CogSci 2025

August 01, 2025

San Francisco, United States

Would you like to see your presentation here, made available to a global audience of researchers?
Add your own presentation or have us affordably record your next conference.

keywords:

comparative studies

spatial cognition

evolution

development

psychology

Humans who use a left-to-right writing system often associate smaller numbers with the left side of space and larger numbers with the right. Whether this left-to-right number-space mapping is innate or culturally learned is unclear. Here, we test whether monkeys who lack human cultural practices show a left-to-right number-space mapping. Previous work in monkeys has found mixed evidence on whether monkeys show a left-to-right bias in their number-space mappings. Replicating the methods of Drucker and Brannon (2014), monkeys were trained to touch the fourth circle from the bottom in a vertical array of five circles. Then, they were tested with a horizontal array of five circles. Overall, monkeys showed no preference for the fourth circle from the left compared to the fourth from the right. This suggests monkeys may not have a directionality bias for number-space mappings. Therefore, the left-to-right bias in humans may be due to specific cultural practices.

Downloads

Paper

Next from CogSci 2025

The Black Stories Experiment: Two Groups are Trying to Solve a Riddle Game Behind a Screen, Only One Group Is Alive
poster

The Black Stories Experiment: Two Groups are Trying to Solve a Riddle Game Behind a Screen, Only One Group Is Alive

CogSci 2025

+1
Yanna Smid and 3 other authors

01 August 2025