CogSci 2025

August 02, 2025

San Francisco, United States

Would you like to see your presentation here, made available to a global audience of researchers?
Add your own presentation or have us affordably record your next conference.

keywords:

human-computer interaction

psychology

artificial intelligence

emotion

This study investigates how interface differences affect willingness for social sharing of emotion with conversational AI depending on motives (cognitive support vs. social-affective support vs. capitalization), while comparing social sharing of emotion with humans. Perceived impressions (warmth and competence) are examined as correlates of willingness ratings. Data from 195 Japanese undergraduates were analyzed. The results showed that for social-affective and cognitive support motives, participants preferred text-based modality over voice-based modality, particularly text-based modality without an avatar. For the capitalization motive, participants preferred interfaces with avatars. Moreover, perceived warmth was positively related to willingness for social sharing with AI for social-affective support and capitalization motives, whereas perceived competence was positively related for cognitive and social-affective support motives. A different pattern of results was found for social sharing of emotions with humans. This study provides novel insights that contribute to the design of conversational AI interfaces.

Downloads

Paper

Next from CogSci 2025

Negation as a tool for conveying mental models
poster

Negation as a tool for conveying mental models

CogSci 2025

Kathryn O'nell and 1 other author

02 August 2025