sedation.
Approximately one hour post-procedure, she developed sudden-onset expressive aphasia, right-sided weakness, and leftward gaze deviation, with a National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) score of 16. Emergent non-contrast head CT and CT angiography (CTA) of the head and neck revealed no acute hemorrhage or large vessel occlusion. Brain magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) showed no evidence of acute ischemia. Supportive care with permissive hypertension was initiated. Neurological symptoms resolved completely within 24 hours. Based on the rapid onset and resolution of symptoms, with no imaging abnormalities, CIN was diagnosed. The patient was discharged in stable condition one week later.

Discussion:
MMA embolization is an effective and increasingly utilized treatment for CSDH, particularly in patients with recurrence, high surgical risk, or surgically challenging anatomy. It offers a minimally invasive approach with lower recurrence rates compared to traditional surgery. Although generally safe, CIN is a rare but significant complication of neurointerventional procedures, with reported incidence ranging from 0.15% to 2.5%. It typically presents within hours of contrast exposure with transient neurological symptoms such as encephalopathy, focal deficits, or cortical blindness. Risk factors include advanced age, hypertension, and higher contrast volume. In this case, CIN closely mimicked acute ischemic stroke. Fortunately, it is
typically self-limiting and resolves within 24-72 hours with supportive care. Further research is needed to optimize MMA embolization use and to better understand CIN’s mechanisms and management.

Stroke or Not? Case of Contrast-Induced Neurotoxicity Following Middle Meningeal Artery Embolization

Background
Radiation therapy significantly impacts the success and cosmetic outcome of implant-based breast reconstruction by inducing irreversible alterations in the surrounding tissues. These changes can include fibrosis, radiation dermatitis, tissue damage, and fat necrosis, which collectively impair the reconstructive process. A common complication is the formation of a dense, fibrotic capsule around the implant, known as symptomatic capsular contracture, which can result in breast firmness, asymmetry, and suboptimal aesthetic outcomes. Radiated tissue also demonstrates reduced elasticity, impaired vascularity, and higher susceptibility to wound healing complications such as dehiscence, infection, and implant loss. Reoperation on irradiated pockets is particularly high-risk due to diminished regenerative capacity, increased fibrosis, and poor tissue quality.
Case Presentation
A patient presented with significant post-radiation asymmetry following bilateral implant-based breast reconstruction. The left, radiated breast developed a tight, contracted implant pocket, resulting in a smaller, higher-riding, and firmer breast mound than the contralateral side. Attempts to revise the radiated side were contraindicated due to concerns about implant exposure, infection, and further tissue compromise. To address the asymmetry, reconstructive efforts focused on modifying the non-radiated breast. The original 500 cc implant was replaced with a 480 cc ultra high-profile Mentor MemoryGel implant, which was tightly wrapped in two large perforated acellular dermal matrix (ADM) sheets. These sheets were configured in a bouffant-style to mimic the fibrotic, projected contour of the radiated side. The ADM was anchored high on the chest wall using 2-0 PDS sutures for secure positioning. Additional skin was excised, and the implant capsule was reinforced to prevent bottoming out, ultimately achieving a symmetric result. 
Discussion
This case presentation illustrates the reconstructive challenges posed by radiation therapy, particularly the inability to safely operate on radiated tissue due to compromised vascularity and structural integrity. Instead of correcting the radiated side directly, the surgical team mirrored its shape and projection by modifying the non-radiated breast. The use of ADM provided structural support and allowed precise shaping to achieve symmetry. This strategic approach addressed both aesthetic and functional concerns while minimizing risk. For patients with similar post-radiation asymmetries, individualized planning that avoids direct manipulation of radiated tissue and instead focuses on contralateral adjustments can provide more optimal outcomes.


Achieving Breast Symmetry in Implant Based Reconstruction following Radiation by Manipulating the Non-irradiated Breast


A Rare Case of Iatrogenic Hemothorax Following Thoracentesis Secondary to an Aberrant Posterior Intercostal Artery


Background

Thoracentesis is the initial procedure performed when diagnosing and treating a pleural effusion. The most common complication for this procedure is pneumothorax, with an incidence reported up to 6%, whereas incidence of hemothorax is approximately 1%.


Case Presentation

A 79-year-old female with history of atrial fibrillation, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, deep vein thrombosis, type 2 diabetes, and early onset myelodysplastic syndrome presented to the emergency department experiencing chest pain and shortness of breath and was admitted to the hospital for atrial fibrillation with rapid ventricular response. Treatment was initiated, including apixaban. Workup revealed a left pleural effusion of unknown origin, so ultrasound-guided diagnostic thoracentesis was successfully performed using a posterolateral approach, and furosemide was initiated.

Within 2 hours, the patient developed extreme dyspnea, becoming hemodynamically unstable, warranting a transfer to intensive care. Repeat chest X-ray revealed a large pleural effusion, so a chest tube was emergently inserted, removing 1 liter of sanguinous fluid.

Given the rapid development of the hemothorax along with the patient’s anticoagulation treatment and recent thoracentesis, a chest computerized tomography angiogram (CTA) was ordered to detect the source of arterial extravasation. It revealed a ruptured aberrant branch of the left 9th intercostal artery coursing inferiorly across the intercostal space and above the 10th rib, which was the cause of the patient’s rapidly developing hemothorax. This artery was treated with coil embolization, which achieved hemostasis and prevented hemothorax recurrence.


Discussion

Hemothorax is a rare complication of thoracentesis when standard technique based on foundational anatomical knowledge is followed. Proper technique involves inserting the needle above the superior rib margin to avoid the neurovascular bundle. Notably, therapeutic anticoagulation is not a contraindication to thoracentesis and has not been shown to increase bleeding risk. The use of imaging guidance reduces the risk of procedural complication; however, anatomical variants and age-related vascular changes, such as increased tortuosity of intercostal vessels, increase the risk. Vessel tortuosity makes medial approaches more hazardous, supporting the recommendation for a posterolateral entry point in the elderly population. 

In the event of suspected vascular injury, as seen in this case, CTA is the diagnostic modality of choice. When active extravasation is identified, coil embolization serves as the preferred intervention to achieve hemostasis and prevent recurrence. This case illustrates a rare and serious complication of thoracentesis secondary to a previously undocumented anatomical variant of the posterior intercostal artery leading to a nearly fatal hemothorax despite appropriate thoracentesis technique.


Safe Technique, Hidden Danger: Post-Thoracentesis Hemothorax from an Intercostal Variant

Background:
The aftermath of whiplash injuries from motor vehicle accidents (MVA) is estimated to cost nearly $4 billion annually in the United States and inflates over sevenfold with litigation costs. In the relationship between whiplash and litigation, prior research cites that no-fault systems generally limit the opportunity for further litigation. However, New York State utilizes a no-fault system that may award plaintiffs further compensation based on a serious injury threshold, for which both injury and treatment are considered. Most MVA do not biomechanically cause disc herniations and are conservatively treated, yet these injuries are frequently litigated. This study examines how treatment of cervical disc herniations claimed in no-fault litigation may impact award compensation, thus evaluating overtreatment as a potential tool to increase compensation.

Methods:
We queried the Thomson Reuters Westlaw database for Jury Verdicts & Settlements in New York that were categorized under “no-fault” and “motor vehicle” and included cervical disc herniation in the claim. 181 of 383 cases from 2005-2011 met the injury criteria and had detailed therapeutic methodology, litigation outcome, and award amount. We categorized cervical disc herniation treatments as surgical or non-surgical. We then separated cases that favored the plaintiff to any degree or were resolved alternatively (Plaintiff Verdict, Settlement, Mediated Settlement, Arbitration, Mixed Verdict) from cases with defendant-oriented outcomes (Defendant Decision and Defendant Verdict). The mean and median true awards (actual value collected by the plaintiff, potentially adjusted by pre-trial high-low agreement) were compared across groups and the Mann-Whitney U Test was used to test significance (p<0.05).

Results:
Of the 181 cases that met our initial query criteria, we included 18 cases describing surgical treatment and 80 cases describing non-surgical treatment that resulted in a plaintiff-oriented outcome. Analysis of included cases demonstrated a significantly greater true award for surgical treatment(s) (n=18, M=$959,257.19, Mdn=$637,500) compared to non-surgical treatment(s) (n=80, M=$195,184.10, Mdn=$74,250, U=141, p<0.001). There was no significant correlation to suggest that either treatment group more often resulted in a defendant or plaintiff-oriented outcome.

Conclusion:
Substantial financial incentives may exist for cervical disc surgical intervention in whiplash compared to more conservative, non-surgical treatment. While neither treatment group resulted in significantly more plaintiff-oriented outcomes, the compensation potential for invasive intervention may still prompt overtreatment. Further work is needed to determine how the medical and legal communities can minimize the economic toll of whiplash while ensuring patients are receiving appropriate care and just compensation.

Impact of Surgical Treatment on Award in NYS No-Fault Accident Claims of Cervical Disc Herniation

Background
Infertility is especially prevalent among female surgeons at all levels of training. Given the high rates of infertility and delayed childbearing among female surgeons, many must utilize assisted reproductive technology (ART) to help them achieve pregnancy. Insurance plans may help offset the financial burden of ART, but coverage has often been limited and inconsistent. This study aims to assess the current status of insurance coverage for ART in orthopaedic surgery residency programs.

Methods
This is a cross-sectional study of 218 orthopaedic surgery residency programs in the United States in 2024. Program websites were searched for resident benefits and insurance coverage for fertility services and dollar coverage for procedures and prescriptions. Program coordinators were identified, and a survey was distributed in addition to phone inquiries about incomplete information and supplemental funding outside of default insurance coverage.

Results
A total of 118 (54.1%) programs had publicly available or available upon request information on insurance coverage of ART. Of those, 106 (90%) had some form of fertility service coverage. Regarding service eligibility, 44 (41.5%) programs required preauthorization, while 15 (14.2%) programs required referrals. IVF and IUI were the most commonly offered ART services, with 75.5% and 71.7% coverage, respectively. The median number of cycles covered was 4 (Q1: 3, Q3: 4), and the median coverage amount was $21,000 (Q1: $15,000; Q3: $30,000). Spousal coverage was offered by 29 (27.4%) programs. Supplemental funding was available at 6 (5.7%) programs.

Conclusion
This study highlights multiple barriers that orthopaedic surgery trainees face to access ART. In addition to limited information availability, there is variation in coverage for adjunct services and minimal supplemental funding from programs. Additional eligibility barriers exist via pre-authorization or referral requirements. Moreover, the median coverage amount may not provide sufficient coverage for some cases. Programs can improve access to fertility treatments and care by promoting transparency and providing supplemental funding.

Premium content

Next from AMA Research Challenge 2025

Age, Biologic Sex, and Supine Blood Pressure

Similar lecture

Enhancing the potassium chloride co-transporter KCC2 reverses functional deficits associated with Alzheimer's disease-related mutations in mice