United States

Background
It is unclear whether heart donor cause of death (CoD) influences recipient mortality and if cardiovascular risk varies by region. By analyzing the UNOS database, it can be determined if donor CoD impacts recipient post-transplant mortality and if regional differences influence cardiovascular health.

Methods
The United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS) registry was queried for all adult heart transplant recipients and donors from 1987 to 2023 in Southern, Western, Northeastern, and Midwest states. Donors were grouped by CoD, including anoxia, gunshot wounds/trauma (GSW), intracranial bleed/stroke (IS/B), and other causes of death. Unadjusted and adjusted mortality was compared.

Results
Of the 56,901 patients included in this analysis, GSW donors accounted for the smallest number of donors (18.13%, p &lt;0.001), the lowest number of female donors (11.38%, p &lt;0.001), and the youngest patients (26.85 ± 9.54, p &lt;0.001). IS/B donors had the highest donor age (40.26 ± 11.19, p &lt;0.001) and the highest number of female donors (11.19%, p &lt;0.001). Mortality at 30 days, 1 year, and 5 years varies significantly according to the CoD (p&lt;0.001). Recipients of IS/B hearts had worse mortality rates 30 days, 1 year, and 5 years post-transplant (6.55%, 14.67%, and 30.04%). Recipients from GSW donors had the best mortality rates 30 days, 1 year, and 5 years following transplant (4.60%, 11.42%, and 26.44%). When adjusting for covariables and mortality by region compared to the Northeast, the South had the increased mortality (hazard ratio [HR] = 1.09, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.06-1.13, p &lt;0.001) and the West had decreased mortality (HR = 0.93, 95% CI = 0.89-0.97, p &lt;0.001). When comparing other donor CoD to GSW, IS/B, and anoxia donor CoD within each region, there were no significant differences in mortality rates.

Conclusion
This study looked at geographical differences in donor CoD and mortality rates. The mortality of heart transplant recipients varies according to the CoD of the donor, even when adjusted for different regions. No significant differences were observed when analyzing each region individually according to the donor CoD.



AMA Research Challenge 2024 

Impact of Donor Cause of Death and Geographic Location on Recipient Mortality Post Heart Transplant- a UNOS Database Review

Welcome to the largest national, multi-specialty research event **featuring research from 750 medical students, residents and fellows, and international medical graduates.**


#### Event Details
The 2022 American Medical Association Research Challenge includes a poster symposium hall and a semifinals hall with the top scored research. Log in at any time throughout the event to:
* **View posters and presentations** on a variety of topics and specialties
* **Score posters in the semifinals** to help decide the top five finalists (AMA member exclusive opportunity)
* **Connect with participants** and provide feedback to help advance their research

At the conclusion of this event, the AMA will announce the top five finalists who will advance to the AMA Research Challenge finals, present their research to an elite panel of judges and compete to win a $10,000 grand prize sponsored by Laurel Road.
 

#### Attend Live Forums
**Oct. 20, 6 — 7 p.m. Central**
 **How to plan a career in academic medicine** 
 Learn how to plan a career in academic medicine and get your questions answered. [Access Here](https://underline.io/events/363/lounge)
 
 **Speakers**
![](https://assets.underline.io/uploads/markdown_image/1/image/d5adb133dfc58eb0a6d469e9cedcd5d4.jpg)
Ricardo Correa, MD, EdD
![](https://assets.underline.io/uploads/markdown_image/1/image/5f9437ab87861538bf02b9ca7c0d926e.jpg)
Stuart M. Greenstein, MD
![](https://assets.underline.io/uploads/markdown_image/1/image/05b1b637c99286d558c371f8e8b185ce.jpg)
Stephanie Strohbeen, MD
 
 **Oct. 22, 11 a.m. — Noon Central**
 **How to get published**
 Learn tips to get your research published and get your questions answered. [Access Here](https://underline.io/events/363/lounge)
 
 **Speakers**
![](https://assets.underline.io/uploads/markdown_image/1/image/8ce6235e957d31cb5e6f9097cc6f6972.jpg)
Jessica Li, MD/PhD Candidate
![](https://assets.underline.io/uploads/markdown_image/1/image/9950ef2e0237f54cb3d8280334d42491.jpg)
Charles Lopresto, DO

### Sponsor
AMA would like to thank Laurel Road for sponsoring a $10,000 grand prize for the winner of the AMA Research Challenge. Laurel Road is not involved in the judging or scoring process to select the winner. The winner will be announced on Dec. 7 during the AMA Research Challenge finals. Payment of the grand prize will be directly from Laurel Road. See the AMA Research Challenge Official Rules for terms and conditions.

![](https://assets.underline.io/uploads/markdown_image/1/image/611e331d4a0eba0920f240cfc04b4d77.png)

**There is no registration fee for this event! **

Register to explore research in a variety of topics. AMA members get exclusive access to score posters in the semifinals.

**Please use the link below to register for free if you have not already done so:**

https://www.ama-assn.org/about/events/ama-research-challenge

Registration Is Required

AMA Research Challenge 2022

Welcome to the largest national, multi-specialty research event featuring research from 750 medical students, residents and fellows, and international medical graduates.


Background
It is unclear whether heart donor cause of death (CoD) influences recipient mortality and if cardiovascular risk varies by region. By analyzing the UNOS database, it can be determined if donor CoD impacts recipient post-transplant mortality and if regional differences influence cardiovascular health.

Methods
The United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS) registry was queried for all adult heart transplant recipients and donors from 1987 to 2023 in Southern, Western, Northeastern, and Midwest states. Donors were grouped by CoD, including anoxia, gunshot wounds/trauma (GSW), intracranial bleed/stroke (IS/B), and other causes of death. Unadjusted and adjusted mortality was compared.

Results
Of the 56,901 patients included in this analysis, GSW donors accounted for the smallest number of donors (18.13%, p <0.001), the lowest number of female donors (11.38%, p <0.001), and the youngest patients (26.85 ± 9.54, p <0.001). IS/B donors had the highest donor age (40.26 ± 11.19, p <0.001) and the highest number of female donors (11.19%, p <0.001). Mortality at 30 days, 1 year, and 5 years varies significantly according to the CoD (p<0.001). Recipients of IS/B hearts had worse mortality rates 30 days, 1 year, and 5 years post-transplant (6.55%, 14.67%, and 30.04%). Recipients from GSW donors had the best mortality rates 30 days, 1 year, and 5 years following transplant (4.60%, 11.42%, and 26.44%). When adjusting for covariables and mortality by region compared to the Northeast, the South had the increased mortality (hazard ratio [HR] = 1.09, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.06-1.13, p <0.001) and the West had decreased mortality (HR = 0.93, 95% CI = 0.89-0.97, p <0.001). When comparing other donor CoD to GSW, IS/B, and anoxia donor CoD within each region, there were no significant differences in mortality rates.

Conclusion
This study looked at geographical differences in donor CoD and mortality rates. The mortality of heart transplant recipients varies according to the CoD of the donor, even when adjusted for different regions. No significant differences were observed when analyzing each region individually according to the donor CoD.

poster

Welcome to the **largest national, multi-specialty research** event featuring research from more than 750 medical students, residents, fellows, and international medical graduates.

Use the buttons below or navigation menu to access the event.
 

[![](https://assets.underline.io/markdown_image/1/image/20e1e77aa954efeac7a15d84c85eb383.jpg)](https://underline.io/events/468/sessions?searchGroup=all)
 
[![](https://assets.underline.io/markdown_image/1/image/068522d81aca0b68a369787c7dfccd1b.jpg)](https://underline.io/events/468/posters?searchGroup=all)
 
[![](https://assets.underline.io/markdown_image/1/image/d3971ece79d5e5575b178bdc2c8bbfae.jpg)](https://underline.io/events/468/help-desk)
 

#### Event Details

The 2024 American Medical Association Research Challenge includes a poster symposium hall and a semifinals hall with the top scored research. **Log in at any time throughout the event to:**

* **View posters and presentations** on a variety of topics and specialties
* **Score posters in the semifinals** to help decide the top five finalists (AMA member exclusive opportunity)
* **Connect with participants** and provide feedback to help advance their research

At the conclusion of this event, the AMA will announce the top five finalists who will advance to the AMA Research Challenge finals, present their research to an elite panel of judges, and compete to win a $10,000 grand prize presented by Laurel Road. 

### Grand Prize Sponsor

AMA would like to thank Laurel Road for sponsoring a $10,000 grand prize for the winner of the AMA Research Challenge. Laurel Road is not involved in winner selection process. The winner will be announced on February 20, 2025 during the AMA Research Challenge finals. Payment of the grand prize will be directly from Laurel Road. See the AMA Research Challenge Official Rules for terms and conditions.

[![](https://assets.underline.io/uploads/markdown_image/1/image/611e331d4a0eba0920f240cfc04b4d77.png)](https://www.laurelroad.com/)

You need to log in with the email address you registered with. Access credentials have been sent to your email. 

Please be sure to check your spam and other email folders if you do not see an email confirmation right away.

Please log in to explore this event.

**There is no registration fee for this event! **

If you have used the AMA Research Challenge platform previously, please click the ‘Log-in’ button below. If you do not remember your password, please click “forgot password” and follow prompts to reset your password. After resetting your password, please refresh your webpage to access the platform.

Register to explore research in a variety of topics. AMA members get exclusive access to score posters in the semifinals. 

**Please use this link [here](https://www.ama-assn.org/member-benefits/events/ama-research-challenge) to register for free.**

Join the AMA Research Challenge poster symposium and semifinals to explore top research posters and score posters in the semifinals (an AMA member exclusive opportunity).

Aims:

The use of intra-aortic balloon pumps (IABP) or percutaneous left ventricular assist devices (pLVAD) in patients with cardiogenic shock (CS) or high-risk percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI) is controversial due to limited data. This study aims to investigate the impact of these devices on hemodynamic and clinical outcomes in patients with high-risk PCI or CS.


Methods:

We systematically searched Embase, PubMed, and Scopus for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and observational studies comparing pLVAD versus IABP or medical therapy in high-risk PCI or CS patients. The primary outcome was major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE). Secondary endpoints included in-hospital stroke and severe bleeding etc. Heterogeneity was assessed using I2 statistics, and a random-effects model was applied for outcomes with low and high heterogeneity.


Results:

This meta-analysis of 7 RCTs and 27 observational studies including 73,701 patients that compared pLVAD to IABP or medical therapy in high-risk PCI or CS patients over a follow-up of 1 month to 1 year. The mean age was 62.4 ± 13.2 years and 34.6 % of the patients were female. There was no significant difference between both groups for in-hospital or 30-day all-cause mortality (OR 1.15; 95% CI [0.90, 1.44]; p = 0.268), MACE (OR 0.97; 95% CI [0.66, 1.43]; P = 0.896), stroke in-hospital (OR 1.21; 95% CI [0.95, 1.54]; p = 0.116).
The incidence of kidney replacement therapy (KRT) (OR 1.73; 95% CI [1.46, 2.05]; p < 0.001), life-threatening bleeding (OR 2.37; 95% CI [1.84, 3.04]; p < 0.001), peripheral vascular access complications (OR 2.09; 95% CI [1.12, 3.88]; p = 0.020), acute kidney injury (AKI) (OR 1.50; 95% CI [1.39, 1.61]; p < 0.001) and hemolytic anemia (OR 6.17; 95% CI [2.00, 19.01]; p = 0.002) were significantly lowered in the pLVAD group than in the IABP or medical therapy group. 
Conversely, pLVAD significantly improved mean arterial pressure (MAP) (MD 11.87; 95% CI [6.72, 17.01]; p < 0.01) and cardiac index (MD 0.36; 95% CI [0.14, 0.57]; p < 0.01) . Furthermore, the use of pLVAD was associated with increased pulmonary capillary wedge pressure (PCWP) (MD -5.57; 95% CI [-10.14, -1.04]; p = 0.02).


Conclusion:

Our meta-analysis found no differences between pLVAD and IABP or medical therapy in in-hospital or 30-day, MACE and stroke in patients with high-risk PCI or CS. However, the use of pLVAD improved cardiac index, MAP as well as reduced the incidence of life-threatening bleeding. Adequately powered randomized controlled trials comparing pLVAD with IABP or medical therapy in patients with high-risk PCI or CS are warranted to define the optimal treatment strategy in patients with high-risk cohort.

Impact of Left Ventricular Assist Devices on Clinical and Hemodynamic Outcomes during Cardiogenic Shock or High-Risk Percutaneous Coronary Intervention

Background: Andersen-Tawil Syndrome (ATS) is an autosomal dominant channelopathy classified as long QT syndrome (LQTS) type 7, Characterized by periodic paralysis, ventricular ectopy/arrhythmia, and dysmorphic features. According to different authors, prolonged QTc is not always present, and thus it should be reclassified. However, no studies have found the correlation to life-threatening arrhythmias (LTAs) and prolong QTc. This study compared the likelihood of LTAs like VT and VF in ATS patients with prolonged QTc intervals against those with normal QTc.

Methods: To enable a meta-analysis, we searched literature reviews of reported cases or cohort studies with ATS between 1994 and 2024. Cases were selected if they presented a cardiologic affection. Prolong QTc interval was defined as QTc 440 msec in females and 460 msec for males. Each variable was calculated using the validated percentage. Numerical variables are expressed as mean and SD. Categorical variables are expressed as percentages. Student’s t-test was used for numerical variables. Categorical variables were analyzed using chi-square. Values of p <0.05 were considered statistically significant.

Results: 209 cardiologic-affected cases with ATS that provided information regarding the QTc interval were included. Of these, only 45.5% evidenced a prolonged QTc with a mean of 490  37 msec. ATS Probands were more likely to present a prolonged QTc than affected family members (51% vs. 29% respectively [p = 0.008]). Patients with prolonged QTc presented lower odds of a U wave than those with normal QTc (43% vs. 75%, respectively [p = 0.004]). Although there was no statistical significance when comparing LTAs in patients with prolonged QTc to normal QTc, LTAs were similar in both groups. VT episodes were more likely present with prolonged QTc than normal QTc (79% vs. 72%). However, episodes of sustained VT were more commonly present in cases with prolonged QTc than normal QTc (20% vs. 12%). Torsade de points and VF were more likely present in patients with a prolonged QTc interval than normal QTc (6% vs. 3% and 14% vs. 13%, respectively). Non-fatal cardiac arrest was slightly more common in cases with prolonged QTc than normal QTc (13% vs. 9%). Both prolonged and normal QTc had the same percentage of SCD (3%).

Conclusion: Although ATS has been classified as a long QT syndrome, prolongation is not always present. Patients with prolonged QTc demonstrated only a slightly increased percentage of developing LTAs compared to those with normal QTc.

Long QT type 7 (Andersen Tawil Syndrome): Is the QTc prolongation associated with higher odds of developing life-threatening arrhythmias or cardiac arrest?

Abstract Title
No Change in Endocarditis Rates in Patients with Congenital Heart Disease During the COVID-19 Pandemic
Background
Infective endocarditis (IE) is an infection of the endothelial layer of the heart with a yearly incidence of 10/100,000 in the general population, 25%-30% from healthcare related infections. Patients with congenital heart disease (CHD) have an increased risk for IE with a mortality rate of 19.4% at 6.7 years of follow-up. In 2025 there will be an estimated 355,000 adults aged 20-65 years of age with CHD. Poor dental hygiene and lack of preventive dental care are additional risk factors for developing IE.
In March 2020, the ADA Health Policy Institute reported 76% of dental offices were only seeing emergency cases and 19% were completely closed, and importantly for the adult CHD population, Medicaid dental coverage was limited or eliminated in many states.
We sought to investigate if the decreased access to dental care during the COVID-19 pandemic led to an increased burden of IE in the CHD population.
Methods
Retrospective review of a de-identified national administrative database (Vizient Clinical Data Base/Resource Manager) for hospitalized patients 2-80 years old with an ICD-10 code for any severity CHD between 10/1/2018 – 8/30/2022. Using the introduction of the ICD-10 code for COVID-19 (U07.1) in April 2020 to designate pre- and post-COVID time periods, two eras were defined: Era 1 (10/1/2018 – 3/31/2020) and Era 2 (4/1/2020 – 8/30/2022). Comparisons were made between endocarditis rates, demographics, length of stay, complication rates, in-hospital mortality and costs between Eras.
Results
There was a total of 264,126 admissions with CHD during the study period, 7,532 (2.9%) with CHD and IE. There was no difference in endocarditis rates between Eras (p = 0.478). The only differences identified were a slightly older age at admission in Era 2 (45 vs 47 years, p = 0.001) and higher costs in Era 2 ($48,952 vs 53,758, p = 0.017).
Conclusion
In this retrospective review of a large U.S. administrative database, we did not identify a significant change in IE hospitalization rates in CHD patients. While this finding is reassuring, it may not tell the complete picture yet.
IE is a relatively rare condition with an annual incidence of 11/10,000 in the CHD population and can take months for symptoms to develop. Given the relatively short period available for study, there may not have been sufficient time with limited access to dental care to effect oral health enough and increase IE rates. It will be important for future studies to continue to assess this question.

No Change in Endocarditis Rates in Patients with Congenital Heart disease During the COVID-19 Pandemic

Background: 
Acute coronary syndrome describes various conditions related to sudden, reduced blood flow to the heart. Some traditional risk factors for ACS include older age, diabetes (DM), hypertension (HTN), hyperlipidemia (HLD), smoking, and obesity. Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is an autoimmune disease which is a novel risk factor for ACS. Therefore, to better understand the impact of this disease, we investigated whether RA is associated with increased mortality, readmission, and length of stay (LOS) in patients with ACS alongside traditional risk factors.

Methods: 
33,223 patients who were admitted with ACS to the West Florida division of a large health system from 1/1/2016 to 12/31/2023 were retrospectively included in the study. The association of risk factors, including RA, age, sex, Black ethnicity, other non-Caucasian ethnicities, current tobacco use, former tobacco use, alcohol use disorder, body mass index (BMI), HLD, and DM, with in-hospital mortality and 30-day readmission was evaluated via logistic regression and with LOS via negative binomial regression. 

Results:
- For RA:
The odds of in-hospital mortality was 0.779 times as likely (p-value .2252) and the odds of 30-day readmission was 0.948 times as likely (p-value .5671). RA resulted in a 1.034 factor increase in LOS (p-value .3369). 
- For traditional risk factors:
The odds of in-hospital mortality were 1.071 times as likely for every 1-year increase in age (p-value <.0001), 1.285 times as likely for current smokers (p-value 0.0020), 0.970 times as likely for every 1-point increase in BMI (p-value <.0001), 0.647 times as likely for patients with HLD (p-value <.0001), and 1.349 times as likely for patients with DM (p-value <.0001). 
Age, DM, and alcohol use disorder resulted in statistically significant increased 30-day readmission. 
Age, male sex, Black ethnicity, other non-Caucasian ethnicities, former tobacco use, current tobacco use, DM, and alcohol use disorder resulted in statistically significant increased LOS. 

Conclusion:
In terms of the discrete odds and incident rate ratios, RA was surprisingly associated with decreased in-hospital mortality and 30-day readmission in the setting of ACS despite an associated increased LOS. In terms of statistical significance, there was no difference in these outcomes in patients with RA versus patients without RA. Meanwhile, the traditional risk factors continued to show worse outcomes with statistical significance in the same patient population. Knowledge of this may prevent over-utilization of time, equipment, and resources when addressing hospitalized patients with RA presenting with ACS.

Rheumatoid Arthritis and Traditional Risk Factors on Outcomes in Acute Coronary Syndrome

Background
Right heart failure (RHF) is a complex syndrome commonly associated with serious cardiac and/or pulmonary disease and carries a high burden of morbidity and mortality. The burden of RHF versus left heart failure (LHF) and biventricular heart failure is not well-quantified and there is a lack of a direct comparison between these types of heart failure in patients’ data from a large clinical database. This study examines the prevalence of all-cause mortality and common comorbidities such as end-stage renal disease (ESRD) and cirrhosis in patients diagnosed with RHF versus LHF and other HF diagnoses.

Methods
Using the Epic COSMOS database, which integrates ICD-10 health information across over 200 health systems in the United States, we evaluated the proportion of death, cirrhosis, ESRD, and average length of hospitalization associated with RHF diagnoses versus other HF diagnoses, including LHF, from 1/1/2010-12/31/2023.

Results
From 577392 patients diagnosed with either RHF or LHF, we found 294233 diagnosed with RHF and 302222 diagnosed with LHF. 7027 were diagnosed with both.
RHF was associated with an average 38.7±0.2% death compared to 26.6±0.03% (p<0.0001) for that of other HF diagnoses and 31.1±0.2% (p<0.0001) for that of LHF diagnoses. The mean length of hospital stay was 7.5±0.03 days for RHF versus 6.7±0.01 days for other HF diagnoses. Furthermore, RHF patients were more likely to develop cirrhosis (p<0.0001) and ESRD (p<0.0001) than LHF patients after diagnosis.

Conclusion
Mortality associated with RHF is 12.3% greater than that of other HF diagnoses and 7.6% greater than that of LHF diagnoses. RHF seems to associate more with serious comorbidities such as ESRD and cirrhosis. Despite the increased mortality and morbidities associated with RHF, the length of hospitalization was not clinically different between the two groups. Since our data shows that RHF indicates a poor prognosis, greater emphasis should be placed on early diagnosis and management of RHF. Further studies are required to explore the pathophysiology of RHF and improve therapeutic approaches.

Right Heart Failure Linked to Worse Outcomes Than Left Heart Failure and Other Heart Failure

Background
Atrial fibrillation (AF) affects 38 million individuals worldwide and is responsible for $26 billion in healthcare costs in the U.S. alone, with 75% of costs attributed to hospitalizations. Early rhythm control improves cardiovascular outcomes in AF and is a cornerstone of treatment. Class III antiarrhythmic drugs (AADs) (e.g., dofetilide, sotalol) typically require inpatient initiation due to the risk of QT prolongation and torsades de pointes (TdP). This limits access and increases healthcare costs, with a single 3-day hospitalization for AAD initiation costing approximately $13,400. This burden disproportionately affects underserved populations, including minorities and rural populations, who may have limited access to appropriate healthcare facilities. We hypothesized that a novel machine learning (ML) algorithm paired with the SafeBeat Rx technology could enable safe outpatient AAD initiation, potentially improving access to care and reducing costs.
Methods
We developed CNN-BiLSTN based ML-model to automate ECG analysis and QTc measurement to drive AAD dosing recommendations. The model was trained on approximately 9M hand-annotated ECG heartbeats, utilizing data augmentation (e.g. noise) and k-fold cross validation (k=5). We then conducted a prospective study of patients admitted for in-patient dofetilide or sotalol initiation. Parallel to standard-of-care drug dosing, based on physician measured QTc on 12-lead ECG at baseline and 2 hours after each dose, patients were instructed to simultaneously record a mECG device (KardiaMobile 6L; AliveCor) which was transmitted to the software application. Software performance was evaluated by comparing software-annotated, physician adjudicated mECG QTc to blinded physician-measured 12-lead ECG QTc.
Results
A total of 50 patients (mean age 67 + 11 years, 64% male, 64% caucasian, 22% Asian/Pacific Islander, 8% Hispanic, mean baseline creatinine clearance 85.5 + 33.0mL/min, mean baseline QTc 417.7 + 30.1ms) underwent AAD initiation (44 dofetilide, 6 sotalol). The ML-based QTc measurement algorithm was used to analyze 314 mECGs that were used to guide 264 AAD doses. The ML- and physician-prescribed AAD dosing were congruent or more conservative in 245/264 (92.8%).
Conclusion
Overall, the software-recommended AAD drug dosing utilizing the ML QTc measurement was in high agreement with cardiologist-determined AAD drug dosing. These data demonstrate this software platform's potential to match clinician decisions for AAD dosing, offering the ability to support streamlined AAD titration regardless of patient setting. This approach shows promise for enabling safe outpatient initiation of AADs, potentially improving access to antiarrhythmic treatment and reducing healthcare costs.

SafeBeat Rx: A Novel Machine Learning Algorithm for Safe Initiation of Antiarrhythmic Drugs

Background: Sex disparities in cardiovascular disorders are well documented, but data on in-hospital outcomes for Complete Heart Block (CHB) remain scarce. Using a national readmissions database, we assessed the association of sex with the outcomes of CHB cases.
Methods: We examined the 2016-2020 Nationwide Readmission Database (NRD) to identify patients with a principal diagnosis of CHB. Men were used as our control group, while women comprised our cohort. The primary outcome was mortality. Secondary outcomes included odds of mechanical ventilation use, all cause 30-day readmission, length of stay (LOS) and total hospitalization charges (THC). Multivariate linear and logistic regression models were used to adjust for confounders.
Results: Among the patients with CHB (N = 175,257), 45% were Female. A Female sex was associated with higher odds of mortality (adjusted OR [aOR] 1.42, 95% CI 1.3 – 1.55, p<0.001) compared to male patients with CHB. Additionally, female sex was associated with a higher likelihood of mechanical ventilation use (aOR 1.1, 95% CI 1.03 – 1.2, p=0.004), all cause 30-day readmission (aOR 1.08, 95% CI 1.03 – 1.13, p=0.004), longer LOS (4.13 days vs 3.86 days, p<0.001) and lower THC ($89,908 vs. $94,590, p=0.002) compared to male patients with CHB. 
Conclusions: Among patients with CHB, female sex was associated with higher odds of mortality and non-fatal adverse events compared to male patients.

Sex-Based Differences in Hospitalization Outcomes for Complete Heart Block: A Population-Based Study 


Background
Methamphetamine use is associated with a range of cardiovascular conditions including hypertension and heart failure. Beta blocker use is commonly avoided when treating patients intoxicated with methamphetamines due to a fear of inducing unopposed alpha stimulation and worsening hypertension.
Methods
We performed a retrospective review of medical records in a county hospital in California with a high prevalence of methamphetamine users. We included adults who tested positive for methamphetamine use on urine toxicology and were admitted to the hospital or stayed in the ER for over 24 hours. Subjects who tested positive for methamphetamines and received beta blockers within 48 hours of their arrival to the ER were assigned to cases, subjects who tested positive for methamphetamines and received a non-beta blocker antihypertensive or no antihypertensive were assigned to the control group. We compared length of stay (LOS), readmission rate within 30 days and systolic (SBP) and diastolic blood pressures (DBP) between the groups at admission and 24 hours.
Results
130 cases and 117 controls were analyzed for LOS, 30 day readmission rate and SBP and DBP. Subjects were predominately male (60-70%) in both groups, with an average age of 52 for cases and 45 for controls. There was no significant difference between LOS and 30 day readmission rates between subjects who received beta blockers and subjects who did not. Subjects who received carvedilol were compared to subjects in the control group who received another antihypertensive, there was no significant difference in LOS between these groups. SBP at admission and 24 hours was significantly higher in the case group, however the effect size diminished over 24 hours. When comparing subjects who received carvedilol to those who received another antihypertensive, SBP was significantly higher at admission, but showed no significant difference after 24 hours.
Conclusion
Our results indicate that beta-blockers, particularly carvedilol, are an effective and safe treatment modality in methamphetamine users. Treatment with beta-blockers in the case group did not increase length of stay or re-admission rates compared to the control group, and treatment with carvedilol effectively reduced systolic blood pressure in patients with hypertension and cardiomyopathy. However it may be prudent to treat patients acutely intoxicated with methamphetamines with a combination of antihypertensives, including beta blockers, particularly in patients with cardiac comorbidities.

The Role of Beta Blockers in Methamphetamine Users with Cardiac Conditions- a Case Control Study

Background:
Mixed aortic valve disease (MAVD) is defined as aortic stenosis (AS) occurring simultaneously with aortic regurgitation (AR), and is the most frequent concomitant valvular disease worldwide. Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) is indicated based on guidelines for the primary lesion while considering the concomitant disease. TAVR seems to be associated with similar mortality rates in patients with MAVD compared to AS, while complications have conflicting data in literature. The aim of this study is to systematically synthesize the latest evidence to compare clinical outcomes of TAVR in MAVD compared to AS.

Methods:
Systematic literature review was conducted on PubMed and Embase for studies on outcomes of TAVR in MAVD from inception until April 2024. Data extracted from the articles included baseline characteristics and several outcomes. Primary outcomes were short- (<30 days) and long-term (>30 days) mortality. Secondary outcomes were complications in accordance with the Valve Academic Research Consortium-2 (VARC-2) consensus, including paravalvular regurgitation, vascular and bleeding complications, pacemaker implantation, and cerebrovascular events. A random-effects model was used to pool risk ratios (RR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) for clinical endpoints, and was conducted using RStudio.

Results:
11 observational studies including 133,558 patients were included in the analysis. There were no significant differences in primary endpoints (p>0.05). MAVD was associated with lower risk of cerebrovascular complications (RR: 0.65, 95% CI: 0.53-0.97) and higher risk of paravalvular regurgitation (RR: 1.29, 95% CI: 1.07-1.55). No significant differences were noted in other secondary outcomes (p>0.05).

Conclusions:
The similar mortality risk of TAVR in MAVD compared to AS as well as higher risk of paravalvular regurgitation in MAVD is in accordance with most recent studies. However, this meta-analysis is the first to show a significantly lower risk of cerebrovascular events in MAVD patients. This study highlights the importance of future research to further delineate differences in procedural outcomes in this population.

Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement for Mixed Aortic Valve Disease: An Updated Meta-analysis

Background: 
Psoriasis is a chronic, relapsing inflammatory condition that mostly affects the skin and joints. Recent data indicate that psoriasis is an independent risk factor for myocardial infarction (MI) and contributes to several cardiovascular (CV) risk factors, including metabolic syndrome, smoking, obesity, hypertension, insulin resistance, and dyslipidemia. Our study quantifies cardiovascular-related deaths among psoriasis patients, examines trends over time, and highlights demographic and geographic disparities to better understand the impact of these coexisting conditions. 

Methods: Data from the CDC WONDER database was analyzed to identify cardiovascular- related deaths among adults aged 25 and older with psoriasis in the United States from 1999 to 2020. Age-adjusted mortality rates (AAMRs) per 100,000 persons and annual percent change (APC) were calculated and stratified by year, sex, and age group. 

Results: Between 1999 and 2020, cardiovascular-related deaths in individuals with psoriasis accounted for 2,353 deaths among adults aged 25 and older in the US. The overall AAMR for cardiovascular-related deaths in psoriasis decreased from 0.87 in 1999 to 0.7 in 2020, with an Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) of -0.9324 (95% CI: -1.5179 to -0.3276, p < 0.05). A significant decline occurred from 1999 to 2011 (APC: -5.0752; 95% CI: -6.6070 to -3.8388), followed by a notable increase from 2011 to 2020 (APC: 4.8738; 95% CI: 2.9977 to 7.5961). Men exhibited higher AAMRs compared to women. The AAMR for both men and women decreased, with a steeper decline for women from 1999 to 2011 (APC: -5.05) compared to men in the same period (APC: -4.97). Individuals aged 65 and older demonstrated a decline in AAMR from 1999 to 2011 (APC: -5.66), followed by an increase from 2011 to 2020 (APC: 4.69). Individuals aged 35 to 64 did not demonstrate a similar trend, with an APC of 0.48 from 1999 to 2020. 

Conclusion: This analysis reveals significant differences in cardiovascular-related mortality rates among individuals with psoriasis. Men had higher mortality rates than women, with a notable decline from 1999 to 2011 followed by an increase from 2011 to 2020. People aged 65 and older showed a similar pattern, while those aged 35 to 64 exhibited stable rates. These findings emphasize the need for targeted interventions to address the increasing mortality rates, particularly in older adults and men, to improve health outcomes for patients with psoriasis.

Premium content

Next from AMA Research Challenge 2024

Impact of Left Ventricular Assist Devices on Clinical and Hemodynamic Outcomes during Cardiogenic Shock or High-Risk Percutaneous Coronary Intervention

Similar lecture

Using social media to increase live organ donation for kidney transplant candidates: Single-center study using Donor App