United States

Speech errors are a natural part of communication, yet they rarely lead to complete communicative failure because both speakers and comprehenders can detect and correct errors. Although prior research has examined error monitoring and correction in production and comprehension separately, integrated investigation of both systems has been impeded by the scarcity of parallel data. In this study, we present SPACER, a parallel dataset that captures how naturalistic speech errors are corrected by both speakers and comprehenders. We focus on single-word substitution errors extracted from the Switchboard speech corpus, accompanied by speaker&#39;s self-repairs and comprehenders&#39; responses from an offline text-editing experiment. Our exploratory analysis suggests asymmetries in error correction strategies: speakers are more likely to repair errors that introduce greater semantic and phonemic deviations, whereas comprehenders tend to correct errors that are phonemically similar to more plausible alternatives or do not fit into prior contexts. Our dataset enables future research on the integrated approach of language production and comprehension.

NAACL 2025

SPACER: A Parallel Dataset of Speech Production And Comprehension of Error Repairs

speech errors; language production & comprehension; rational inference

Join us for CogSci2022! Our 44th Annual Conference will be centered around the theme of diversity, with an accompanying range of keynotes and invited speakers who themselves highlight the diversity of our field. Our three symposia are Cognition across Diverse Populations, Cognition within Diverse Societies, and Global Challenges for Cognitive Science. The conference is being offered in a fully hybrid environment for onsite and online attendees.
 
 [**The Program at a Glance can be found here**](https://cognitivesciencesociety.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/07/Cogsci-2022-PAAG-Detailed-July-12final-1.pdf)
 [**The Detailed Program can be found here**](https://cognitivesciencesociety.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/08/DeArmond-CogSci2022-program-v113-final.pdf)

This conference requires a registration to attend. Please use the link below to secure your ticket. The website will be available to all registered attendees on July 25th. 

[Register to Attend](https://cognitivesciencesociety.org/registration/)

Registration Is Required

CogSci 2022

The 44th Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society highlighted research on the theme Cognitive Diversity in addition to the full breadth and diversity of research topics offered by the society’s membership. 





Speech errors are a natural part of communication, yet they rarely lead to complete communicative failure because both speakers and comprehenders can detect and correct errors. Although prior research has examined error monitoring and correction in production and comprehension separately, integrated investigation of both systems has been impeded by the scarcity of parallel data. In this study, we present SPACER, a parallel dataset that captures how naturalistic speech errors are corrected by both speakers and comprehenders. We focus on single-word substitution errors extracted from the Switchboard speech corpus, accompanied by speaker's self-repairs and comprehenders' responses from an offline text-editing experiment. Our exploratory analysis suggests asymmetries in error correction strategies: speakers are more likely to repair errors that introduce greater semantic and phonemic deviations, whereas comprehenders tend to correct errors that are phonemically similar to more plausible alternatives or do not fit into prior contexts. Our dataset enables future research on the integrated approach of language production and comprehension.

workshop paper

### Welcome to 2025 Annual Conference of the Nations of the Americas Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics

Welcome to the 2025 meeting of the Nations of the Americas Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics! I am proud to help organize the first NAACL conference to carry the new name of our organization, one that emphasizes inclusion for all of the Americas. I am also pleased to welcome you to Albuquerque, New Mexico, a state whose unique blend of cultural influences will make for an excellent backdrop for NAACL 2025, especially with this year’s special theme on NLP in a Multicultural World. 
**[Continue reading...](https://drive.google.com/file/d/1jX-qGhqVSZZCIrAnJaz798pflu5Irrdn/view?usp=sharing)**

*- Colin Cherry, Google, NAACL 2025 General Chair* 

[![](https://assets.underline.io/markdown_image/1/image/b087f8a4dc5816d6e1a6514e59c59ac3.png)](https://drive.google.com/file/d/1T96GzPqObXrMln2BMByCSXTSizjTg69P/view?usp=sharing)

You need to log in with the email address you registered with. Access credentials have been sent to your email. 

Please be sure to check your spam and other email folders if you do not see an email confirmation right away.

Please log in to explore this event.

To access NAACL 2025 event page you are required to register. Please follow [**this link**](https://2025.naacl.org/registration/registration/) to register. Access will depend on your registration type.

Please register!

Welcome to 2025 Annual Conference of the Nations of the Americas Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics

Humans deal with temporary syntactic ambiguity all the time in incremental sentence processing. Sentences with temporary ambiguity that causes processing difficulties, often reflected by increase in reading time, are referred to as garden-path sentences. Garden-path theories of sentence processing attribute the increases in reading time to the reanalysis of the previously ambiguous syntactic structure to make it consistent with the new disambiguating text. It is unknown whether transformer-based language models successfully resolve the temporary ambiguity after encountering the disambiguating text. We investigated this question by analyzing completions generated from language models for a type of garden-path sentence with ambiguity between a complement clause interpretation and a relative clause interpretation. We found that larger language models are worse at resolving such ambiguity.

Are Larger Language Models Better at Disambiguation?

In cases of pervasive uncertainty, cognitive systems benefit from heuristics or committing to more general hypotheses. Here we have presented a hierarchical cognitive model of lexical processing that synthesizes advances in early rational cognitive models with modern-day neural architectures. Probabilities of higher-order categories derived from layers extracted from the middle layers of an encoder language model have predictive power in accounting for several reading measures for both predicted and unpredicted words and influence even early first fixation duration behavior. The results suggest that lexical processing can take place within a latent, but nevertheless discrete, space in cases of uncertainty.

Towards a Bayesian hierarchical model of lexical processing

LLM-surprisal is a computational measure of how unexpected a word or character is given the preceding context, as estimated by large language models (LLMs). This study investigated the effectiveness of LLM-surprisal in modeling second language (L2) writing development, focusing on Chinese L2 writing as a case to test its cross-linguistical generalizability. We selected three types of LLMs with different pretraining settings: a multilingual model trained on various languages, a Chinese-general model trained on both Simplified and Traditional Chinese, and a Traditional-Chinese-specific model. This comparison allowed us to explore how model architecture and training data affect LLM-surprisal estimates of learners’ essays written in Traditional Chinese, which in turn influence the modeling of L2 proficiency and development. We also correlated LLM-surprisals with 16 classic linguistic complexity indices (e.g., character sophistication, lexical diversity, syntactic complexity, and discourse coherence) to evaluate its interpretability and validity as a measure of L2 writing assessment. Our findings demonstrate the potential of LLM-surprisal as a robust, interpretable, cross-linguistically applicable metric for automatic writing assessment and contribute to bridging computational and linguistic approaches in understanding and modeling L2 writing development. All analysis scripts are available at https://github.com/JingyingHu/ChineseL2Writing-Surprisals.

Modeling Chinese L2 Writing Development: The LLM-Surprisal Perspective

Animacy is a well-documented factor affecting language production, but its influence on Language Models (LMs) in complex structures like Object Relative Clauses (ORCs) remains underexplored. This study examines LMs' sensitivity to animacy in English ORC structure choice (passive vs. active) using surprisal-based and prompting-based analyses, alongside human baselines. In surprisal-based analysis, DistilGPT-2 best mirrored human preferences, while GPT-Neo and BERT-base showed rigid biases, diverging from human patterns. Prompting-based analysis expanded testing to GPT-4o-mini, Gemini models, and DeepSeek-R1, revealing GPT-4o-mini’s stronger human alignment but limited animacy sensitivity in Gemini models and DeepSeek-R1. Some LMs exhibited inconsistencies between analyses, reinforcing that prompting alone is unreliable for assessing linguistic competence. Corpus analysis confirmed that training data alone cannot fully explain animacy sensitivity, suggesting emergent animacy-aware representations. These findings underscore the interaction between training data, model architecture, and linguistic generalization, highlighting the need for integrating structured linguistic knowledge into LMs to enhance their alignment with human sentence processing mechanisms.

Beyond Binary Animacy: A Multi-Method Investigation of LMs’ Sensitivity in English Object Relative Clauses

Language syllabification is the separation of a word into written or spoken syllables. The study of syllabification plays a pivotal role in morphology and there have been previous attempts to study this phenomenon using graphs or networks. Previous approaches have claimed through visual estimation that the degree distribution of language networks follows the Power Law distribution, however, there have not been any empirically grounded metrics to determine the same. In our study, we implement two kinds of language networks, namely, syllabary and lexical networks, and investigate the syllabification of four European languages: English, French, German and Spanish using network analysis and examine their small-world, random and scale-free nature. We additionally empirically prove that contrary to claims in previous works, although the degree distribution of these networks appear to follow a power law distribution, they are actually more in agreement with a log-normal distribution, when a numerically grounded curve-fitting is applied. Finally, we explore how syllabary and lexical networks for the English language change over time using a database of age-of-acquisition rating words. Our analysis further shows that the preferential attachment mechanism appears to be a well-grounded explanation for the degree distribution of the syllabary network.

An Empirical Study of Language Syllabification using Syllabary and Lexical Networks

This paper investigates good-enough parsing in Turkish by comparing human self-paced reading performance to the surprisal and attention patterns of three Turkish Large Language Models (LLMs), GPT-2-Base, GPT-2-Large, and LLaMA-3. The results show that Turkish speakers rely on good-enough parsing for implausible but grammatically permissible sentences (e.g., interpreting sentences such as `the man bit the dog' as 'the dog bit the man'). Although the smaller LLMs (e.g., GPT-2) were better predictors of human RTs, they seem to have relied more heavily on semantic plausibility than humans. Comparably, larger LLMs (e.g., LLaMA-3) tended to make more probabilistic parsing based on word order, exhibiting less *good-enough* parsing behavior. Therefore, we conclude that LLMs take syntactic and semantic constraints into account when processing thematic roles, but not to the same extent as human parsers.

When Men Bite Dogs: Testing Good-Enough Parsing in Turkish with Humans and Large Language Models

Humans tend to predict the next words during sentence comprehension, but under unique circumstances, they demonstrate an ability for longer coherent word sequence prediction. In this paper, we investigate whether Transformers can model such hyperprediction observed in humans during sentence processing, specifically in the context of Japanese buzzer quizzes. We conducted eye-tracking experiments where the participants read the first half of buzzer quiz questions and predicted the second half, while we modeled their reading time using the GPT-2. By modeling the reading times of each word in the first half of the question using GPT-2 surprisal, we examined under what conditions fine-tuned language models can better predict reading times. As a result, we found that GPT-2 surprisal effectively explains the reading times of quiz experts as they read the first half of the question while predicting the latter half. When the language model was fine-tuned with quiz questions, the perplexity value decreased. Lower perplexity corresponded to higher psychometric predictive power; however, excessive data for fine-tuning led to a decrease in perplexity and the fine-tuned model exhibited a low psychometric predictive power. Overall, our findings suggest that a moderate amount of data is required for fine-tuning in order to model human hyperprediction.

Transformers Can Model Human Hyperprediction in Buzzer Quiz

This study examines how sentence structure shapes contrast predictions in both humans and large language models (LLMs). Using Mandarin ditransitive constructions — double object (DO, “She gave the girl the candy, but not…”) vs. prepositional object (PO, “She gave the candy to the girl, but not…”) as a testbed, we employed a sentence continuation task involving three human groups (written, spoken, and prosodically normalized spoken stimuli) and three LLMs (GPT-4o, LLaMA-3, and Qwen-2.5). Two principal findings emerged: (1) Although human participants predominantly focused on the theme (e.g., “the candy”), contrast predictions were significantly modulated by sentence structure—particularly in spoken contexts, where the sentence-final element drew more attention. (2) While LLMs showed a similar reliance on structure, they displayed a larger effect size and more closely resembled human spoken data than written data, indicating a stronger emphasis on linear order in generating contrast predictions. By adopting a unified psycholinguistic paradigm, this study advances our understanding of predictive language processing for both humans and LLMs and informs research on human–model alignment in linguistic tasks.

What to Predict? Exploring How Sentence Structure Influences Contrast Predictions in Humans and Large Language Models

This paper uses autoregressive large language models to explore at which points in a given input sentence the semantic information is decodable. Using representational similarity analysis and probing, the results show that autoregressive models are capable of extracting the semantic relation information from a dataset of noun-noun compounds. When considering the effect of processing the head and modifier nouns in context, the extracted representations show greater correlation after processing both constituent nouns in the same sentence. The linguistic properties of the head nouns may influence the ability of LLMs to extract relation information when the head and modifier words are processed separately. Probing suggests that Phi-1 and LLaMA-3.2 are exposed to relation information during training, as they are able to predict the relation vectors for compounds from separate word representations to a similar degree as using compositional compound representations. However, the difference in processing condition for GPT-2 and DeepSeek-R1 indicates that these models are actively processing the contextual semantic relation information of the compound.

Investigating noun-noun compound relation representations in autoregressive large language models

Large language models (LLMs) exhibit remarkable capabilities on not just language tasks, but also various tasks that are not linguistic in nature, such as logical reasoning and social inference. In the human brain, neuroscience has identified a core language system that selectively and causally supports language processing. We here ask whether similar specialization for language emerges in LLMs. We identify language-selective units within 18 popular LLMs, using the same localization approach that is used in neuroscience. We then establish the causal role of these units by demonstrating that ablating LLM language-selective units -- but not random units -- leads to drastic deficits in language tasks. Correspondingly, language-selective LLM units are more aligned to brain recordings from the human language system than random units. Finally, we investigate whether our localization method extends to other cognitive domains: while we find specialized networks in some LLMs for reasoning and social capabilities, there are substantial differences among models. These findings provide functional and causal evidence for specialization in large language models, and highlight parallels with the functional organization in the brain.

Downloads

Next from NAACL 2025

Are Larger Language Models Better at Disambiguation?

Similar lecture

A conflict-based model of speech error repairs in humans

.css-70qvj9{display:-webkit-box;display:-webkit-flex;display:-ms-flexbox;display:flex;-webkit-align-items:center;-webkit-box-align:center;-ms-flex-align:center;align-items:center;}Downloads

Next from NAACL 2025

Are Larger Language Models Better at Disambiguation?

Similar lecture

A conflict-based model of speech error repairs in humans

Downloads