CogSci 2025

•

July 31, 2025

•

San Francisco, United States

keywords:

cognitive neuropsychology

electroencephalography (eeg)

cognitive neuroscience

motor control

action

Error monitoring is commonly studied using various inhibitory control tasks, involving response withholding, response cancellation, or response selection. However, it remains unclear whether there is a common neural mechanism underlying error monitoring across these tasks or if it is specific to distinct types of cognitive failures. To identify both similarities and differences in the neural processing of errors across go/no-go, stop-signal, and flanker tasks, we employed microstate analysis. This method allows to study the dynamically evolving topographical patterns of neural activity throughout the brain. Our results revealed that the early phase of error monitoring in all tasks predominantly engages the supplementary motor area. In addition, we observed task-specific neural activity encompassing visual and motor areas in the go/no-go task, the dorsal part of the anterior cingulate cortex in the stop-signal task, and its ventral part in the flanker task. These findings suggest that error monitoring involves a collection of interconnected cognitive processes, rather than a uniform mechanism across tasks.

Downloads

Paper

Next from CogSci 2025

Do Analogies in Geoscience Textbooks Inflate Judgments of Understanding?
poster

Do Analogies in Geoscience Textbooks Inflate Judgments of Understanding?

CogSci 2025

Lena Hildenbrand
Jennifer Wiley
Thomas Griffin and 2 other authors

31 July 2025

Similar lecture

Error Classification of Large Language Models on Math Word Problems: A Dynamically Adaptive Framework
poster

Error Classification of Large Language Models on Math Word Problems: A Dynamically Adaptive Framework

EMNLP 2025

Xuanjing Huang
Xipeng Qiu
+2
Xuanjing Huang and 4 other authors

06 November 2025