United States

This study explores the application of Large Language Models (LLMs) and supervised learning to analyze social media posts from Reddit users, addressing two key objectives: first, to extract adaptive and maladaptive self-state evidence that supports psychological assessment (Task A1); and second, to predict a well-being score that reflects the user’s mental state (Task A2). We propose i) a fine-tuned RoBERTa (Liu et al., 2019) model for Task A1 to identify self-state evidence spans and ii) evaluate two approaches for Task A2: a retrieval-augmented DeepSeek-7B (DeepSeek-AI et al., 2025) model and a Random Forest regression model trained on sentence embeddings. While LLM-based prompting utilizes contextual reasoning, our findings indicate that supervised learning provides more reliable numerical predictions. The RoBERTa model achieves the highest recall (0.602) for Task A1, and Random Forest regression outperforms DeepSeek-7B for Task A2 (MSE: 2.994 vs. 6.610). These results highlight the strengths and limitations of generative vs. supervised methods in mental health NLP, contributing to the development of privacy-conscious, resource-efficient approaches for psychological assessment. This work is part of the CLPsych 2025 shared task (Tseriotou et al., 2025).

NAACL 2025

Self-State Evidence Extraction and Well-Being Prediction from Social Media Timelines

self-state evidence

psychological assessment

reddit posts

large language models (llms)

supervised learning

social media analysis

### Welcome to 2025 Annual Conference of the Nations of the Americas Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics

Welcome to the 2025 meeting of the Nations of the Americas Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics! I am proud to help organize the first NAACL conference to carry the new name of our organization, one that emphasizes inclusion for all of the Americas. I am also pleased to welcome you to Albuquerque, New Mexico, a state whose unique blend of cultural influences will make for an excellent backdrop for NAACL 2025, especially with this year’s special theme on NLP in a Multicultural World. 
**[Continue reading...](https://drive.google.com/file/d/1jX-qGhqVSZZCIrAnJaz798pflu5Irrdn/view?usp=sharing)**

*- Colin Cherry, Google, NAACL 2025 General Chair* 

[![](https://assets.underline.io/markdown_image/1/image/b087f8a4dc5816d6e1a6514e59c59ac3.png)](https://drive.google.com/file/d/1T96GzPqObXrMln2BMByCSXTSizjTg69P/view?usp=sharing)

You need to log in with the email address you registered with. Access credentials have been sent to your email. 

Please be sure to check your spam and other email folders if you do not see an email confirmation right away.

Please log in to explore this event.

To access NAACL 2025 event page you are required to register. Please follow [**this link**](https://2025.naacl.org/registration/registration/) to register. Access will depend on your registration type.

Please register!

Welcome to 2025 Annual Conference of the Nations of the Americas Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics

workshop paper

We tackle the task by using a pretrained large language model (LLM) and in-context learning with template-based instructions to guide the LLM. To improve generation quality, we employ a two-step procedure: sampling and selection. For the sampling step, we randomly sample a subset of the provided training data for the context of LLM prompting. Next, for the selection step, we map the LLM generated outputs into a vector space and employ the Gaussian kernel density estimation to select the most likely output. The results show that the approach can achieve a certain degree of performance and there is still room for improvement.

Team ISM at CLPsych 2025: Capturing Mental Health Dynamics from Social Media Timelines using A Pretrained Large Language Model with In-Context Learning

The CLPsych workshop, held annually since 2014, promotes the application of computational linguistics to behavioral analysis and neurological health assessment. The CLPsych 2025 shared task, extending the framework of the 2022 iteration, leverages the MIND framework to model temporal fluctuations in mental states. This shared task comprises three sub-tasks, each presenting substantial challenges to natural language processing (NLP) systems, requiring sensitive and precise outcomes in analyzing adaptive and maladaptive behaviors. In this study, we employed a range of modeling strategies tailored to the requirements and expected outputs of each subtask. Our approach mostly utilized traditional language models like BERT, LongFormer and Pegasus diverging from the prevalent trend of prompt-tuned large language models. We achieved an overall ranking of 13th, with subtask rankings of 8th in Task 1a, 13th in Task 1b, 8th in Task 2, and 7th in Task 3. These results highlight the efficacy of our methods while underscoring areas for further refinement in handling complex behavioral data.

Transformer-Based Analysis of Adaptive and Maladaptive Self-States in Longitudinal Social Media Data

Mental health is not a fixed trait but a dynamic process shaped by the interplay between individual dispositions and situational contexts. Building on interactionist and constructionist psychological theories, we develop interpretable models to predict well-being and identify adaptive and maladaptive self-states in longitudinal social media data. Our approach integrates person-level psychological traits (e.g., resilience, cognitive distortions, implicit motives) with language-inferred situational features derived from the Situational 8 DIAMONDS framework. We compare these theory-grounded features to embeddings from a psychometrically-informed language model that captures temporal and individual-specific patterns. Results show that our principled, theory-driven features provide competitive performance while offering greater interpretability. Qualitative analyses further highlight the psychological coherence of features most predictive of well-being. These findings underscore the value of integrating computational modeling with psychological theory to assess dynamic mental states in contextually sensitive and human-understandable ways.

Who We Are, Where We Are: Mental Health at the Intersection of Person, Situation, and Large Language Models

Due to the increasing productivity in the scientific community, it is difficult to keep up with the literature without the assistance of AI methods. This paper evaluates various methods for extracting mathematical model variables from epidemiological studies, such as \``infection rate (α),'' \``recovery rate (γ),'' and \``mortality rate (μ).'' Variable extraction appears to be a basic task, but plays a pivotal role in recovering models from scientific literature. Once extracted, we can use these variables for automatic mathematical modeling, simulation, and replication of published results. We also introduce a benchmark dataset comprising manually-annotated variable descriptions and variable values extracted from scientific papers. Our analysis shows that LLM-based solutions perform the best. Despite the incremental benefits of combining rule-based extraction outputs with LLMs, the leap in performance attributed to the transfer-learning and instruction-tuning capabilities of LLMs themselves is far more significant. This investigation demonstrates the potential of LLMs to enhance automatic comprehension of scientific artifacts and for automatic model recovery and simulation.

Variable Extraction for Model Recovery in Scientific Literature

Automatic keyword extraction from scientific articles is pivotal for organizing scholarly archives, powering semantic search engines, and mapping interdisciplinary research trends. However, existing methods—including statistical and graph-based approaches—struggle to handle domain-specific challenges such as technical terminology, cross-disciplinary ambiguity, and dynamic scientific jargon. This paper presents an empirical comparison of traditional keyword extraction methods (e.g. TextRank and YAKE) with approaches based on Large Language Model. We introduce a novel evaluation framework that combines fuzzy semantic matching based on Levenshtein Distance with exact-match metrics (F1, precision, recall) to address inconsistencies in keyword normalization across scientific corpora. Through an extensive ablation study across nine different LLMs, we analyze their performance and associated costs. Our findings reveal that LLM-based methods consistently achieve superior precision and relevance compared to traditional approaches. This performance advantage suggests significant potential for improving scientific search systems and information retrieval in academic contexts.

How Well Do Large Language Models Extract Keywords? A Systematic Evaluation on Scientific Corpora

Recent studies have evaluated creativity, where novelty is an important aspect, of large language models (LLMs) primarily from a semantic perspective, using benchmarks from cognitive science. However, assessing the novelty in scholarly publications, a critical facet of evaluating LLMs as scientific discovery assistants, remains underexplored, despite its potential to accelerate research cycles and prioritize high-impact contributions in scientific workflows. We introduce SchNovel, a benchmark to evaluate LLMs’ ability to assess novelty in scholarly papers, a task central to streamlining discovery pipeline. SchNovel consists of 15000 pairs of papers across six fields sampled from the arXiv dataset with publication dates spanning 2 to 10 years apart. In each pair, the more recently published paper is assumed to be more novel. Additionally, we propose RAG-Novelty, a retrieval-augmented method that mirrors human peer review by grounding novelty assessment in retrieved context. Extensive experiments provide insights into the capabilities of different LLMs to assess novelty and demonstrate that RAG-Novelty outperforms recent baseline models highlight LLMs’ promise as tools for automating novelty detection in scientific workflows.

Evaluating and Enhancing Large Language Models for Novelty Assessment in Scholarly Publications

The study of food pairing has evolved beyond subjective expertise with the advent of machine learning. This paper presents FlavorDiffusion, a novel framework leveraging diffusion models to predict food-chemical interactions and ingredient pairings without relying on chromatography. By integrating graph-based embeddings, diffusion processes, and chemical property encoding, FlavorDiffusion addresses data imbalances and enhances clustering quality. Using a heterogeneous graph derived from datasets like Recipe1M and FlavorDB, our model demonstrates superior performance in reconstructing ingredient-ingredient relationships. The addition of a Chemical Structure Prediction (CSP) layer further refines the embedding space, achieving state-of-the-art NMI scores and enabling meaningful discovery of novel ingredient combinations. The proposed framework represents a significant step forward in computational gastronomy, offering scalable, interpretable, and chemically informed solutions for food science.

FlavorDiffusion: Predicting Food Pairings and Chemical Interactions Using Diffusion Models

Foundation models are increasingly used in scientific research, but evaluating AI-generated scientific work remains challenging. Expert reviews are costly, while large language models (LLMs) as proxy reviewers have proven to be unreliable. To address this, we investigate two automatic evaluation metrics, specifically citation count prediction and review score prediction. We parse all papers of OpenReview and augment each submission with its citation count, reference, and research hypothesis. Our findings reveal that citation count prediction is more viable than review score prediction, and predicting scores is more difficult purely from the research hypothesis than from the full paper. Furthermore, we show that a simple prediction model based solely on title and abstract outperforms LLM-based reviewers, though it still falls short of human-level consistency.

Automatic Evaluation Metrics for Artificially Generated Scientific Research

We introduce Functional Group-Aware Representations for Small Molecules (FARM), a novel foundation model designed to bridge the gap between SMILES, natural language, and molecular graphs. The key innovation of FARM lies in its functional group-aware tokenization, which directly incorporates functional group information into SMILES, enriching SMILES with detailed chemical context. For example, instead of using ``O" to represent all oxygen atoms, we use specific tokens like "O_ketone" and "O_hydroxyl" to differentiate oxygen atoms belonging to distinct functional groups. This tokenization expands the chemical lexicon, effectively bridging the gap between SMILES and natural language in terms of vocabulary size, ultimately enhancing the model’s ability to predict molecular properties. FARM also represents molecules from two perspectives: by (1) using masked language modeling to capture atom-level features and (2) employing graph neural networks to encode the whole molecule topology. FARM leverages contrastive learning to aligns these two views of representations into a unified molecular embedding. We rigorously evaluate FARM on the MoleculeNet dataset, where it achieves state-of-the-art performance on 11 out of 13 tasks. These results highlight FARM’s potential to improve molecular representation learning and demonstrate its strong transfer learning capabilities, paving the way for promising applications in drug discovery and pharmaceutical research.

FARM: Functional Group-Aware Representations for Small Molecules

Food systems are responsible for a third of human-caused greenhouse gas emissions. We investigate what Large Language Models (LLMs) can contribute to reducing the environmental impacts of food production. We define a typology of design and prediction tasks based on the sustainable food literature and collaboration with domain experts, and evaluate six LLMs on four tasks in our typology. For example, for a sustainable protein design task, food science experts estimated that collaboration with an LLM can reduce time spent by 45% on average, compared to 22% for collaboration with another expert human food scientist. However, for a sustainable menu design task, LLMs produce suboptimal solutions when instructed to consider both human satisfaction and climate impacts. We propose a general framework for integrating LLMs with combinatorial optimization to improve reasoning capabilities. Our approach decreases emissions of food choices by 79% in a hypothetical restaurant while maintaining participants' satisfaction. Our results demonstrate LLMs' potential, supported by optimization techniques, to accelerate sustainable food development and adoption.

Downloads

Next from NAACL 2025

Team ISM at CLPsych 2025: Capturing Mental Health Dynamics from Social Media Timelines using A Pretrained Large Language Model with In-Context Learning

Similar lecture

Capturing the Dynamics of Mental Well-Being: Adaptive and Maladaptive States in Social Media

.css-70qvj9{display:-webkit-box;display:-webkit-flex;display:-ms-flexbox;display:flex;-webkit-align-items:center;-webkit-box-align:center;-ms-flex-align:center;align-items:center;}Downloads

Next from NAACL 2025

Team ISM at CLPsych 2025: Capturing Mental Health Dynamics from Social Media Timelines using A Pretrained Large Language Model with In-Context Learning

Similar lecture

Capturing the Dynamics of Mental Well-Being: Adaptive and Maladaptive States in Social Media

Downloads